SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Next Year

Créé par: BigBallsBriere
Équipe: 2024-25 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 20 avr. 2024
Publié: 20 avr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Chicago Continues on mostly same track they've been on, except this year they make a tad more of an effort to be better, by filling out most of their roster with actual NHLers. Definitely expect them to overpay --purposefully-- like they have with Foligno/Dickinson/AA89/Mrazek/etc in order to get guys. Mostly expect them to go for guys that make them tougher, bigger, but have some skill -- Mantha, Foegele, Dillon all do that imo. Carrier is brought on to actually be a piece for Chicago.

Kyle Davidsson said he realizes now is the time the Blackhawks need to start ascending. They might not be playoff contenders next year, but he’s ready to begin building up. They can’t finish bottom-three in the league again. Which to me means they'll make moves to gradually get better.

Trades:
Only One Trade Hayton, upside bet here Hayton had a promising year then regressed a little and battled injury fresh start in Chicago might do him good.

I don't think it's neccesarily time to trade 1sts for a youn talent but expect moves similar to Hayton, followed by likely recouping of whatever assets they spend at TDL by dealing whoever they sign in Free Agency to 1/2 year deals.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 700 000 $
21 300 000 $
11 000 000 $
22 400 000 $
2800 000 $
2800 000 $
2800 000 $
2800 000 $
2800 000 $
2800 000 $
2800 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
25 000 000 $
24 250 000 $
14 250 000 $
44 250 000 $
Transactions
CHI
  1. Hayton, Barrett [Droits de RFA]
ARI
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (LAK)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de CHI
Logo de TBL
Logo de CHI
Logo de VAN
Logo de CHI
Logo de OTT
Logo de CGY
Logo de CHI
2025
Logo de CHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de DAL
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de NYR
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2026
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de NYI
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de OTT
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2787 500 000 $76 947 500 $0 $5 400 000 $10 552 500 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 500 000 $$4M)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AG, C, AD
RFA - 1
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA
2 400 000 $2 400 000 $
C, AG
RFA
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance900 000 $$900K)
AD, C
RFA - 2
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD
RFA
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, C
RFA
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
C
RFA
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, C
RFA
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
AD
RFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
DG
UFA
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
962 500 $962 500 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
918 333 $918 333 $ (Bonis de performance1 000 000 $$1M)
DG
RFA - 2
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
DD
UFA
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
RFA
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
DD
RFA
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
RFA

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
20 avr. à 19 h 59
#1
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,682
Mentions "j'aime": 9,833
No thank you
Hawksguy81 a aimé ceci.
20 avr. à 20 h 44
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2022
Messages: 8,724
Mentions "j'aime": 10,584
As discussed in your prior Utah post, Hawks aren't spending a 2nd on Hayton. He just doesn't have that sort of value. Hawks also won't target Dillon or any other LD as a free agent other than maybe a depth left shot guy who can play both sides as their 7th D. I'm fine w/ Carrier and Foegele. Instead of Mantha, Hawks need a middle 6 C. Reichel isn't in the lineup. He will be for sure. Entwistle, Johnson, Roos won't be re-signed.
Garak et DaKeGa a aimé ceci.
20 avr. à 21 h 38
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2023
Messages: 165
Mentions "j'aime": 94
Quoting: Hawksguy81
As discussed in your prior Utah post, Hawks aren't spending a 2nd on Hayton. He just doesn't have that sort of value. Hawks also won't target Dillon or any other LD as a free agent other than maybe a depth left shot guy who can play both sides as their 7th D. I'm fine w/ Carrier and Foegele. Instead of Mantha, Hawks need a middle 6 C. Reichel isn't in the lineup. He will be for sure. Entwistle, Johnson, Roos won't be re-signed.


Hayton still has great value. Imo a 2nd would be a steal. A late 1st and a b-prospect if AZ/UT are desperate to move him. Which they shouldn't be. Hes still has legit top 6 potential. Just might not be a fit with Cooley and Geekie coming.
21 avr. à 9 h 22
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2022
Messages: 8,724
Mentions "j'aime": 10,584
Quoting: SLAFSQUATCH
Hayton still has great value. Imo a 2nd would be a steal. A late 1st and a b-prospect if AZ/UT are desperate to move him. Which they shouldn't be. Hes still has legit top 6 potential. Just might not be a fit with Cooley and Geekie coming.


Your correct. Utah shouldn't move Hayton. Because coming off his injury and poor offensive production this season, his value is nowhere close to a 1st or a 2nd. He's had one solid season as a pro. Not a great season. A solid season. Hawks definitely wouldn't pay your ask for Hayton. I doubt any team would.
21 avr. à 10 h 4
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2023
Messages: 165
Mentions "j'aime": 94
Quoting: Hawksguy81
Your correct. Utah shouldn't move Hayton. Because coming off his injury and poor offensive production this season, his value is nowhere close to a 1st or a 2nd. He's had one solid season as a pro. Not a great season. A solid season. Hawks definitely wouldn't pay your ask for Hayton. I doubt any team would.


I disagree. Enjoy!
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage