SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/NHL

Worst NMC for Expansion Draft

Who has the worst NMC to affect their team in the 2021 NHL Expansion Draft?
Le graphique a été masqué

Options de sondage


6 déc. 2018 à 17 h 21
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,080
Mentions "j'aime": 435
Someone is going to have to protect these players.
6 déc. 2018 à 17 h 38
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 5,012
Mentions "j'aime": 3,523
Bobby Ryan will be a pending UFA during the Expansion Draft and OTT will probably buy out the last year or two of his contract anyway. I think Seabrook is the biggest liability b/c he will still have 3 years remaining on his current deal and his production has already fallen off precipitously. His cap hit is ridiculously high.
6 déc. 2018 à 17 h 42
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,080
Mentions "j'aime": 435
Quoting: Brian2016
Bobby Ryan will be a pending UFA during the Expansion Draft and OTT will probably buy out the last year or two of his contract anyway. I think Seabrook is the biggest liability b/c he will still have 3 years remaining on his current deal and his production has already fallen off precipitously. His cap hit is ridiculously high.


Seattle's first season is 2021-22 and Bobby Ryan is signed through 2022. So he has one season remaining after the expansion draft occurs.
Right? Or am I missing something?
6 déc. 2018 à 18 h 33
#4
Black Lives Matter
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 29,920
Mentions "j'aime": 4,651
No idea who these teams will need to protect. Depends who's on the team by 2021.
6 déc. 2018 à 18 h 36
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 5,012
Mentions "j'aime": 3,523
Quoting: Bflo_Soldier
Seattle's first season is 2021-22 and Bobby Ryan is signed through 2022. So he has one season remaining after the expansion draft occurs.
Right? Or am I missing something?


Yeah "pending" UFA not UFA. Similar to James Neal last season w/ VGK. The difference is Bobby Ryan most likely won't be playing for OTT in 2021.
6 déc. 2018 à 18 h 40
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 8,440
Mentions "j'aime": 6,060
some of these players will likely waive their NMC knowing that they arent valuable enough for Seattle to even want to take them
palhal a aimé ceci.
6 déc. 2018 à 18 h 41
#7
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,728
Mentions "j'aime": 22,773
Players can waive their NMCs for the draft, which would enable their home team to protect one more player.

The player can change his contract where he can't be traded but only can be claimed in the draft. Due to cap and declining skills, I figure Seabrook, Ryan, Lucic wouldn't get claimed and therefore will waive their NMCs.
6 déc. 2018 à 19 h 20
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,080
Mentions "j'aime": 435
Quoting: rangersandislesfan
No idea who these teams will need to protect. Depends who's on the team by 2021.


We know they will have to protect players with NMC.
6 déc. 2018 à 19 h 20
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,080
Mentions "j'aime": 435
Quoting: Brian2016
Yeah "pending" UFA not UFA. Similar to James Neal last season w/ VGK. The difference is Bobby Ryan most likely won't be playing for OTT in 2021.


I see what you're saying now.
6 déc. 2018 à 19 h 21
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,080
Mentions "j'aime": 435
Quoting: moli92
some of these players will likely waive their NMC knowing that they arent valuable enough for Seattle to even want to take them


How many players waived their NMC for the Vegas draft? If I recall correctly, there was maybe one (though I dont remember who).
6 déc. 2018 à 19 h 23
#11
Follow capfriendly
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 1336
Messages: 2,666
Mentions "j'aime": 1,918
Bobby Ryan didn't need to be protected last expansion. and won't need to this expansion either.

He is a unique case due to the specific wording of his NMC.
ricochetii a aimé ceci.
6 déc. 2018 à 19 h 37
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 8,440
Mentions "j'aime": 6,060
Quoting: Bflo_Soldier
How many players waived their NMC for the Vegas draft? If I recall correctly, there was maybe one (though I dont remember who).


enstrom and fleury is all i can remember
6 déc. 2018 à 21 h 50
#13
Black Lives Matter
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 29,920
Mentions "j'aime": 4,651
Quoting: Bflo_Soldier
We know they will have to protect players with NMC.


Yes, but we don't know who else will be on the roster by then, and who the NMCs will stop them from protecting.
7 déc. 2018 à 0 h 52
#14
Molson beer is meh
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 3,873
Mentions "j'aime": 1,783
You can bet that during the next CBA negotiations, teams/owners will be fighting for another “get a free buyout” card like last time with the anticipation of the Seattle expansion draft. Then this problem neatly goes away.
7 déc. 2018 à 7 h 29
#15
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,728
Mentions "j'aime": 22,773
Quoting: Bflo_Soldier
How many players waived their NMC for the Vegas draft? If I recall correctly, there was maybe one (though I dont remember who).


Don't you remember the big discussion about MA Fleury and the Pens. Murray had won the Cup, and MAF had a NMC....so Murray was going to have go be exposed or likely traded before the draft.
MAF decided to waive his NMC and claimed in the draft. Pens therefore could protect Murray. It was actually more of a trade as Vegas received a 2nd rounder from the Pens, as well as MAF.
Clarkson was in career ending LTIR waived his NMC. Vegas traded for him (really just a paper trade, means nothing), and Columbus gave a first rounder to Vegas, not so much for Clarkson but for so Vegas wouldn't claim other Columbus unprotected players. Vegas was forced to claim "Marschault"....didn't that turn out well for Vegas
7 déc. 2018 à 7 h 32
#16
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,728
Mentions "j'aime": 22,773
[ss
Buchnevesey a aimé ceci.
7 déc. 2018 à 8 h 49
#17
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,080
Mentions "j'aime": 435
Quoting: palhal
Don't you remember the big discussion about MA Fleury and the Pens. Murray had won the Cup, and MAF had a NMC....so Murray was going to have go be exposed or likely traded before the draft.
MAF decided to waive his NMC and claimed in the draft. Pens therefore could protect Murray. It was actually more of a trade as Vegas received a 2nd rounder from the Pens, as well as MAF.
Clarkson was in career ending LTIR waived his NMC. Vegas traded for him (really just a paper trade, means nothing), and Columbus gave a first rounder to Vegas, not so much for Clarkson but for so Vegas wouldn't claim other Columbus unprotected players. Vegas was forced to claim "Marschault"....didn't that turn out well for Vegas


I thought Fleury had been traded (due to the existence of his M-NTC), but I was mistaken.
MacArthur and Clarkson I thought were injury exemptions.
7 déc. 2018 à 11 h 3
#18
My Balls Itch
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 489
Mentions "j'aime": 101
dont see how bishops is bad
7 déc. 2018 à 13 h 1
#19
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,728
Mentions "j'aime": 22,773
Quoting: Bflo_Soldier
I thought Fleury had been traded (due to the existence of his M-NTC), but I was mistaken.
MacArthur and Clarkson I thought were injury exemptions.


You're probably right about Clarkson and a injury exemption.. He was had a NMC, but undoubtedly would have waived due to never coming to play.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Chargement de l'animation
Soumettre les modifications du sondage