SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

At Draft

Créé par: NHLfan10506
Équipe: 2024-25 Devils du New Jersey
Date de création initiale: 3 mai 2024
Publié: 3 mai 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
In total...

NJD gives: #10, #154, Nolan Foote, Nico Daws
NJD gets: #24, #37, #48, #59, Hayes, Hill, Jones, Schmid


----

Draft
#24 -- Emil Hemming (RW, TPS, Liiga)

#37 -- Alfons Freij (LHD, Vaxjo, SHL)
#48 -- Hagen Burrows (C/W, Sioux City, USHL)
#59 -- Ilya Protas (LW, Des Moines, USHL)

#75 -- Adam Kleber (RHD, Lincoln, USHL)
#93 -- Tomas Lavoie (RHD, Cape Breton, QMJHL)
#97 -- Sam O'Reilly (RW, London, OHL)

#139 -- Mikhail Yegorov (G, Omaha, USHL)

#171 -- Darels Uljanskis (LHD, AIK, SHL)
#180 -- Carson Pilgrim (C, Tri-City, USHL)
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3950 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
33 500 000 $
21 100 000 $
2875 000 $
2825 000 $
2825 000 $
2775 000 $
2775 000 $
1775 000 $
21 350 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
32 300 000 $
2825 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Hemming, Emil
3950 000 $
Freij, Alfons
3950 000 $
Burrows, Hagen
3950 000 $
Kleber, Adam
3950 000 $
Transactions
1.
NJD
  1. Hayes, Kevin (1 785 714 $ retained)
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (STL)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (STL)
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (NYR)
Détails additionnels:
Puckpedia pick values

1st (#16) = 23.5
2nd (#48) = 5.4
3rd (#97) = 1.3

Hayes - Foote = 4.0 *

(*implied, late 2nd value)
STL
  1. Foote, Nolan
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (NJD)
Détails additionnels:
Puckpedia pick values

1st (#10) = 34.2





https://puckpedia.com/pickvalue
2.
NJD
  1. Hill, Adin
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (VGK)
  3. Choix de 6e ronde en 2024 (VGK)
Détails additionnels:
Puckpedia pick values

1st (#19) = 19.8
6th (#180) = 0.3

Hill - Daws = 3.1 *

(*implied, late 2nd value)
VGK
  1. Daws, Nico
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (STL)
Détails additionnels:
Puckpedia pick values

1st (#16) = 23.5





https://puckpedia.com/pickvalue
3.
NJD
  1. Jones, Max [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (EDM)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (BOS)
Détails additionnels:
Puckpedia pick values

1st (#24) = 15.2
2nd (#59) = 3.7

Jones = 1.6 *

(*implied, mid 3rd value)
ANA
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (VGK)
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2024 (COL)
Détails additionnels:
Puckpedia pick values

1st (#19) = 19.8
5th (#154) = 0.6
4.
NJD
  1. Schmidt, Nate (1 500 000 $ retained)
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (MTL)
WPG
Frais appliqués
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de EDM
Logo de STL
Logo de BOS
Logo de MTL
Logo de NJD
Logo de WPG
Logo de NYR
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de VGK
2025
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de WPG
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
2026
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de DAL
Logo de WPG
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2387 700 000 $86 837 112 $1 538 897 $5 950 000 $862 888 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
UFA - 6
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
8 800 000 $8 800 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD, C
RFA
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
C, AG
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
1 785 715 $1 785 715 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 3
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
AG, C
UFA
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AG, AD
RFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 850 000 $$2M)
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 925 000 $1 925 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
918 333 $918 333 $ (Bonis de performance3 250 000 $$3M)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
4 450 000 $4 450 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
825 000 $825 000 $
DG/DD, AG
UFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
3 mai à 8 h 59
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2023
Messages: 162
Mentions "j'aime": 43
blues accept
noted a aimé ceci.
3 mai à 9 h 27
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 17,511
Mentions "j'aime": 7,672
Winnipeg isn't giving up that pick and retaining to move Schmidt.
CF18GM a aimé ceci.
3 mai à 9 h 39
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,149
Mentions "j'aime": 13,194
I don’t get why we would move up to 19 honestly

What would Edmonton’s 1st & Gibby come out to?
3 mai à 9 h 43
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 43,417
Mentions "j'aime": 19,640
Quoting: Windjammer
Winnipeg isn't giving up that pick and retaining to move Schmidt.


Cheaper than a buyout (for two years).

It has often taken a 1st to move a year of ~$6m (Marleau, Monahan, etc). And 2nd plus for cap hits closer to $5m (Stralman, Zaitsev, Ladd, Johnson, Nemeth, etc).
3 mai à 9 h 47
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 43,417
Mentions "j'aime": 19,640
Quoting: GeneralLandro
I don’t get why we would move up to 19 honestly

What would Edmonton’s 1st & Gibby come out to?


Early 2nd probably. If they eat cap, there is probably profit to be made….but selling now = Mrazek comp.
3 mai à 9 h 57
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 17,511
Mentions "j'aime": 7,672
Quoting: NHLfan10506
Cheaper than a buyout (for two years).

It has often taken a 1st to move a year of ~$6m (Marleau, Monahan, etc). And 2nd plus for cap hits closer to $5m (Stralman, Zaitsev, Ladd, Johnson, Nemeth, etc).


Not really. All 2nds aren't created equal and this one is basically a first. Way too much for $4.5 of cap for a year and then the Jets don't draft until the 4th round.

The buyout option is far cheaper.
CF18GM a aimé ceci.
3 mai à 12 h 22
#7
Future Ducks legend
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 10,963
Mentions "j'aime": 7,779
Don't think the math on that works out to give up a 2nd to move up 5 spots to 19. Typically around 20 or so it's just a crapshoot who hits.
3 mai à 12 h 37
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 43,417
Mentions "j'aime": 19,640
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
Don't think the math on that works out to give up a 2nd to move up 5 spots to 19. Typically around 20 or so it's just a crapshoot who hits.


All dependent on how draft goes…would have to be a guy Ducks like at 19 that likely won’t be around at 24.
3 mai à 13 h 53
#9
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 30,428
Mentions "j'aime": 11,701
The Blues are NOT paying their 24 2nd (or anything, really) for Foote. Go back to the last trade you had.
3 mai à 15 h 22
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 3,098
Mentions "j'aime": 1,106
Quoting: mokumboi
The Blues are NOT paying their 24 2nd (or anything, really) for Foote. Go back to the last trade you had.


Who cares about Foote here. They’re moving up to 10. They would do this
3 mai à 17 h 20
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 43,417
Mentions "j'aime": 19,640
Quoting: noted
Who cares about Foote here. They’re moving up to 10. They would do this


It probably depends more on who is there/not there at #10…moreso than taking a risk Foote’s health.
4 mai à 12 h 46
#12
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 30,428
Mentions "j'aime": 11,701
Quoting: noted
Who cares about Foote here. They’re moving up to 10. They would do this


I cate about paying a middle 24 2nd for him, as should you. His previous iterations were very acceptable. This one goes too far.
4 mai à 14 h 10
#13
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 43,417
Mentions "j'aime": 19,640
Quoting: mokumboi
I cate about paying a middle 24 2nd for him, as should you. His previous iterations were very acceptable. This one goes too far.


Note it’s Nolan Foote, not Cal.

Picks for picks…Foote for Hayes
4 mai à 14 h 11
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 3,098
Mentions "j'aime": 1,106
Quoting: mokumboi
I cate about paying a middle 24 2nd for him, as should you. His previous iterations were very acceptable. This one goes too far.


He’s getting rid of Hayes and paying a 2nd and 3rd to move up to 10 overall….again - who cares about Foote
4 mai à 15 h 30
#15
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 30,428
Mentions "j'aime": 11,701
Quoting: NHLfan10506
Note it’s Nolan Foote, not Cal.

Picks for picks…Foote for Hayes


I'm well aware.

Nah. This is exactly the STL 2nd for Foote beyond the trade you had right before this one. Like maybe one page later. Go back to that one, this one is asking too much. And even if it's how you described, you left that 2x1.75 retention out of the equation. The Blues are NOT paying for Foote. Serves no purpose whatsoever. You keep adding and adding and adding. That's not gonna work.
4 mai à 15 h 32
#16
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 30,428
Mentions "j'aime": 11,701
Quoting: noted
He’s getting rid of Hayes and paying a 2nd and 3rd to move up to 10 overall….again - who cares about Foote


Dude. The AGM he had right before this one was exactly this trade minus an extra 24 2nd for Foote added on. We are not paying anything for Foote, let alone a 24 2nd we still need.
4 mai à 20 h 44
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 3,098
Mentions "j'aime": 1,106
Quoting: mokumboi
Dude. The AGM he had right before this one was exactly this trade minus an extra 24 2nd for Foote added on. We are not paying anything for Foote, let alone a 24 2nd we still need.


Ok - was not aware of other one
mokumboi a aimé ceci.
4 mai à 21 h 49
#18
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 43,417
Mentions "j'aime": 19,640
Quoting: mokumboi
I'm well aware.

Nah. This is exactly the STL 2nd for Foote beyond the trade you had right before this one. Like maybe one page later. Go back to that one, this one is asking too much. And even if it's how you described, you left that 2x1.75 retention out of the equation. The Blues are NOT paying for Foote. Serves no purpose whatsoever. You keep adding and adding and adding. That's not gonna work.


It’s just for variety…don’t want to send same trade each time. I think I have done #10/#16+2nd and #10/#16+2025 2nd+4th before too.
5 mai à 12 h 37
#19
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 30,428
Mentions "j'aime": 11,701
Quoting: NHLfan10506
It’s just for variety…don’t want to send same trade each time. I think I have done #10/#16+2nd and #10/#16+2025 2nd+4th before too.


I hear ya. But more variety is not inherently better. smile
5 mai à 12 h 41
#20
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 43,417
Mentions "j'aime": 19,640
Quoting: mokumboi
I hear ya. But more variety is not inherently better. smile


Will never be “that guy” who posts exact same ACGM over and over.
5 mai à 12 h 50
#21
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 30,428
Mentions "j'aime": 11,701
Quoting: NHLfan10506
Will never be “that guy” who posts exact same ACGM over and over.


I get that, but those that annoy generally are the wholly unrealistic trades that get posted ad nauseum despite all criticism. If you have one everybody agrees on, I'd just run with it.

But anyway... yeah, I think it's safe to remove Foote for a 2nd from any future iterations.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage