SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

BOS TDL (ARI this should piss some people off)

Créé par: dragonlocks
Équipe: 2017-18 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 28 janv. 2018
Publié: 1 févr. 2018
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
ARI
  1. Beleskey, Matt
  2. Carlo, Brandon
  3. Senyshyn, Zach
  4. Zboril, Jakub
  5. Choix de 1e ronde en 2019 (BOS)
Détails additionnels:
Carlo and Beleskey are a staple in this trade but Zboril, Senyshyn, and 2019 1st BOS are put on the table and ARI is given their choice of 2 of 3
2.
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2018
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2019
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2020
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2375 000 000 $71 409 167 $0 $1 302 500 $3 590 833 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 8
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 5
6 666 667 $6 666 667 $
AD
UFA - 6
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
AD, AG
UFA - 3
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
821 666 $821 666 $ (Bonis de performance320 000 $$320K)
AD, AG
UFA - 3
872 500 $872 500 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
900 000 $900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 4
775 000 $775 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
808 750 $808 750 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
725 000 $725 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
DD
UFA - 2
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
G
UFA - 1
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
858 750 $858 750 $
DG
UFA - 1
725 000 $725 000 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
1 févr. 2018 à 13 h 56
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 467
Mentions "j'aime": 50
Way too much for him, my opinion.
TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
1 févr. 2018 à 13 h 59
#2
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,875
Mentions "j'aime": 10,139
Doesn't make me upset. I actually think Both sides should seriously think about something like this. AZ will probably want the 2018...minor tweak. BUT, there's absolutely a thing called giving too much for ANYONE for 1.5 years of service. This is a good package. I'd even dare say...too much because there aren't enough roster spots for all of AZ's prospect now lol.
ricochetii a aimé ceci.
1 févr. 2018 à 14 h 4
#3
Lets Go Blues
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 6,789
Mentions "j'aime": 4,341
Quoting: exo2769
Doesn't make me upset. I actually think Both sides should seriously think about something like this. AZ will probably want the 2018...minor tweak. BUT, there's absolutely a thing called giving too much for ANYONE for 1.5 years of service. This is a good package. I'd even dare say...too much because there aren't enough roster spots for all of AZ's prospect now lol.


Normally I'd say "not 1.5 years if you extend him", but BOS would have to give something like $7-8M to OEL, $6-7M to MacAvoy and would still have Krejci, Backes, and Rask on the books...sounds tricky.

I think the trade value would come down to how ARI values Zboril. I consider him a little bit raw still but he's got potential.
exo2769 a aimé ceci.
1 févr. 2018 à 14 h 5
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 11,532
Mentions "j'aime": 4,570
At that price, OEL better come with an agreement of a max extension when he gets to Boston. I'm still not 100% sure you give up Carlo as now you've weakened the right side...which is significantly shallow compared to the LHD group (pros/prospects).
1 févr. 2018 à 14 h 8
#5
BreKel
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 3,537
Mentions "j'aime": 460
What do you mean "Beleskey is a staple"? This deal is giving up a lot. Carlo + Zboril + Senyshyn + 1st is a lot of value going the other way. You also create a hole for the RHD now, and there are zero prospects coming up anytime soon. You're locking yourself in to Kevan Miller being a top 4 guy. I like Miller, but I prefer him as a solid #5. On top of that, you're going to have to re-sign OEL, after giving this package up. I think it's doable? I did a mock with McDonagh, who I think gets a bit less than OEL but still gets a big contract.
1 févr. 2018 à 14 h 9
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 373
Mentions "j'aime": 88
It's a pretty fair trade (maybe a slight overpayment, particularly if given the 2019 first), but inserting Adam McQuaid back into the regular lineup is probably enough of a downgrade that adding Ekman-Larsson isn't as much of a benefit as it should be. Not sure it would be worth that package.
1 févr. 2018 à 14 h 10
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 11,532
Mentions "j'aime": 4,570
Quoting: AK_tune
Normally I'd say "not 1.5 years if you extend him", but BOS would have to give something like $7-8M to OEL, $6-7M to MacAvoy and would still have Krejci, Backes, and Rask on the books...sounds tricky.

I think the trade value would come down to how ARI values Zboril. I consider him a little bit raw still but he's got potential.


True, but in the year where his extension kicks in....

Krejci - goes from a NMC to a modified NTC
Backes - same as Krejci
Rask - currently has a modified NTC through the 20-21 season (final year)

Where I'm going, is Krejci & Backes have significantly less say over where/if they are moved. I'll be honest, Backes in the final 2 years of his contract is probably the type of player ARZ is looking for lol. While his cap hit is $6 million, he only paid $4 million. For a team like ARZ they get a higher hit without having pay the actual $6 million in cash. That's a whole different topic though.
1 févr. 2018 à 14 h 14
#8
Black Lives Matter
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 29,923
Mentions "j'aime": 4,652
I don't see the Bruins giving up a RHD for a LHD. Their LHD is probably a bit better than their RHD. Also, this is a lot to give up.
TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
1 févr. 2018 à 14 h 31
#9
Démarrer sujet
Sergeant
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 486
Mentions "j'aime": 64
Quoting: BreKel
What do you mean "Beleskey is a staple"? This deal is giving up a lot. Carlo + Zboril + Senyshyn + 1st is a lot of value going the other way. You also create a hole for the RHD now, and there are zero prospects coming up anytime soon. You're locking yourself in to Kevan Miller being a top 4 guy. I like Miller, but I prefer him as a solid #5. On top of that, you're going to have to re-sign OEL, after giving this package up. I think it's doable? I did a mock with McDonagh, who I think gets a bit less than OEL but still gets a big contract.


I mean ARI taking on Beleskey's contract is a must for this deal to go on BOS end.
BreKel a aimé ceci.
1 févr. 2018 à 14 h 33
#10
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 60,336
Mentions "j'aime": 23,158
I think it's too much for the Bruins to pay. And the extension, still up questionable, and the need of the Bruins to rid themselves of Kreijci/Backus in the future is iffy at best.
TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
1 févr. 2018 à 14 h 43
#11
Démarrer sujet
Sergeant
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 486
Mentions "j'aime": 64
Quoting: ON3M4N
At that price, OEL better come with an agreement of a max extension when he gets to Boston. I'm still not 100% sure you give up Carlo as now you've weakened the right side...which is significantly shallow compared to the LHD group (pros/prospects).


Quoting: tadhockey
It's a pretty fair trade (maybe a slight overpayment, particularly if given the 2019 first), but inserting Adam McQuaid back into the regular lineup is probably enough of a downgrade that adding Ekman-Larsson isn't as much of a benefit as it should be. Not sure it would be worth that package.


Everything you say is true. This would weaken the right side. We would have to rely heavily on McQuaid and Miller (which we have done in the past) but I believe the good would outweigh the bad. Also true that this deal only benefits BOS if we can sign OEL to a new contract (that is long and friendly enough to make room for McAvoy, Heinen, & others)

The title of this mock up says it all. This would be a very controversial move if it happened.
2 févr. 2018 à 0 h 3
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 9,807
Mentions "j'aime": 4,658
Too much to give up for the Bruins I'd say.
Gofnut999 a aimé ceci.
2 févr. 2018 à 10 h 21
#13
Démarrer sujet
Sergeant
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 486
Mentions "j'aime": 64
Quoting: ajc
Way too much for him, my opinion.


Quoting: TJTwolf
Too much to give up for the Bruins I'd say.


Quoting: palhal
I think it's too much for the Bruins to pay. And the extension, still up questionable, and the need of the Bruins to rid themselves of Kreijci/Backus in the future is iffy at best.


What if I added Spooner to the deal but had Christian Fischer coming back the other way to Boston?
8 févr. 2018 à 19 h 13
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 9,807
Mentions "j'aime": 4,658
Quoting: dragonlocks
What if I added Spooner to the deal but had Christian Fischer coming back the other way to Boston?


Personally I'd just take out one of Zboril/Carlo (probably Carlo for balance for the Bruins and because Zboril has the expected higher ceiling for the 'Yotes). I'm not all that certain on the Bruins cap situation without spending a lot of time looking at it (long term as far as signing OEL plus others and what is already on the books), but I suspect this would be a tough fit?
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage