It's a good idea and I would love chunky but nurse is to important to the organization and he has only gotten better and better. His skating is amazing. He's a big part of our future so I'd have to say no to this trade

You have to give to receive ... Of course you loose a piece if you acquire something of Galchenyuk magnitude . Could be the ideal partner for McGod very cerebral , like to slow the game , both sniper and playmaker. Maroon + Nurse vs Galchenyuk + 2nd (mtl) + McCarron maybe ? Darrell Nurse would be ideal to play alongside Shea Weber or a horse .

Of course I agree it's a good offer but strome looks to be working alright beside McDavid and I'd rather keep nurse he's strong, big, and effective. He's young and has a lot to learn and grow and means to much to the oilers

Is this actually true? That it's confirmed.

Isn't Galchenyuk a LW? Edmonton has their left side pretty set with Maroon, Lucic and Jokinen - it's their right side that has question marks. Besides, with Sekera out until January, why would they want to trade a serviceable defenseman?

I think you just made this up. It makes no sense from Edmonton's side.

I wouldn't do this If I was the Habs. We need scoring more than another dman. Its why we gave up Sergachev for Drouin.

Source?

I just don't see why Edmonton would want Galchenyuk.

It really doesn't matter if he made it up, it just makes zero sense for both teams. Edmonton needs defensemen even now. There is zero reason why they move one of their most promising Dmen to get more scoring when that is not a problem

Maroon will probably walk or get paid big time , Galchenyuk is a special case ... Played mostly Lw in Nhl but play RW in Pp and a lot of insiders see him possibly play RW but it remains to be seen ...

Me . A1111 . A is the first letter (essential) . 1 is the first number = A source very near .

This is exactly why it will happen ! When was the last time Chiarelli made sense ? Except for that one time when he said on the phone (while trading Seguin) QUOTE :«'' i would like to have a first with it , but since you have none im gonna take a second with it '' BRILLANT .