PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE
Basculer en mode sombre
Thème automatique
COTES DES PARIS
Cotes activées
LANGUE
EN
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
FORUMS
ARCHIVES ▾
ARCHIVES
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
CBA ▾
CBA
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
COTES
8
DÉPISTAGE
CALCS ▾
CALCS
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
Historique des blessures
OUTILS ▾
OUTILS
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Équipes affiliées
Essais professionnels
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
JOUEURS ▾
JOUEURS
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
ÉQUIPES ▾
CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST
PACIFIQUE
Ducks d'Anaheim
Flames de Calgary
Oilers d'Edmonton
Kings de Los Angeles
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
CENTRALE
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Stars de Dallas
Wild du Minnesota
Predators de Nashville
Blues de St-Louis
Jets de Winnipeg
CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST
MÉTROPOLITAINE
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Capitals de Washington
ATLANTIQUE
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Red Wings de Detroit
Panthers de la Floride
Canadiens de Montréal
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
INTERACTIF ▾
OUTILS INTERACTIFS
Fauteuil - DG (Simulateur de formation personnalisée)
Repêchage simulé
Simulateur de transactions (propositions de transactions)
RECHERCHER
FAUTEUIL - DG
REPÊCHAGE SIMULÉ
SIMULATEUR DE TRANSACTIONS
ÉQUIPES ▾
Ducks d'Anaheim
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Flames de Calgary
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Stars de Dallas
Red Wings de Detroit
Oilers d'Edmonton
Panthers de la Floride
Kings de Los Angeles
Wild du Minnesota
Canadiens de Montréal
Predators de Nashville
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Blues de St-Louis
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
Capitals de Washington
Jets de Winnipeg
JOUEURS ▾
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
OUTILS ▾
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Essais professionnels
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
Équipes affiliées
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
CALCS ▾
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
RAPPORTS DE DÉPISTAGE
COTES
CBA▾
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
ARCHIVES ▾
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
FORUMS
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
EN
Basculer en mode sombre
Cotes activées
KrakenTheCode
Membre depuis
15 juill. 2022
Équipe favorite
Kraken de Seattle
Messages dans les forums
779
Messages par jour
1.2
MESSAGES
SUJETS
MENTIONS "J'AIME"
ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG
Forum:
Trade Machine Proposals
20 févr. à 13 h 38
Sujet:
Worth a shot
I mean, the Avalanche could definitely give that trade offer a shot, but the Kraken would reject it pretty quickly. Johansen and Wennberg have basically the same point production, only Johansen doesn't do any of the other things Wennberg does when it comes to playmaking and contributing defensively. There's a pretty sizable gap in value between the two. If Seattle is open to trading Wennberg, Colorado would have to give up something of real value to get the Kraken to consider a swap.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
20 févr. à 2 h 51
Sujet:
Other Fans Help Me Out
In all likelihood, Seattle will not be trading Larsson anytime soon. Even if they end up selling at the deadline this year, they will be looking to reload for a return to contention next season. Larsson plays a huge role on the Kraken currently and would continue to do so next year as well. For that reason, I believe the Kraken will be VERY reluctant to move him, and wouldn't consider doing so barring a package too good to refuse. Of the trade pieces you've listed, only Niemelä, Robertson, and the first round pick would be higher value assets in my opinion. If you packaged all three of them together with maybe a third round pick as well, that might be a fair offer for Larsson in a vacuum (depending on how the Kraken feel about Niemelä and Robertson). However, that offer may get beat by other interested teams should Larsson hypothetically end up on the trade block.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
19 févr. à 12 h 32
Sujet:
On the fly
Seattle is never going to go for that. For as good as Guentzel is, he's a rental until proven otherwise. The Kraken are in no position to be giving up that huge of a package for any rental right now.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
18 févr. à 23 h 53
Sujet:
Fgddgd
Seattle wouldn't go for that trade offer. Even if they fall out of the playoff race this year, they will be looking for a swift turnaround next season. Larsson and Daccord would be major parts of that, so they're not going anywhere barring an offer too good to refuse. This isn't that. The draft capital isn't enough for both players, and Brodie and Jones, by virtue of being expiring contracts, would have little value to the Kraken except as sallary ballast in this scenario, as trading Larsson and Daccord would signal they are punting on this year. And yes, I am aware Seattle could theoretically flip Brodie for another asset, but I'm not convinced he has much standalone trade value considering his cap hit, age, and step back in play.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
30 janv. à 13 h 2
Sujet:
TDL24
Seattle rather quickly declines that trade offer. The gap in value between Larsson and Ceci is much more than a single second round pick. Seattle isn't likely to trade Larsson at all anyway, and Larsson himself wouldn't be willing to return to Edmonton for personal reasons.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
28 janv. à 20 h 16
Sujet:
Seattle TD
Seattle isn't going to be giving up draft capital to dump Driedger. His contract is expiring at the end of the season and isn't hindering their current financial flexibility in any meaningful way. Worst case scenario, he'll just remain in Coachella Valley as the Kraken's third goaltender.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
25 janv. à 1 h 37
Sujet:
Based on The Athletic TDL team needs
Seattle wouldn't make that swap. They could use more goalscoring threats, but not at the expense of one of their better defensemen. Borgen's contributions to the Kraken right now exceeds any benefits Greenway would bring.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
23 janv. à 18 h 42
Sujet:
Vancouver Penguins
Seattle's not going to go for that. McCann is on the more valuable deal, and is much more well-rounded as a player than Kuzmenko. He also fits the Kraken roster much better than Kuzmenko, who for all his offensive talent, doesn't really fit the mold of forward the team has targeted in the past.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
22 janv. à 11 h 18
Sujet:
What do krakens fans think of this
Personally, I'm not a fan of this, and I don't think the Kraken will be either. The team appears to really value Borgen and are intent on keeping him around. Timmins doesn't really fit the roster when the Kraken already have Dunn, Evans, and Schultz around as offense-first blueliners. Seattle already has plenty of capable wingers, so another winger like Robertson isn't as much of a need as a defensive RHD like Borgen. All in all, this swap doesn't make much sense for the Kraken given their present roster construction.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
18 janv. à 19 h 6
Sujet:
whats the price
If Seattle ends up selling some veteran rentals at the deadline, Wennberg with half his cap hit retained would cost in the neighborhood of a second round pick in my opinion. However, I'm not sure Montreal would be likely destination, they probably shouldn't be trading for veteran rentals right now.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
15 janv. à 0 h 42
Sujet:
major changes need to happen
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>odyssey</b></div><div>how far off value wise am i? i felt like these are okay offers</div></div>
FWIW I don't think your offer from Larsson is all that far off in a vacuum, it's just that the Kraken aren't going to be inclined to trade him anytime soon. With how they've clawed their way back into the postseason picture and how important Larsson is to the team, Seattle can't really afford to lose him.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
15 janv. à 0 h 28
Sujet:
Driedger
Driedger's kind of in a weird spot. He returned from an ACL tear at the start of the season and has essentially played one NHL game in two seasons, meaning it's impossible to get a true gauge on his trade value. Meanwhile, the Kraken need him as a backup for Daccord with Grubauer injured, but who knows what happens when Gru is ready to return.
Long story short, a lot could happen between now and the deadline. It'll be hard to figure out whether Driedger will be available until Grubauer returns and where the Kraken are in the standings at that point, and we won't have a good idea of any potential trade value until he plays some more games.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
13 janv. à 14 h 18
Sujet:
GREASY
In a vacuum, the value isn't bad, though personally I'd prefer Niemelä to either Robertson or Timmins. But I have a hard time envisioning any scenario where Seattle considers trading Larsson right now. They're on a good run of form and clearly still gunning for the playoffs this season, with the aim of continuing to do so in the near future as well. Larsson is just too important a piece of the roster to lose.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
13 janv. à 13 h 18
Sujet:
My ideal situation for this year
Seattle wouldn't be interested in that trade. Borgen's an important part of the Kraken defense, both for now and the future. Meanwhile, they have a surplus of wingers now that Burakovsky and Schwartz are back, so much so that Yamamoto, a player who would be a lineup lock on many other teams, has been getting scratched lately. Robertson in all likelihood wouldn't be able to crack the Kraken's starting lineup.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
9 janv. à 21 h 42
Sujet:
Trade Deadline Playoffs
I think if Seattle ends up selling at the deadline, they'd most likely accept that offer very quickly before the Avs change their minds, although it's looking less and less likely the Kraken will be sellers given their recent form. However, I'm fairly certain Colorado wouldn't offer that deal unless something happened with Byram that I don't know about. With a trade package like that, they could aim higher in their search for a long-term second line center.
Forum:
NHL Signings
8 janv. à 13 h 24
Sujet:
Toronto Maple Leafs signed William Nylander (8 Years / $11,500,000 AAV)
I voted yes because on it's own, I think Nylander's new deal is worth it. He made noticeable strides over the last couple of seasons, and the underlying numbers back up those improvements. But where the Leafs will run into problems is with their roster construction; it was incredibly top-heavy before and will be even more so now. I think there's a world where Toronto can potentially win a cup with a roster like this, but it would require them to be incredibly savvy with filling out the rest of the lineup, finding a plethora of undervalued players who will greatly outperform their contracts. So far the Leafs have not done this.
As a side note, Nylander's two closest contract comparables are Pastrnak's and Huberdeau's recent deals. It'll be interesting to revisit his contract in a couple of years and see where it lands on that spectrum.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
6 janv. à 3 h 7
Sujet:
Would they
Even if Seattle ends up selling some players at the deadline, Tolvanen would be pretty far down the list. He's fit in quite well since arriving in Seattle and is still under RFA control; plus he's young enough to be a part of future contending Kraken teams. I don't see the Kraken parting ways with Tolvy anytime soon, and I believe it would take more than Robertson and a fourth round pick to get them to even seriously listen.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
5 janv. à 18 h 32
Sujet:
What does he cost if available
I doubt Seattle will seriously entertain trading Gourde, given they are still very much in the running for a playoff spot and even if they aren't by the deadline, will be gunning for the postseason next year. However, should they listen to offers, I think it would take the value of a first round pick plus a couple of mid-to-late round picks (like a third and a fourth) to get the Kraken to seriously consider a move involving Gourde half retained. That could take the form of draft picks but more likely the Kraken would want at least one piece to be close to or at the NHL level.
Again though, I don't really see the Kraken moving Gourde, as he's the linchpin of arguably Seattle's most successful forward line and a big reason why Tolvanen/Bjorkstrand have been as successful as they have.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
5 janv. à 18 h 25
Sujet:
Next year with Nylander raise
I personally find it extremely unlikely Seattle will even consider dealing Larsson at this year's deadline, given everything they've done indicates they are very still gunning for the playoffs both this year and next, and Larsson will play a key role in those efforts. Even in the hypothetical scenario where Seattle seriously listens to offers, it will take quite a bit more on top of the first round pick to interest them.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
2 janv. à 10 h 59
Sujet:
What is his value
Wennberg's player profile is a well rounded middle six center. He's not much of a goalscorer and prefers to act as a playmaker while chipping in on both the power play and penalty kill. Wennberg is currently the Kraken's second line center, though he might be best suited as a third line center on a serious contender. I think second and fifth round picks for Wennberg half retained is pretty fair value for a deadline deal, but whether Seattle will be willing to sell him given their recent good run of form is an open question at this time.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
2 janv. à 1 h 0
Sujet:
Seattle
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>aadoyle</b></div><div>I think next season they gonna get serious as they took a step back this season. So having 1.2m Daccord being their starter will help them get back to the playoffs come next season. Especially if he continues playing like this. Basically they would probs want Cowan for him which is an auto no.
Larsson I can see go as this offseason is loaded with Dman
Roy, Pesce, Hanafin, Skeji, Ghost, Dillon, Walker, etc.
So losing him wont be so bad
Goaltending its voodo and if you got a young guy on a dirt cheap deal doing well keep em. As someone of his caliber gonna cost at lest 5m in FA</div></div>
Sure, there might be a lot of defenseman in free agency this offseason, but it's far from a guarantee Seattle will be able to sign any of them, let alone sign someone who can do everything Larsson does for this team. A lot of times the best way to get a shutdown top four RHD is to just keep the one you already have. Minten, Timmins, and a first round pick isn't bad value for Larsson in a trade, but given Seattle's current position, roster construction, and franchise trajectory, I don't really see a move like that making a ton of sense for them right now. The Kraken aren't likely to be trading Larsson or Daccord anytime soon in my view.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
1 janv. à 20 h 46
Sujet:
Whats The Cost Seattle Fans
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ATC</b></div><div>Yeah it just doesnt make any sense short or long term. We've had a run of some truly awful goaltending, this guy comes out of nowhere and gives us hope and we're gunna deal that for picks?
If he werent signed for next year too I might consider it. But goaltending being what it is in the nhl, Im happy to ride this high until the carriage turns back into a pumpkin lol.</div></div>
I'm with you there. Also, this is Daccord's first full-time role in the NHL, and he's certainly taken the opportunity and run with it so far. Who knows, maybe he sustains his high level play and entrenches himself as a longer-term part of Seattle's goaltending tandem. We'll see, but I'm hopeful and I'll be rooting for Joey.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
1 janv. à 20 h 38
Sujet:
Whats The Cost Seattle Fans
For all the reasons listed by ATC above, I don't think the Kraken would seriously consider moving Daccord. However, if Edmonton or another team were to make an offer, the cost would undoubtedly be quite steep. Given Seattle has had goalie issues of their own in the past and Daccord is on the best run of form by a Kraken goaltender ever, I think right now you're looking at a first round pick or a conditional second round pick that becomes a first if Edmonton makes a certain round of the playoffs (a la the Fleury to Minnesota deal) to get Seattle to listen.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
1 janv. à 19 h 36
Sujet:
Elite depth
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>HockeyManiac95</b></div><div>I feel like Kraken fans would hate that</div></div>
You'd be correct about that, at least from my point of view.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MeetYourMakar</b></div><div>Nice post. Im interested to see the Kraken feedback</div></div>
A first rounder might be enough for one of Borgen or Tolvanen, but certainly not both. In addition, both are important parts of a Kraken team that has clawed its way back into the playoff picture and are young enough to be part of future Kraken teams that would be more serious contenders, so I doubt Seattle will seriously consider moving either player anytime soon.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
30 déc. 2023 à 3 h 5
Sujet:
Re-Tool
I don't know if you're joking or not, but the odds of Seattle agreeing to a trade like that are less than zero. Beniers and Wright are slated to be the Kraken's one-two punch at center for the next decade or so. There is absolutely no way either, let alone both, are getting traded for a rental player, even one as good as Guentzel.
Premier
2
3
4
Suivant
Page 3
Remerciements à
Guillaume Lambert-Héon
pour l'aide à la traduction de l'anglais au français
SalarySwish
| Masses salariales de la NBA par CapFriendly
Conditions d’utilisation
Politique de confidentialité
Règlements du forum
À propos de nous
FAQ - Convention collective
Nous contacter
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com