SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Jake Trade Destinations Ranked By Best Options

Créé par: edeangel84
Équipe: 2023-24 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 2 mars 2024
Publié: 2 mars 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
It appears Vancouver is really interested according to Marek, and that is my top destination for Jake. Rutherford and Allvin know Jake and the possibility of an extension to play there seems to be a real possibility. I also think Reilly Smith could end up there in a swap involving Mikheyev.
Transactions
1.
PIT
  1. Åman, Nils
  2. Höglander, Nils
  3. Lekkerimäki, Jonathan
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (VAN)
Détails additionnels:
The possibility of an extension with Vancouver means they have an incentive to pay more to get the job done because Jake isn’t just a rental.
VAN
  1. Guentzel, Jake (3 000 000 $ retained)
2.
PIT
  1. Brisson, Brendan
  2. Dorofeyev, Pavel
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (VGK)
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (VGK)
VGK
    Jake 50%
    3.
    PIT
    1. Broberg, Philip
    2. Holloway, Dylan
    3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (EDM)
    4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (EDM)
    EDM
      Jake 50%
      4.
      PIT
      1. Kaliyev, Arthur
      2. Turcotte, Alex
      3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (LAK)
      4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (LAK)
      Détails additionnels:
      By far the least likely trade
      LAK
      Rachats de contrats
      Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
      Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
      2024
      Logo de VGK
      Logo de EDM
      Logo de LAK
      Logo de PIT
      Logo de PIT
      Logo de PIT
      Logo de PIT
      Logo de NYR
      2025
      Logo de PIT
      Logo de VAN
      Logo de PIT
      Logo de VGK
      Logo de EDM
      Logo de LAK
      Logo de PIT
      Logo de PIT
      Logo de PIT
      Logo de PIT
      2026
      Logo de PIT
      Logo de PIT
      Logo de PIT
      Logo de SJS
      Logo de PIT
      Logo de PIT
      Logo de PIT
      Logo de CHI
      TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
      3283 500 000 $90 939 759 $0 $3 737 500 $-7 439 759 $
      Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
      Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
      5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
      AG, AD
      M-NTC
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
      8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
      C
      NMC
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
      5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
      AD, AG
      M-NTC
      UFA - 5
      Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
      925 000 $925 000 $
      AG
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
      6 100 000 $6 100 000 $
      C
      NMC
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
      3 125 000 $3 125 000 $
      AD, C
      NMC
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
      850 000 $850 000 $
      AG
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
      2 450 000 $2 450 000 $
      C
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
      900 000 $900 000 $
      AD, AG
      RFA - 1
      Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
      775 000 $775 000 $
      AG
      RFA - 1
      Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
      2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
      C, AD
      M-NTC
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
      800 000 $800 000 $
      AD
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
      1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
      AG, AD
      RFA - 2
      Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
      883 750 $883 750 $
      C
      RFA - 1
      Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
      775 000 $775 000 $
      AD, AG
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
      825 000 $825 000 $
      AG, AD
      RFA - 1
      Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
      925 000 $925 000 $
      C, AG, AD
      RFA - 2
      Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
      775 000 $775 000 $
      AD, C
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
      925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance650 000 $$650K)
      AG, C
      RFA - 1
      Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
      894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance1 550 000 $$2M)
      C
      RFA - 1
      Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
      950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance475 000 $$475K)
      AD, C
      RFA - 3
      Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
      894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
      AD, AG
      RFA - 1
      Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
      Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
      4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
      DG
      M-NTC
      UFA - 6
      Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
      10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
      DD
      NMC
      UFA - 4
      Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
      5 375 000 $5 375 000 $
      G
      M-NTC
      UFA - 5
      Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
      4 025 175 $4 025 175 $
      DG
      M-NTC
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
      6 100 000 $6 100 000 $
      DD
      NMC
      UFA - 5
      Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
      1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
      G
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
      825 000 $825 000 $
      DG
      RFA - 1
      Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
      800 000 $800 000 $
      DD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
      775 000 $775 000 $
      DG
      RFA - 2
      Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
      863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
      DG
      RFA - 1
      Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
      Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
      5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
      AD, AG
      NMC
      UFA - 5
      Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
      900 000 $900 000 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 2

      Code d'intégration

      • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
      • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

      Texte intégré

      Cliquer pour surligner
      2 mars à 8 h 23
      #1
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: oct. 2020
      Messages: 10,662
      Mentions "j'aime": 8,259
      That Vancouver trade is too much. Take out Lekkerimakki and it's on par with your other values. Just don't see them giving him up at all.
      remowilliams a aimé ceci.
      2 mars à 8 h 30
      #2
      Démarrer sujet
      JimmyPaek
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: avr. 2019
      Messages: 3,971
      Mentions "j'aime": 1,184
      Quoting: Lancebmx
      That Vancouver trade is too much. Take out Lekkerimakki and it's on par with your other values. Just don't see them giving him up at all.


      I stated it’s only that much with extension.
      SydBarrett a aimé ceci.
      2 mars à 8 h 36
      #3
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: oct. 2020
      Messages: 10,662
      Mentions "j'aime": 8,259
      Quoting: edeangel84
      I stated it’s only that much with extension.


      The value of an extension isn't worth a top prospect though.
      remowilliams a aimé ceci.
      2 mars à 8 h 50
      #4
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mars 2023
      Messages: 2,813
      Mentions "j'aime": 956
      The Van trade is a bit too much. Remove Aman.
      The Vegas trade is about right.
      The Edmonton trade is a bit light, add Bourgault
      SydBarrett a aimé ceci.
      2 mars à 8 h 51
      #5
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mars 2023
      Messages: 2,813
      Mentions "j'aime": 956
      Quoting: Lancebmx
      The value of an extension isn't worth a top prospect though.


      The value of Guentzel is worth a lot. He is a top winger in the NHL
      edeangel84 et SydBarrett a aimé ceci.
      2 mars à 8 h 54
      #6
      Syd Barret
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: sept. 2018
      Messages: 996
      Mentions "j'aime": 481
      Quoting: Lancebmx
      The value of an extension isn't worth a top prospect though.


      Since when isn’t a top 5 LW extended not worth a top prospect? That’s news to me
      edeangel84 a aimé ceci.
      2 mars à 8 h 57
      #7
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: oct. 2020
      Messages: 10,662
      Mentions "j'aime": 8,259
      Quoting: SydBarrett
      Since when isn’t a top 5 LW extended not worth a top prospect? That’s news to me


      A negotiated extension is not worth a top prospect. The value for Vancouver is alot more than these other trades.
      remowilliams a aimé ceci.
      2 mars à 8 h 57
      #8
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: oct. 2020
      Messages: 10,662
      Mentions "j'aime": 8,259
      Quoting: Victor24
      The value of Guentzel is worth a lot. He is a top winger in the NHL


      Yes that is true but Vancouver is paying a ton and according to the OP, the extension alone is worth a top prospect.
      2 mars à 9 h 7
      #9
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mars 2023
      Messages: 2,813
      Mentions "j'aime": 956
      Quoting: Lancebmx
      A negotiated extension is not worth a top prospect. The value for Vancouver is alot more than these other trades.


      If you remove Aman, it's on par with Vegas
      2 mars à 9 h 9
      #10
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mars 2023
      Messages: 2,813
      Mentions "j'aime": 956
      Quoting: Lancebmx
      Yes that is true but Vancouver is paying a ton and according to the OP, the extension alone is worth a top prospect.


      I can't speak for OP but Lekkerimaki + 1st + Hoglander is a fair price for Guentzel without an extension (IMO)
      SydBarrett a aimé ceci.
      2 mars à 10 h 10
      #11
      Démarrer sujet
      JimmyPaek
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: avr. 2019
      Messages: 3,971
      Mentions "j'aime": 1,184
      Quoting: Lancebmx
      A negotiated extension is not worth a top prospect. The value for Vancouver is alot more than these other trades.


      If he extends it’s more than worth it. The reporting from Vancouver indicates they feel there’s a real chance of extending him. https://thehockeynews.com/nhl/vancouver-canucks/latest-news/jake-guentzel-vancouver-canucks-pittsburgh-penguins-trade-deadline
      SydBarrett a aimé ceci.
      2 mars à 10 h 30
      #12
      Syd Barret
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: sept. 2018
      Messages: 996
      Mentions "j'aime": 481
      Quoting: Lancebmx
      A negotiated extension is not worth a top prospect. The value for Vancouver is alot more than these other trades.


      So then it would be fair for the pens to trade a 1st, pickering, and blomqvist for Larkin ?
      2 mars à 11 h 38
      #13
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: févr. 2018
      Messages: 118
      Mentions "j'aime": 21
      L
      Quoting: Lancebmx
      That Vancouver trade is too much. Take out Lekkerimakki and it's on par with your other values. Just don't see them giving him up at all.


      Completely disagree. This is a 40 goal scorer coming to your team with an extension for the duration of your window. The prospect you’re talking about is going to come to NA and likely spend atleast one full year in the AHL before trying to crack a lineup in the NHL AND MAYBE, with some LUCK, he might just be the next JAKE GUENTZEL in 5-7 years.
      2 mars à 12 h 28
      #14
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: oct. 2020
      Messages: 10,662
      Mentions "j'aime": 8,259
      Quoting: SydBarrett
      So then it would be fair for the pens to trade a 1st, pickering, and blomqvist for Larkin ?


      Larkin isn't on the table so obviously not.
      2 mars à 13 h 39
      #15
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juill. 2021
      Messages: 1,361
      Mentions "j'aime": 593
      Van isn’t making that trade. It’s a huge overpay compared to the other deals. Hoglander is far better than any of the fringe NHL players in the other deals and Lekkerimaki is by far the best prospect of all the trades. I don’t think Van would include either one of them in a Guentzel trade. I think it would be something like Podkolzin, Raty, a 1st and maybe another small piece
      2 mars à 13 h 42
      #16
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: févr. 2022
      Messages: 1,528
      Mentions "j'aime": 1,063
      Canucks aren't making that deal. Can't see them moving Hoglander with how good he's played this season, he'll be asked to take a step up next year and his bargain contract is a major asset to a cap strapped team. Lekkerimaki is also untouchable, any trade that starts with him ends there too. No team is giving up their top prospects for Guentzel, regardless of how many times Pens fans post it.
      2 mars à 15 h 25
      #17
      Syd Barret
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: sept. 2018
      Messages: 996
      Mentions "j'aime": 481
      Quoting: Lancebmx
      Larkin isn't on the table so obviously not.


      But the offer is fair , yes ?
      2 mars à 18 h 21
      #18
      Démarrer sujet
      JimmyPaek
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: avr. 2019
      Messages: 3,971
      Mentions "j'aime": 1,184
      Quoting: Aasen6
      Van isn’t making that trade. It’s a huge overpay compared to the other deals. Hoglander is far better than any of the fringe NHL players in the other deals and Lekkerimaki is by far the best prospect of all the trades. I don’t think Van would include either one of them in a Guentzel trade. I think it would be something like Podkolzin, Raty, a 1st and maybe another small piece


      If he is signing an 8 year extension then you’re going to pay more in a trade.
      2 mars à 18 h 21
      #19
      Démarrer sujet
      JimmyPaek
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: avr. 2019
      Messages: 3,971
      Mentions "j'aime": 1,184
      Quoting: Epic_Ninja_Dude
      Canucks aren't making that deal. Can't see them moving Hoglander with how good he's played this season, he'll be asked to take a step up next year and his bargain contract is a major asset to a cap strapped team. Lekkerimaki is also untouchable, any trade that starts with him ends there too. No team is giving up their top prospects for Guentzel, regardless of how many times Pens fans post it.


      IF HE IS EXTENDED
       
      Répondre
      To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
      Question:
      Options:
      Ajouter une option
      Soumettre le sondage