This is the definition of trading the future and "disrupting the plan" for short term gain.

They don't want to block LD spots.
This doesn't help them with the weak forward group.

Swap "Boldy" for "Brodin and 13OA" and we can talk.

no they arent and what they are missing from being competitive more scoring in their top 6 not another left shot dman.

Yer funny

Habs arent in cap trouble so getting rid of Anderson is nothing to us

Like John said above, Brodin isn't the piece Habs would be asking for from the Wild to move back that far

Montreal is overfilled with Defense, they don't need more.

What they need is a top6 forward. habs_need_Scoring specified Boldy cause he fits that need and age. Montreal would be better to keep Anderson and the picks. Select Lindstrom themselves.

As it stands Montreal declines the trade offer.

No need for another LHD. Need of a young top 6 forward.

Lol that's not funny, that's the true price to going in the top 5.......

Good one

I mean, we know that's 100% not gonna happen because that's doesn't make sense.

Thanks! I try to be funny and fair to all, unlike the trade that you originally proposed which was unfair to the Habs.