SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

utah yeti

Créé par: iggy12rocks
Équipe: 2024-25 Utah Hockey Club
Date de création initiale: 23 mai 2024
Publié: 23 mai 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
66 000 000 $
44 330 000 $
32 000 000 $
23 000 000 $
22 000 000 $
2900 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
57 400 000 $
25 000 000 $
12 000 000 $
22 800 000 $
Transactions
UTA
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (CBJ)
Détails additionnels:
Top ten protected.
If the jackets make the playoffs and Vejmelka plays in 50 or more games utah gets a 2025 3rd also
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de UTA
Logo de UTA
Logo de FLA
Logo de WSH
Logo de UTA
Logo de COL
Logo de EDM
Logo de UTA
Logo de SJS
Logo de UTA
Logo de UTA
Logo de DAL
Logo de UTA
2025
Logo de UTA
Logo de CBJ
Logo de UTA
Logo de TOR
Logo de EDM
Logo de NYR
Logo de UTA
Logo de NYR
Logo de UTA
Logo de UTA
Logo de UTA
2026
Logo de UTA
Logo de UTA
Logo de NYR
Logo de OTT
Logo de UTA
Logo de CAR
Logo de UTA
Logo de UTA
Logo de UTA
Logo de UTA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2187 700 000 $69 102 500 $0 $4 350 000 $18 597 500 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Utah Hockey Club
7 150 000 $7 150 000 $
AG, AD
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Utah Hockey Club
5 850 000 $5 850 000 $
AD, C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA
Logo de Utah Hockey Club
3 425 000 $3 425 000 $
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Utah Hockey Club
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 500 000 $$4M)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Utah Hockey Club
4 300 000 $4 300 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Utah Hockey Club
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Utah Hockey Club
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Utah Hockey Club
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Utah Hockey Club
775 000 $775 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Utah Hockey Club
1 599 999 $1 599 999 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Utah Hockey Club
925 000 $925 000 $
AD
RFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
7 400 000 $7 400 000 $
DG
UFA
Logo de Utah Hockey Club
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DG/DD
RFA
Logo de Utah Hockey Club
1 950 000 $1 950 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Utah Hockey Club
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG
RFA
Logo de Utah Hockey Club
4 330 000 $4 330 000 $
DG/DD
RFA
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
UFA
2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
DG
UFA
Logo de Utah Hockey Club
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Utah Hockey Club
900 000 $900 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Utah Hockey Club
7 857 143 $7 857 143 $
DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
23 mai à 19 h 6
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 4,780
Mentions "j'aime": 1,192
You want a 1st for a bust C and a goaltender? No. If you are willing to trade Keller we could have discussions but as for this trade…no.
benjgc et Viqsi a aimé ceci.
23 mai à 19 h 31
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 2,674
Mentions "j'aime": 2,428
That trade makes sense for a contender looking for a bounceback/breakout candidate with a high draft pedigree and a need for a new starter.

It does not, however, make sense for Columbus, a team with no less than 3 capable starters, no fewer than 10 bounceback candidates of our own, and an affinity for finishing dead last in the east.
Viqsi a aimé ceci.
23 mai à 19 h 48
#3
19 lotteries, 0 wins
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 1,299
Mentions "j'aime": 799
Would rather have Sillinger in the middle 6 C position not him, and we have Greaves, Tarasov, Ivanov going forward unless presented with a bonafied starter
23 mai à 20 h 19
#4
Jesus Christ Is King
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 2,873
Mentions "j'aime": 824
McBain and Utah's 2nd round pick this year for WPG's 26th OA this year and MTL's 5th round pick next year.
Take Dvorak's final year back and ill throw in and ill add Barron or Kovacevic and upgrade that 5th to a 2nd round pick

Utah swaps out 4th line Centers , get better faceoff wins if nothing else but loses physicality to do it
Have him play Dvorak's Wing with Doan and have Hayton learn then take over the Center role full time
Evans only got better as a Faceoff Center since Dvo arrived and its the one single solitary positive about him being on the ice.
55% Faceoff win rate and with the current roster only Duchene can say he's as high or higher.
He's still a cap dump in his final year but he's a good 4th line faceoff center option who might help 1/4 Utah Centers get a Win Rate above 50% this year
Utah can sell him at the trade deadline if they show he's a good 4th line Center for Bulk Faceoffs similar to how Matt Cullen finished his career taking 2nd most on the team with 4th line minutes

Come TDL you'll have Dvo to move and Hayton proving he can be a reliable faceoff guy so he can provide something others dont on another team then work his way up .
If Hayton can maintain a 52% win rate and hit 350-500 by the TDL then i could see teams willing to invest in the 6'1 207lb Center
A cap strapped team will see him as a good gamble if they are shown there is something to build on

Plus Utah's GM gets the chance to profit off Dvorak twice
Why McBain? Hughes was runner up to sign McBain who's the perfect Power Center for MTL to skate beside Slafkovsky and Dach
That said Slaf is on top line now but Dach could still use that boost and our team could use the Physicality he brings

I know a late 1st compared to a CBJ 1st isnt quite what you'd want
But its a deep draft and its still a good pick plus Utah can use it and its numerous 2nd rounders to trade up if thats their desire and get more immediate impact.
If you take Dvorak then you'll be getting a 1st and 2nd so if you trade up it will cover the majority of the cost while acquiring you a similar pick that you were shooting for.
If you get lucky with Dvorak and shop him at the TDL it could recover a decent chunk of the remaining cost to trade up while leaving Hayton still in play hopefully rebounding
iggy12rocks a aimé ceci.
24 mai à 12 h 49
#5
Démarrer sujet
Wayne glenskyisaGOAT
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2024
Messages: 541
Mentions "j'aime": 129
Quoting: Billy316
McBain and Utah's 2nd round pick this year for WPG's 26th OA this year and MTL's 5th round pick next year.
Take Dvorak's final year back and ill throw in and ill add Barron or Kovacevic and upgrade that 5th to a 2nd round pick

Utah swaps out 4th line Centers , get better faceoff wins if nothing else but loses physicality to do it
Have him play Dvorak's Wing with Doan and have Hayton learn then take over the Center role full time
Evans only got better as a Faceoff Center since Dvo arrived and its the one single solitary positive about him being on the ice.
55% Faceoff win rate and with the current roster only Duchene can say he's as high or higher.
He's still a cap dump in his final year but he's a good 4th line faceoff center option who might help 1/4 Utah Centers get a Win Rate above 50% this year
Utah can sell him at the trade deadline if they show he's a good 4th line Center for Bulk Faceoffs similar to how Matt Cullen finished his career taking 2nd most on the team with 4th line minutes

Come TDL you'll have Dvo to move and Hayton proving he can be a reliable faceoff guy so he can provide something others dont on another team then work his way up .
If Hayton can maintain a 52% win rate and hit 350-500 by the TDL then i could see teams willing to invest in the 6'1 207lb Center
A cap strapped team will see him as a good gamble if they are shown there is something to build on

Plus Utah's GM gets the chance to profit off Dvorak twice
Why McBain? Hughes was runner up to sign McBain who's the perfect Power Center for MTL to skate beside Slafkovsky and Dach
That said Slaf is on top line now but Dach could still use that boost and our team could use the Physicality he brings

I know a late 1st compared to a CBJ 1st isnt quite what you'd want
But its a deep draft and its still a good pick plus Utah can use it and its numerous 2nd rounders to trade up if thats their desire and get more immediate impact.
If you take Dvorak then you'll be getting a 1st and 2nd so if you trade up it will cover the majority of the cost while acquiring you a similar pick that you were shooting for.
If you get lucky with Dvorak and shop him at the TDL it could recover a decent chunk of the remaining cost to trade up while leaving Hayton still in play hopefully rebounding


Jesus Christ is king
Billy316 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage