SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

NEED OPINIONS

Créé par: MarcBergyCH
Équipe: 2019-20 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 13 janv. 2020
Publié: 13 janv. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
2.
3.
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
2021
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de ANA
2022
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2481 500 000 $74 531 625 $132 500 $3 700 000 $6 968 375 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
AD
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
AG, AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
2 775 000 $2 775 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
675 000 $675 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
874 125 $874 125 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
850 000 $850 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
13 janv. 2020 à 1 h 1
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 39,451
Mentions "j'aime": 20,288
AA is a RFA and is probably better than Chucky, Pit needs to add there
Minnesota trade is fine
Vegas doesn't need LD they need a top 4 RD. That trade is really bad for them
aedoran a aimé ceci.
13 janv. 2020 à 1 h 2
#2
Hockey Fan13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 3,949
Mentions "j'aime": 2,503
Wild would be elated with that deal.
13 janv. 2020 à 1 h 35
#3
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,811
Mentions "j'aime": 31,489
DET trade - terrible for Wings. AA is better and he's also RFA. Galchenyuk sucks and he's pending UFA. 0 reasons for them to even consider.

MIN trade - PIT is the more likely one to decline this. Bjugstad brings size and physicality, Rask brings pretty much nothing.

VGK trade - easy no. Johnson's contract is terrible due to it's term. PIT needs to pay to move it, they're not gaining assets in exchange.
aedoran et Dan10900 a aimé ceci.
13 janv. 2020 à 5 h 32
#4
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: BurgerBoss
DET trade - terrible for Wings. AA is better and he's also RFA. Galchenyuk sucks and he's pending UFA. 0 reasons for them to even consider.

MIN trade - PIT is the more likely one to decline this. Bjugstad brings size and physicality, Rask brings pretty much nothing.

VGK trade - easy no. Johnson's contract is terrible due to it's term. PIT needs to pay to move it, they're not gaining assets in exchange.


people keep wanting to make JJ contract out to be worse than it is. "terrible" you must be kidding yourself.
His play now is better than most teams 2LD.
The length has nothing to do with it. He's a stay at home guy and is a good skater. He easily has another 2 years in him. It takes a long time for the wheels to fall off a stay at home guy who can skate well. Just look at Hainsey. The length isn't the issue on his contract.
The only real issue is he is best suited for a 3LD role, and it's about 1 million too much on that role. But what you get is a better 3LD than what most people have for it and a guy capable of playing in a 2LD role. But not someone you ideally want to leave there.
His contract isn't hard to move,

I honestly wouldn't want Reeves back. He's dead weight. They have better forwards than that.
13 janv. 2020 à 8 h 5
#5
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,811
Mentions "j'aime": 31,489
Quoting: pharrow
people keep wanting to make JJ contract out to be worse than it is. "terrible" you must be kidding yourself.
His play now is better than most teams 2LD.
The length has nothing to do with it. He's a stay at home guy and is a good skater. He easily has another 2 years in him. It takes a long time for the wheels to fall off a stay at home guy who can skate well. Just look at Hainsey. The length isn't the issue on his contract.
The only real issue is he is best suited for a 3LD role, and it's about 1 million too much on that role. But what you get is a better 3LD than what most people have for it and a guy capable of playing in a 2LD role. But not someone you ideally want to leave there.
His contract isn't hard to move,

I honestly wouldn't want Reeves back. He's dead weight. They have better forwards than that.


I think you're literally the only one in this site that thinks Johnson has some value.
13 janv. 2020 à 10 h 33
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 5,351
Mentions "j'aime": 1,535
Even if Minnesota added a second Rutherford probably wouldn't move Bjugstad for Rask.
13 janv. 2020 à 18 h 41
#7
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: BurgerBoss
I think you're literally the only one in this site that thinks Johnson has some value.


and you are one of hunderes on it that think it costs a 1st to move Gudbranson.
Go look around the league at all the bad defense out there. Come tell me JJ isn't somewhere in the middle as a decent player.
13 janv. 2020 à 19 h 40
#8
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,811
Mentions "j'aime": 31,489
Quoting: pharrow
and you are one of hunderes on it that think it costs a 1st to move Gudbranson.
Go look around the league at all the bad defense out there. Come tell me JJ isn't somewhere in the middle as a decent player.


No, I never said anything to that regard...
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage