SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

best and worst contracts on each team

Créé par: kopiino
Équipe: 2019-20 Équipe personnalisée
Date de création initiale: 18 nov. 2019
Publié: 18 nov. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
left is best
right is worst

taking extensions into consideration
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
3181 500 000 $128 089 389 $0 $392 500 $-46 589 389 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
775 000 $775 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
7 260 000 $7 260 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 666 667 $6 666 667 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
4 025 000 $4 025 000 $
DD
UFA - 5
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 333 333 $3 333 333 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
5 850 000 $5 850 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 062 500 $1 062 500 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Stars de Dallas
4 916 667 $4 916 667 $
G
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Stars de Dallas
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
6 100 000 $6 100 000 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
AG, AD
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 6
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
5 900 000 $5 900 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
800 000 $800 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
2 900 000 $2 900 000 $
G
UFA - 4
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
925 000 $925 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 625 000 $4 625 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Predators de Nashville
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Predators de Nashville
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
2 325 000 $2 325 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Islanders de New York
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Islanders de New York
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
11 642 857 $11 642 857 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 700 000 $5 700 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance360 000 $$360K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
4 333 333 $4 333 333 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
3 571 429 $3 571 429 $
C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
4 150 000 $4 150 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 893 000 $10 893 000 $
AD
UFA - 6
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG, AD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
5 200 000 $5 200 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
5 900 000 $5 900 000 $
C
UFA - 8
Logo de Capitals de Washington
3 350 000 $3 350 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
2 280 000 $2 280 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 166 667 $6 166 667 $
G
UFA - 5

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
19 nov. 2019 à 12 h 11
#51
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 7,261
Mentions "j'aime": 2,706
Quoting: Capitalfail67
Being good defensively isn’t the same as being a selke candidate or don’t you understand the difference also? Haha man you might be worse than him. You guys dating? Why are you defending him? I would understand if he had a point but you’re helping him argue that a circle block goes into the square spot. You guys should just text message you terrible ideas to each other instead


so if the selke trophy isn't awarded based off defensive abilities, what is it based off then?
kopiino a aimé ceci.
19 nov. 2019 à 12 h 12
#52
torontos finest
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 9,562
Mentions "j'aime": 11,197
Quoting: AFOX10900
so if the selke trophy isn't awarded based off defensive abilities, what is it based off then?


Being named Patrice Bergeron or Mark Stone.
Dan10900 a aimé ceci.
19 nov. 2019 à 12 h 12
#53
Analytics are good
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 3,604
Mentions "j'aime": 962
Quoting: Capitalfail67
Bro I honestly lost interest In this. You are pulling out the dumbest stats. Since 2007? How is that applying to this year? Man you are so off topic it’s annoying


Just because you don't understand what the other person is saying doesn't mean it's off topic
19 nov. 2019 à 12 h 13
#54
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,124
Mentions "j'aime": 7,781
Quoting: Capitalfail67
He said ZAR and Copp are selke contenders


I KNEW there was a reason I'd blocked this guy!
19 nov. 2019 à 12 h 13
#55
Analytics are good
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 3,604
Mentions "j'aime": 962
Quoting: Capitalfail67
He plays 10 minutes..... this is why people hate advanced stat guys. Okay so he’s 27th meaning that there is 26 people better already. How is that fall into Selke candidate? Do they pick 1 from every team? Haha


Genuine question. Do you know how to read?
19 nov. 2019 à 12 h 15
#56
Analytics are good
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 3,604
Mentions "j'aime": 962
Quoting: Capitalfail67
He plays 10 minutes..... this is why people hate advanced stat guys. Okay so he’s 27th meaning that there is 26 people better already. How is that fall into Selke candidate? Do they pick 1 from every team? Haha


Oh wow the mighty TOI argument.
19 nov. 2019 à 12 h 15
#57
Analytics are good
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 3,604
Mentions "j'aime": 962
Quoting: CD282
I KNEW there was a reason I'd blocked this guy!


I block person because they show stats that go against my agenda.

A+ logic
19 nov. 2019 à 12 h 15
#58
Démarrer sujet
DeBrincat > Kane
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 983
Mentions "j'aime": 339
Quoting: CD282
I KNEW there was a reason I'd blocked this guy!


>blocking people because they show how shiddy your agendas are
19 nov. 2019 à 12 h 17
#59
Analytics are good
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 3,604
Mentions "j'aime": 962
Quoting: CD282
The Oilers "worst" contract has 12 goals in 22 games... tied for 9th in the league!! cheers


Oilers worst contract is living off the PP and a high shot%, he'll regress and then everyone will see how trash he is again
19 nov. 2019 à 12 h 17
#60
Démarrer sujet
DeBrincat > Kane
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 983
Mentions "j'aime": 339
Quoting: CD282
The Oilers "worst" contract has 12 goals in 22 games... tied for 9th in the league!! cheers


scoring goals =/= good player
19 nov. 2019 à 12 h 17
#61
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,124
Mentions "j'aime": 7,781
Quoting: PenGoater99
Oilers worst contract is living off the PP and a high shot%, he'll regress and then everyone will see how trash he is again


tears of joy
19 nov. 2019 à 12 h 21
#62
Analytics are good
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 3,604
Mentions "j'aime": 962
Quoting: CD282
tears of joy


Nice counter-argument. I'm still waiting if you have any statistical proof to show that he's worth that contract
19 nov. 2019 à 12 h 22
#63
Caps fan idk why
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 11,333
Mentions "j'aime": 4,373
Quoting: PenGoater99
Just because you don't understand what the other person is saying doesn't mean it's off topic


Quoting: CD282
I KNEW there was a reason I'd blocked this guy!


Quoting: PenGoater99
Genuine question. Do you know how to read?


Quoting: PenGoater99
Oh wow the mighty TOI argument.


Quoting: PenGoater99
I block person because they show stats that go against my agenda.

A+ logic


Quoting: kopiino
>blocking people because they show how shiddy your agendas are


Quoting: kopiino
scoring goals =/= good player


Quoting: CD282
tears of joy



Since when is xGA the deciding factor in a player winning the Selke or not? This is one of many factors yet all you choose to focus on this and only this. I wish you still had me blocked. It’s funny to see you all try to hype this up so much
19 nov. 2019 à 12 h 23
#64
Démarrer sujet
DeBrincat > Kane
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 983
Mentions "j'aime": 339
Quoting: PenGoater99
Oilers worst contract is living off the PP and a high shot%, he'll regress and then everyone will see how trash he is again


neal.png

no see, hes so good!

naea.png

see!!!
19 nov. 2019 à 12 h 23
#65
Analytics are good
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 3,604
Mentions "j'aime": 962
Quoting: Capitalfail67
Since when is xGA the deciding factor in a player winning the Selke or not? This is one of many factors yet all you choose to focus on this and only this. I wish you still had me blocked. It’s funny to see you all try to hype this up so much


It's almost like xGA shows how good a player has been defensively.
19 nov. 2019 à 12 h 23
#66
Démarrer sujet
DeBrincat > Kane
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 983
Mentions "j'aime": 339
Quoting: Capitalfail67
Since when is xGA the deciding factor in a player winning the Selke or not? This is one of many factors yet all you choose to focus on this and only this. I wish you still had me blocked. It’s funny to see you all try to hype this up so much


so are you gonna answer any of the questions we asked? or.....?
19 nov. 2019 à 12 h 29
#67
Caps fan idk why
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 11,333
Mentions "j'aime": 4,373
Quoting: kopiino
so are you gonna answer any of the questions we asked? or.....?


1) common sense tells you ZAR isnt a selke candidate and only focusing on xGA is idiotic
2) Kahun is arguably better than ZAR. He has the beta TA/GA IN THE NHL.
19 nov. 2019 à 12 h 32
#68
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 5,351
Mentions "j'aime": 1,535
When was the last time a 4th liner was even a finalist for the Selke?

I honestly did not look, but I am guessing that the answer rhymes with "clever"
CD282 et Capitalfail67 a aimé ceci.
19 nov. 2019 à 12 h 36
#69
Caps fan idk why
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 11,333
Mentions "j'aime": 4,373
Quoting: Yojimbo
When was the last time a 4th liner was even a finalist for the Selke?

I honestly did not look, but I am guessing that the answer rhymes with "clever"


Oh no ZAR AND COPP are the 2 best defensive players to come to the Nhl. If you only focus on xGA and not:

Zone start zone finish ratio
Toi ( a guy said this doesn’t matter)
Qualcomp
Corsi (if you don’t read too much into it)
Block shots
Turnover ratio
Hits
Points
19 nov. 2019 à 12 h 39
#70
Démarrer sujet
DeBrincat > Kane
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 983
Mentions "j'aime": 339
Quoting: Capitalfail67
Oh no ZAR AND COPP are the 2 best defensive players to come to the Nhl. If you only focus on xGA and not:

Zone start zone finish ratio
Toi ( a guy said this doesn’t matter)
Qualcomp
Corsi (if you don’t read too much into it)
Block shots
Turnover ratio
Hits
Points


copp and ZAR are both top 5 in CA/60
time on ice has nothing to do with defense
they both play against the other teams best players for a lot of their shifts
points gave nothing to do with defense
JayBeagleFanAccount et Dan10900 a aimé ceci.
19 nov. 2019 à 12 h 41
#71
Lets Go Blues
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 6,786
Mentions "j'aime": 4,336
Quoting: JayBeagleFanAccount
Hes the best forward in xGA (225 minutes played) this season and on pace for the 27th best xGA season by a forward since 2007. I know reading comprehension is tough when you actually have to use your brain.


ah the classic cut-off of 225 minutes to leave out a player on his own team with a better xGA/60 in 33 less 5v5 minutes. Kahun 4 Selke
Capitalfail67 a aimé ceci.
19 nov. 2019 à 13 h 23
#72
torontos finest
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 9,562
Mentions "j'aime": 11,197
zach aston reese is better than evgeny kuznetsov
19 nov. 2019 à 13 h 24
#73
Who adds what?
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 13,677
Mentions "j'aime": 2,703
Quoting: JayBeagleFanAccount
You still havent provided an argument for why ZAR shouldnt be a Selke contender this year


A few lucky bounces and easy matchups can swing defensive stats, especially through just 20 or so games. Too early to discuss. Glad to hear he can eat again.
19 nov. 2019 à 15 h 44
#74
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 19,601
Mentions "j'aime": 6,738
I mentioned this in another thread but I'll bring it up here as well.

The Selke trophy is an opinion based award from a select group of people. If the PHWA was comprised of people who put all their faith in analytics, the award WOULD go to guys like ZAR/Copp for example...... and who would we be to argue otherwise? They are ones that choose. You can disagree but that doesn't mean your right either.

Judging by previous nominees and winners though, its painfully clear they are not people who use analytics to completely form their opinion so how can anyone claim to say a player like ZAR/Copp should win the Selke based on analytics that not everyone in a position of authority even agree upon as a standard?

If the argument was if ZAR/Copp are having a very good defensive seasons this year, would anyone disagree that they aren't? I don't think so. That has no bearing on how many minutes they've played or better yet you could use any level factor we could agree upon just to say a player is having a good season in any particular category and it be fine. I haven't personally watched enough of them this season to form my opinion but based on what the analytics show, i wouldn't discredit it either. but that's not what we're all talking about, is it? Its whether ZAR/Copp would win the Selke and I've already addressed why that isn't probable.

As for the AGM in particular, most of them are pretty valid, I mean there is no eye test nor analytic that could say Seabrook is not a huge anchor for his team right now but some of them others are hard to agree with. Especially (mainly) without knowing how you are value weighing what makes a contract good or bad based on the players on ice and off ice performance overall.
Eli a aimé ceci.
19 nov. 2019 à 15 h 56
#75
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 7,261
Mentions "j'aime": 2,706
Quoting: F50marco
I mentioned this in another thread but I'll bring it up here as well.

The Selke trophy is an opinion based award from a select group of people. If the PHWA was comprised of people who put all their faith in analytics, the award WOULD go to guys like ZAR/Copp for example...... and who would we be to argue otherwise? They are ones that choose. You can disagree but that doesn't mean your right either.

Judging by previous nominees and winners though, its painfully clear they are not people who use analytics to completely form their opinion so how can anyone claim to say a player like ZAR/Copp should win the Selke based on analytics that not everyone in a position of authority even agree upon as a standard?

If the argument was if ZAR/Copp are having a very good defensive seasons this year, would anyone disagree that they aren't? I don't think so. That has no bearing on how many minutes they've played or better yet you could use any level factor we could agree upon just to say a player is having a good season in any particular category and it be fine. I haven't personally watched enough of them this season to form my opinion but based on what the analytics show, i wouldn't discredit it either. but that's not what we're all talking about, is it? Its whether ZAR/Copp would win the Selke and I've already addressed why that isn't probable.

As for the AGM in particular, most of them are pretty valid, I mean there is no eye test nor analytic that could say Seabrook is not a huge anchor for his team right now but some of them others are hard to agree with. Especially (mainly) without knowing how you are value weighing what makes a contract good or bad based on the players on ice and off ice performance overall.


Should != Would... Gibson SHOULD win the Vezina (probably), but will he... No, probably not...
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage