SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

What pieces matter now

Créé par: DopeGM
Équipe: 2024-25 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 30 avr. 2024
Publié: 30 avr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
The rebuild is still in “BPA” territory but LHS D looks really well populated so that eliminates a lot of the BPA around their range (Buium, Silayev, Dickenson).

I don’t think they should grab a smaller forward. It doesn’t matter at this stage of the rebuild but it’s not ideal. And it’s probably too early a pick to grab Catton anyways.

So it seems to come down to Demidov and Levshunov. Two great picks. Both fill needs.

If they grab a long term top sixer this summer like a Necas, I would think they are one more bad year away from having all the pieces! This assumes Moore can pan out as the number 2 C which seems like a very reasonable bet.

Exciting times ahead for Hawks fans.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3950 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
1850 000 $
1850 000 $
1850 000 $
1850 000 $
86 250 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Demidov, Ivan
3950 000 $
Levshunov, Artem
3950 000 $
Transactions
CHI
  1. Necas, Martin [Droits de RFA]
CAR
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (CHI)
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (DAL)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2026 (TOR)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de CHI
Logo de TBL
Logo de LAK
Logo de VAN
Logo de CHI
Logo de OTT
Logo de CGY
Logo de CHI
2025
Logo de CHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de NYR
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2026
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de NYI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de OTT
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2387 500 000 $66 303 333 $0 $5 457 500 $21 196 667 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Demidov, Ivan
950 000 $950 000 $
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 500 000 $$4M)
C
RFA - 2
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
AD
RFA
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $
C
RFA
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AG, C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance900 000 $$900K)
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
850 000 $850 000 $
C
RFA
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
850 000 $850 000 $
AD
RFA
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, C
RFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
918 333 $918 333 $ (Bonis de performance1 000 000 $$1M)
DG
RFA - 2
Levshunov, Artem
950 000 $950 000 $
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
962 500 $962 500 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
855 833 $855 833 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
30 avr. à 10 h 30
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 378
Mentions "j'aime": 105
Canes probably ask for a first
Hawksguy81 a aimé ceci.
30 avr. à 10 h 31
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,534
Mentions "j'aime": 537
If they trade Necas, they surely can do better than three 2nds.

Awful proposal
Hawksguy81 a aimé ceci.
30 avr. à 10 h 40
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,295
Mentions "j'aime": 9,751
Quoting: spockrock
If they trade Necas, they surely can do better than three 2nds.

Awful proposal


"awful" is exaggerating a bit
30 avr. à 10 h 41
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,534
Mentions "j'aime": 537
Quoting: ChiHawk
"awful" is exaggerating a bit


Please explain how the Canes dealing Necas for those picks isn’t awful?
30 avr. à 10 h 43
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,295
Mentions "j'aime": 9,751
Quoting: spockrock
Please explain how the Canes dealing Necas for those picks isn’t awful?


Necas is worth a 1st and probably 2nd, but (3) 2nds, including one that is the 33rd pick in the draft, is not "awful"...it's a bit off but not "awful"
PaulKorea a aimé ceci.
30 avr. à 10 h 46
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,534
Mentions "j'aime": 537
Quoting: ChiHawk
Necas is worth a 1st and probably 2nd, but (3) 2nds, including one that is the 33rd pick in the draft, is not "awful"...it's a bit off but not "awful"


The Canes are not rebuilding. They’re contending. If they deal Necas, it’s very likely for a roster player or players, not futures. Three 2nds, regardless of where they fall does nothing to help them now or next season.

Again, awful proposal from a Canes’ POV

And technically, the San Jose pick will be 33OA, not the Chicago pick.
Cushmaker a aimé ceci.
30 avr. à 12 h 6
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,295
Mentions "j'aime": 9,751
Quoting: spockrock
The Canes are not rebuilding. They’re contending. If they deal Necas, it’s very likely for a roster player or players, not futures. Three 2nds, regardless of where they fall does nothing to help them now or next season.

Again, awful proposal from a Canes’ POV

And technically, the San Jose pick will be 33OA, not the Chicago pick.


Simply from a value perspective be it players or picks, the proposal is a bit off, but not "awful". I agree with what you're saying, but your initial response made it sound like value wise Necas lands some massive haul

33 or 34 tomato/tomato
30 avr. à 12 h 27
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,534
Mentions "j'aime": 537
Quoting: ChiHawk
Simply from a value perspective be it players or picks, the proposal is a bit off, but not "awful". I agree with what you're saying, but your initial response made it sound like value wise Necas lands some massive haul

33 or 34 tomato/tomato


I’ll stick with awful as that’s what it is.

Necas, to me, gets a Fiala-like return if traded.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage