Matheson is valuable enough on his own to get that pick (not that MIN are even interested) so why add a prospect and a late 1st

Fair value for Marino…but I think we would want less in picks, more in player, if we can get it.

Struble option likely preferred over Harris option.

No they're not



No he's not

I don't think Matheson alone is worth 13 but maybe with 26 he is - MTL Fans hold him high (even me sometimes) but being realistic he could maybe get a T22 pick by himself and thats a maybe still

Figured it was close for value, I know NJ and Habs fans been going at it for a month now over Matheson for 10th lol had to change it up

Oh yes he is

Matheson is not really a fit here…we have offensive dmen.

Struble perhaps…really depends on what other moves we make (do we sign Pesce, etc)

No he's not

I think Matheson gets a 50-65 pick if dealt. So Wild could probably send #45 and get change back.

Mike Matheson ?

Mike Matheson

Matheson for pick 50-65 is the entire deal?

Wild don't want Matheson but that's certainly a reasonable deal, unlike Matheson for 13.

Yes, defenseman who can play 25 minutes a night and score 62 points while making less than 5m sure do available for a 2nd rnd pick

Calm down, he's playing 25 minutes a night in Montreal and you guys are about to pick 5th overall tomorrow. That's not a flex. On a real team he doesn't get the opportunity for 25 minutes or the PP opportunity for 62 points. You guys just don't have anything better, which (full circle moment) is why you're picking 5th overall.

For the record, I think he would return more than just a late 2nd, but we're talking a late 2nd and a C+ prospect, not the 13th overall pick.

Any defenseman in the NHL can play 25 minutes a night if you give it to them.

The question is are they effective hockey players.

Is Mike Matheson a net positive on the ice in any situation? I’m not sure he is.

Definitely not on the PK, where he’s awful.

Not a great PP QB, as much as MTL tries to run their PP through him to virtually 0 success.

And not particularly good 5v5

Anyone who knows anything about montreal knows they didn't finish bottom 5 because of the D, the F group outside the top line couldn't score and montreal had the most games a team lost by one goal (by a wide margin)

Yet he got 62 points

Anyone who knows anything about hockey knows you don't finish bottom 5 unless your entire team sucks. Your forwards suck, your defense sucks, your goaltending sucks.

Montreal finished 2nd to last in expected goals allowed.

one of the worst PPs in the NHL (matheson is a big part of that lack of success)
One of the worst PKs in hockey (Matheson is a big part of that lack of success)

Yeah if you give a guy 5 minutes a night of a PP that runs exclusively through him he'll put up some points.

Pretty much. He'd likely return a late 1st from a contender looking to add depth. Minnesota is not that team.

I don't think it's likely. I think it's an outside chance he returns a late 1st. Pure OFD who shouldn't be your best PPQB, poor defense, no physical presence. This is not the type of player that playoff teams covet, this is Shayne Gostisbehere.

Wild are not movie back from #13. I'm certain #13 is on the table for McGrarty

I have seen you type out his name 3 times, all 3 times have been spelled different, and all 3 times have been spelled incorrectly

Thanks?

I have same you post this same stupid trade multiple times.