SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

The best team possible - does not mean realistic or likely

Créé par: dons_weeney
Équipe: 2024-25 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 23 avr. 2024
Publié: 23 avr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
I would never actually do this lol. It would be good for 1-2 years but still not a contender. Real problem is the lack of 1C, but they'll never be bad enough to get one via draft.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
25 500 000 $
2800 000 $
2800 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
38 500 000 $
47 600 000 $
Transactions
BOS
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (NJD)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de NJD
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2025
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2026
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2083 500 000 $83 491 667 $50 000 $542 500 $8 333 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
AG, C
UFA
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
11 250 000 $11 250 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
870 000 $870 000 $ (Bonis de performance80 000 $$80K)
C
RFA - 2
7 600 000 $7 600 000 $
AD, AG
UFA
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
800 000 $800 000 $
C, AG
RFA
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AD
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG
NTC, NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Bruins de Boston
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
G
RFA
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $$250K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
800 000 $800 000 $
G
RFA
Logo de Bruins de Boston
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
23 avr. à 17 h 24
#1
Rebuilding
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2024
Messages: 435
Mentions "j'aime": 184
Ullmark for NJ 1st makes too much sense
dons_weeney a aimé ceci.
23 avr. à 17 h 27
#2
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 12,081
Mentions "j'aime": 3,209
Linus Ullmark does not fetch a top 10 pick.

If you're trying to find a comp to the Cory Schneider trade, there is one on bostons roster. It's not ullmark tho
23 avr. à 17 h 35
#3
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 21,332
Mentions "j'aime": 7,048
a 20 man roster isn't just not realistic, it's a step or two beyond that. this team isn't cap complaint.
23 avr. à 17 h 35
#4
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 21,332
Mentions "j'aime": 7,048
Quoting: dgibb10
Linus Ullmark does not fetch a top 10 pick.

If you're trying to find a comp to the Cory Schneider trade, there is one on bostons roster. It's not ullmark tho


schneider is a bad comp for swayman.
23 avr. à 17 h 37
#5
Démarrer sujet
Best armchair GM yet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 593
Mentions "j'aime": 139
Quoting: dgibb10
Linus Ullmark does not fetch a top 10 pick.

If you're trying to find a comp to the Cory Schneider trade, there is one on bostons roster. It's not ullmark tho


True, I keep forgetting NJ sucked this year lol. In my head it's a 20-25 pick. But it's not like NJ needs young prospects.
23 avr. à 17 h 38
#6
Démarrer sujet
Best armchair GM yet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 593
Mentions "j'aime": 139
Quoting: Bcarlo25
a 20 man roster isn't just not realistic, it's a step or two beyond that. this team isn't cap complaint.


Agreed, just for fun.
23 avr. à 17 h 42
#7
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 12,081
Mentions "j'aime": 3,209
Quoting: Bcarlo25
schneider is a bad comp for swayman.


Cory Schneider= Mid 20s, 2 years term
Swayman= Mid 20s, 2 years rfa control

Schneider over the previous 3 years:
1st in SV%, 1st in GAA, 4th in GSAx
Swayman:
6th in sv%, 6th in GAA, 9th in GSAx

Neither were full time starters playing every 2 days.
23 avr. à 17 h 43
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 3,918
Mentions "j'aime": 1,218
Modifié 23 avr. à 17 h 48
Quoting: Bcarlo25
schneider is a bad comp for swayman.


The Bruins today are a bad comp for the Canucks from that year.

The Bruins aren’t trading Swayman for a #10 pick.

I can see why the Devils are saying they won’t trade a #10 pick for Ullmark.

I do want to say one thing to Jersey fans … a top 10 pick and the #10 pick are two different things in terms of value. It’s basically the range where you move from great to good prospects in this draft
Schuyler a aimé ceci.
23 avr. à 17 h 45
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 3,918
Mentions "j'aime": 1,218
Quoting: dgibb10
Cory Schneider= Mid 20s, 2 years term
Swayman= Mid 20s, 2 years rfa control

Schneider over the previous 3 years:
1st in SV%, 1st in GAA, 4th in GSAx
Swayman:
6th in sv%, 6th in GAA, 9th in GSAx

Neither were full time starters playing every 2 days.


Go ahead and make it two years if you’d like on Swayman smile.
23 avr. à 17 h 46
#10
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 12,081
Mentions "j'aime": 3,209
Quoting: Celtics21
Go ahead and make it two years if you’d like on Swayman smile.


6th in GSAx, 3rd in SV% for Swayman compared to Schneider 4th in GSAx and 1st in SV%?
23 avr. à 17 h 50
#11
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 21,332
Mentions "j'aime": 7,048
Quoting: Celtics21
The Bruins today are a bad comp for the Canucks from that year.

The Bruins aren’t trading Swayman for a #10 pick.

I can see why the Devils are saying they won’t trade a #10 pick for Ullmark.

I do want to say one thing to Jersey fans … a top 10 pick and the #10 pick are two different things in terms of value. It’s basically the range where you move from great to good prospects in this draft


i'm saying it's a bad comp because Swayman>>>>Schneider.
23 avr. à 17 h 52
#12
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 21,332
Mentions "j'aime": 7,048
Quoting: dgibb10
Cory Schneider= Mid 20s, 2 years term
Swayman= Mid 20s, 2 years rfa control

Schneider over the previous 3 years:
1st in SV%, 1st in GAA, 4th in GSAx
Swayman:
6th in sv%, 6th in GAA, 9th in GSAx

Neither were full time starters playing every 2 days.


schneider was a clear backup getting the easier matchups. swayman was in a platoon.
23 avr. à 17 h 54
#13
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 12,081
Mentions "j'aime": 3,209
Quoting: Bcarlo25
schneider was a clear backup getting the easier matchups. swayman was in a platoon.


Schneider was literally the starter in 2012-13 but okay
Schuyler a aimé ceci.
23 avr. à 17 h 57
#14
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 12,081
Mentions "j'aime": 3,209
Quoting: Bcarlo25
schneider was a clear backup getting the easier matchups. swayman was in a platoon.


Jeremy Swayman playing in 49.4% of team games the last 2 years: flirting
Cory Schneider playing in 48.5% of team games in his last 2 years in Van: harassment
Schuyler a aimé ceci.
23 avr. à 18 h 6
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 3,625
Mentions "j'aime": 1,222
Cap is goi g up next year - $87.7M is my best guess. Don’t like it (as a Leafs fan) but you should have more cap to play with than you show
23 avr. à 18 h 35
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 3,918
Mentions "j'aime": 1,218
Quoting: dgibb10
6th in GSAx, 3rd in SV% for Swayman compared to Schneider 4th in GSAx and 1st in SV%?


Swayman .561 GsAx/60 over 81 starts in 2 years
Schneider .397 GSSx/60 over 63 starts in 2 years

Swayman is better
23 avr. à 19 h 45
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 2,031
Mentions "j'aime": 803
Quoting: dgibb10
Linus Ullmark does not fetch a top 10 pick.

If you're trying to find a comp to the Cory Schneider trade, there is one on bostons roster. It's not ullmark tho


It’s not a particularly strong draft class this year so a top 10 pick for a Vezina winning goalie isn’t a bad price at all. I’d argue Boston should get more but goalies typically don’t get huge hauls
23 avr. à 20 h 0
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 3,918
Mentions "j'aime": 1,218
Quoting: Ryminister_92
It’s not a particularly strong draft class this year so a top 10 pick for a Vezina winning goalie isn’t a bad price at all. I’d argue Boston should get more but goalies typically don’t get huge hauls


I like Berkly Catton. Watched him twice this year. I don’t think he’s as good as Nate Danielson who went 9th last year. Probably rate him about even with Oliver Moore who went 19, but should have gone 15.

Either way, I would assume Boston would be adding a 2025 first to get someone like him for Ullmark.
23 avr. à 20 h 3
#19
Good nerd
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 761
Mentions "j'aime": 425
Quoting: dgibb10
Linus Ullmark does not fetch a top 10 pick.


This is correct. I think a late round first or an early 2nd rounder + 3rd rounder is probably the appropriate range, given his play of late, the likely demand for G in the offseason, and the lack of quality UFA G this offseason.

Quoting: dgibb10
If you're trying to find a comp to the Cory Schneider trade, there is one on bostons roster. It's not ullmark tho


Situationally, it doesn't make sense for the Bruins to give up Swayman for a single pick likely near #10. You can argue about fair value and comps until you are blue in the face, you can present all of the numbers, and I won't try to counter them because that stuff doesn't matter. Many of you who follow the NJD-BOS threads already know my song-and-dance routine on this topic, so I'll spare you all this time.
dgibb10 a aimé ceci.
23 avr. à 20 h 7
#20
Good nerd
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 761
Mentions "j'aime": 425
Quoting: Ryminister_92
It’s not a particularly strong draft class this year so a top 10 pick for a Vezina winning goalie isn’t a bad price at all. I’d argue Boston should get more but goalies typically don’t get huge hauls


To be fair to the Devils, unless there is an agreement to discuss contracts prior to the trade, they are only getting him for 1 year. I'm not sure any team would give up a top 10 pick for 1 year of any player at any position unless they are going all-in at the TDL (and in that case, they almost never have a top 10 pick anyway).
23 avr. à 20 h 26
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 2,031
Mentions "j'aime": 803
Quoting: tupty
To be fair to the Devils, unless there is an agreement to discuss contracts prior to the trade, they are only getting him for 1 year. I'm not sure any team would give up a top 10 pick for 1 year of any player at any position unless they are going all-in at the TDL (and in that case, they almost never have a top 10 pick anyway).


I can see your point on this, but when Schneider was dealt it was only with 2 years left on his deal and it was a much stronger draft class. I think with the weaker prospects the 1 year less kinda averages it out pretty similar
tupty a aimé ceci.
23 avr. à 20 h 52
#22
Good nerd
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 761
Mentions "j'aime": 425
Quoting: Ryminister_92
I can see your point on this, but when Schneider was dealt it was only with 2 years left on his deal and it was a much stronger draft class. I think with the weaker prospects the 1 year less kinda averages it out pretty similar


Sure, that all plays into it too. I'm not going to argue too hard against the Bruins getting a better return since I am a B's fan after all!
23 avr. à 21 h 56
#23
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 12,081
Mentions "j'aime": 3,209
Quoting: Celtics21
Swayman .561 GsAx/60 over 81 starts in 2 years
Schneider .397 GSSx/60 over 63 starts in 2 years

Swayman is better


that mark had Cory Schneider 2nd in the NHL over that span behind only Henrik

Swayman ranks 3rd, and is 2nd on his own team.

That's like comparing point totals from today to when Jamie Benn won the art ross. Is an 88 point scorer from this year better than Benn was then?
23 avr. à 21 h 59
#24
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 12,081
Mentions "j'aime": 3,209
Quoting: tupty
This is correct. I think a late round first or an early 2nd rounder + 3rd rounder is probably the appropriate range, given his play of late, the likely demand for G in the offseason, and the lack of quality UFA G this offseason.



Situationally, it doesn't make sense for the Bruins to give up Swayman for a single pick likely near #10. You can argue about fair value and comps until you are blue in the face, you can present all of the numbers, and I won't try to counter them because that stuff doesn't matter. Many of you who follow the NJD-BOS threads already know my song-and-dance routine on this topic, so I'll spare you all this time.


I 100% agree that Swayman shouldn't be moved for 10th overall. I have consistently said I'd add to either 10th overall or Mercer for Swayman. Goalie market has changed. But Schneider was imo better than Swayman is now.
23 avr. à 22 h 0
#25
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 12,081
Mentions "j'aime": 3,209
Quoting: Bcarlo25
i'm saying it's a bad comp because Swayman>>>>Schneider.


Cory Schneider was literally him.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage