Forums/NHL Signings

New York Rangers signed Kevin Hayes (1 Year / $5,175,000 AAV)

Was this a good signing?
Le graphique a été masqué

Options de sondage

 

30 jui 2018 à 17 h 51
#1
Kevin Hayes has signed a new contract with the New York Rangers.
CONTRAT STANDARD
COMPARER CE CONTRAT
DURÉE: 1 AN
STATUT À L’ÉCHÉANCE DU CONTRAT: UFA
CONTRAT SIGNÉ AVEC: Rangers de New YorkRangers de New York
VALEUR: 5 175 000 $
% DU C.H. : 6,51
DATE DE SIGNATURE: 30 juillet 2018
SOURCE: @CapFriendly
SAISONCLAUSECAP HIT AAV BONIS DE PERF. BONIS DE SIGN. SALAIRE DE BASE SALAIRE TOTAL SALAIRE DES LIGUES MINEURES
2018-195 175 000 $5 175 000 $0 $0 $5 175 000 $5 175 000 $5 175 000 $
TOTAL5 175 000 $5 175 000 $0 $0 $5 175 000 $5 175 000 $5 175 000 $
30 jui 2018 à 18 h 03
#2
Rejoint: jan 2018
Messages: 9,140
Mentions "j'aime": 4,726
Rangers making their intentions crystal clear. Hayes is not a part of their vision of the future. I think that's a mistake, but there you go. Should Fetch a nice price at the deadline though.
BeastModeUnknown et bixyboii a aimé ceci.
30 jui 2018 à 18 h 25
#3
Rejoint: déc 2017
Messages: 2,454
Mentions "j'aime": 1,055
I agree. They should be able to garner a 1st round pick if he has a solid season. However, $5.125M for a #2 Center on a terrible team seems a little high. His offensive numbers don't support Hayes cap hit for a long-term deal; hence the 1 year contract. Last season he posted only 44 points in 76 games. Hayes has averaged only 43.5 points per season over the past 4 seasons, never eclipsing the 50 point mark. Zibanejad makes $5.35M and he's clearly the #1 Center. Either Andersson or Chytil will most likely take the #2 spot starting in 2019-20.
30 jui 2018 à 18 h 29
#4
rangersandislesfan
Rejoint: mar 2017
Messages: 28,650
Mentions "j'aime": 3,623
Now he's a year away from UFA.
30 jui 2018 à 19 h 01
#5
Rejoint: jun 2018
Messages: 1,916
Mentions "j'aime": 647
I know there was a lot of talk about trading him, this really hurts his trade value.

may make him attractive at the deadline though
30 jui 2018 à 19 h 22
#6
Rejoint: aoû 2017
Messages: 1,717
Mentions "j'aime": 534
.

If the Leafs can pick up Hayes at the deadline in their annual 2nd rounder for a 4th line center swap.....I'd support it for the first time in 3 trades (Boyle + Plekanec + Hayes).

Though he'll bring back a 1st unless he has a very poor offensive season....in which case I'll take a pass.
30 jui 2018 à 20 h 43
#7
CPDunn Untouchable
Rejoint: mar 2018
Messages: 7,833
Mentions "j'aime": 2,206
Quoting: Claesson4Norris
Rangers making their intentions crystal clear. Hayes is not a part of their vision of the future. I think that's a mistake, but there you go. Should Fetch a nice price at the deadline though.


I don’t see why re-sign him for just a year. You can literally just flip him for picks if he does an extension.
30 jui 2018 à 21 h 21
#8
I'm a Skatman
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 1,044
Mentions "j'aime": 290
Quoting: BeastModeUnknown
I don’t see why re-sign him for just a year. You can literally just flip him for picks if he does an extension.


because this is not an EA game.if the Rangers don't see him as long term part of the future, he wants to hit UFA if you bait him into a long term deal just to keep his trade value up you lose the trust of players agents.
mhan63 et MoreOfAnIslesGuy a aimé ceci.
31 jui 2018 à 0 h 11
#9
CPDunn Untouchable
Rejoint: mar 2018
Messages: 7,833
Mentions "j'aime": 2,206
Quoting: Barathrum_Obama
because this is not an EA game.if the Rangers don't see him as long term part of the future, he wants to hit UFA if you bait him into a long term deal just to keep his trade value up you lose the trust of players agents.


It’s not ea logic to flip a guy in a sign and trade
31 jui 2018 à 6 h 42
#10
I'm a Skatman
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 1,044
Mentions "j'aime": 290
Quoting: BeastModeUnknown
It’s not ea logic to flip a guy in a sign and trade


these rarely (if ever) happen and as I said, it's not even slightly interesting to the player.
31 jui 2018 à 9 h 35
#11
NY Rangers
Rejoint: fév 2018
Messages: 206
Mentions "j'aime": 43
Quoting: BeastModeUnknown
I don’t see why re-sign him for just a year. You can literally just flip him for picks if he does an extension.


Hayes & his agent could have been demanding 6.5M if he was signing long term. We don't know how those negotiations went down, but I had read they weren't close on the money, so this is the compromise just to get him signed. Works for Hayes because he'll be a UFA after next season and someone will vastly overpay him then. He wasn't part of the Rangers future anyway, so he'll still be gone before the trade deadline. He should go for a late 1st, assuming his production stays on track.
31 jui 2018 à 10 h 10
#12
mothariah
Rejoint: jui 2017
Messages: 149
Mentions "j'aime": 51
He basically got the same deal as JT Miller, and he has better offensive numbers. I would think he would be a part of the team moving forward, but that is a pretty rich contract. I bet they could have got 4-5 years at a similar price, and everyone would be happy. The one year deal only means he will want like 6.5 or 7 next year, and then it can't work in NY or a lot of places.
31 jui 2018 à 10 h 27
#13
Below Market Value
Rejoint: nov 2015
Messages: 1,339
Mentions "j'aime": 1,182
Quoting: BeastModeUnknown
I don’t see why re-sign him for just a year. You can literally just flip him for picks if he does an extension.


If they were to extend him with the intention to flip him, it would severely limit the buyer's market on Hayes. With just one year, almost any contender would be willing to make a deadline move for him at 50% retained; there are a lot more options for the Rangers on the trade market. If he had 5-6 years attached to him with a $5-6 million AAV, certain teams may not be willing to include him as a part of their future and thus would not want to part with any assets for him.
mhan63 a aimé ceci.
31 jui 2018 à 12 h 48
#14
Pain.
Rejoint: jui 2018
Messages: 19
Mentions "j'aime": 11
Jesus Christ. What's with the Rags and awful signings this year?
31 jui 2018 à 13 h 55
#15
Formerly BF3351
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 7,718
Mentions "j'aime": 1,955
Wow, it seems like 2018 is the year of signing bad contracts. This can be bad. Whoever has the best agent gets the most money. A 4th line player can get 4M now days. I strongly believe every role should have it's own market of salary. A 4th line player shouldn't make more than 2M, a 3rd line player shouldn't make more than 3.5M, scoring wingers 4M+, 2nd line Center no more than 6M, and goalies no more than 6M. Price at 10.5M is insanity. He's now setting the market for every great goalie. Could you imagine having Toews, Kane, and Crawford all at 10M? What would the rest of the team look like?
31 jui 2018 à 20 h 59
#16
Rejoint: avr 2017
Messages: 290
Mentions "j'aime": 183
Good in the sense that a 1-year contract will let the Rangers flip Hayes at the deadline for picks and prospects. I don’t think - barring a surge in production this season - that he will merit a 1st rounder, a 3rd and a mid-level prospect perhaps? That said, each trade deadline has different valuations. Remember Martin Hanzal? The trend has been towards a buyer’s market at the deadline (somewhat confusing, as there are more teams competing now then ever) thus suppressing returns for rentals. I think teams are wising up to the limited value a rental brings and of the importance of keeping a strong system intact.
1 aoû 2018 à 5 h 24
#17
I'm a Skatman
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 1,044
Mentions "j'aime": 290
Quoting: Gearhead
Jesus Christ. What's with the Rags and awful signings this year?


what's up with shitposter and their inability to objectively access anything
1 aoû 2018 à 11 h 34
#18
Rejoint: jun 2018
Messages: 26
Mentions "j'aime": 32
As a Rangers fan, I feel Hayes is a decent player, but definitely not a 5 mil+ per year guy. Therefore, it’s good they signed him for one year rather than putting themselves in straitjacket.

P.S. They should’ve given the Lightning Hayes rather than Miller in that trade. Any sane Rangers fan would rather have JT Miller.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Soumettre les modifications du sondage