SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Rakell would make them dangerous

Créé par: Ducks
Équipe: 2020-21 Avalanche du Colorado
Date de création initiale: 21 juill. 2020
Publié: 21 juill. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
55 250 000 $
43 500 000 $
21 750 000 $
11 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
33 750 000 $
Transactions
1.
COL
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (NYI)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (NJD)
NJD
  1. Zadorov, Nikita [Droits de RFA]
2.
COL
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (STL)
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (VGK)
MTL
  1. Jost, Tyson [Droits de RFA]
3.
ANA
  1. Beaucage, Alex [Liste de réserve]
  2. Bowers, Shane
  3. Greer, AJ [Droits de RFA]
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (COL)
4.
COL
  1. Fischer, Christian [Droits de RFA]
ARI
  1. Kamenev, Vladislav [Droits de RFA]
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de STL
Logo de TOR
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de FLA
Logo de COL
2021
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de NYI
Logo de COL
Logo de NJD
Logo de VGK
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
2022
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $78 731 234 $0 $5 425 000 $2 768 766 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
5 571 429 $5 571 429 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
6 300 000 $6 300 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
9 250 000 $9 250 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 5
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 463 139 $2 463 139 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 333 333 $3 333 333 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 7
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
880 833 $880 833 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
DG/DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
925 000 $925 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 450 000 $3 450 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
21 juill. 2020 à 10 h 36
#1
John 3 16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 9,584
Mentions "j'aime": 4,618
Not a bad roster at all, nice job.

Some comments on the roster:

- Calvert is a full-time part of the 4th line and won't be bumped out of the lineup. If anyone would be it would be Bellemare or Kaut.
- 5 years seems a year too much for Burakovsky. $4.85m x 4 years is probably the sweetspot.
- The blueline is a bit green, so I think we'd keep Cole around as 7D instead of Lindholm, particularly as there's enough capspace to keep him.

Regarding trades:

- Zadorov trade is good, right on the value but I would prefer a 2020 2nd if possible.
- Jost's value is probably a bit higher than a very late 2nd and a 2021 4th. If the 2nd was the MTL 2nd or CHI 2nd (which Montreal also have) then it would be acceptable.
- The Rakell trade is good, I think Colorado accept that, even if it's painful to lose Bowers and a 1st in a deep draft. Rakell would be a great fit on this team, and acquiring him without giving up one of our top 3-4 prospects would be great. If we traded Bowers for Rakell though I think we'd be inclined to keep Jost as we'd otherwise be really thin in terms of bottom 6 C depth.
Ducks a aimé ceci.
21 juill. 2020 à 10 h 40
#2
Démarrer sujet
TAVARES IS A LEAF
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 659
Mentions "j'aime": 175
Quoting: Richard88
Not a bad roster at all, nice job.

Some comments on the roster:

- Calvert is a full-time part of the 4th line and won't be bumped out of the lineup. If anyone would be it would be Bellemare or Kaut.
- 5 years seems a year too much for Burakovsky. $4.85m x 4 years is probably the sweetspot.
- The blueline is a bit green, so I think we'd keep Cole around as 7D instead of Lindholm, particularly as there's enough capspace to keep him.

Regarding trades:

- Zadorov trade is good, right on the value but I would prefer a 2020 2nd if possible.
- Jost's value is probably a bit higher than a very late 2nd and a 2021 4th. If the 2nd was the MTL 2nd or CHI 2nd (which Montreal also have) then it would be acceptable.
- The Rakell trade is good, I think Colorado accept that, even if it's painful to lose Bowers and a 1st in a deep draft. Rakell would be a great fit on this team, and acquiring him without giving up one of our top 3-4 prospects would be great. If we traded Bowers for Rakell though I think we'd be inclined to keep Jost as we'd otherwise be really thin in terms of bottom 6 C depth.

Cool! I don’t think teams would pay more than this for Jost though
21 juill. 2020 à 10 h 56
#3
Boris Bagel
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2016
Messages: 2,870
Mentions "j'aime": 615
Jost? Habs don't need another 4th liner. Pass
21 juill. 2020 à 11 h 19
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 5,618
Mentions "j'aime": 2,764
Quoting: Foreskin_Gump
Cool! I don’t think teams would pay more than this for Jost though


I actually think right now thats too much for jost. You can get a similar to better quality player right now with the 2nd rounder. Im not sold he isnt anything more than a fringe 3rd liner.

this team would be scary offensively if they got rakell.
Ducks a aimé ceci.
21 juill. 2020 à 11 h 52
#5
Démarrer sujet
TAVARES IS A LEAF
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 659
Mentions "j'aime": 175
Quoting: hanson493
I actually think right now thats too much for jost. You can get a similar to better quality player right now with the 2nd rounder. Im not sold he isnt anything more than a fringe 3rd liner.

this team would be scary offensively if they got rakell.


Yeah he had like 8 goals? I wouldn’t give a 2nd for Jost unless I’m a contender who could use his depth and have late 2nd..
21 juill. 2020 à 11 h 52
#6
Démarrer sujet
TAVARES IS A LEAF
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 659
Mentions "j'aime": 175
Quoting: BorisBagel
Jost? Habs don't need another 4th liner. Pass


Got to many I see
21 juill. 2020 à 11 h 59
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 5,618
Mentions "j'aime": 2,764
Quoting: Foreskin_Gump
Yeah he had like 8 goals? I wouldn’t give a 2nd for Jost unless I’m a contender who could use his depth and have late 2nd..


9 but he also isnt even making the top 12 in the restart for the playoffs. Right now hes a healthy scratch which kills his value.
21 juill. 2020 à 12 h 8
#8
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,581
Mentions "j'aime": 25,433
You all know how much I love the Ducks but that just feels like a little too much for Rakell. If we're getting the Colorado first I'd be happy with two guys off the Reserve List: Beaucage and Drew Helleson.
21 juill. 2020 à 12 h 48
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 2,586
Mentions "j'aime": 1,142
Done. The only thing I would change is that if they traded for Rackell they aren’t signing Namestikov too.
21 juill. 2020 à 12 h 55
#10
Xx_Zegras46_xX
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 3,960
Mentions "j'aime": 1,658
I like it
21 juill. 2020 à 13 h 11
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,127
Mentions "j'aime": 448
Quoting: Richard88
Not a bad roster at all, nice job.

Some comments on the roster:

- Calvert is a full-time part of the 4th line and won't be bumped out of the lineup. If anyone would be it would be Bellemare or Kaut.
- 5 years seems a year too much for Burakovsky. $4.85m x 4 years is probably the sweetspot.
- The blueline is a bit green, so I think we'd keep Cole around as 7D instead of Lindholm, particularly as there's enough capspace to keep him.

Regarding trades:

- Zadorov trade is good, right on the value but I would prefer a 2020 2nd if possible.
- Jost's value is probably a bit higher than a very late 2nd and a 2021 4th. If the 2nd was the MTL 2nd or CHI 2nd (which Montreal also have) then it would be acceptable.
- The Rakell trade is good, I think Colorado accept that, even if it's painful to lose Bowers and a 1st in a deep draft. Rakell would be a great fit on this team, and acquiring him without giving up one of our top 3-4 prospects would be great. If we traded Bowers for Rakell though I think we'd be inclined to keep Jost as we'd otherwise be really thin in terms of bottom 6 C depth.


Devils don't have a Devils 2020 2nd round pick
21 juill. 2020 à 14 h 24
#12
John 3 16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 9,584
Mentions "j'aime": 4,618
Quoting: Scoob1978
Devils don't have a Devils 2020 2nd round pick

I guess 2021 picks make more sense in that case.

Another alternative would be to swap 2020 1sts. What do you feel about this:

2020 VAN 1st (#20)?
2021 NJ 3rd

for

2020 COL 1st
Zadorov
21 juill. 2020 à 15 h 41
#13
RETIRED
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 4,846
Mentions "j'aime": 2,481
Rakell would be a good fit.
Lines look good except I think you’d see Bellemare as 4C and Kaut develops in the AHL one more year
23 juill. 2020 à 14 h 43
#14
Démarrer sujet
TAVARES IS A LEAF
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 659
Mentions "j'aime": 175
Quoting: hanson493
9 but he also isnt even making the top 12 in the restart for the playoffs. Right now hes a healthy scratch which kills his value.


Avs fans don’t make sense to me. Jost has been so average yet they think he’s worth a 2nd and a 3rd. Like seriously wtf. Jeff Skinner and Gustav Nyquist got that package and that’s a 40 goal scorer and a 50+ point player. Jost can’t even get in the damn lineup.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage