LARSSON is AVAILABLE

The wild are not going to retain 2,500,000 for 6 years man, his contract is good why would they even retain. Doubt Arizona does this trade tbh and the Seattle trade is possible but we would probably have to pay a premium due to us being divisional rivals.

Add a touch more and get larsson half retained

My guess is that they would want a hockey trade too. Supposedly, they need help on offense so maybe Kuzmenko for Larsson.

1) Minnesota isn't retaining. His contract is already a steal. And no one ever retains for longer than 2 years on a moved contract.

Furthermore, even if the team was to consider selling. JEE is NOT a piece that would ever be moved. He's still young and a central pillar of their core.

2) That isn't even close to sufficient value for JEE, and that's before retention. Which would cost more.

3) The ONLY player Minnesota considers moving JEE for is EP40. It would be unreasonable and unrealistic, but EP40 would have to be coming back Minnesota's way before they would willingly move JEE.

That's a laugh. JEE is not Matthew Tkachuk. He's not earning Huberdeau + Weegar + 1st. He's not Jack Eichel, he's not earning Tuch + Krebs + 1st.

JEE has scored more than 50 points once in his career, he's on pace to do it again. He has finished Top-10 in Selke voting, but has never won. His closest comparison that has been traded recently is Ryan O'Rielly, who was signed to a long-term deal.

O'Rielly earned Buffalo 1st + 2nd + Thompson (struggling prospect) + Sobotka (bottom-sixer) + Berglund (long-term cap dump)

You could reasonably ask for a 1st + struggling prospect + roster player, more if a team requires you to take a cap dump back.

Comparable to the O'Rielly trade, Vancouver could offer 1st + Podkolzin + Blueger, or 1st + 2nd + Podkolzin + Garland.