SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Bowen Byram HYPOTHETICAL

Créé par: Kyle_Davidson
Équipe: 2019-20 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 11 déc. 2019
Publié: 11 déc. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
HYPOTHETICAL IN EVERY SENSE OF THE WORD. Assumes the hawks win the 3rd overall spot in this years draft.
Transactions
CHI
  1. Byram, Bowen
Détails additionnels:
They could get a good forward here.
COL
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (CHI)
Détails additionnels:
If we won the third overall pick again.
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2021
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de MTL
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2781 500 000 $71 071 686 $0 $7 665 000 $10 428 314 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance2 475 000 $$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
775 833 $775 833 $ (Bonis de performance107 500 $$108K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 333 225 $3 333 225 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
925 000 $925 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 4

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
11 déc. 2019 à 20 h 50
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 7,261
Mentions "j'aime": 2,706
I would never ever trade a top 5 pick for Byram (or Dach or whoever went 5)
11 déc. 2019 à 20 h 50
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 6,470
Mentions "j'aime": 1,982
And Colorado still says no as they want their D prospect
11 déc. 2019 à 20 h 50
#3
Isles7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 12,222
Mentions "j'aime": 5,299
I would have drafted Byram and draft one of byfield, Lundell, or Lapierre in 2020. Byram-boqvist would be a top d pairing for the next decade
HatterTParty a aimé ceci.
11 déc. 2019 à 20 h 51
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
I don't know thats a tough one. I think Its still a No by the Avs. There isn't a top Dman like Byram who you can justify to take at 3 right?
11 déc. 2019 à 20 h 53
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: Isles777
I would have drafted Byram and draft one of byfield, Lundell, or Lapierre in 2020. Byram-boqvist would be a top d pairing for the next decade


and from what's been talked about in Avs circles, they were dead set on taking Dach at 4 and wanted him bad.
Isles777 a aimé ceci.
11 déc. 2019 à 20 h 55
#6
Sam
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,241
Mentions "j'aime": 2,188
Quoting: coga16
I don't know thats a tough one. I think Its still a No by the Avs. There isn't a top Dman like Byram who you can justify to take at 3 right?


I think Drysdale is better
11 déc. 2019 à 20 h 57
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: STLBlues17
I think Drysdale is better in every aspect of the game


not im up on this years draft class bc I am not cheerleading a Sens pick to a Top 5 one haha. But thats pretty high praise bc of just how highly regarded Byram is and his overall complete game. Offensive Defensive and physical
STLBlues17 a aimé ceci.
11 déc. 2019 à 20 h 59
#8
Sam
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,241
Mentions "j'aime": 2,188
Quoting: coga16
not im up on this years draft class bc I am not cheerleading a Sens pick to a Top 5 one haha. But thats pretty high praise bc of just how highly regarded Byram is and his overall complete game. Offensive Defensive and physical


Yeah I’m pretty high on Drysdale, he’s so damn impressive. I also feel like Byram has some things to do to straighten up on defense, he’s still legit af and is far better than the 2nd best d in this class though
11 déc. 2019 à 21 h 0
#9
Isles7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 12,222
Mentions "j'aime": 5,299
Quoting: coga16
and from what's been talked about in Avs circles, they were dead set on taking Dach at 4 and wanted him bad.


over Turcotte? interesting .
11 déc. 2019 à 21 h 3
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: Isles777
over Turcotte? interesting .


yup, bc he has a quicker path to the NHL since Turcotte was already committed to NCAA.
11 déc. 2019 à 21 h 4
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: STLBlues17
Yeah I’m pretty high on Drysdale, he’s so damn impressive. I also feel like Byram has some things to do to straighten up on defense, he’s still legit af and is far better than the 2nd best d in this class though


still cant believe that Mortiz Seider was the 2nd Dman picked. I think hes a fine D prospect but at 6?
STLBlues17 a aimé ceci.
11 déc. 2019 à 21 h 5
#12
Isles7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 12,222
Mentions "j'aime": 5,299
Quoting: coga16
yup, bc he has a quicker path to the NHL since Turcotte was already committed to NCAA.


I'll take Turcotte any day over Dach.
HatterTParty a aimé ceci.
11 déc. 2019 à 21 h 6
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 1,351
Mentions "j'aime": 445
Quoting: coga16
and from what's been talked about in Avs circles, they were dead set on taking Dach at 4 and wanted him bad.


Yaroslav Askarov?
11 déc. 2019 à 21 h 11
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: EzioUchiha
Yaroslav Askarov?


again...dont know much about the Top prospects this year, but that would make it interesting. IF the avs didn't have Justus Annunen in their system I think that would be a very tempting hypothetical swap
11 déc. 2019 à 21 h 17
#15
Former Hockey Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 13,144
Mentions "j'aime": 10,516
Quoting: Isles777
over Turcotte? interesting .


Well Chicago obviously agreed.
11 déc. 2019 à 21 h 42
#16
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 21,578
Mentions "j'aime": 7,110
The team that has landeskog, McKinnon, and rantanen keep the d man
11 déc. 2019 à 22 h 30
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,351
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Quoting: Kotkaniemi15
Well Chicago obviously agreed.


Quoting: Isles777
I'll take Turcotte any day over Dach.


I think the problem is that Chicago was in a far different spot than Colorado. Colorado had a position where if they got dach, he’d be a perfect, fully sheltered 3C behind mackinnon and kadri. I do think they would have had the sense sent him back to the W, but who knows.

However, in Chicago’s case, desperation drove the decision more than logic. I will say, I truly believe that turcotte has a far higher ceiling than dach. Turcotte could average 80+ points a year and be a energetic two way dynamo once at his peak. However, dach getting 60 a year and being passable as a two way center would be enough for me. Having said that, Chicago panicked and took what was ready now versus what was best for the future. I don’t really understand what Colorado’s interest in dach was in all honesty, since they already have the landeskog-rantanen archetype filled up. However, the second that Chicago took him, everyone knew (or should have known) that it was meant to be a fix now with a lower ceiling versus taking the time to have a truly elite player in turcotte. I hate the choice as a hawks fan, but I do have to live with it, and have to deal with turcotte on the kings and byram on the Avs. Yea, it’s a bad future for Chicago.
Isles777 et graderman a aimé ceci.
11 déc. 2019 à 22 h 38
#18
Isles7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 12,222
Mentions "j'aime": 5,299
Quoting: HatterTParty
I think the problem is that Chicago was in a far different spot than Colorado. Colorado had a position where if they got dach, he’d be a perfect, fully sheltered 3C behind mackinnon and kadri. I do think they would have had the sense sent him back to the W, but who knows.

However, in Chicago’s case, desperation drove the decision more than logic. I will say, I truly believe that turcotte has a far higher ceiling than dach. Turcotte could average 80+ points a year and be a energetic two way dynamo once at his peak. However, dach getting 60 a year and being passable as a two way center would be enough for me. Having said that, Chicago panicked and took what was ready now versus what was best for the future. I don’t really understand what Colorado’s interest in dach was in all honesty, since they already have the landeskog-rantanen archetype filled up. However, the second that Chicago took him, everyone knew (or should have known) that it was meant to be a fix now with a lower ceiling versus taking the time to have a truly elite player in turcotte. I hate the choice as a hawks fan, but I do have to live with it, and have to deal with turcotte on the kings and byram on the Avs. Yea, it’s a bad future for Chicago.


Best case scenario for the hawks would be to finish bottom 7 and draft one of Raymond or holtz.
12 déc. 2019 à 0 h 17
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,351
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Quoting: Isles777
Best case scenario for the hawks would be to finish bottom 7 and draft one of Raymond or holtz.


Here’s my problem: fire bowman and mark Kelley first. Then worry about the draft. Fire Colliton too obviously. But as it stands, I don’t either one of these jackasses after the way they handled the 2019 draft.
15 déc. 2019 à 2 h 29
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 1,729
Mentions "j'aime": 288
Quoting: Isles777
I would have drafted Byram and draft one of byfield, Lundell, or Lapierre in 2020. Byram-boqvist would be a top d pairing for the next decade
Instead Byram-Makar will be that top d pairing in the Rockies...
HatterTParty a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage