PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE
Basculer en mode sombre
Thème automatique
COTES DES PARIS
Cotes activées
LANGUE
EN
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
FORUMS
ARCHIVES ▾
ARCHIVES
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
CBA ▾
CBA
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
COTES
DÉPISTAGE
CALCS ▾
CALCS
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
Historique des blessures
OUTILS ▾
OUTILS
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Équipes affiliées
Essais professionnels
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
JOUEURS ▾
JOUEURS
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
ÉQUIPES ▾
CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST
PACIFIQUE
Ducks d'Anaheim
Flames de Calgary
Oilers d'Edmonton
Kings de Los Angeles
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
CENTRALE
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Stars de Dallas
Wild du Minnesota
Predators de Nashville
Blues de St-Louis
Jets de Winnipeg
CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST
MÉTROPOLITAINE
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Capitals de Washington
ATLANTIQUE
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Red Wings de Detroit
Panthers de la Floride
Canadiens de Montréal
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
INTERACTIF ▾
OUTILS INTERACTIFS
Fauteuil - DG (Simulateur de formation personnalisée)
Repêchage simulé
Simulateur de transactions (propositions de transactions)
RECHERCHER
FAUTEUIL - DG
REPÊCHAGE SIMULÉ
SIMULATEUR DE TRANSACTIONS
ÉQUIPES ▾
Ducks d'Anaheim
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Flames de Calgary
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Stars de Dallas
Red Wings de Detroit
Oilers d'Edmonton
Panthers de la Floride
Kings de Los Angeles
Wild du Minnesota
Canadiens de Montréal
Predators de Nashville
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Blues de St-Louis
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
Capitals de Washington
Jets de Winnipeg
JOUEURS ▾
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
OUTILS ▾
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Essais professionnels
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
Équipes affiliées
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
CALCS ▾
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
RAPPORTS DE DÉPISTAGE
COTES
CBA▾
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
ARCHIVES ▾
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
FORUMS
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
EN
Basculer en mode sombre
Cotes activées
SLAFSQUATCH
Membre depuis
11 nov. 2023
Messages dans les forums
165
Messages par jour
0.9
MESSAGES
SUJETS
MENTIONS "J'AIME"
ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG
Forum:
Armchair-GM
25 avr. à 17 h 8
Sujet:
Keller Rumor
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BadaBing</b></div><div>https://www.nhltraderumor.com/nhl-trade-rumors-clayton-keller-montreal/</div></div>
ugh.. too many of these garbage sites. Not worth the attention or the traffic.
Forum:
NHL Signings
25 avr. à 15 h 38
Sujet:
Chicago Blackhawks signed Alex Vlasic (6 Years / $4,600,000 AAV)
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ste_Catherine_Street</b></div><div>I respectfully disagree with everyone saying this is a good contract. He's played less than 100 games. 6 years 4.5M is crazy risky.
What was the rush to sign him long-term???? Sorry but this guy is a 3rd pairing dman. Hate the risk to this.</div></div>
Dude. Vlasic is a stud. How would you feel if Guhle signed this deal?
Forum:
Fauteuil - DG
24 avr. à 22 h 2
Sujet:
Utah need defenseman
Prepare yourself! Apparently Matheson isn't worth a 4th with retention. haha
Forum:
Armchair-GM
24 avr. à 9 h 4
Sujet:
Zegras Since the Rumors Be Rolling Neither Side Should Do This
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Lancebmx</b></div><div>I looked at your other one, which you labelled as "too much". It's not that it's not enough, in its just not the right pieces. Anaheim won't want, if there was a desire to trade him, mid pieces. They would want a high-end piece coming back. Think of Reinbacher, 2024 1st + something else, Slaf. Those are what Anaheim would be after. Think of the Gauthier trade, they sent a high end piece in Drysdale.
Josh Anderson, even at that retention, doesn't have any value and probably even less so to Anaheim. Have to remember that each team would value players differently depending on where they are at.<strong> Anderson has less than zero value to Anaheim at 50% retained. </strong>
Farrell doesn't have any value, likely not going to be a NHL player. Also not a player Anaheim would want either way.
Barron has a bit of a value, maybe a 2nd. He's the type of player you could package with your 2024 1st.
Winnipeg's 1st, Mesar, Beck all are mid type of pieces. Anaheim, like alot of teams rebuilding, have a bunch of pieces like that.
If you want a high quality player, you have to offer something of high quality in return, not just a bunch of mid stuff. Ask yourself if you would trade Caufield for that package and if you say no, that's probably your answer.</div></div>
Anderson, at 50% retained. Has value to every single team in the league.
I'm really starting to question Duck fans.
I understand the need to get max value for Zegras. But, is he not simply a skilled 65 point wing that lacks 200 foot game?
And yes. If somehow Caufield was somehow in trade rumours and deemed expendable. A late 1st Beck/Mesar/Baron would look pretty good as a potential return.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
24 avr. à 8 h 56
Sujet:
Next season
Too much too soon. Need another season to let pieces fall into place. Spending cap and trading assets to advance into purgatory again would make the rebuild moot. Patience. One more year.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
24 avr. à 8 h 33
Sujet:
Zegras Since the Rumors Be Rolling Neither Side Should Do This
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>habs_trade_churner_50</b></div><div>GeneralLandro, may absolutely be right, maybe Verbeek isn't Shopping Z at all.
Nevertheless, if something were to happen. What would make both sides feel like they were not ripped off.</div></div>
See PLD trade. Habs fans were offering "fair trades" for PLD. Considering leverage. Winnipeg fans were irate. LA swoops in and overpays in comparison to Habs concensus. And, signs him to a contract where Habs fan were considering 7x7 big max. In the end. As of right now. LA is sucking on lemons. Perhaps PLD evolves into that player LA paid to get. But as of right now, it would be fair to deem that, dare I say, Habs fans were right in this regard.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
24 avr. à 8 h 20
Sujet:
2024-25
I agree. I think Tomasino would be a smart add. Untapped potential. Perfect St-Louis project. He's very high on my short list for RW. I think I'd prefer him to Kakko as well.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
23 avr. à 22 h 17
Sujet:
Living In Delusion
Yup! Habs def need more dmen! Solid offer! :P
Forum:
NHL Signings
23 avr. à 22 h 13
Sujet:
Philadelphia Flyers signed Ivan Fedotov (2 Years / $3,275,000 AAV)
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>kckrebs</b></div><div>Do you think the Flyers have a legit starter right now? Ersson has been pretty good given the circumstances but do you think the Flyers would be smart to just lean on him for the future? Or would it be smart to try to find another goalie from somewhere? You might think he deserves less but this is evidently the money he wanted to come over to NA. 3.25 isn’t really that much and it’s basically nothing considering we now have less that 5 million for our goalies for the next 2 years. Thinking Briere could lose his job over this is a quite laughable.</div></div>
I think Errson could be a solid starter moving forward. Fedotov probably won't be better than him. BUT he could be. And if he is, this contract is a steal. Period.
Forum:
NHL Signings
23 avr. à 22 h 11
Sujet:
Philadelphia Flyers signed Ivan Fedotov (2 Years / $3,275,000 AAV)
Let's see how he looks after and off-season & training camp. I'd give him until the 15 starts mark next year to judge this. Could still be a solid goalie. You people are nuts.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
23 avr. à 0 h 20
Sujet:
whats enough to let go Zegras
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GiggywithGibby</b></div><div>I said those are the trades we'd accept, you have your choice of three, pick one or give up your Zegras fantasies.</div></div>
"we'd accept" ahh ha. Speaking of fantasies. Enjoy!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
22 avr. à 23 h 47
Sujet:
whats enough to let go Zegras
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GiggywithGibby</b></div><div>MTLs 24 1st + Beck + Kovacevic
Reinvacher + MTLs 25 2nd
Slafkovsky
Select one from the above three offers and you might have a deal.
Anything else, and I mean any combination of assets not identified above isn't worth considering. One of 6OA, Reinbacher, or Slafkovsky is required, or there is no deal.</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GiggywithGibby</b></div><div>MTLs 24 1st + Beck + Kovacevic
Reinvacher + MTLs 25 2nd
Slafkovsky
Select one from the above three offers and you might have a deal.
Anything else, and I mean any combination of assets not identified above isn't worth considering. One of 6OA, Reinbacher, or Slafkovsky is required, or there is no deal.</div></div>
Really. If you think Zegs is worth Slaf, you should put down your playstation.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
22 avr. à 23 h 44
Sujet:
whats enough to let go Zegras
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>squashmaple</b></div><div>Anaheim can and would do better than that offer.
Those are some fascinating UFA choices. Not sure what the attraction is for either the Ducks or those players, tbh.</div></div>
Doubt it.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
21 avr. à 22 h 40
Sujet:
Coremy Schwayman
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Habs_22_14_20</b></div><div>I really thought the title was for Habs legend Corey Schueneman</div></div>
Me too lmao
Forum:
Armchair-GM
21 avr. à 10 h 4
Sujet:
Next Year
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hawksguy81</b></div><div>Your correct. Utah shouldn't move Hayton. Because coming off his injury and poor offensive production this season, his value is nowhere close to a 1st or a 2nd. He's had one solid season as a pro. Not a great season. A solid season. Hawks definitely wouldn't pay your ask for Hayton. I doubt any team would.</div></div>
I disagree. Enjoy!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
20 avr. à 22 h 53
Sujet:
2024-25 Habs
Im not sure how, but I feel like you make the team worse.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
20 avr. à 21 h 38
Sujet:
Next Year
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hawksguy81</b></div><div>As discussed in your prior Utah post, Hawks aren't spending a 2nd on Hayton. He just doesn't have that sort of value. Hawks also won't target Dillon or any other LD as a free agent other than maybe a depth left shot guy who can play both sides as their 7th D. I'm fine w/ Carrier and Foegele. Instead of Mantha, Hawks need a middle 6 C. Reichel isn't in the lineup. He will be for sure. Entwistle, Johnson, Roos won't be re-signed.</div></div>
Hayton still has great value. Imo a 2nd would be a steal. A late 1st and a b-prospect if AZ/UT are desperate to move him. Which they shouldn't be. Hes still has legit top 6 potential. Just might not be a fit with Cooley and Geekie coming.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
20 avr. à 19 h 38
Sujet:
interesting
Habs won't be desperate for cap space. Probably the year Anderson's contract is ending. At that point a playoff team would pay something for his services at 50% retained.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
20 avr. à 19 h 23
Sujet:
Wildcard 2025
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OldNYIfan</b></div><div>Minnesota isn't trading you the 13th overall draft pick in return for two bottom-pairing defensemen and a pick in the late 50's. Don't you think that they'd rather have Greentree or Hage themselves instead of that package? (And that assumes that all of Parekh, Silayev and Yakemchuk and the most highly-rated European forwards are all off the board, too.)</div></div>
Personally I see Harris and Struble and middle pairing dmen. And NHL ready. Never know what a draft pick can become. Habs have that luxury. They might be upgrades on Gologoski, Merrill and/or Bogosian as early as next year. But thank you for your perspective.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
19 avr. à 13 h 31
Sujet:
trade up
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ansabch12</b></div><div>Man you couldn’t even muster one singular argument to disprove anything ledge said, you got cooked buddy 😬</div></div>
Only fools think interaction about hockey on a board have any merit. Enjoy!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
18 avr. à 21 h 53
Sujet:
Continuing the retool
I doubt they fracture Harris' value into pieces. Imo he would net a late 2nd.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
18 avr. à 21 h 47
Sujet:
off season
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>squashmaple</b></div><div>If you feel like you have to add that many pieces to one side of a trade to balance it… it’s a bad trade.</div></div>
I would agree with you. But there is alot alot of quality in that trade. I would argue it is an overpay. 6 quarters for a dollar, imho.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
18 avr. à 20 h 57
Sujet:
trade up
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ledge_And_Dairy</b></div><div>I watched my fair share of games. The issue is outside of Savard all of the Habs defensemen did quite a bit better than him.
Lmao nobody is giving you a top 50 pick for him without retention. Maybe some dumb GM will toss you a late 2nd then quickly regret it like Detroit did with Leddy.</div></div>
Okie Dokie. Keep posting 20 comments a day, you might get something right.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
18 avr. à 19 h 14
Sujet:
trade up
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ledge_And_Dairy</b></div><div>Sure I can.
5v5 out of ~250 defensemen that have played at least 300 minutes he ranks 2nd in SCA and 13th is SCA/60, he ranks 24th in xGA/60 and 9th is CA/60. Despite having 62 points this season only has 21 points at 5v5 and 29 points on the PP, despite playing over 1100 more minutes at 5v5. his other 12 points are split between 6v5, 5v6, and PK.</div></div>
..and how many games did you watch of the 26th overall Canadiens with a minus 53 goal diff??
Forum:
Armchair-GM
18 avr. à 18 h 59
Sujet:
trade up
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>westcoasthabslifer</b></div><div>Legitimately insane takes on Matheson here. Matheson ALONE is worth #9. I can’t even believe there’s people arguing that. He literally plays the top 5 hardest minutes in the league while being top 10 in points. On a steal of a contract for 2 more years. Like come on.</div></div>
EA pro's know best. He wasn't as good in NHL2022. So he's a flash in the pan. Not enough x-factor icons.
1
2
Suivant
Page 1
Remerciements à
Guillaume Lambert-Héon
pour l'aide à la traduction de l'anglais au français
SalarySwish
| Masses salariales de la NBA par CapFriendly
Conditions d’utilisation
Politique de confidentialité
Règlements du forum
À propos de nous
FAQ - Convention collective
Nous contacter
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com