SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Realistic Maybe

Créé par: MyTeamsSuck
Équipe: 2023-24 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 22 avr. 2024
Publié: 22 avr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
In this case draft goes:

Celebrini- SJS
Levshunov- CHI
Demidov- ANA
Lindstrom- CBJ
Iginla- MTL
Silayev- ARI
Parakh- OTT
Dickinson- SEA
Catton- CGY
Yakemchuk- CGY (NJD)

Flames sign Kylington to a 2 year 2 mill contract
Wolf resigns at 1.4 mill/3 years
Pelts resigns at 1 mill/2 years
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Yakemchuk, Carter
3950 000 $
Catton, Berkley
3950 000 $
Transactions
1.
CGY
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (NJD)
NJD
  1. Markström, Jacob (2 000 000 $ retained)
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (DAL)
2.
CGY
  1. Wahlstrom, Oliver
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (NYI)
NYI
  1. Mangiapane, Andrew (2 000 000 $ retained)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de CGY
Logo de VAN
Logo de NJD
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de VGK
Logo de CGY
Logo de NJD
Logo de CGY
2025
Logo de FLA
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de NYI
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2026
Logo de CGY
Logo de VGK
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de VAN
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2283 500 000 $72 049 957 $0 $1 092 500 $11 450 043 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Flames de Calgary
775 000 $775 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
863 333 $863 333 $
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Islanders de New York
874 125 $874 125 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
762 500 $762 500 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 8
Logo de Flames de Calgary
775 000 $775 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
813 333 $813 333 $ (Bonis de performance15 000 $$15K)
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
823 333 $823 333 $ (Bonis de performance15 000 $$15K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
762 500 $762 500 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
787 500 $787 500 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
22 avr. à 18 h 33
#1
do not Devil my ass
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 4,902
Mentions "j'aime": 4,265
A top 10 pick might be realistic for a goalie like Swayman.
For Markström... not so much.

Not even close, really.
Gm_LJF a aimé ceci.
22 avr. à 18 h 38
#2
Islanders Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 7,843
Mentions "j'aime": 2,763
Would take that in a heartbeat if I was the Islanders. You really think that’s all Mangiapane goes for?
22 avr. à 18 h 43
#3
Démarrer sujet
R.I.P Yotes
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2023
Messages: 296
Mentions "j'aime": 81
Quoting: Tintin
A top 10 pick might be realistic for a goalie like Swayman.
For Markström... not so much.

Not even close, really.


Yall need goaltending pretty damn badly. Marky at 34 is still a top 20 goalie in the league. Rn he has some trust issues with management and needs a change of scenery. Say he’s worth a second on his own, throw retention on and he’s valued at a late first. Throw in VAN first and pair that with the fact that NJ doesn’t need the pick, and that trade gets done, no?
22 avr. à 18 h 43
#4
Démarrer sujet
R.I.P Yotes
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2023
Messages: 296
Mentions "j'aime": 81
Quoting: joshelkin
Would take that in a heartbeat if I was the Islanders. You really think that’s all Mangiapane goes for?


Yeah, not much right now
22 avr. à 18 h 46
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2023
Messages: 104
Mentions "j'aime": 38
I really like that Markstrom deal for both parties, I wonder if the Devils are serious about contending next year you merge the two deals into something like this:

NJD receives: Markstrom (2M retained), Mangiapane (2M retained), 2024 2nd RP (DAL)
CAL receives: Schmid, Palat (to make cap work), 2024 1st RP (NJD)
22 avr. à 18 h 50
#6
On the Rod Meal Plan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 532
Mentions "j'aime": 319
Quoting: MyTeamsSuck
Yall need goaltending pretty damn badly. Marky at 34 is still a top 20 goalie in the league. Rn he has some trust issues with management and needs a change of scenery. Say he’s worth a second on his own, throw retention on and he’s valued at a late first. Throw in VAN first and pair that with the fact that NJ doesn’t need the pick, and that trade gets done, no?


Markstrom in his age 33 and 34 seasons has been right around .900 save percentage - that would put him in the 30-40 range. Given the history of goalies I'm not sure Markstrom would:
1) Be worth a top ten pick even if he was a top 20 goalie in the league the past two seasons
2) Get any better for his age 35 and 36 seasons.

So why would New Jersey pay the top ten pick now?
Tintin et Archiv3 a aimé ceci.
22 avr. à 18 h 50
#7
do not Devil my ass
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 4,902
Mentions "j'aime": 4,265
Quoting: MyTeamsSuck
Yall need goaltending pretty damn badly. Marky at 34 is still a top 20 goalie in the league. Rn he has some trust issues with management and needs a change of scenery. Say he’s worth a second on his own, throw retention on and he’s valued at a late first. Throw in VAN first and pair that with the fact that NJ doesn’t need the pick, and that trade gets done, no?

No. Trading a super valuable asset like #10 for a mid 30s goalie having a last hurrah of career year but also falling off a cliff right after TDL would be a disastrous move for the Devils.
And what do you mean about the Devils not needing the pick? Picking a top 6 guy up on an ELC for when the Devils are right in the middle of their window of contention would be huge for them.

Besides, it's not like Markström is the only goalie out there.
Ullmark could probably be had for the NJD 2025 1st. Kähkönen played amazing in very difficult circumstances over the course of the season, could easily resign him. Allen had a very good showing too.
Point being, there are plenty of better alternatives than Markström out there for the Devils. Markström never made any sense to acquire, even less so now.
TyeZerker a aimé ceci.
22 avr. à 19 h 4
#8
Future Norris guy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 15,605
Mentions "j'aime": 8,625
laugh The NJD aren't giving up a top 10 pick for Jacob Markstrom. shakes head
22 avr. à 19 h 25
#9
Démarrer sujet
R.I.P Yotes
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2023
Messages: 296
Mentions "j'aime": 81
Quoting: Tintin
No. Trading a super valuable asset like #10 for a mid 30s goalie having a last hurrah of career year but also falling off a cliff right after TDL would be a disastrous move for the Devils.
And what do you mean about the Devils not needing the pick? Picking a top 6 guy up on an ELC for when the Devils are right in the middle of their window of contention would be huge for them.

Besides, it's not like Markström is the only goalie out there.
Ullmark could probably be had for the NJD 2025 1st. Kähkönen played amazing in very difficult circumstances over the course of the season, could easily resign him. Allen had a very good showing too.
Point being, there are plenty of better alternatives than Markström out there for the Devils. Markström never made any sense to acquire, even less so now.


Who would you take with that 10th overall? Risk taking Eiserman in the top ten? Celebrini, Demidov, Catton, Lindstrom and Iginla all go before 10. Eiserman is a liability outside of the O zone 99% of the time, Helenius is good, but not insane offensively, Nygard isn’t good enough to risk choosing him as a top ten pick and Connelly is a player with some big holes in his game rn. The pick is 100% expendable.
22 avr. à 19 h 32
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 7,579
Mentions "j'aime": 3,211
Quoting: DeclanLovesHockey
I really like that Markstrom deal for both parties, I wonder if the Devils are serious about contending next year you merge the two deals into something like this:

NJD receives: Markstrom (2M retained), Mangiapane (2M retained), 2024 2nd RP (DAL)
CAL receives: Schmid, Palat (to make cap work), 2024 1st RP (NJD)


3 years of Palat at 6 mil per and 2 mil retention each on Markstrom and Mangiapane? No deal!
22 avr. à 19 h 35
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 7,579
Mentions "j'aime": 3,211
Quoting: MoSeider53
laugh The NJD aren't giving up a top 10 pick for Jacob Markstrom. shakes head


Another way of saying the NJD won't be fixing their goalie problem anytime soon.
22 avr. à 19 h 38
#12
do not Devil my ass
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 4,902
Mentions "j'aime": 4,265
Quoting: MyTeamsSuck
The pick is 100% expendable.

Yes, for Swayman.
Not for Markström and a bunch of lesser assets.

The Devils have pretty good depth in their prospect pipeline, your idea of the Devils moving way further back in the draft doesn't fill a need for them.
Quoting: MyTeamsSuck
Who would you take with that 10th overall? Risk taking Eiserman in the top ten? Celebrini, Demidov, Catton, Lindstrom and Iginla all go before 10. Eiserman is a liability outside of the O zone 99% of the time, Helenius is good, but not insane offensively, Nygard isn’t good enough to risk choosing him as a top ten pick and Connelly is a player with some big holes in his game rn.

I'd be happy with Eiserman or Helenius at #10. One of Brandsegg-Nygård, Parekh or Buium could also be available.
There's gonna be a very interesting player available at #10. Is that not why you'd love for the Flames to trade Markström for that pick?
22 avr. à 19 h 49
#13
Démarrer sujet
R.I.P Yotes
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2023
Messages: 296
Mentions "j'aime": 81
Quoting: Tintin
Yes, for Swayman.
Not for Markström and a bunch of lesser assets.

The Devils have pretty good depth in their prospect pipeline, your idea of the Devils moving way further back in the draft doesn't fill a need for them.

I'd be happy with Eiserman or Helenius at #10. One of Brandsegg-Nygård, Parekh or Buium could also be available.
There's gonna be a very interesting player available at #10. Is that not why you'd love for the Flames to trade Markström for that pick?


No, one of Marky or Vladar need to go, and Marky has more value. I could care less about the pick, it’s more about getting Markys value right. The extra pick is a bonus. NJ is just one of the only teams that need better goaltending. I’d offer the same to Colorado or… maybe not EDM.
22 avr. à 20 h 2
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 7,579
Mentions "j'aime": 3,211
Quoting: MyTeamsSuck
No, one of Marky or Vladar need to go, and Marky has more value. I could care less about the pick, it’s more about getting Markys value right. The extra pick is a bonus. NJ is just one of the only teams that need better goaltending. I’d offer the same to Colorado or… maybe not EDM.


Add Toronto to the list of teams that need better goaltending. A bidding war may be brewing. Saros is unlikely to be moved that pretty much just leave Markstrom and Ulmark as realistic possibilities for 4+ teams.
22 avr. à 20 h 4
#15
Démarrer sujet
R.I.P Yotes
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2023
Messages: 296
Mentions "j'aime": 81
Quoting: MoxNix
Add Toronto to the list of teams that need better goaltending. A bidding war may be brewing.


Yep, Ullmark, Saros and Marky go to the leafs, oilers and devils, maybe the sabres or Ottawa too
22 avr. à 20 h 6
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 7,579
Mentions "j'aime": 3,211
Quoting: MyTeamsSuck
Yep, Ullmark, Saros and Marky go to the leafs, oilers and devils


I doubt Saros will be moved. If Colorado is willing to trade Calum Ritchie that'd be ideal for Calgary's needs. Murray Edwards might even let Conroy retain 50%.
22 avr. à 20 h 16
#17
Démarrer sujet
R.I.P Yotes
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2023
Messages: 296
Mentions "j'aime": 81
Quoting: MoxNix
I doubt Saros will be moved. If Colorado is willing to trade Calum Ritchie that'd be ideal for Calgary's needs. Murray Edwards might even let Conroy retain 50%.


I think most deals regarding Colorado and an upgrade in net will start with Ritchie. After the fat goose egg that Georgiev layed last game, they really need that upgrade
MoxNix a aimé ceci.
22 avr. à 20 h 23
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 7,579
Mentions "j'aime": 3,211
Quoting: MyTeamsSuck
I think most deals regarding Colorado and an upgrade in net will start with Ritchie. After the fat goose egg that Georgiev layed last game, they really need that upgrade


Yeah Boston would almost certainly ask for Ritchie and Ritchie+ might be enough to get the Preds to seriously consider moving Saros too.

If Saros is available he's everyone's number 1 target but he'd also cost to more to acquire.

Ulmark vs Marky is where it gets interesting. Marky when hot is the better of the two but when he's cold he's really cold. The extra year left on his contract makes him worth a little more but Ulmark can sign an extension this summer. If Ulmark comes with an extension then he probably fetches a bit more than Marky.
MyTeamsSuck a aimé ceci.
22 avr. à 20 h 24
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 1,149
Mentions "j'aime": 166
Quoting: MoxNix
Another way of saying the NJD won't be fixing their goalie problem anytime soon.


damn didnt know markstrom was the only goalie out there they can trade for damn your so dumb
22 avr. à 20 h 25
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 7,579
Mentions "j'aime": 3,211
Quoting: TyeZerker
damn didnt know markstrom was the only goalie out there they can trade for damn your so dumb


Trying reading the rest of the thread before making idiotic comments. If they aren't willing to pay for Marky they won't be able to afford Ulmark or (dream on) Saros either.
22 avr. à 20 h 26
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 1,149
Mentions "j'aime": 166
Quoting: Tintin
Yes, for Swayman.
Not for Markström and a bunch of lesser assets.

The Devils have pretty good depth in their prospect pipeline, your idea of the Devils moving way further back in the draft doesn't fill a need for them.

I'd be happy with Eiserman or Helenius at #10. One of Brandsegg-Nygård, Parekh or Buium could also be available.
There's gonna be a very interesting player available at #10. Is that not why you'd love for the Flames to trade Markström for that pick?


So you want Eisermann who is basically luke hughes, terrible in the dzone HMMM
22 avr. à 20 h 26
#22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 1,149
Mentions "j'aime": 166
Quoting: MyTeamsSuck
No, one of Marky or Vladar need to go, and Marky has more value. I could care less about the pick, it’s more about getting Markys value right. The extra pick is a bonus. NJ is just one of the only teams that need better goaltending. I’d offer the same to Colorado or… maybe not EDM.


34 year old goalie, who literally hold the power where he goes, so Flame have no leverage
22 avr. à 20 h 28
#23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 7,579
Mentions "j'aime": 3,211
Quoting: TyeZerker
34 year old goalie, who literally hold the power where he goes, so Flame have no leverage


NJ has no leverage. Calgary is perfectly content to keep Markstrom if they don't get an acceptable offer for him.
22 avr. à 20 h 29
#24
Démarrer sujet
R.I.P Yotes
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2023
Messages: 296
Mentions "j'aime": 81
Quoting: TyeZerker
damn didnt know markstrom was the only goalie out there they can trade for damn your so dumb


I mean… they probably won’t anyways. Let’s keep it a buck, NJ wants the world, but isn’t willing to give up a large piece of theirs to get that. Top goalies don’t just grow on trees, hence the reason they don’t have one rn, and to get one it costs a pretty penny.
MoxNix a aimé ceci.
22 avr. à 21 h 1
#25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,610
Mentions "j'aime": 19,725
Quoting: Tintin
A top 10 pick might be realistic for a goalie like Swayman.
For Markström... not so much.

Not even close, really.


You are trolling if you think Boston would ever consider that
MoxNix a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage