@Jamiepo

What ya think?

Wild pass. Greenway is to much to give up here.

What else would need to be added to entice the wild?

I think a 3rd or a 4th rounder gets added or you make it Donato instead of Greenway.

I don't think adding a 3rd or 4th would be a deal-breaker for the leafs, but I think we would rather than Greenway but would settle for Donato.

I have seen variations of this trade all over ACGM the key pieces always being Dumba and 1 Wild goalie and Nylander and Liljegren. I think after that there are multiple ways to work it out.

Agreed.

If the wild demand liljegren in a trade after receiving nylander for dumba maybe they aren’t the best trade partner.

I get your point of view and like I said, I would like to keep Liljegren too....but they'll want him and this trade checks a lot of boxes for us. We solve our backup conundrum with someone who has term on a team-friendly deal, we get a top pair D for Rielly who's in his prime with term on a team-friendly deal also and we add some much-needed grit with Greenway. They get two right handed RWs who can play in their lineup immediately and a solid RHD prospect who can also step into their lineup right away. We likely have to add a 3rd or 4th as @Paul13 said but I think this is a good hockey trade for both sides, like I said you gotta give to get.

Not a believer in Stalock tbh.

I like Dumba but find it hard to see Wild moving him.
Would rather see this with Marner in the deal, but Wild would need to add.

@tansor @MNBassman

Yeah, that's what tansor said too. I'm fine with moving Marner just thought Nylander was easier to fit his contract in.

If Wild could get a good center I could see Wild moving Dumba. I know Nylander is used most frequently as a RW but Wild make this trade with intention of using him at center. Marner doesn't give Wild this option, furthermore he ties up a lot of salary cap.