SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Rakell Overpay is worth it

Créé par: sabretooth12
Équipe: 2019-20 Sabres de Buffalo
Date de création initiale: 11 juill. 2019
Publié: 11 juill. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
11 500 000 $
32 500 000 $
42 500 000 $
22 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
BUF
  1. Rakell, Rickard
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (ANA)
Détails additionnels:
Rakell proved this season that he is just not the player ANA can commit a rebuild around. He needs an elite center to produce and I just don't believe Getzlaf is that guy anymore going forward. He doesn't fit the timeline of this team, who is either aging on an expensive contract or very young and promising. He could use a change of scenery and ANA should fully commit to a rebuild
ANA
  1. Ristolainen, Rasmus
  2. Samuelsson, Mattias [Liste de réserve]
  3. Smith, C.J.
  4. Thompson, Tage
Détails additionnels:
I think this is an appropriate package for a 2 time 30 goal scorer who just turned 26 that can play any forward position and can even slip in at 2C if needed for this season. ANA needs a top 4 RD desperately, Tage is a great RW prospect to eventually replace Rakell's spot for ANA, Samuelsson is a recent high 2nd round pick, and Smith is a bottom 6 NHL ready prospect who I just can't see cracking the Sabres lineup. Botts needs to get this deal done and I don't think he would truly regret getting rid of any of these players.
2.
BUF
OTT
  1. Sobotka, Vladimír
Détails additionnels:
Waived/KHL
3.
BUF
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2020 (DET)
DET
  1. Bogosian, Zach
  2. Choix de 7e ronde en 2020 (BUF)
Rachats de contrats
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de DET
Logo de DAL
2021
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de ANA
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
2022
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $70 247 306 $0 $4 682 500 $11 252 694 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 463 139 $2 463 139 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
767 500 $767 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
3 650 000 $3 650 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 275 000 $2 275 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
3 875 000 $3 875 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
3 387 500 $3 387 500 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DD
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
812 500 $812 500 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
11 juill. 2019 à 10 h 28
#1
Watches no games
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 3,268
Mentions "j'aime": 977
That's not close to the value of Rakell
Dan10900, Mike_Gartner et awatt a aimé ceci.
11 juill. 2019 à 10 h 30
#2
HabsFan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 5,448
Mentions "j'aime": 933
Qty won't get you Rakell.. don't forget he is on a great NHL Deal for the next 3y @ 3.8M$
Mike_Gartner a aimé ceci.
11 juill. 2019 à 10 h 31
#3
Former Hockey Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 13,149
Mentions "j'aime": 10,521
Ducks reject without thinking.
Mike_Gartner a aimé ceci.
11 juill. 2019 à 10 h 31
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2017
Messages: 1,904
Mentions "j'aime": 768
this doesn't come close to an overpayment - this is spare parts and you get a 3rd!
That Rakell contract is a beaut - not many top 6 wingers are on 3 year deals for under $4m...
TheDuminator a aimé ceci.
11 juill. 2019 à 10 h 33
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 910
Mentions "j'aime": 208
I still don't think you're getting Rakell for that package. I don't think BM sees anything he likes from Buffalo.
11 juill. 2019 à 10 h 34
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 375
Mentions "j'aime": 87
Quoting: MelonVK
That's not close to the value of Rakell


How so? I think I made it pretty clear of the value of the players ANA would be getting back... what else would be needed to complete the trade?
11 juill. 2019 à 10 h 36
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 7,261
Mentions "j'aime": 2,706
Quoting: MelonVK
That's not close to the value of Rakell


Better than Risto for Rakell+ (which I've seen on here)

I don't think Rakell is being traded, if they're "committing to the rebuild" then they wouldn't go after a top 4 d man, they'd just wait for one of their prospects to develop instead of trading their second most valuable forward (debatably, he could be ahead of Steel, or Kase could be ahead of him) for a top 4 d man that is just a PP merchant and is TERRIBLE defensively, a bust, an ok spec, and a bottom 6er and they're adding a third which has more value than Thompson and Smith combined, oh yeah and Rakell has one of the best contracts in the league, and debatably the one thing they need more than a 2RD is scoring from their forwards which Rakell brings, I just don't see ANA moving Rakell unless they get a crazy package back, they'd never consider losing a trade for Rakell, and this would be a massive L for them
11 juill. 2019 à 10 h 45
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 375
Mentions "j'aime": 87
Quoting: AFOX10900
Better than Risto for Rakell+ (which I've seen on here)

I don't think Rakell is being traded, if they're "committing to the rebuild" then they wouldn't go after a top 4 d man, they'd just wait for one of their prospects to develop instead of trading their second most valuable forward (debatably, he could be ahead of Steel, or Kase could be ahead of him) for a top 4 d man that is just a PP merchant and is TERRIBLE defensively, a bust, an ok spec, and a bottom 6er and they're adding a third which has more value than Thompson and Smith combined, oh yeah and Rakell has one of the best contracts in the league, and debatably the one thing they need more than a 2RD is scoring from their forwards which Rakell brings, I just don't see ANA moving Rakell unless they get a crazy package back, they'd never consider losing a trade for Rakell, and this would be a massive L for them


That's a fair assessment. I think taking away the 3rd is fine, but I do not think Tage is a bust. Give him a year in the AHL as a first line RW and he is going to get at least a PPG. He has serious offensive NHL potential and he's only 21. What else from Buffalo that includes Risto would be a "crazy package"? Also, I don't exactly see anything from Kase that would suggest he's more valuable than Rakell, I just don't know enough about him
11 juill. 2019 à 10 h 48
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 5,216
Mentions "j'aime": 6,079
Is this what an over pay looks like from BUF? if thats the case there is definitely not a chance of any rakell for risto based deal
11 juill. 2019 à 10 h 51
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 7,261
Mentions "j'aime": 2,706
Quoting: sabertooth12
That's a fair assessment. I think taking away the 3rd is fine, but I do not think Tage is a bust. Give him a year in the AHL as a first line RW and he is going to get at least a PPG. He has serious offensive NHL potential and he's only 21. What else from Buffalo that includes Risto would be a "crazy package"? Also, I don't exactly see anything from Kase that would suggest he's more valuable than Rakell, I just don't know enough about him


Tage might not be a bust, but imo he has like 3rd line PWF upside, Kase has like top 10-20 possession/defensive metrics league wide (for forwards) and he was 2/3 PPG, roughly the same as Rakell (who had a down year) also he has a fantastic contract as well, idk what else BUF would need to add, but it would probably be something substantial, a lottery protected first or something would be my guess
11 juill. 2019 à 11 h 4
#11
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 29,090
Mentions "j'aime": 15,213
Ristolainen is overrated but he isnt spare parts.

Thompson was 1st round in 2016
Samuelsson was 32 OA in 2018 and played on team USA for WJ.
Smith is an AHL all star who was a college late bloomer.

Not spare parts
sabretooth12 a aimé ceci.
11 juill. 2019 à 11 h 15
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 375
Mentions "j'aime": 87
Quoting: AFOX10900
Tage might not be a bust, but imo he has like 3rd line PWF upside, Kase has like top 10-20 possession/defensive metrics league wide (for forwards) and he was 2/3 PPG, roughly the same as Rakell (who had a down year) also he has a fantastic contract as well, idk what else BUF would need to add, but it would probably be something substantial, a lottery protected first or something would be my guess


I think a lottery protected first would be fair to add, but that probably takes Tage out of the deal then. Adding Risto gives the Ducks one of the best top 4 defensive pairings in the league to go along with a top 5 goalie. That's pretty substantial
11 juill. 2019 à 11 h 18
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 7,261
Mentions "j'aime": 2,706
Quoting: sabertooth12
I think a lottery protected first would be fair to add, but that probably takes Tage out of the deal then. Adding Risto gives the Ducks one of the best top 4 defensive pairings in the league to go along with a top 5 goalie. That's pretty substantial


Also just a random thought I had, last year the ducks defence wasn't great at actually playing defense, adding Risto would make that worse...
And irdc if you take out Thompson, the ducks already have a bunch of similar guys
11 juill. 2019 à 12 h 0
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 504
Mentions "j'aime": 191
I'm confused.

I haven't seen Rakell play so excuse my ignorance but from some quick research he seems like a primarily left winger that you can hope for 30 goals and 50 points out of. Which is good, don't get me wrong, but that's a really strong package going the other way and y'all are making it sound like that package isn't even in the ballpark of Rakell.

Is he also a two way monster, are people just really pumping up his value due to his team-friendly contract, or is there something else I'm missing here? At face value, I don't understand the reaction to this proposal.
sabretooth12 a aimé ceci.
11 juill. 2019 à 12 h 23
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2017
Messages: 1,904
Mentions "j'aime": 768
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
Ristolainen is overrated but he isnt spare parts.

Thompson was 1st round in 2016
Samuelsson was 32 OA in 2018 and played on team USA for WJ.
Smith is an AHL all star who was a college late bloomer.

Not spare parts


if all of this is true, why isn't Buffalo using these guys to their potential and promoting from within.
buffalo's biggest problem outside of having half a 2nd line and no goaltending is their depth, these guys are the teams depth...no?

when you answer that, just remember, THEY ARE SPARE PARTS!
11 juill. 2019 à 13 h 21
#16
Watches no games
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 3,268
Mentions "j'aime": 977
Quoting: AFOX10900
Better than Risto for Rakell+ (which I've seen on here)

I don't think Rakell is being traded, if they're "committing to the rebuild" then they wouldn't go after a top 4 d man, they'd just wait for one of their prospects to develop instead of trading their second most valuable forward (debatably, he could be ahead of Steel, or Kase could be ahead of him) for a top 4 d man that is just a PP merchant and is TERRIBLE defensively, a bust, an ok spec, and a bottom 6er and they're adding a third which has more value than Thompson and Smith combined, oh yeah and Rakell has one of the best contracts in the league, and debatably the one thing they need more than a 2RD is scoring from their forwards which Rakell brings, I just don't see ANA moving Rakell unless they get a crazy package back, they'd never consider losing a trade for Rakell, and this would be a massive L for them


Something around Rakell and Laine would make more sense for example. Let the young Finn try to live up to Selänne's legacy (he won't obviously) and get Wpg a low-cost 1st line forward in his prime. I'd assume the price is basically any young player with elite upside
Dan10900 a aimé ceci.
11 juill. 2019 à 13 h 24
#17
Watches no games
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 3,268
Mentions "j'aime": 977
Quoting: sabertooth12
How so? I think I made it pretty clear of the value of the players ANA would be getting back... what else would be needed to complete the trade?


Adding spare parts you (let's be honest) that you're basically indifferent to isn't going to swing that trade in Anaheim's favor. I personally believe Rostilainen is one of the worst defensemen in the league, but even when considering the somehow not terrible perception of him I think they'd have to cough up at least a 1st rounder or one really solid prospect as well (Tage isn't that and you know it). But I might be wrong, if there's any substance behind him for Ehlers I think that's an absolute slam dunk for Buffalo as well. But then again I'd consider giving him away for free a slam dunk too.
11 juill. 2019 à 13 h 42
#18
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 375
Mentions "j'aime": 87
Quoting: Shootica
I'm confused.

I haven't seen Rakell play so excuse my ignorance but from some quick research he seems like a primarily left winger that you can hope for 30 goals and 50 points out of. Which is good, don't get me wrong, but that's a really strong package going the other way and y'all are making it sound like that package isn't even in the ballpark of Rakell.

Is he also a two way monster, are people just really pumping up his value due to his team-friendly contract, or is there something else I'm missing here? At face value, I don't understand the reaction to this proposal.


From a Sabres fan to Sabres fan perspective, I agree. But he's right handed and can play anywhere across the line, so the RW concern isn't much of a concern. And he isn't much of a two way monster, not a liability defensively, but just about average two way game. I think people in this thread are freaking out because they don't know enough about the Sabres players going the other way.
Shootica a aimé ceci.
11 juill. 2019 à 13 h 44
#19
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 375
Mentions "j'aime": 87
Quoting: MelonVK
Something around Rakell and Laine would make more sense for example. Let the young Finn try to live up to Selänne's legacy (he won't obviously) and get Wpg a low-cost 1st line forward in his prime. I'd assume the price is basically any young player with elite upside


You're delusional if you think Rakell is worth Laine
11 juill. 2019 à 13 h 44
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 504
Mentions "j'aime": 191
Quoting: MelonVK
Adding spare parts you (let's be honest) that you're basically indifferent to isn't going to swing that trade in Anaheim's favor. I personally believe Rostilainen is one of the worst defensemen in the league, but even when considering the somehow not terrible perception of him I think they'd have to cough up at least a 1st rounder or one really solid prospect as well (Tage isn't that and you know it). But I might be wrong, if there's any substance behind him for Ehlers I think that's an absolute slam dunk for Buffalo as well. But then again I'd consider giving him away for free a slam dunk too.



If you don't view Ristolainen positively, then this framework of a trade obviously will never work for you. Because he's the main piece here. Risto is a very polarizing player, and a lot of people do see him as a valuable asset.
11 juill. 2019 à 16 h 10
#21
Watches no games
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 3,268
Mentions "j'aime": 977
Quoting: Shootica
If you don't view Ristolainen positively, then this framework of a trade obviously will never work for you. Because he's the main piece here. Risto is a very polarizing player, and a lot of people do see him as a valuable asset.


I see him as absolutely worthless, but even when I ignore my personal beliefs don't see this happening. When I go by not even general, but the perception leaning the opposite way of mine, I could maybe, maybe see him being traded for Ehlers - if you undervalue Nik solely based on points. Every other person on this board has a ACGM of Rakell going to literally every cap strapped team because he's a great forward on a cheap deal. I just honestly think people are being lazy, don't watch Anaheim, and then assume he can just be had for whatever they have in abundance
11 juill. 2019 à 16 h 14
#22
Watches no games
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 3,268
Mentions "j'aime": 977
Quoting: sabertooth12
You're delusional if you think Rakell is worth Laine


I actually don't think Laine is worth Rakell. Especially for Wpg that 3 year deal costing nothing against the cap would be of immense value. With that said I understand that general perception is something else. If the Jets feel like they can't pay Laine with their cap situation, I think something involving the Ducks and Rakell would be a great option. Because its hockey, and because outdated methods of evaluating players are prominent, I could see Anaheim adding on that deal. But yes, I've made myself clear, I think Rakell is the better player.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage