PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE
Basculer en mode sombre
Thème automatique
COTES DES PARIS
Cotes activées
LANGUE
EN
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
FORUMS
ARCHIVES ▾
ARCHIVES
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
CBA ▾
CBA
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
COTES
8
DÉPISTAGE
CALCS ▾
CALCS
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
Historique des blessures
OUTILS ▾
OUTILS
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Équipes affiliées
Essais professionnels
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
JOUEURS ▾
JOUEURS
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
ÉQUIPES ▾
CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST
PACIFIQUE
Ducks d'Anaheim
Flames de Calgary
Oilers d'Edmonton
Kings de Los Angeles
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
CENTRALE
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Stars de Dallas
Wild du Minnesota
Predators de Nashville
Blues de St-Louis
Jets de Winnipeg
CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST
MÉTROPOLITAINE
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Capitals de Washington
ATLANTIQUE
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Red Wings de Detroit
Panthers de la Floride
Canadiens de Montréal
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
INTERACTIF ▾
OUTILS INTERACTIFS
Fauteuil - DG (Simulateur de formation personnalisée)
Repêchage simulé
Simulateur de transactions (propositions de transactions)
RECHERCHER
FAUTEUIL - DG
REPÊCHAGE SIMULÉ
SIMULATEUR DE TRANSACTIONS
ÉQUIPES ▾
Ducks d'Anaheim
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Flames de Calgary
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Stars de Dallas
Red Wings de Detroit
Oilers d'Edmonton
Panthers de la Floride
Kings de Los Angeles
Wild du Minnesota
Canadiens de Montréal
Predators de Nashville
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Blues de St-Louis
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
Capitals de Washington
Jets de Winnipeg
JOUEURS ▾
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
OUTILS ▾
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Essais professionnels
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
Équipes affiliées
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
CALCS ▾
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
RAPPORTS DE DÉPISTAGE
COTES
CBA▾
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
ARCHIVES ▾
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
FORUMS
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
EN
Basculer en mode sombre
Cotes activées
Sicarius
Sicarius
Membre depuis
2 nov. 2016
Équipe favorite
Blues de St-Louis
Deuxième équipe favorite
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Messages dans les forums
1280
Messages par jour
0.5
MESSAGES
SUJETS
MENTIONS "J'AIME"
ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG
Forum:
Armchair-GM
14 févr. 2022 à 13 h 32
Sujet:
ppppp
Blues might give a 4th for Chiarot.. but not Kostin plus a 2nd plus a 3rd…
Forum:
Armchair-GM
13 févr. 2022 à 17 h 18
Sujet:
Deal or No Deal
Army doesn’t like to do rentals as trade targets so I would say Lindholm is coming with an extension.
If that’s the case the Blues pay more and gladly accept
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 févr. 2022 à 20 h 25
Sujet:
Trade deadline
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>xercuses</b></div><div>Blues decline all these trades especially that NYR one Jesus take off retention and add a first</div></div>
The Rangers are strapped for cap space going forward. Both pieces from the Rangers are untested in the NHL. Robertson is still a couple years away but Kravtsov can play now.
Do you know anything about either prospect?
The Blues accept all day long on the Arizona trade.
I don’t think Tarasenko is traded until the offseason but they won’t get this much in return. It’s 1 year of value vs 2.
If Edmonton offered a 1st for Husso, Army would drive him to the airport
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 févr. 2022 à 18 h 40
Sujet:
Trade deadline
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jruf12</b></div><div>we dont need a player for him we have
Krug-Faulk
Parayko-Mikkola
Bortuzzo-Perounivich
Scratch- Walman
We wont need anyone else</div></div>
If you don’t see the glaring need for a top LHD I’m not sure what to say
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 févr. 2022 à 17 h 56
Sujet:
Trade deadline
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jruf12</b></div><div>i could then see scandella being shipped of cuz that instantly gives you that 3 mill</div></div>
When Scandella goes there has to be a better option coming back that's most likely going to cost more than 3 million
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 févr. 2022 à 17 h 39
Sujet:
Trade deadline
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jruf12</b></div><div>I think they should resign husso because currently hes carrying us rn</div></div>
It would be tough.. he's probably looking at 3+ million per season if he keeps up his level of play and that'll be very hard to fit in the Blues cap.. has to be moving parts
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 févr. 2022 à 17 h 32
Sujet:
Trade deadline
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bringer_Of_Snow</b></div><div>A 1st for Husso is insane haha
A nice small sample size but not at all worth the risk at that price</div></div>
I figure Edmonton is desperate and.. there is the Holland aspect
Forum:
Armchair-GM
6 févr. 2022 à 23 h 42
Sujet:
Blues TDL
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ledge_And_Dairy</b></div><div>You are trying to define a 23 year old defenseman as if he is anywhere remotely close to his prime. People did the same thing with Hanifin for years. Now he's excellent.
Just because a defenseman enters the league at 18 doesn't mean they will peak sooner than dmen that enter at age 23</div></div>
There’s no real point in debating him. Every GM in the league would consider Chychrun a top pairing D and yet the armchair QB knows best.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
6 févr. 2022 à 0 h 24
Sujet:
Blues TDL
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Shylo_Moxii</b></div><div>you massively overrate the man and massively underrate the effects that go against us in this deal</div></div>
A top pairing LHD that makes 4.6 million for the next 3 seasons… hard to overvalue that
Forum:
Armchair-GM
28 janv. 2022 à 15 h 18
Sujet:
Provorov
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BeastModeUnknown</b></div><div>Who knows what Provorov would actually bring to the table all I know is he's another Vince Dunn.</div></div>
You still can’t understand what you read which isn’t surprising at this point. The fact you think Provorov = Dunn pretty much says it all. You could have started with this and that way everyone would realize your evaluation skills.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
28 janv. 2022 à 14 h 32
Sujet:
Provorov
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BeastModeUnknown</b></div><div>Lol. Sicarius if anyone hasn't watched hockey is you. You are a Tampa and St.Louis fan ironically those are the only 2 that have won cups in the past 3 years. I've watched every game this year thanks to multicast. Maybe you should instead of using your eyes (which doesn't really tell anyone anything only that you believe Provorov is a defensive defenseman which is hilarious) you should start looking into the stats how about the fact he has given away the puck more than taken away which also tells you a lot about his defense v his offense.</div></div>
You obviously have some trouble with reading comprehension. You are the one that claimed he is an offensive defenseman. I said he can do it all. Now you are insinuating I said he’s a shutdown defensive D.
I’ve been a hockey fan since ‘80. I have no clue what you’re trying to accomplish by saying Tampa and the Blues have won recently.
You show your complete ignorance about Provorov. He’s a legitimate #1 D and can in fact do everything asked from a top D. I doubt if you’ve ever seen him play outside of Blues games and if you have it further shows your incompetence in evaluating NHL players.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
28 janv. 2022 à 9 h 6
Sujet:
Provorov
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BeastModeUnknown</b></div><div>The only thing he excels at is finishing which he is 87th percentile of all defenseman in the NHL in advanced analytics. EV offense 48th percentile EV Defense 39th Percentile Power Play 1st Percentile Penalty Kill 4th Percentile, Overall in WAR (Wins Above Replacement) of all defenseman 25th percentile Yes he's 6'1 201 pounds but he worries more about his offense than his defense. He doesn't play defense if he did he would leave heart out to dry all year long.</div></div>
Instead of looking up advanced stats you can just say that you've not spent much time watching him play :-)
Forum:
Armchair-GM
28 janv. 2022 à 0 h 29
Sujet:
Provorov
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BeastModeUnknown</b></div><div>Both reject. Provorov fell off a ton, Blues wouldn't want another offensive defenseman as for Philadelphia he's one of the main pieces you want to keep for a retool regardless of his awful season.</div></div>
Provorov can do it all including physically. He’s not an “offensive defenseman”
Forum:
Armchair-GM
26 janv. 2022 à 23 h 34
Sujet:
Hard Retool in 18 months
No thanks to Chiarot
Forum:
Armchair-GM
21 janv. 2022 à 12 h 47
Sujet:
Habs
So the Blues just resigned Parayko so they could trade him before the new contract starts..... and... decimate their D for a forward when they have a plethora of forwards already...
Forum:
Armchair-GM
21 janv. 2022 à 12 h 36
Sujet:
Whos selling
The Blues are not selling and would never make this trade if they were
Forum:
Armchair-GM
19 janv. 2022 à 23 h 47
Sujet:
Please fire Holland
Doesn’t Edmonton really need D and depth and a goalie???
Forum:
Armchair-GM
19 janv. 2022 à 23 h 43
Sujet:
Chychrun will be a Blue
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>West_Virginia_Take_Me_Home</b></div><div>You trade away the teams best player for futures when we are in win mode now? That doesn't make any sense.</div></div>
Army looked for trade deals so obviously he tried to meet Tarasenko’s demand. Sometimes as a GM you’re put in a tough spot and you do things for the good of the future.
People complained when Backes wasn’t resigned and when Stastny was traded etc..etc..
Nobody in the press has reported Tarasenko has rescinded his trade request. In fact it was reported in December he indeed still wanted to be traded.
The Blues have a plethora of forwards. They need a #1 LHD. That’s going to require a chunk of cap space. Organizations always want to trade from a position of strength. Trading Tarasenko next offseason frees up cap space to sign free agents and potentially fit a #1 LHD on the roster.
I don’t necessarily want to see Tarasenko traded. I’d prefer he play his entire career as a Blue. I think he’d be a lock to get his jersey retired if he stayed and signed another contract. I just think it’s more probable he gets traded.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
18 janv. 2022 à 12 h 4
Sujet:
Chychrun will be a Blue
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>xercuses</b></div><div>i dont think thats what was said at all</div></div>
Yes, Tarasenko still wants out of St. Louis. It's highly doubtful a trade is made until the off-season but he will be traded.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
18 janv. 2022 à 0 h 29
Sujet:
Chychrun will be a Blue
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>West_Virginia_Take_Me_Home</b></div><div>IMO he isn't worth it. Even if you get him what are you going to do with your cap space the next two years. We are maxed out with no money for Parayko or Perron and its likely they cost more. Then the year after that you have Tarasanko, ROR, Thomas, and Kyrou to fit</div></div>
Tarasenko will be traded in the offseason for a futures package. That gives Army plenty of cap space.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
14 janv. 2022 à 22 h 11
Sujet:
If the blues get rid of tarasenko and also get chychrun
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>tkecanuck341</b></div><div>That's probably fair value, but not an offer that Arizona will accept.</div></div>
That’s 2 1st’s and a hobey baker award winner along with a goalie prospect
Forum:
Armchair-GM
14 janv. 2022 à 16 h 3
Sujet:
If the blues get rid of tarasenko and also get chychrun
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>tkecanuck341</b></div><div>From St. Louis, the return for Chychrun probably is something like a 2022 1st, Thomas, and Bolduc.</div></div>
C'mon the Blues wouldn't trade Thomas when they got ROR,, there's 0% chance they trade Thomas..
Neighbors + 1st + Perunovich + Hofer is about right for Chychrun
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 janv. 2022 à 8 h 57
Sujet:
Chychrun
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NoVaSpartan</b></div><div>Would be an interesting offseason with the Cap situation you have here, but I like the trade. Feels about right for the reports coming out, and It makes that defense quite scary.</div></div>
I think most people feel like Tarasenko will be traded in the off-season. That frees up 7.5million to spend elsewhere.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 janv. 2022 à 0 h 24
Sujet:
Singing the Blues
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>suburbanrobot</b></div><div>I mean...you are moving the goalposts. You said in your last post "Tkachuk Would not be the best player on the Blues roster". That's not correct and I cited a bunch of stuff to basically prove it out, though not sure I should have bothered because you dismissed it as sounding like an agent asking for more money.
So now that we have established that Tkachuk would in fact be the best player on the Blues roster, we get to the work of figuring out a fair deal for him. In this case, the proposal was basically Tarasenko and Thomas for Tkachuk (I'll ignore the rest to keep it simple).
Tkachuk would come with let's say 8x8.5 AAV.
Tarasenko has 1x7.5 and then is gone. Thomas has 1x2.8 but the Blues have team control thereafter. He likely either takes a deal like 8x6.5 (maybe a bit more) or a 3-4 year bridge deal at a slightly lower cost.
So your two options:
Scenario 1 (trade Tarasenko for pick+prospect): Thomas at 2.8 year 1 and ~6.5 for several more years, 1st round pick, mid-level prospect
Scenario 2 (trade Tarasenko + Thomas for Tkachuk): Tkachuk at 8x8.5
Then the question -- would you trade Thomas + a 1st round pick (Tarasenko return) + a mid-level prospect (Tarasenko return) for Tkachuk on a long term deal? I say yes, you probably say no. Either way, it certainly isn't a "ludicrous" play as you said in your first post.</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>suburbanrobot</b></div><div>I mean...you are moving the goalposts. You said in your last post "Tkachuk Would not be the best player on the Blues roster". That's not correct and I cited a bunch of stuff to basically prove it out, though not sure I should have bothered because you dismissed it as sounding like an agent asking for more money.
So now that we have established that Tkachuk would in fact be the best player on the Blues roster, we get to the work of figuring out a fair deal for him. In this case, the proposal was basically Tarasenko and Thomas for Tkachuk (I'll ignore the rest to keep it simple).
Tkachuk would come with let's say 8x8.5 AAV.
Tarasenko has 1x7.5 and then is gone. Thomas has 1x2.8 but the Blues have team control thereafter. He likely either takes a deal like 8x6.5 (maybe a bit more) or a 3-4 year bridge deal at a slightly lower cost.
So your two options:
Scenario 1 (trade Tarasenko for pick+prospect): Thomas at 2.8 year 1 and ~6.5 for several more years, 1st round pick, mid-level prospect
Scenario 2 (trade Tarasenko + Thomas for Tkachuk): Tkachuk at 8x8.5
Then the question -- would you trade Thomas + a 1st round pick (Tarasenko return) + a mid-level prospect (Tarasenko return) for Tkachuk on a long term deal? I say yes, you probably say no. Either way, it certainly isn't a "ludicrous" play as you said in your first post.</div></div>
I tried showing you that advanced stats isn’t the end of your discussion. I don’t think Tkachuk would be the best nor most talented now most valuable player on the Blues.
Kyrou, Buchnevich , and Tarasenko all have higher p/gp than Tkachuk. This isn’t a one category thing when weighing value to the team. When you factor in everything, cost, stats, team control, position, it’s fairly easy to say Tkachuk would not be the best player nor most valuable.
It’s ok if you disagree.
Yes I stand firmly by this proposal is ludicrous by a landslide.
If you spent time evaluating the Blues roster you would see this isn’t what they need at all. The most glaring need is a #1 LHD and it’s not close.
So I would propose not only are any of your options not realistic, they don’t address roster needs.
The correct offer is to trade futures for the LHD in Chychrun, Lindholm, etc..
The next move is to trade Tarasenko for a futures package after this year.
This would give a roster like the following in 22-23.
Saad ROR Perron
Kyrou Thomas Schenn
Buchnevich Barbashev Kostin
Brown Bozak Sundqvist
Chychrun, Parayko
Krug Faulk
Mikkola Perunovich
This is how Army builds rosters. It’s death by a million cuts instead of incredibly top heavy superstar teams like Edmonton etc..
I also disagree with your estimate of Tkachuk getting anything less than 9 million per season, but we’ll see
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 janv. 2022 à 21 h 32
Sujet:
Singing the Blues
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>suburbanrobot</b></div><div>I'm not sure what is wrong here?
1) The list of Blues players that you could argue today are better than Matthew Tkachuk start and end with Jordan Kyrou. By any advanced metric you want to use (Corsi, Fenwick, Point Shares, etc.) Tkachuk is better than anyone the Blues have signed. His 4.4 point share is higher than anyone on the roster (Kyrou is the Blues' highest with 4.3). He has a higher Corsi (both actual and relative) than anyone on the roster (Krug is team best with 7.1 rel at even strength, Tkachuk is at 9.2). And it isn't like this is a one year flash thing -- Tkachuk has been consistently really good for several seasons. It should not be a controversial take that he's a better player than the Blues have. That's not a slight; he's just a truly great player and the Blues are good because they have a lot of guys that are very good.
2) The Blues are absolutely "losing Tarasenko" unless he has a massive change of heart and decides to re-up with the team after next year. A very unlikely prospect at this point.
3) Agree on your return for Tarasenko if the Blues were not contending and shipping him out for picks. This is different -- Tkachuk is a better/more valuable player than Tarasenko and anyone that isn't a massive Blues homer would steadfastly agree.
4) In this case you are shipping Tarasenko for Tkachuk so not sure how the Blues would be overstocked with wingers. It's not like Tkachuk would be blocking a world beating talent.
5) Yes, cap is tricky. Tkachuk probably 8.5x8. You lose Tarasenko's 7.5, but then you also have to pay Kyrou who will command at least 7.5. Thomas will need 5.5-6.0 in his own right so DA has a LOT of cap navigation to work out. Schenn/Parayko/Binnington/Krug/Faulk contracts are really tough in an environment where the cap isn't going up.</div></div>
Let’s define losing Tarasenko. If Seattle had taken him that would have been losing him. What the Blues trade him and get a 1st and valuable assets this no longer qualifies as losing. Losing a player refers to getting nothing in return when a player leaves the organization.
The Blues lost Brett Hul for example.
Your use of advanced state sounds like an agent arguing for more money.
Tkachuk is in the last year of his deal. Realistically, what’s his next deal look like, 9+ million per season? You don’t have to convince Blues fans that Tkachuk is good. We all know he’s a great player but he’s not a generational player. I wouldn’t want to pay him what he will get if I were a GM.
The value of a player isn’t just measured in advanced stats. For example, I’d rather pay Perron close to 4 million for the next 4 years than pay Tkachuk 9 etc..
Pretty much all Blues fans would like Tkachuk on the roster if the circumstances were right. Neither this trade nor real life presents it.
Premier
2
3
4
Suivant
Page 3
Remerciements à
Guillaume Lambert-Héon
pour l'aide à la traduction de l'anglais au français
SalarySwish
| Masses salariales de la NBA par CapFriendly
Conditions d’utilisation
Politique de confidentialité
Règlements du forum
À propos de nous
FAQ - Convention collective
Nous contacter
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com