SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Boston Trade

Créé par: Wildfan5611
Équipe: 2019-20 Wild du Minnesota
Date de création initiale: 30 janv. 2020
Publié: 30 janv. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Curious to see any thoughts on this trade. Backes is obviously from Minnesota so he would likely be happy to be here even if he isn’t playing every night. There is only one more season of his contract, and let’s be honest the Wild won’t be competing for a Cup in the next 2 years, so it won’t hurt to eat the contact in return for some legit prospects. Boston clearly wants to dump Backes, so Minnesota gets some good futures and a guy like Studnicka who can jump into Minnesota’s lineup immediately. From what I’ve read on the Athletic, Studnicka and Beecher are Boston’s top 2 prospects but they are in win now mode with an already weak prospect pool. They get a 30 goal scorer to add to an already stacked top 9 which arguably makes them the cup favorites.

This also allows Kaprizov to slide right into Zucker’s spot next fall.
Transactions
MIN
  1. Backes, David
  2. Beecher, John [Liste de réserve]
  3. Studnicka, Jack
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (BOS)
BOS
  1. Zucker, Jason
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2020 (MIN)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de BOS
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
2021
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
2022
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2481 500 000 $72 422 758 $0 $1 217 500 $9 077 242 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
7 538 462 $7 538 462 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 625 000 $1 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance600 000 $$600K)
AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 875 000 $2 875 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 487 500 $1 487 500 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
769 167 $769 167 $ (Bonis de performance117 500 $$118K)
AD, C
RFA - 3
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
916 666 $916 666 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
7 538 462 $7 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
785 000 $785 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
4 166 667 $4 166 667 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
5 187 500 $5 187 500 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 166 667 $2 166 667 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
725 000 $725 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
700 000 $700 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
30 janv. 2020 à 12 h 14
#1
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 5,265
Mentions "j'aime": 2,154
bostons top 9 is already stacked?
30 janv. 2020 à 12 h 19
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 11,507
Mentions "j'aime": 4,566
Boston isn't trading their top 2 center prospects to dump a year of Backes (Even with Zucker coming back). They can buy him out in the off-season.

The 2nd basically is for taking on Backes contract, so that leaves Studnicka + Beecher for Zucker. No thanks
Wildfan5611 et Silkysmooth42 a aimé ceci.
30 janv. 2020 à 12 h 19
#3
Démarrer sujet
Wildfan5611
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 89
Mentions "j'aime": 2
Quoting: vr1995
bostons top 9 is already stacked?


Umm... have you looked at their roster?
30 janv. 2020 à 12 h 20
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,843
Mentions "j'aime": 8,857
Hell no
30 janv. 2020 à 12 h 21
#5
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 5,265
Mentions "j'aime": 2,154
Quoting: Wildfan5611
Umm... have you looked at their roster?


i have, their first line is stacked, other than that calling the rest of the top 9 stacked is pretty crazy
30 janv. 2020 à 12 h 39
#6
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 21,231
Mentions "j'aime": 7,011
The bruins would love zucker. Problem is, there’s no one on your roster that the bruins would give up studnicka for. That may be over zealous on the bruins part, but it is their line of thought regarding that prospect.
30 janv. 2020 à 13 h 3
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 1,511
Mentions "j'aime": 255
Quoting: Bcarlo25
The bruins would love zucker. Problem is, there’s no one on your roster that the bruins would give up studnicka for. That may be over zealous on the bruins part, but it is their line of thought regarding that prospect.


Just spit balling but what if they took out stud and threw in let’s say Vaak and minny adds brodin? Zucker and brodin for backes, Beecher, Vaak and a 2nd. Or is that way off in terms of BOS return?
30 janv. 2020 à 13 h 6
#8
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 4,561
Mentions "j'aime": 1,266
GOD NO, bruins reject 10000 times.

Take out Studnicka and put in zboril and its a deal
30 janv. 2020 à 13 h 18
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 11,507
Mentions "j'aime": 4,566
Quoting: ngikas
Just spit balling but what if they took out stud and threw in let’s say Vaak and minny adds brodin? Zucker and brodin for backes, Beecher, Vaak and a 2nd. Or is that way off in terms of BOS return?


I think that would still be tough. Boston lacks young center depth in their prospect pool. Their top 4 are probably Studnicka, Beecher, Frederic and JFK. Of course Beecher is still 1-2 years away, Frederic could slide over to LW and JFK isn't expected back for another season.
ngikas a aimé ceci.
30 janv. 2020 à 14 h 2
#10
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 21,231
Mentions "j'aime": 7,011
Quoting: ngikas
Just spit balling but what if they took out stud and threw in let’s say Vaak and minny adds brodin? Zucker and brodin for backes, Beecher, Vaak and a 2nd. Or is that way off in terms of BOS return?


I respect that you’re giving up a lot of value on the minnesota side, but judging from everything coming out of the boston organization, Studnicka and Vaakainanen are the two untouchables in the organization.

Now, I don’t think they are actually untouchable, but what I think it means is that they value those two prospects more than most organizations do.
ngikas a aimé ceci.
30 janv. 2020 à 14 h 25
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 1,511
Mentions "j'aime": 255
Quoting: Bcarlo25
I respect that you’re giving up a lot of value on the minnesota side, but judging from everything coming out of the boston organization, Studnicka and Vaakainanen are the two untouchables in the organization.

Now, I don’t think they are actually untouchable, but what I think it means is that they value those two prospects more than most organizations do.


Would you say/think that vaaks ceiling is around brodins? I honestly don’t know, just curious as to ur opinion on what he can be
30 janv. 2020 à 14 h 27
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 1,511
Mentions "j'aime": 255
Quoting: ON3M4N
I think that would still be tough. Boston lacks young center depth in their prospect pool. Their top 4 are probably Studnicka, Beecher, Frederic and JFK. Of course Beecher is still 1-2 years away, Frederic could slide over to LW and JFK isn't expected back for another season.


Assuming Bergeron still has 2-4 real good years left. You don’t think they can get away with stud/coyle/jfk/Frederic/kuraly as their future pieces down the middle?
30 janv. 2020 à 14 h 56
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 8,221
Mentions "j'aime": 3,642
Bos shouldn't trade Stud, he's the type of prospect you hold on to for until (at least) the TDL next year. See if he makes a jump, plateaus, or falls off in his 2nd AHL year.
30 janv. 2020 à 16 h 9
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 11,507
Mentions "j'aime": 4,566
Quoting: ngikas
Assuming Bergeron still has 2-4 real good years left. You don’t think they can get away with stud/coyle/jfk/Frederic/kuraly as their future pieces down the middle?


There is a lot of development with some of these guys still to come before we have any idea what they are going to be. If everyone hit their potential, sure, but what are the odds on that?
ngikas a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage