PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE
Basculer en mode sombre
Thème automatique
COTES DES PARIS
Cotes activées
LANGUE
EN
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
FORUMS
ARCHIVES ▾
ARCHIVES
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
CBA ▾
CBA
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
COTES
DÉPISTAGE
CALCS ▾
CALCS
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
Historique des blessures
OUTILS ▾
OUTILS
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Équipes affiliées
Essais professionnels
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
JOUEURS ▾
JOUEURS
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
ÉQUIPES ▾
CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST
PACIFIQUE
Ducks d'Anaheim
Flames de Calgary
Oilers d'Edmonton
Kings de Los Angeles
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
CENTRALE
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Stars de Dallas
Wild du Minnesota
Predators de Nashville
Blues de St-Louis
Jets de Winnipeg
CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST
MÉTROPOLITAINE
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Capitals de Washington
ATLANTIQUE
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Red Wings de Detroit
Panthers de la Floride
Canadiens de Montréal
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
INTERACTIF ▾
OUTILS INTERACTIFS
Fauteuil - DG (Simulateur de formation personnalisée)
Repêchage simulé
Simulateur de transactions (propositions de transactions)
RECHERCHER
FAUTEUIL - DG
REPÊCHAGE SIMULÉ
SIMULATEUR DE TRANSACTIONS
ÉQUIPES ▾
Ducks d'Anaheim
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Flames de Calgary
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Stars de Dallas
Red Wings de Detroit
Oilers d'Edmonton
Panthers de la Floride
Kings de Los Angeles
Wild du Minnesota
Canadiens de Montréal
Predators de Nashville
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Blues de St-Louis
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
Capitals de Washington
Jets de Winnipeg
JOUEURS ▾
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
OUTILS ▾
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Essais professionnels
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
Équipes affiliées
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
CALCS ▾
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
RAPPORTS DE DÉPISTAGE
COTES
CBA▾
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
ARCHIVES ▾
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
FORUMS
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
EN
Basculer en mode sombre
Cotes activées
Epic_Ninja_Dude
Membre depuis
14 févr. 2022
Équipe favorite
Canucks de Vancouver
Messages dans les forums
1523
Messages par jour
1.9
MESSAGES
SUJETS
MENTIONS "J'AIME"
ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG
Forum:
Armchair-GM
7 mars à 14 h 14
Sujet:
according to the rumors
And according to the rumours the Canucks have dropped out of the Guentzel race presumably because of the absurd asking price. They're now pursing Toffoli.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
4 mars à 13 h 53
Sujet:
Realistic TDL
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>TheAlien</b></div><div>If the Cap can pay the bonus I'd do it but I'm not sure they're allowed</div></div>
Bonuses are paid as they are met, and since Pacioretty has already met all his bonuses, they've all been paid. The bonuses are then counted towards the teams salary cap the next season, and I'd assume since WSH paid the bonuses they'd also get stuck with the cap hit from them, though being traded could move the bonus overage to the new team (not exactly sure how that part works).
Forum:
Armchair-GM
4 mars à 13 h 47
Sujet:
This Is Where The Fun Begins
Can't see the Canucks parting with either of those pieces, especially for a rental.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
4 mars à 13 h 41
Sujet:
Deep gloves n Mitts
Canucks decline. They have no reason to trade Zadorov for less than they gave up for him. They had been targeting him for a long time and like his style of play, it would take significantly more than they gave up to pry him away, not less.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
4 mars à 3 h 1
Sujet:
goodbye buch
When are fans of both teams gonna give this deal up? Blues should be keeping Buchnevich, it would take a massive haul to pry him away from them. Willander is untouchable, and the Canucks aren't giving up the kind of haul it would take to pry Buch away. It doesn't make sense for either side, every Buch deal is either the Blues selling way to cheap to get an offer that would actually interest the Canucks or the Canucks mortgaging their entire future and moving multiple assets they've stated are untouchable for a single player.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 mars à 21 h 2
Sujet:
Who Says No
Canucks definitely decline. Hughes is easily a top 5, arguably top 3 defenceman in the league. There chance Nemec becomes as good as Hughes is probably less than 1%, he'll be great bust absolute best case scenario is they're even. Chances are Nemec becomes a good to great top 4 defenceman, but he won't be Hughes. Giving up the surefire top 3 defenceman for a chance at getting one back doesn't make any sense, when the odds are that guy doesn't even reach Hughes' potential. Getting a late 1st doesn't come close to moving the needle on that front, the chances that pick turns into an impact player are already not great.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 mars à 20 h 58
Sujet:
Trades for Jake
Don't think the Canucks would be willing to do that. Hoglander has been great this year, and will be expected to step up into a more prominent role next year. Getting a potential top 6 forward on a bargain $1M contract will be a major asset for a cap strapped team in Vancouver. Lekkerimaki is also untouchable, only possible situation I can see the Canucks trading him is in a deal for a under 25 top pairing right-handed defenceman with term.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 mars à 0 h 16
Sujet:
TDL action
Doubt the Canucks would be interested in giving up assets for a guy who wouldn't make their top 6 and would be an overpaid 7th d
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 mars à 0 h 15
Sujet:
Pens 23-24
Canucks aren't trading Lekkerimaki
Forum:
Armchair-GM
2 mars à 20 h 48
Sujet:
Pittsburgh penguins
Canucks decline as always, Lekkerimaki is untouchable.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
2 mars à 13 h 42
Sujet:
Jake Trade Destinations Ranked By Best Options
Canucks aren't making that deal. Can't see them moving Hoglander with how good he's played this season, he'll be asked to take a step up next year and his bargain contract is a major asset to a cap strapped team. Lekkerimaki is also untouchable, any trade that starts with him ends there too. No team is giving up their top prospects for Guentzel, regardless of how many times Pens fans post it.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
2 mars à 13 h 39
Sujet:
I just got back from March 9th
Can't see the Canucks moving Willander, he's untouchable.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
1 mars à 16 h 54
Sujet:
Petey
I think Petey will re-sign, but if it comes to trading him I'd be happy with that return.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
1 mars à 15 h 9
Sujet:
Number 1 Center
Pettersson would cost a lot more than that if he were to become available. You'd have 15-20 other teams bidding for him, chances are at least half of them would easily beat that offer.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
1 mars à 15 h 8
Sujet:
Now To TDL - Pens Sell Old -BUT- Buy Young NHLers to Almost NHL Ready
Can't see the Canucks wanting to trade Hoglander. He's been great this year and will take a step up in role next year, and his contract is an absolute bargain for a team that is very cap strapped. Willander is also completely untouchable, any negotiations that start with him end there as well.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
1 mars à 15 h 7
Sujet:
Kyle Dubas Would Be A G for this
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>python3504</b></div><div>i never understood why players dont do this more, say sid next season says ill do the same thing they would get a kings ransom for him and they would still have him.</div></div>
They don't do it because of the risks involved. If any word leaks out that a player has this kind of agreement, his value is completely tanked and no one is going to trade anything of value for him. Say Guentzel did something like this and word leaked, other GM's will know he's not signing with their team and would be a pure rental, so you're probably only gonna get like a 2nd or 3rd round pick for him maximum. Under the table contract agreements also run the risk of the league finding you guilty of tampering and punishing you for it with major fines, loss of draft picks, and potential voiding of the signing all together. It's a very risking play as one slip of the tongue can completely derail the plan and leave you 5 steps backwards instead of forwards.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
1 mars à 15 h 0
Sujet:
How would you make this trade more fair
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Caniac2000</b></div><div>Aho and EP40 are the same caliber of player, that would be a lateral swap for the Canes. Necas 1st Pesce could be workable, I've done Necas, Morrow 1st, Drury deals in the past</div></div>
Yeah, I'd give Petey the edge offensively but Aho definitely beats him defensively. It would be a lateral move that doesn't really make sense for the Canes. Necas, Drury, Morrow, 1st is probably pretty similar value wise to Necas, Pesce, 1st. I just think the 2nd offer would fill the Canucks needs better and I think it's the kind of move they'd be more interested in, but I wouldn't be opposed to the value in either of those deals.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
1 mars à 2 h 50
Sujet:
How would you make this trade more fair
Canucks are competing, if they did move Petey they'd want a Tkachuk-style return focused on assets that can help them win now rather than futures. My guess is they'd start the ask with one of Aho/Svechnikov, and I assume both would be off limits. Those two aside, I'd have to think the more realistic ask would start with Necas, Pesce, and the Canes 24 1st.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
1 mars à 2 h 47
Sujet:
Ottawas Next moves part 1 v2 deadline edition
If the Canucks are sending Mikheyev then the $1.5M retention from Pittsburgh means they're actually gaining cap space, no reason to be giving up an extra asset for unneeded extra retention.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
29 févr. à 23 h 16
Sujet:
Nuck Nuck spend a Buch
Canucks decline. They aren't moving Lekkerimaki, both him and Willander are off limits. Any deal that starts with one of them ends there as well.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
29 févr. à 18 h 45
Sujet:
We could easily beat the Kotkaniemi and Necas offer
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>csick</b></div><div>I’d be asking for Svechnikov, Morrow and a pick if I’m Vancouver</div></div>
I'd definitely have started the ask with Aho/Svechnikov, Morrow/Nikishin, and the 24 1st. Given that the Canucks are competing, I could also see them wanting a Tkachuk-style return centred around a package like Necas, Pesce, and the 24 1st.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
29 févr. à 18 h 42
Sujet:
Possible Tdl
Tarasenko could be a good piece for Vancouver. However, I don't think they'd do that deal since management have said they won't be trading a 1st for a rental.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
29 févr. à 18 h 40
Sujet:
We could easily beat the Kotkaniemi and Necas offer
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>theleano1</b></div><div>I agree do we know the actual package that was offered? I don't think we do but I could be wrong, that seems really low for me as well, that's a part of the reason I don't think there was actually any serious thought put into it outside of it being a backup plan</div></div>
To me it sounds like it was mostly just a situation where Carolina called and Allvin basically used trade talks with them as leverage to force a decision out of Petey. Gave him the ultimatum of you're either gonna extend/commit to extending, or you wont be wearing a Canucks jersey by the end of the year. Basically just wanted to use the leverage of a potential trade to force Petey's hand by taking some control instead of letting him hold all the cards.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
29 févr. à 18 h 31
Sujet:
Just messin around
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Sagecoll</b></div><div>Yeah it's interesting because a lot of the reporting basically was that the money is on the table but Petey was pretty meh about it. Not having to do with term/$$, but more about being stuck in Vancouver. Which I get. But hopefully for their sake, they can get it done.</div></div>
Problem for Petey wasn't being stuck in Vancouver, there were never reports that he didn't want to be here. Reports were that he wanted to play for a winning team, hence he didn't want to sign an extension at that point since in the offseason, the Canucks didn't look poised to be a winning team based on them being a lottery team the two years prior. No one expected the Canucks to come out and be the 1st place team in the league coming up to the TDL, but now they are and they are clearly a team that is winning and ready to compete. Petey also said he didn't want to talk extension during the season as he wanted to focus purely on hockey and didn't want the distractions of contract talks (he also did the same thing the last time he was an RFA, didn't begin negotiations until after the season ended and offseason began). Now he knows the team is a winning team and ready to compete, hence why he'd have the change of mind to want to work out an extension in season. It was also just reported by Friedman that the other big reason for his change of heart is that he knows teams have been calling the Canucks on him, and the Canucks had also engaged in talks with the Canes involving Petey. The following are Friedman's exact words on the situation on his latest appearance on the Jeff Marek Show.
"According to multiple sources, the Vancouver Canucks and Carolina Hurricanes had discussions about Elias Pettersson that advanced to a stage where both the Canucks and the player needed to make serious decisions about where their relationship was headed. The Canucks ultimately decided in favour of another attempt at extending Pettersson, and he, facing the possibility Vancouver could move him, allowed agents Pat Brisson and JP Barry to resume negotiations. Previously, the talented forward indicated he preferred to wait until after the season."
Forum:
Armchair-GM
29 févr. à 14 h 38
Sujet:
Vancouver goes for Top 4 LD
Canucks decline. Matheson isn’t a fit for Vancouver. He’s an offensively-minded defenceman man who generates most of his value from the PP. Canucks already have two guys who fill that role and are much better players in Hughes and Hronek. Matheson wouldn’t get PP time in Vancouver, which would significantly limit the value he can provide. Then there’s also the issues between him and Pettersson, and I highly doubt you’d want to bring in a guy your superstar RFA hates. On top of that, Lekkerimaki is untouchable and won’t be traded under pretty much any circumstances. Deal just doesn’t make sense from Vancouver’s perspective in an way.
Premier
2
3
Suivant
Page 2
Remerciements à
Guillaume Lambert-Héon
pour l'aide à la traduction de l'anglais au français
SalarySwish
| Masses salariales de la NBA par CapFriendly
Conditions d’utilisation
Politique de confidentialité
Règlements du forum
À propos de nous
FAQ - Convention collective
Nous contacter
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com