SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

sounds like a rossi trade is gonna happen

Créé par: DROIGER
Équipe: 2024-25 Wild du Minnesota
Date de création initiale: 27 avr. 2024
Publié: 27 avr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
For the record, I am against trading Rossi. Russo made it sound like it was pretty likely to happen. If I had to trade him, the only thing that I would be willing to get in return is a shooting right shot right wing prospect (Michael Brandsegg-Nygard, Jimmy Snuggerud, etc.). Let me know if either of these two trade options are at all possible.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
11 100 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
21 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
MIN
  1. Snuggerud, Jimmy [Liste de réserve]
2.
MIN
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (STL)
Détails additionnels:
16 OA for Michael Brandsegg-Nygard
STL
    Marco Rossi
    Rachats de contrats
    Enfoui
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2024
    Logo de MIN
    Logo de STL
    Logo de MIN
    Logo de MIN
    Logo de MIN
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de MIN
    2025
    Logo de MIN
    Logo de MIN
    Logo de MIN
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de MIN
    2026
    Logo de MIN
    Logo de MIN
    Logo de MIN
    Logo de COL
    Logo de MIN
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de MIN
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de MIN
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de MIN
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2387 675 000 $85 157 754 $425 000 $2 140 000 $2 517 246 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Wild du Minnesota
    9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
    AG
    NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Wild du Minnesota
    950 000 $950 000 $
    C, AG, AD
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Wild du Minnesota
    4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
    AD, AG
    NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Wild du Minnesota
    918 333 $918 333 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
    AG
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Wild du Minnesota
    5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
    C
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Wild du Minnesota
    7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Wild du Minnesota
    4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
    AD, AG
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Wild du Minnesota
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    C
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Wild du Minnesota
    4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
    C, AD
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Wild du Minnesota
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Wild du Minnesota
    867 500 $867 500 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
    C
    RFA - 2
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA
    Logo de Wild du Minnesota
    2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
    C, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Wild du Minnesota
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    DG
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Wild du Minnesota
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $$250K)
    DD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Wild du Minnesota
    3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Wild du Minnesota
    2 450 000 $2 450 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Wild du Minnesota
    7 575 000 $7 575 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Wild du Minnesota
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    G
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Wild du Minnesota
    828 333 $828 333 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
    DG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Wild du Minnesota
    1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Wild du Minnesota
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
    G
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Wild du Minnesota
    1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
    DG/DD
    RFA

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    27 avr. à 22 h 29
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2024
    Messages: 748
    Mentions "j'aime": 373
    Mind linking Russo's comments?
    27 avr. à 22 h 31
    #2
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2023
    Messages: 70
    Mentions "j'aime": 7
    https://theathletic.com/5439840/2024/04/24/wild-gustavsson-rossi-trades-free-agency/
    27 avr. à 22 h 39
    #3
    2285 Stanley Cup Cha
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2020
    Messages: 1,600
    Mentions "j'aime": 582
    Would you do Rossi for Savoie?
    27 avr. à 22 h 41
    #4
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2023
    Messages: 70
    Mentions "j'aime": 7
    Also probably too small. The whole point of trading Rossi is that he's too small and Guerin wants the team to get bigger.
    27 avr. à 23 h 3
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2021
    Messages: 2,710
    Mentions "j'aime": 973
    Dont think Blues would trade Snuggerud for him but yes to the 1st rd pick one.
    27 avr. à 23 h 5
    #6
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2020
    Messages: 1,303
    Mentions "j'aime": 352
    No to Snuggerud, however I would add something to the 1st if needed
    27 avr. à 23 h 17
    #7
    SkateOrDie
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2024
    Messages: 2,754
    Mentions "j'aime": 445
    Quoting: DROIGER
    Also probably too small. The whole point of trading Rossi is that he's too small and Guerin wants the team to get bigger.



    Guerin is good at hockey and he's right.
    Your second line can not be 6'1 5'9 5'8
    It just can't, it doesn't work.
    Rossi would be better off on the wing of a normal sized line.
    28 avr. à 7 h 58
    #8
    mokumboi
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2019
    Messages: 29,593
    Mentions "j'aime": 11,456
    Quoting: noted
    Dont think Blues would trade Snuggerud for him but yes to the 1st rd pick one.


    Quoting: RClay321
    No to Snuggerud, however I would add something to the 1st if needed


    Why? We need Dmen. We have loads of forwards. I can't imagine the Wild would send him to STL anyway.
    28 avr. à 8 h 1
    #9
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2021
    Messages: 2,710
    Mentions "j'aime": 973
    Quoting: mokumboi
    Why? We need Dmen. We have loads of forwards. I can't imagine the Wild would send him to STL anyway.


    Because he’s a better player than whoever they will get at 16.

    He’s already in the league and won’t have to wait 3-5 years for him.
    28 avr. à 8 h 8
    #10
    mokumboi
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2019
    Messages: 29,593
    Mentions "j'aime": 11,456
    Quoting: noted
    Because he’s a better player than whoever they will get at 16.

    He’s already in the league and won’t have to wait 3-5 years for him.


    Who says we're staying at 16?
    28 avr. à 8 h 20
    #11
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2021
    Messages: 2,710
    Mentions "j'aime": 973
    Quoting: mokumboi
    Who says we're staying at 16?


    Unless you want to give up a legit prospect/player, the extra 2nd’s and 3rd’s that the Blues have are not going to move them up to the top 10
    28 avr. à 11 h 34
    #12
    MNBassman
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2015
    Messages: 8,227
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,590
    Nashville prospect Matthew Wood would be a good target too
    28 avr. à 15 h 32
    #13
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2020
    Messages: 1,303
    Mentions "j'aime": 352
    Quoting: mokumboi
    Why? We need Dmen. We have loads of forwards. I can't imagine the Wild would send him to STL anyway.


    sure they need defensemen, however doesn't mean they can't improve the forwards as well. Especially since they were terrible at 5 v 5 offense again
    29 avr. à 1 h 8
    #14
    mokumboi
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2019
    Messages: 29,593
    Mentions "j'aime": 11,456
    Quoting: noted
    Unless you want to give up a legit prospect/player, the extra 2nd’s and 3rd’s that the Blues have are not going to move them up to the top 10


    We shall see. Not sure what bar constitutes legit prospect for you, but judging from history it should not take a 1st round level prospect.
    29 avr. à 1 h 12
    #15
    mokumboi
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2019
    Messages: 29,593
    Mentions "j'aime": 11,456
    Quoting: RClay321
    sure they need defensemen, however doesn't mean they can't improve the forwards as well. Especially since they were terrible at 5 v 5 offense again


    Dude, we have a serious imbalance. And a bunch of high end D prospects on this draft. To use this 1st on a redundancy would tick me off. We're gonna tell Dvorsky he has every chance to make the team and then we ignore our one dire need to go get another C? As super as it would be to have Rossi, I'm not interested in straying from the plan.
    29 avr. à 1 h 45
    #16
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2016
    Messages: 8,223
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,642
    I'm not sure how much interest there is for Rossi by other teams. He was being shopped last offseason too, slightly different circumstance due to him still being unproven at the NHL level.

    I'm thinking that he's going to be another Dumba situation where MN wants to trade him, but there is a just a lack of interest by other teams unless they are paying pennies on the dollar.
    29 avr. à 11 h 35
    #17
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2020
    Messages: 4,469
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,177
    Quoting: wabit
    I'm not sure how much interest there is for Rossi by other teams. He was being shopped last offseason too, slightly different circumstance due to him still being unproven at the NHL level.

    I'm thinking that he's going to be another Dumba situation where MN wants to trade him, but there is a just a lack of interest by other teams unless they are paying pennies on the dollar.


    Right, because 22 year old 2C's who score 20+ goals in their first full rookie season and was a top 3 Calder race player for the vast majority of it while still on their ELC grow on trees and won't garner interest because of it. 🤦‍♂️

    Have you noticed the crap ton of other fanbases putting out ACGM's for him right now? They're f'ing salivating at the thought he could be moved. Other teams GM's aren't that stupid, he'll garner massive interest.

    Don't be daft just because you hate smaller players.
    29 avr. à 12 h 14
    #18
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2016
    Messages: 8,223
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,642
    Quoting: RazWild
    Right, because 22 year old 2C's who score 20+ goals in their first full rookie season and was a top 3 Calder race player for the vast majority of it while still on their ELC grow on trees and won't garner interest because of it. 🤦‍♂️

    Have you noticed the crap ton of other fanbases putting out ACGM's for him right now? They're f'ing salivating at the thought he could be moved. Other teams GM's aren't that stupid, he'll garner massive interest.

    Don't be daft just because you hate smaller players.


    This the same 22 yo, 20g, center than MN is trying to get rid of and they are barren at center. The other teams on here salivating over him are offering basically junk.

    It's not my hate for small players, it's a fit thing. Rossi doesn't fit well on many teams (MN included). He's a top-6 or bust player and he's not an upgrade at center for many teams. He could be a fit as a wing on a few more teams. His 5v5 stats were on par with Steel (with and without Kap) the previous season, and Rossi doesn't PK where as Steel did.

    I actually don't care if they trade Rossi or not this offseason. He's cheap and there are bigger issues with the team than where/how Rossi fits. If it's a quality trade offer then trade him, if its not then keep him.
    29 avr. à 21 h 21
    #19
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2020
    Messages: 1,303
    Mentions "j'aime": 352
    Quoting: mokumboi
    Dude, we have a serious imbalance. And a bunch of high end D prospects on this draft. To use this 1st on a redundancy would tick me off. We're gonna tell Dvorsky he has every chance to make the team and then we ignore our one dire need to go get another C? As super as it would be to have Rossi, I'm not interested in straying from the plan.


    They don't have the assets to move up unless you want to trade young forwards. Only defenseman that is interesting that should be available around 16 is Jiricek (I am all for picking him btw) but he won't be ready for 3 years minimum. I would be open to a Rossi deal, i's not my first choice but it's not a terrible move. Could have Thomas, Dvorsky, Rossi down the middle in a few years
    4 mai à 12 h 57
    #20
    mokumboi
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2019
    Messages: 29,593
    Mentions "j'aime": 11,456
    Quoting: RClay321
    They don't have the assets to move up unless you want to trade young forwards. Only defenseman that is interesting that should be available around 16 is Jiricek (I am all for picking him btw) but he won't be ready for 3 years minimum. I would be open to a Rossi deal, i's not my first choice but it's not a terrible move. Could have Thomas, Dvorsky, Rossi down the middle in a few years


    Dude, they have two 2nds and two 3rds this summer, plus all their picks moving forward and a raft full of B/B+-is prospects at all positions. We have loads to trade up with.

    As much I'd ordinarily like to have Rossi, I'm not interested in splurging important assets for him when we have specific dire needs that can be tended to.
    4 mai à 16 h 43
    #21
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2020
    Messages: 1,303
    Mentions "j'aime": 352
    Quoting: mokumboi
    Dude, they have two 2nds and two 3rds this summer, plus all their picks moving forward and a raft full of B/B+-is prospects at all positions. We have loads to trade up with.

    As much I'd ordinarily like to have Rossi, I'm not interested in splurging important assets for him when we have specific dire needs that can be tended to.


    Which team will trade back from the top 10?
    4 mai à 17 h 9
    #22
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2020
    Messages: 4,469
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,177
    Quoting: RClay321
    Which team will trade back from the top 10?


    Likely NJD. But we'll see if they do or not. I know the Gustavsson and Minnesota's 13th OVA for their 10th OVA and additional piece is fairly popular with their fans right now.

    Not that that helps the Blues, of course. 🤷‍♂️
    4 mai à 20 h 34
    #23
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2020
    Messages: 1,303
    Mentions "j'aime": 352
    Quoting: RazWild
    Likely NJD. But we'll see if they do or not. I know the Gustavsson and Minnesota's 13th OVA for their 10th OVA and additional piece is fairly popular with their fans right now.

    Not that that helps the Blues, of course. 🤷‍♂️


    That makes sense though, additional picks which is all I would want to give NJ to move up doesn't do them much good. Plus the defenseman I would want for the Blues would most likely be gone by 10
    5 mai à 12 h 37
    #24
    mokumboi
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2019
    Messages: 29,593
    Mentions "j'aime": 11,456
    Quoting: RClay321
    Which team will trade back from the top 10?


    There's a few prime candidates. New Jersey, for one.
    5 mai à 14 h 57
    #25
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2020
    Messages: 1,303
    Mentions "j'aime": 352
    Quoting: mokumboi
    There's a few prime candidates. New Jersey, for one.


    the only pieces the Blues have that NJ would want in a trade is Buchnevich and Binnington imo. The shouldn't want futures
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage