SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

MANSON IS FINALLY OURS

Créé par: TMLSage
Équipe: 2019-20 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 9 févr. 2020
Publié: 9 févr. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
The Leafs finally deliver the goods and Anaheim agrees to trade Manson.
Transactions
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de CAR
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de STL
Logo de WPG
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $71 613 810 $0 $602 500 $9 886 190 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 634 000 $11 634 000 $
C
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 893 000 $10 893 000 $
AD
UFA - 6
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
675 000 $675 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AD
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
694 444 $694 444 $ (Bonis de performance70 000 $$70K)
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
759 167 $759 167 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 050 000 $2 050 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
675 000 $675 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
675 000 $675 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
RFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
9 févr. 2020 à 2 h 39
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 6,839
Mentions "j'aime": 5,304
I don't think that's a package Anaheim fans are okay with. The value is okay, but they want it to meet their needs better. Though I do think Anaheim would be making a mistake in not trading him this year.
TMLSage et GenXHockey a aimé ceci.
9 févr. 2020 à 3 h 7
#2
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,157
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
I’m sure this puts them over in contracts. Don’t think they have any use for Bracco. I would move him at the draft to the wild for a 3rd or 4th.
9 févr. 2020 à 3 h 23
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 6,839
Mentions "j'aime": 5,304
Quoting: Jamiepo
I’m sure this puts them over in contracts. Don’t think they have any use for Bracco. I would move him at the draft to the wild for a 3rd or 4th.


I disagree about the Bracco thing. Anaheim has the worst PP in the league, and that is Bracco's bread and butter. Even if they just brought him in and played him in a specialist role, I think he could help their team.
9 févr. 2020 à 3 h 25
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,923
Mentions "j'aime": 19,955
Quoting: LeafsFanForSomeReason
I disagree about the Bracco thing. Anaheim has the worst PP in the league, and that is Bracco's bread and butter. Even if they just brought him in and played him in a specialist role, I think he could help their team.


Sure fair arguement but i think a rebuilding team isnt to worried about their PP right now
9 févr. 2020 à 5 h 41
#5
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,916
Mentions "j'aime": 25,724
"The Leafs finally deliver the goods and Anaheim agrees to trade Manson."

Not for those random bits and pieces, we don't.

Start with Timothy Liljegren and a 2020 second. Remember what Jake Muzzin cost you?
Copenhagen a aimé ceci.
9 févr. 2020 à 6 h 27
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 28,051
Mentions "j'aime": 14,666
Quoting: LeafsFanForSomeReason
I disagree about the Bracco thing. Anaheim has the worst PP in the league, and that is Bracco's bread and butter. Even if they just brought him in and played him in a specialist role, I think he could help their team.


Does their AHL team need power play help?
9 févr. 2020 à 8 h 17
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 2,057
Mentions "j'aime": 587
Quoting: OldNYIfan
"The Leafs finally deliver the goods and Anaheim agrees to trade Manson."

Not for those random bits and pieces, we don't.

Start with Timothy Liljegren and a 2020 second. Remember what Jake Muzzin cost you?


Lilijegren is more than any player they gave up in the the Muzzin trade. Also, he is a right shot D with team control.

Also, the question of Ducks needs. I think they need everybody who is younger than 24 with talent. This team is heading towards the bottom of the nhl
9 févr. 2020 à 8 h 38
#8
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 60,251
Mentions "j'aime": 23,110
Why would include Barrie in the trade? Leafs have cap with this proposal. And it's not like out of the playoffs Ducks need Barrie. So the trade at an NHL level is Johnsson for Manson. Ducks decline
Copenhagen, OldNYIfan et TMLSage a aimé ceci.
9 févr. 2020 à 8 h 52
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 7,261
Mentions "j'aime": 2,706
Quoting: LeafsFanForSomeReason
I disagree about the Bracco thing. Anaheim has the worst PP in the league, and that is Bracco's bread and butter. Even if they just brought him in and played him in a specialist role, I think he could help their team.


I mean they already got bit on trading for Sprong, I highly doubt Murray will trade for another winger with terrible defense but wowing AHL points and underwhelming (or just none) NHL time, plus Sprong already is essentially that guy that they have to shelter 5 on 5 but can score on the PP (ik Bracco is a playmaker but still) do you want another one of those types of guys lol
9 févr. 2020 à 9 h 12
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 1,042
Mentions "j'aime": 137
Quoting: OldNYIfan
"The Leafs finally deliver the goods and Anaheim agrees to trade Manson."

Not for those random bits and pieces, we don't.

Start with Timothy Liljegren and a 2020 second. Remember what Jake Muzzin cost you?


Jake muzzin cost us a 1st and a chl prospect, and a ahl prospect. So why would a NHL RHD be the same value.
9 févr. 2020 à 9 h 43
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 846
Mentions "j'aime": 345
Manson is a proven NHL top 4 RHD defenseman. Liljegren has played 1 (one) game in the NHL so far. Loads of potential, but not proven. If Toronto is trying to win this year, and everyone knows they need a top 4 RHD, Liljegren and a 2nd seems to be close in value. Certainly more of a package that Anaheim would accept than what was proposed to start this thread.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
9 févr. 2020 à 10 h 55
#12
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 33,053
Mentions "j'aime": 8,999
Not for those pieces you wont get Manson? Like i've stated before without Liljegren heading to Anaheim you're not getting Manson period.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
9 févr. 2020 à 11 h 19
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 6,839
Mentions "j'aime": 5,304
Quoting: OldNYIfan
"The Leafs finally deliver the goods and Anaheim agrees to trade Manson."

Not for those random bits and pieces, we don't.

Start with Timothy Liljegren and a 2020 second. Remember what Jake Muzzin cost you?


I know that the return doesn't meet Anaheim's needs, but the package in the mentioned trade, as well as Liljegren and a 2nd is more than what they paid for Muzzin, who is the superior player.
9 févr. 2020 à 11 h 29
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 6,839
Mentions "j'aime": 5,304
Quoting: AFOX10900
I mean they already got bit on trading for Sprong, I highly doubt Murray will trade for another winger with terrible defense but wowing AHL points and underwhelming (or just none) NHL time, plus Sprong already is essentially that guy that they have to shelter 5 on 5 but can score on the PP (ik Bracco is a playmaker but still) do you want another one of those types of guys lol


Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Sure fair arguement but i think a rebuilding team isnt to worried about their PP right now


I'm not saying to trade a young rhd for him straight up. But as an extra piece in a deal, he's nothing to scoff at... sure he may end up being nothing, but he might one day be able to run one of your PP units. As a throw in, in a larger deal, I just don't think you turn your nose up at him
Dan10900 a aimé ceci.
9 févr. 2020 à 11 h 40
#15
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,916
Mentions "j'aime": 25,724
Quoting: PuckPal
Jake muzzin cost us a 1st and a chl prospect, and a ahl prospect. So why would a NHL RHD be the same value.


NHL RhD? He's. played ONE game in the NHL. Daniel Sprong and Kiefer Sherwood have played a dozen or more, and hit the scoresheet, too.
Dan10900 a aimé ceci.
9 févr. 2020 à 12 h 25
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 7,261
Mentions "j'aime": 2,706
Quoting: LeafsFanForSomeReason
I'm not saying to trade a young rhd for him straight up. But as an extra piece in a deal, he's nothing to scoff at... sure he may end up being nothing, but he might one day be able to run one of your PP units. As a throw in, in a larger deal, I just don't think you turn your nose up at him


I mean you don't, but you also shouldn't treat him as much more than a throw in
9 févr. 2020 à 12 h 29
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 6,839
Mentions "j'aime": 5,304
Quoting: AFOX10900
I mean you don't, but you also shouldn't treat him as much more than a throw in


I don't understand where I did? I said imo he could possibly help the Ducks on the PP at some point
9 févr. 2020 à 12 h 29
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 7,261
Mentions "j'aime": 2,706
Quoting: LeafsFanForSomeReason
I don't understand where I did? I said imo he could possibly help the Ducks on the PP at some point


I was agreeing with you lol
9 févr. 2020 à 12 h 33
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 6,839
Mentions "j'aime": 5,304
Quoting: AFOX10900
I was agreeing with you lol


Sorry, I misunderstood what you were saying, I thought you were implying that I was treating him as more than a throw in, and I didn't know where you got that impression. But just in general, yes, he should not be seen as more than an extra piece of a deal.
Dan10900 a aimé ceci.
9 févr. 2020 à 13 h 1
#20
Démarrer sujet
GM - Canucks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 5,192
Mentions "j'aime": 1,218
Quoting: palhal
Why would include Barrie in the trade? Leafs have cap with this proposal. And it's not like out of the playoffs Ducks need Barrie. So the trade at an NHL level is Johnsson for Manson. Ducks decline


I included Barrie in trade because I am frustrated with his high risk and high reward playing style. I thought he made a real mistake in OT loss to Montreal which led to a clear breakway which ended up costing Leafs. The Ducks can have Barrie for rest of season which will help them sign him as a UFA and Leafs upgrade their defence.
9 févr. 2020 à 14 h 24
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 1,042
Mentions "j'aime": 137
Quoting: OldNYIfan
NHL RhD? He's. played ONE game in the NHL. Daniel Sprong and Kiefer Sherwood have played a dozen or more, and hit the scoresheet, too.


My point was they were less developed players for jake muzzin why is Johnsson a lesser talant that Grundström?
9 févr. 2020 à 17 h 55
#22
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,916
Mentions "j'aime": 25,724
Quoting: PuckPal
My point was they were less developed players for jake muzzin why is Johnsson a lesser talant that Grundström?


Yes, the two prospects in the Muzzin trade were less developed than Johnsson or Barrie, but Barrie is a UFA and the Muzzin trade involved a first.

Johnsson >> Grundstrom
Durzi = Duszak, and that's being kind
Barrie, Bracco and a fourth don't equal a first by any stretch of the imagination, and that difference isn't made up by the gap between Johnsson and Grundstrom
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage