SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

The End of the core 4

Créé par: Sadleaffan
Équipe: 2024-25 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 29 avr. 2024
Publié: 29 avr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
1800 000 $
22 400 000 $
1850 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
43 200 000 $
43 500 000 $
44 000 000 $
56 000 000 $
56 300 000 $
11 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
2.
TOR
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (CBJ)
3.
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de CBJ
Logo de TOR
Logo de NSH
Logo de VAN
Logo de TOR
Logo de OTT
2025
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2026
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2187 500 000 $86 991 667 $0 $0 $508 333 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
C, AD
UFA
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
13 250 000 $13 250 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
7 150 000 $7 150 000 $
AG, AD
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 500 000 $11 500 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AG, C
UFA
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, C
RFA
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, AD
RFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 6
6 300 000 $6 300 000 $
DD
UFA
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
766 667 $766 667 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
UFA
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
UFA
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 400 000 $2 400 000 $
DD
RFA

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
29 avr. à 14 h 32
#1
Future Ducks legend
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 10,257
Mentions "j'aime": 7,050
I'm sure several other Anaheim fans will come on here not wanting Kampf, but I'm interested in him. Yeah, Toronto can't afford his services, but the Ducks can.
LosPatos a aimé ceci.
29 avr. à 15 h 7
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 1,269
Mentions "j'aime": 630
Keller at 7.1 > marner at 11
squashmaple a aimé ceci.
29 avr. à 15 h 28
#3
LosPatos
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 3,381
Mentions "j'aime": 1,905
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
I'm sure several other Anaheim fans will come on here not wanting Kampf, but I'm interested in him. Yeah, Toronto can't afford his services, but the Ducks can.


It’s an upgrade over Lundestrom and could be a fine 4th liner.
29 avr. à 15 h 32
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,909
Mentions "j'aime": 1,933
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
I'm sure several other Anaheim fans will come on here not wanting Kampf, but I'm interested in him. Yeah, Toronto can't afford his services, but the Ducks can.


Quoting: LosPatos
It’s an upgrade over Lundestrom and could be a fine 4th liner.


Can I ask why? He’s 100% not a 3C, and $2.9M over 3 years for a 4C just seems silly. We can afford him, but I don’t think we should. Especially that third and final year hitting when every ELC we have will be on a contract
29 avr. à 15 h 35
#5
not a he )
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 3,374
Mentions "j'aime": 4,695
Columbus is definitely not spending assets on replacement level players.
benjgc a aimé ceci.
29 avr. à 16 h 13
#6
Future Ducks legend
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 10,257
Mentions "j'aime": 7,050
Quoting: Jded
Can I ask why? He’s 100% not a 3C, and $2.9M over 3 years for a 4C just seems silly. We can afford him, but I don’t think we should. Especially that third and final year hitting when every ELC we have will be on a contract


His cap hit is 2.4 and he's got significantly better defensive analytics than Lundestrom. He's tough to play against as well. There's a reason he got that contract to get a bottom 6 role. Yeah, probably overly rich contract, but not by that much. He's a viable bottom 6 upgrade.
29 avr. à 16 h 20
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,909
Mentions "j'aime": 1,933
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
His cap hit is 2.4 and he's got significantly better defensive analytics than Lundestrom. He's tough to play against as well. There's a reason he got that contract to get a bottom 6 role. Yeah, probably overly rich contract, but not by that much. He's a viable bottom 6 upgrade.


That’s well put. I don’t personally think the money should be spent on a 4C with term right now though. We aren’t going to be pushing for the cup to make it worthwhile, so I’d personally rather see the spot be filled either more affordable or more strategically (like giving Gaucher a look). But see your point at least. If it had 1 less year on it that’d be more palatable as well
29 avr. à 16 h 26
#8
Future Ducks legend
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 10,257
Mentions "j'aime": 7,050
Quoting: Jded
That’s well put. I don’t personally think the money should be spent on a 4C with term right now though. We aren’t going to be pushing for the cup to make it worthwhile, so I’d personally rather see the spot be filled either more affordable or more strategically (like giving Gaucher a look). But see your point at least. If it had 1 less year on it that’d be more palatable as well


I think if his contract became a cap issue for us before it's over then Verbeek went nuts with spending. Even for McTavish and Leo I think they get 2-3 year bridge deals because that's just the way Verbeek operates.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage