SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Vlasic Jones

Créé par: RecycleShark
Équipe: 2024-25 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 26 avr. 2024
Publié: 26 avr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3900 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 000 000 $
21 000 000 $
33 000 000 $
3900 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
33 000 000 $
33 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Jones, Seth
Détails additionnels:
Six years left on contract
CHI
  1. Vlasic, Marc-Édouard
Détails additionnels:
Two years left on contract
2.
3.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de SJS
Logo de PIT
Logo de SJS
Logo de NJD
Logo de TBL
Logo de VGK
Logo de CHI
Logo de PIT
Logo de SJS
2025
Logo de SJS
Logo de VGK
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de WPG
Logo de SJS
Logo de NJD
2026
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $74 001 667 $0 $1 807 500 $9 498 333 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C, AG
RFA
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AD, C, AG
UFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
828 333 $828 333 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
AG
RFA - 1
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, C
UFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
900 000 $900 000 $
C
RFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
950 000 $950 000 $
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AD, C
RFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 350 000 $2 350 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
5 200 000 $5 200 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG
RFA
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
5 950 000 $5 950 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
900 000 $900 000 $
DD
RFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
941 667 $941 667 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
AD, C
RFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
26 avr. à 0 h 56
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 5,723
Mentions "j'aime": 5,965
Jones = top 4 defenseman overpaid by a couple mil.
Vlasic = 37 year old ahl defenseman overpaid by about 6.5 mil. Hawks will stick with the much younger and much better player. They're not hurting for cap space anytime soon.
PaulKorea, Hawksguy81 et Snowhawk18 a aimé ceci.
26 avr. à 1 h 17
#2
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,910
Mentions "j'aime": 5,898
See, the thing is… Jones is still good albeit overpaid by maybe 2.5 million. If you put him on a team like Dallas where he wouldn’t have to do it all, he would probably be an elite number 2 D.

The other Vlasic, the bad one that is, is not the same.
PaulKorea, Hawksguy81 et Snowhawk18 a aimé ceci.
26 avr. à 1 h 53
#3
Démarrer sujet
RecycleShark
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 1,027
Mentions "j'aime": 295
I understand that Jones is much better than Vlasic (the older cousin.) I figured the value to Chicago was saving $9.5M per year for the 4 years after Vlasics's contract expires. So they can afford to pay Bedard and other young players. This is a way for Chicago to get out of Jones' contract without retaining $2M+ for six years.
26 avr. à 2 h 0
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 5,723
Mentions "j'aime": 5,965
Quoting: RecycleShark
I understand that Jones is much better than Vlasic (the older cousin.) I figured the value to Chicago was saving $9.5M per year for the 4 years after Vlasics's contract expires. So they can afford to pay Bedard and other young players. This is a way for Chicago to get out of Jones' contract without retaining $2M+ for six years.


I understand the thought process but Jones is the only long term contract on the team. There's so much flexibility to the hawks cap situation that the Jones contract won't be a problem until the last year or 2 of his deal. And if it's a problem sooner that just means the hawks are ahead of schedule and their hitting on a majority of their prospects which is unlikely
Hawksguy81 et Snowhawk18 a aimé ceci.
26 avr. à 2 h 7
#5
Démarrer sujet
RecycleShark
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 1,027
Mentions "j'aime": 295
Quoting: SociallyHawkward
I understand the thought process but Jones is the only long term contract on the team. There's so much flexibility to the hawks cap situation that the Jones contract won't be a problem until the last year or 2 of his deal. And if it's a problem sooner that just means the hawks are ahead of schedule and their hitting on a majority of their prospects which is unlikely


Got it. Awesome name btw.
SociallyHawkward a aimé ceci.
26 avr. à 6 h 34
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 1,346
Mentions "j'aime": 613
That conversation between Brisebois and Grier goes something like this.
GMMG: Julien got a trade for you says above.
GMJBB: Mike go F*** yourself
MisstheWhalers et Hawksguy81 a aimé ceci.
26 avr. à 7 h 4
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 11,216
Mentions "j'aime": 11,149
Quoting: RecycleShark
I understand that Jones is much better than Vlasic (the older cousin.) I figured the value to Chicago was saving $9.5M per year for the 4 years after Vlasics's contract expires. So they can afford to pay Bedard and other young players. This is a way for Chicago to get out of Jones' contract without retaining $2M+ for six years.


CHI is not trying to get out of Jones contract. The only way they would consider moving him, is if he asks for a trade (because he has a full NMC), and if they are receiving positive value. There is zero value in this trade.
PaulKorea, Hawksguy81 et Snowhawk18 a aimé ceci.
26 avr. à 10 h 7
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2022
Messages: 9,051
Mentions "j'aime": 10,968
The Chicago trade has been asked and answered. But Tampa Bay easily declines as well. Not sure how trading for an older, less talented player helps Tampa. If your thinking was for Tampa to shed cap space, there are far better options than trading away their best defensive D man.
PaulKorea, Snowhawk18 et Garak a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage