PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE
Basculer en mode sombre
Thème automatique
COTES DES PARIS
Cotes activées
LANGUE
EN
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
FORUMS
ARCHIVES ▾
ARCHIVES
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Arizona Coyotes Final Roster
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
CBA ▾
CBA
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
COTES
26
DÉPISTAGE
CALCS ▾
CALCS
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
Historique des blessures
OUTILS ▾
OUTILS
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Équipes affiliées
Essais professionnels
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
JOUEURS ▾
JOUEURS
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
ÉQUIPES ▾
CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST
PACIFIQUE
Ducks d'Anaheim
Flames de Calgary
Oilers d'Edmonton
Kings de Los Angeles
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
CENTRALE
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Stars de Dallas
Wild du Minnesota
Predators de Nashville
Blues de St-Louis
Utah
Jets de Winnipeg
CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST
MÉTROPOLITAINE
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Capitals de Washington
ATLANTIQUE
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Red Wings de Detroit
Panthers de la Floride
Canadiens de Montréal
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
INTERACTIF ▾
OUTILS INTERACTIFS
Fauteuil - DG (Simulateur de formation personnalisée)
Repêchage simulé
Simulateur de transactions (propositions de transactions)
RECHERCHER
FAUTEUIL - DG
REPÊCHAGE SIMULÉ
SIMULATEUR DE TRANSACTIONS
ÉQUIPES ▾
Ducks d'Anaheim
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Flames de Calgary
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Stars de Dallas
Red Wings de Detroit
Oilers d'Edmonton
Panthers de la Floride
Kings de Los Angeles
Wild du Minnesota
Canadiens de Montréal
Predators de Nashville
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Blues de St-Louis
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Utah
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
Capitals de Washington
Jets de Winnipeg
JOUEURS ▾
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
OUTILS ▾
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Essais professionnels
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
Équipes affiliées
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
CALCS ▾
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
RAPPORTS DE DÉPISTAGE
COTES
CBA▾
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
ARCHIVES ▾
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Arizona Coyotes Final Roster
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
FORUMS
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
EN
Basculer en mode sombre
Cotes activées
Epic_Ninja_Dude
Membre depuis
14 févr. 2022
Équipe favorite
Canucks de Vancouver
Messages dans les forums
1531
Messages par jour
1.9
MESSAGES
SUJETS
MENTIONS "J'AIME"
ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Hier à 4 h 2
Sujet:
Tough Decisions
As a Canucks fan, what I'm expecting is something along the lines of:
1. Signing a top 6 winger for Petey. I think they'll go out and sign someone, maybe like a Guentzel (PIT connection) or Reinhart (hometown kid). Lindholm isn't out of the question, but my gut tells me he'll end up being a rental as the Canucks pivot to a different top 6 FA winger. Leaves us with a top 6 of Hoggy - Petey - FA and Suter - Miller - Boeser
2. Finish the bottom 6. I think Blueger will be re-signed and Garland obviously stays, but I think Joshua may end up leaving. Canucks will probably try to keep him, but I can see him leaving for another team to cash in on his first FA experience, probably to somewhere with cap space that can overpay and give him potential top 6 minutes (maybe an Anaheim or Chicago). If Joshua does leave, I think the Canucks will look to fill that hole either by asking Podz to step up or by bringing in another Joshua-type who they think they can get more out of (maybe Duhaime who they were interested in at TDL). Mikheyev could also be an option to fill the hole if they don't move him. 4th line will be a mix match of young guys like Aman/Karlsson and vets like PDG or free agents.
3. Lock up the defence. By the sounds of things Hronek has a pretty absurd ask, but I think with time and his so far poor playoff performance that it will come down to a more reasonable price. My guess is he'll get something around 7 x $7.25M. After Hronek, Zadorov is the next big piece. He's fit Tocchet's system amazing and is an absolute fan favourite, and I think with Vancouver's connections to Milstein and their growing pool of Russian players he'll be locked up for 4-5 years around the $4-$5M range.
4. Finishing the defence. With a Hughes/Zadorov/Soucy left side, there's no need for Cole anymore so I think he walks. I think they'll bring back Myers on a cheap 1-2 year deal, as he seems to be a well respected player in the locker room and a pretty big leader for the team. I also think they'll bring back Tanev, Hughes said to target him deadline and they did, management seems interested and it sounds like Tanev would also be interested in coming back (and I also heard a rumour he may even be willing to take a "hometown discount" with Van).
5. Goaltending. Pretty straight forward, Demko is locked up and DeSmith walks with Silovs cementing himself as the backup with this playoff run. Maybe bring in a 3rd depth guy to play AHL mintues and be there in case of injury.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mer. à 19 h 21
Sujet:
Tavares retained twice for goalie- would any team
Demko isn't available. If for whatever reason he was, Canucks have no interest in Tavares being the piece brought back for him.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
6 mai à 0 h 50
Sujet:
Wings
Why on earth would the Canucks give up assets for Chiarot when they can just re-sign Zadorov who is a way better player, will be a similar contract, doesn't cost a pick, has already shown to be a great fit chemistry wise, and on top of all that, has been an absolute fan favourite pretty much since the day he got here.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
6 mai à 0 h 48
Sujet:
Shake up
Value isn't terrible in the Vancouver trade, but value aside the pieces we're giving up are too important to the team. Podkolzin's cheap contract is a big asset for a cap strapped team in Vancouver who will ask him to step up and produce in a top 9 role, similar to what Hoglander has done this year. Soucy is one of our only NHL d-men under contract for next year, and he's a solid 3rd pair guy that can play up to the 2nd pair and has fit well, and Juulsen is a local product and cheap 7th D who has actually played really well this season. Just don't see the value in Vancouver giving up 3 useful pieces for a 34 year old pending UFA.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
5 mai à 23 h 32
Sujet:
RHD will cost alot--Marner to VAN--JT on LTIR
Canucks won't be interested in Marner at all. He's a great player, but they don't have the cap space to afford his contract. Boeser for Marner doesn't make any sense, yes Marner is an upgrade but not nearly a big enough one to consider paying nearly double the salary for him over Boeser.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
4 mai à 23 h 10
Sujet:
LINDY V3
Canucks decline. They won't move Pettersson, but if they did, it would have to be something involving Dahlin. Power wouldn't get the conversation started.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
4 mai à 19 h 54
Sujet:
Unrealistic
Canucks decline. Hronek for Marner doesn't make sense from Vancouver's perspective. It fills the hole in the top 6, but puts Vancouver in a terrible cap position where they'd be losing multiple other key players, and it would leave them with no depth and a massive hole on the defence. It basically puts them back in the same position they were a few years ago, great top end forwards but no depth and terrible defence behind Hughes. If the Canucks move Hronek, it's because he's demanding too much money, in which case they'd move him for a top 4 RHD who will be cheaper to save them the cap so they have the space to keep guys like Joshua and Zadorov around.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
1 mai à 11 h 28
Sujet:
Its time
Doubt Vancouver would be interested in Couturier. His age and contract combination doesn’t fit the mold of the team they’re trying to build, I think they’d rather keep Garland who’s been amazing this year than take on the unnecessary risk of Couturier.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
1 mai à 11 h 26
Sujet:
Cernak Trades
Canucks decline. Hronek is way more valuable than Cernak, and Jeannot is barely an upgrade, if even one at all over Di Giuseppe. Di Giuseppe’s contract makes him more valuable to Vancouver than Jeannot, and Hronek is a better player than Cernak. Deal doesn’t make any sense from their perspective.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
1 mai à 0 h 38
Sujet:
Ponder
If the Canucks move Mikheyev, it's for cap space in which case they aren't retaining.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
1 mai à 0 h 29
Sujet:
2025 Maple Leafs
Canucks decline. Miller has more value to us than Nylander, Nylander may have the edge offensively but Miller is a far more complete player and his leadership is a major part of the Canucks success. Wouldn't swap Miller straight up for Nylander, and definitely wouldn't give up 2 1sts+ for Tavares and McCabe. This deal also puts Vancouver in a terrible cap situation where they'd be forced to lose Hronek plus all their depth, which would put them in the same situation they were a few years back with an amazing top 6 and absolutely no depth to support it.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
26 avr. à 12 h 55
Sujet:
Blow it up as much as we can
Hoglander isn’t available. With their current cap crunch, the Canucks are going to rely heavily on him to be a top 6 producer next year at an insanely cheap cap hit. Trading him for a much older player who we can’t afford doesn’t make any sense at all.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
25 avr. à 3 h 49
Sujet:
This years Kevin Fiala
Canucks are in a weird spot with Hronek. He's been great for us and has shown amazing chemistry with Hughes, and I think the Canucks should do everything they can to keep him. He fills a major hole on the right side of the top 4 that we've had for years, and has played his role to perfection. On the other hand, if the rumours of his wanting $8M+ are true and he's not willing to budge, I simply don't think the Canucks can afford to keep him with the cap crunch they are going to be under this offseason. With a ton of important UFA's due for raises (Lindholm, Blueger, Joshua, Lafferty, Zadorov), they're going to struggle to keep everyone together as is, and if Hronek wants $8M plus they'd probably have to look at moving him and brining in a different top 4 RHD to keep a more competitive team all around (Example: Canucks could put $8M towards Hronek and maybe only have $1M left for Joshua and have to let him walk, or they could move Hronek and look at someone like Montour or Pesce for $7M, leaving them with $2M which could be enough to keep Joshua around as well). Personally, I think the Canucks will be able to talk Hronek down and get something worked out in the end (my prediction is $7.25M x 7). People were talking about Pettersson as an absolute at $12.5M+, and he's making $1M less then that. I think there will definitely be rumours about Hronek that heat up in the offseason like Petey at the deadline, possibly as a tactic to try and bring his price down. Right now I'd be pretty surprised if he ended up being dealt this offseason, but I also do think it is a possibility that shouldn't be ruled out if negotiations don't go as planned.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
24 avr. à 0 h 4
Sujet:
2025-26 Playoffs
Canucks decline. No interest in Matheson, we already have two players who fill the same role but are better and younger in Hughes and Hronek. Matheson produces well because he gets top ice time and PP time in Montreal, in Vancouver he'd be 2nd/3rd pair with zero special teams time, which would cause him to fall off massively and not produce nearly as much. There's also the history with Pettersson, so a pretty easy no to Matheson ever wearing a Canucks jersey just based off of that, let alone the fact that he isn't a fit for this team in the slightest.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
22 avr. à 21 h 58
Sujet:
Blockbusters
A Hronek-Marner swap doesn’t make sense for Vancouver. It fills the hole in the top 6, but makes a much bigger one on the defence while putting a cap strapped team in an even worse cap situation. Also if that’s all it takes to sign Hronek then the Canucks will keep him, if he gets dealt he’s getting $8M+.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 avr. à 3 h 37
Sujet:
Ideal set up for next year
Don't think the Canucks would be interested in Faulk at all. In the end I think they'll talk some sense into Hronek and he'll resign (same as Petey where people were talking 12M+, then he took significantly less than expected). Assuming they did trade him, Faulk doesn't really fit the mold of the team. The new management group has been very clear since coming in that they're focused on acquiring younger talent who fit the timeline of their current core. In two and a half years, Rutherford and Allvin have only added two players on the wrong side of 30, Cole and DeSmith, and both were on 1 year deals to fill a major hole. Faulk, given his age and more importantly his term, just doesn't fit in with the clear vision management has for this team. I could maybe see them being interested if Faulk had one year, they didn't like any of the FA options or other trade market options, and the price was right, but I just don't think Faulk would fit in with the type of player Rutherford and Allvin have been looking to add to the Canucks core.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
7 avr. à 3 h 21
Sujet:
Next season
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mv21227</b></div><div>Laughably bad offer for Miller
Canucks counter with Mikheyev and Soucy for Suzuki</div></div>
It's a terrible offer for Miller, and Mikheyev and Soucy for Suzuki is the exact same equivalent I thought of when I saw that Miller deal too!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
5 avr. à 16 h 7
Sujet:
Hronek
Can’t see the Canucks being interested in that, it doesn’t fit their needs. I’d be hesitant to deal Boeser for Marner 1 for 1, let alone add a 1st and Hronek on top. Yes, Marner is an upgrade on Boeser, but he’s not enough of an upgrade to justify paying nearly twice the salary with Vancouver’s current cap situation. This deal would fill the need for a top 6 winger, but would leave a much bigger hole on the defence with only about $8M in cap space to sign 3 top 4 defencemen. With the current market, you’d be insanely lucky to get even 2 guys with that cap space, getting 3 isn’t even a possibility.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 avr. à 13 h 7
Sujet:
Marner for Hronek
Can’t see the Canucks being interested in this. The deal would leave them with like $8M in cap space to sign 3 top 4 defencemen, they’d be lucky to even get two with that amount of money. The hole in the top 6 would be fixed, but it would make a much bigger hole on the defence.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 avr. à 13 h 2
Sujet:
CanesCanucks
If that’s all it takes to sign Hronek, then the Canucks will pay him that. If they move him, he’s getting $8M x 8 absolute bare minimum, might be closer to $8.5M even.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
1 avr. à 17 h 54
Sujet:
Trades
Canucks easily decline. Lekkerimaki is a top prospect and is untouchable, they aren't trading him for a late first and two fringe NHLers who can't stay healthy for more than 20 games in a season.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
30 mars à 1 h 43
Sujet:
stanley cup champions
Canucks would rather sign Zadorov or Cole than give up assets for a worse player in Kulak.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
28 mars à 18 h 7
Sujet:
Offseason
Canucks will give you Mikheyev alone for that package. Hronek won't get moved, but if he did, the Canucks wouldn't trade him for a package that isn't even worth half of what they gave up to get him, especially after he's had a career year no less.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
27 mars à 15 h 51
Sujet:
A Fun Offseason
You want a breakout winger closing in on 40 goals with a near PPG pace, and all you're willing to give up is a conditional 2nd and a 3rd pairing defenceman. Canucks will give you Mikheyev or maybe Garland for that offer. Boeser isn't available to begin with, but certainly not for such an underpay.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
27 mars à 15 h 45
Sujet:
Hronek to the Caps
Hronek is having a career year, so why on earth would the Canucks trade him for less than half of what they paid to get him? That deal makes absolutely no sense, there's no reason to be selling Hronek, let alone for a massive underpay.
1
2
Suivant
Page 1
Remerciements à
Guillaume Lambert-Héon
pour l'aide à la traduction de l'anglais au français
SalarySwish
| Masses salariales de la NBA par CapFriendly
Conditions d’utilisation
Politique de confidentialité
Règlements du forum
À propos de nous
FAQ - Convention collective
Nous contacter
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com