SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Would Calgary do this?

Créé par: Habshabshabs
Équipe: 2018-19 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 9 août 2018
Publié: 9 août 2018
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Calgary has no need for Max, but if someone goes down or doesn't work out he is a real good replacement in the top six. Habs fan trading Price!
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
54 250 000 $
Transactions
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2019
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de NYI
Logo de CGY
Logo de CAR
2020
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2021
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2279 500 000 $74 324 643 $0 $1 025 000 $5 175 357 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 4
6 375 000 $6 375 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 5
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 6
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
UFA - 1
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NTC
UFA - 6
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 5
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance175 000 $$175K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
900 000 $900 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
3 125 000 $3 125 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
950 000 $950 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
850 000 $850 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
3 375 000 $3 375 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 4
3 857 143 $3 857 143 $
DD
UFA - 2
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 2
900 000 $900 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
800 000 $800 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 8

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
9 août 2018 à 11 h 34
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2016
Messages: 4,275
Mentions "j'aime": 1,156
too many moving parts for this to ever be considered a possibility
Herms17 a aimé ceci.
9 août 2018 à 11 h 37
#2
Jetsfan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2017
Messages: 8,015
Mentions "j'aime": 2,598
CGY is giving up two D-men..Cant do it...MTL would have to take back Smith
9 août 2018 à 11 h 39
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 211
Mentions "j'aime": 35
Personally, I like this trade as a Flames fan.

Smith was holding up a lot last year and when he went down things really fell apart; Gillies and Rittich are the closest to stepping up but I'd feel much more comfortable with more stability in net.

Price brings a hell of a lot more than just stability and I'd take an all-star goaltender any day of the week. Plus if you folks are in full rebuild mode and want to give Price a shot, and I know I'm really biased here, I think the Flames are a Price/1st string goalie away from being a consistent stanley cup finals threat.

The only tricky thing for us is the long term cap space. We still need to sign Tkachuk so I don't see Max staying here more than this year (if this ever were to happen). Having said that, I'd rather have the problem of moving salary out if it meant we had a goalie of Price's calibre in net.
Habshabshabs a aimé ceci.
9 août 2018 à 11 h 43
#4
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 60,251
Mentions "j'aime": 23,113
Treize131 is correct about long term cap space. Seeing Ceci got 4.25m in his arbitration, I can't see Hanifan signing for so little long term.
9 août 2018 à 11 h 50
#5
Subbanator
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 7,582
Mentions "j'aime": 3,479
Quoting: palhal
Treize131 is correct about long term cap space. Seeing Ceci got 4.25m in his arbitration, I can't see Hanifan signing for so little long term.


I’m hoping they fix this contract problem in the next CBA, without a lockout. A couple years ago guys coming out of entry level deals were signing affordable contracts, now, no one knows where the market is because of UFA signings and long term high paying contracts to young kids.
palhal a aimé ceci.
9 août 2018 à 12 h 11
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,301
Mentions "j'aime": 260
My counter to you would be
CGY Receives:
Carey Price ($2,100,000) retained
Max Pacioretty (No retention very reasonable contract) (With 4yr/$22 M Extension)
Jacob De La Rose
Nikita Scherbak

Total Cap: $14,663,333

MTL Receives:
Mike Smith (With a 2yr/$8.4M Extension)
TJ Brodie
Sam Bennett
Rasmuss Andersson
Tyler Parsons
Glenn Gadwin
2020 1st Round Pick

Cap: Around $13.85M

About $850,000 more in cap for the Flames
Canadianape a aimé ceci.
9 août 2018 à 12 h 54
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 606
Mentions "j'aime": 119
Quoting: MTLFAN27
My counter to you would be
CGY Receives:
Carey Price ($2,100,000) retained
Max Pacioretty (No retention very reasonable contract) (With 4yr/$22 M Extension)
Jacob De La Rose
Nikita Scherbak

Total Cap: $14,663,333

MTL Receives:
Mike Smith (With a 2yr/$8.4M Extension)
TJ Brodie
Sam Bennett
Rasmuss Andersson
Tyler Parsons
Glenn Gadwin
2020 1st Round Pick

Cap: Around $13.85M

About $850,000 more in cap for the Flames


this benefits both teams I would love to see a blockbuster like this. all depends on the patches extension however.
9 août 2018 à 15 h 35
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 71
Mentions "j'aime": 4
Habs would never retain salary on Price. Max they would. Plus Calgary's top 6 are set for years to come. Max is a rental for them. Hanifan is only 21 maybe just 3 years for him. Smith can steal games and Habs need good picks so no thanks. Calgary will have to move him themselves. Could be better ufas for goalies next year anyways.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage