SalarySwishSalarySwish

Palat or Rakell

Créé par: SankFeravalli
Équipe: 2020-21 Avalanche du Colorado
Date de création initiale: 24 août 2020
Publié: 24 août 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Colorado’s primary position of need going into the offseason is probably at forward. They have very good depth, but they could really use one more addition to their top six. I don’t necessarily think they need a Hall or Gaudreau, though those players would be welcomed at the right price. They have 5 legit top six forwards already (MacKinnon, Rantanen, Landeskog, Kadri, Burakovsky) so you’re really talking about adding forward #5 or #6 to that group.

There are a few specific qualities - in my opinion - that would make an ideal fit:
-Offensive consistency - Aside from MacKinnon, the rest of the top six has been known to be a little streaky offensively. There’s plenty of skill to carry the load when one player is in a slump, but a 50ish point player who can consistently move the play in the right direction could help balance that streakiness.
-High IQ and competent two-way play - Of all the great qualities Colorado’s forward group possesses, their collective hockey IQ is middling. It’s bot necessarily a major weakness, but it’s an area for improvement. The DNVR crew has talked about this on their podcast a few times. In addition, they have a couple of wingers in Burakovsky and Rantanen who have had their share of defensive zone struggles. Again, not a huge weakness for the top six as a whole, but an area for improvement.
-Versatility - We have seen with recent additions that Sakic and Bednar both prefer players who can play multiple roles and/or positions. For example - Kadri’s ability to play in all situations, Burakovsky, Donskoi, and Nichushkin can play on either wing. Namestnikov can play all three forward positions, and can play in all situations.
-Contract term of 2-3 years - Since the Boedker trade with Arizona in 2016, we haven’t seen any major rental trades from Colorado. I wouldn’t expect him to be after a player that would cost significant assets that they may only have for one season. At the same time, Colorado has some significant contracts coming up in the next few season. Makar, Landeskog and Grubauer expire in 2021, Kadri expires in 2022, and MacKinnon expires in 2023. I would expect the Avs to be hesitant to add any new players signed beyond 2023, especially with some of the financial uncertainty of the next several seasons. Of course, AAV is also an important consideration. They have a good amount of cap space for a contending team, but not enough to be willingly overpaying on AAV.

With all those factors in mind, I think Palat and Rakell are two potentially available players that would make a ton of sense as trade targets. Both are signed through 2022 at reasonable AAVs. Palat can play either wing, and Rakell can play all forward positions. Palat has hovered between .53 and .69 points per game for the last 5 seasons. Rakell has been slightly better, between .60 and .72 in the same time frame, with one outlying year at .90 in 2017-18. They have both also played the left half-wall on the power play with success, which is an oddly specific area where the Avs’s 2nd power play has struggled to find the right fit. I don’t think either would be used in a PK role - given Bednar typically uses bottom six player like Compher, Calvert, Nieto, Bellemare, etc. on the PK - but both are solid in their own end.

Tampa is expected to move at least one of their top nine forwards outside of Point, Kucherov, and Stamkos to create cap space. Palat fits within that group and would provide some nice cap relief. The Ducks aren’t in a pinch to move Rakell like Tampa is, but as they rebuild they would be able to get a better return for him now with 2 years left on his deal that they would a year later. Tampa is probably looking for inexpensive NHL players who can help them now, or potentially draft picks to replenish the picks they traded away this past deadline. Anaheim is after young talent like any rebuilder. They have a good group of forward prospects, and would probably prefer a young defenseman.

I don’t think Colorado would be open to trading Byram or Newhook in this situation. Conor Timmins might be on the table, and would fit nicely with either Tampa or Anaheim as a young/inexpensive right-shot defenseman who can play in the nhl right now. Colorado is very high on him, so I don’t know if they would be willing to part with much more in this situation. Plus you’re talking about a forward who is likely only with the Avs for two years in exchange for a potential 10-12 year top-4 defenseman. The Avs also have a couple of younger NHL defenseman who could be available as Byram and Timmins should be in the NHL next year - Nikita Zadorov and Ryan Graves. Both are RFAs and I expect only one is resigned by the Avs. Would Zadorov or Graves + a young forward with upside like Jost, Kaut, or Bowers get a deal done for either of these players? There is also a possibility that Ian Cole could be moved to create roster space for a young D. He doesn’t have as mu Co long term value, but he is a solid top 6 NHL D who knows how to win. With 1 year left on his deal, Colorado could probably retain salary to make him an affordable add. Maybe Tampa would be interested in two proven NHL players in Cole (50%) and Jost, plus a draft pick.

I went with Timmins for Palat in the example below - Palat has a higher AAV to demonstrate how he fits with the cap, and I think Timmins would hurt Colorado the most to give up.

Let me know your thoughts!
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
45 000 000 $
22 000 000 $
22 500 000 $
12 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
2.
COL
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (FLA)
FLA
  1. Zadorov, Nikita [Droits de RFA]
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de COL
Logo de FLA
Logo de TOR
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de FLA
Logo de COL
2021
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
2022
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $78 543 095 $0 $5 575 000 $2 956 905 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
5 571 429 $5 571 429 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
6 300 000 $6 300 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
9 250 000 $9 250 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 5
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
AG, AD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
880 833 $880 833 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 333 333 $3 333 333 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 7
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 450 000 $3 450 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
DG/DD
RFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance150 000 $$150K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
725 000 $725 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

24 août 2020 à 11 h 49
#1
Bo Horvat enjoyer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 10,711
Mentions "j'aime": 11,932
Out of the two I think Palat is the best option. Colorado is a place he could potentially waive his NTC for, he’s also got a great 2-way game. If you don’t want another streaky top 6 forward, Rakell probably isn’t the right fit. Palat also probably costs considerably less, I think even a 2nd gets it done because of how desperate Tampa is to clear cap. If Palat for some reason doesn’t work out on line 2, he’d probably fit well on line 3 also, even though he might be a bit expensive for that line
24 août 2020 à 11 h 49
#2
alwaysnextyear
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 5,529
Mentions "j'aime": 1,568
I think Palat will be cheaper to acquire, as Timmins should be a fairly sought after prospect if he's on the table. On the other hand I kind of doubt that Zadorov gets the Avs a 2nd.
Josh a aimé ceci.
24 août 2020 à 11 h 53
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 8,440
Mentions "j'aime": 6,060
I like both Palat and Rakell as trade targets, but I think Palat will be significantly cheaper to acquire. Not only will TBL be desperate to clear cap, many of the players they will look to move have NTCs or M-NTCs. Palat has a full NTC for next season and I doubt there are many teams he will waive for - Id definitely put in a lowball offer for him (maybe a 2nd or 2nd + 3rd) but I wouldnt even consider moving Timmins for him.
Lenny7 et Anus_McLeod a aimé ceci.
24 août 2020 à 11 h 54
#4
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
Quoting: AndrewLadd
Out of the two I think Palat is the best option. Colorado is a place he could potentially waive his NTC for, he’s also got a great 2-way game. If you don’t want another streaky top 6 forward, Rakell probably isn’t the right fit. Palat also probably costs considerably less, I think even a 2nd gets it done because of how desperate Tampa is to clear cap. If Palat for some reason doesn’t work out on line 2, he’d probably fit well on line 3 also, even though he might be a bit expensive for that line


I don't think Rakell is particularly streaky, he's just had a bit of bad luck with injuries, and hasn't had much in the way of help offensively over the past couple of years.
24 août 2020 à 11 h 54
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Not a fan Of that palat trade at all, moving Timmins is a huge mistake
Voir tout