SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Hear me out

Créé par: RalphMac
Équipe: 2019-20 Wild du Minnesota
Date de création initiale: 30 nov. 2019
Publié: 30 nov. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
What if we buy, or at least acquire talent now? Wild are rolling right now, and the blues were midseason last place and won it all. Why are we just trashing this team? I dont have any trades in mind, but interested in anyone has thoughts on what wild could do IF they were to be a buyer rather than a seller
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
2021
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
2022
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $73 421 091 $0 $1 232 500 $8 078 909 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 625 000 $1 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
7 538 462 $7 538 462 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
916 666 $916 666 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 487 500 $1 487 500 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance600 000 $$600K)
AD, C
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
7 538 462 $7 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
5 187 500 $5 187 500 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
767 500 $767 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
4 166 667 $4 166 667 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
785 000 $785 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
700 000 $700 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
725 000 $725 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 875 000 $2 875 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 166 667 $2 166 667 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
30 nov. 2019 à 11 h 14
#1
Hockey Fan13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 3,945
Mentions "j'aime": 2,502
Only way wild could buy NHL level talent is trading away prospects and draft picks. Kaprizov and Boldy would fetch a nice return. If Wild did this they probably still wouldn't be good enough to win a cup. Put some potential trades out there and see what people are willing to give up.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
30 nov. 2019 à 11 h 19
#2
MisstheWhalers
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 23,909
Mentions "j'aime": 12,511
Go all in or tear it down as much as possible, this staggering along as is isn't gonna get this team anywhere.
OutCold13 a aimé ceci.
30 nov. 2019 à 11 h 35
#3
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 41,196
Mentions "j'aime": 25,941
If you're going to be a buyer, you have to have surplus assets to offer (if they're not surplus, it's difficult to make anything more than a lateral trade). For example, without passing on their value, Buffalo has an excess of RD and Anaheim has an extra young LD (Jacob Larsson, Brendan Guhle, Josh Mahura). I don't see anything "extra" on your team other than a surplus of middle-six forwards, all of whom are left-handed at that, which seems to me to restrict your possibilities. Furthermore, forward is where your need is, because you have a strong defense set through next season and goaltending hasn't really lost you a significant number of games even with Dubnyk underperforming. And other than Chris Kreider (yet another leftie), I don't see anyone on the horizon that might make a significant difference for you even though I've suggested a trade with Pittsburgh for homeboy Nick Bjugstad (based more on the Penguins' cap needs than anything else) a couple of times. Maybe some dice rolls like Ho-Sang or Puljujarvi might bear unexpected fruit, but they're risky.
OutCold13 a aimé ceci.
30 nov. 2019 à 11 h 38
#4
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 41,196
Mentions "j'aime": 25,941
Quoting: Paul13
Only way wild could buy NHL level talent is trading away prospects and draft picks. Kaprizov and Boldy would fetch a nice return. If Wild did this they probably still wouldn't be good enough to win a cup. Put some potential trades out there and see what people are willing to give up.

I hope the thought of trading Boldy or Kaprizov makes you shiver as much as the thought of trading Zegras or Lundestrom or Comtois or Tracey does me.
30 nov. 2019 à 11 h 43
#5
Hockey Fan13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 3,945
Mentions "j'aime": 2,502
Quoting: OldNYIfan
I hope the thought of trading Boldy or Kaprizov makes you shiver as much as the thought of trading Zegras or Lundestrom or Comtois or Tracey does me.


Yes it does. Unfortunately the Wilds prospect pool is pretty shallow. Most of the other prospects would probably fetch 3rd line talent at best.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
30 nov. 2019 à 11 h 46
#6
Démarrer sujet
RalphMac
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2019
Messages: 114
Mentions "j'aime": 22
Quoting: Paul13
Yes it does. Unfortunately the Wilds prospect pool is pretty shallow. Most of the other prospects would probably fetch 3rd line talent at best.


Oh I totally agree. The majority of our prospect pool are bottom 6 potential players (minus the likes of kaprisov and boldy), but Wild have made stagnant moves for the longest time and i feel a risk has to be taken at some point
OutCold13 a aimé ceci.
30 nov. 2019 à 11 h 53
#7
Hockey Fan13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 3,945
Mentions "j'aime": 2,502
Quoting: RalphMac
Oh I totally agree. The majority of our prospect pool are bottom 6 potential players (minus the likes of kaprisov and boldy), but Wild have made stagnant moves for the longest time and i feel a risk has to be taken at some point


We have a few prospects with better than bottom 6 potential but they are not far enough along to get top 6 return.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
30 nov. 2019 à 11 h 53
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 39,285
Mentions "j'aime": 20,196
Blues are different, on paper their team was packed full of talent and should have been winning all season, it was legitimately a goalie difference. Minnesota is a team with some talent yes, but they are also a team that has a lot of older contracts. It should be noted that the only team the Wild beat of recent that are actually a legitimate playoff team is Colorado, who us quite injured right now.
30 nov. 2019 à 12 h 6
#9
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 41,196
Mentions "j'aime": 25,941
Quoting: RalphMac
Oh I totally agree. The majority of our prospect pool are bottom 6 potential players (minus the likes of kaprisov and boldy), but Wild have made stagnant moves for the longest time and i feel a risk has to be taken at some point


Like Filip Forsberg for Martin Erat?
30 nov. 2019 à 13 h 18
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 732
Mentions "j'aime": 283
I mean honestly, no one should ever assume their team is gonna do what the Blues did last year. It was magical and amazing, but remember they were the dark horse candidate in the preseason to make the Cup Finals. So it wasn’t like it was unbelievable that the talent finally meshed.

As for the Wild, I would go full on sell mode and work on dealing anything with value over 25 years old I’d ship out and maintain just a few vets for development sake. This is supposed to be a good draft so I’d take as many picks as I could get my hands on plus futures who are a year or two out.
MNBassman a aimé ceci.
2 déc. 2019 à 9 h 8
#11
MNBassman
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 8,299
Mentions "j'aime": 3,622
It won’t surprise me one bit when/if the Wild talk themselves into being buyers at the deadline this year... They have spent the better part of 20 years borrowing from their future to build a decent team for today and have literally nothing to show for it but yet another decent team and a prospect cupboard that is barren. Wash. Rinse. Repeat.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage