SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Picking 5th

Créé par: Habsfansince73
Équipe: 2024-25 Canadiens de Montréal
Date de création initiale: 18 avr. 2024
Publié: 18 avr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
If the trade is accepted, the Habs will be picking Cayden Lindstrom and Tij Iginla.
If it's not, what do the Habs need to add for it to happen.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3800 000 $
2775 000 $
2775 000 $
2775 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
2900 000 $
1900 000 $
3900 000 $
21 250 000 $
2900 000 $
31 750 000 $
2950 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
2800 000 $
2800 000 $
2800 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Lindstrom, Cayden
3800 000 $
Iginla, Tij
3775 000 $
Transactions
1.
MTL
  1. Choix de 7e ronde en 2026 (ARI)
Détails additionnels:
ANY TEAM
ARI
  1. Armia, Joel
  2. Dvorak, Christian
  3. Ylönen, Jesse
Détails additionnels:
at the 24/25 TDL
2.
MTL
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (ARI)
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (ARI)
ARI
  1. Barron, Justin
  2. Harris, Jordan
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (CGY)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de MTL
Logo de WPG
Logo de ARI
Logo de COL
Logo de ARI
Logo de MTL
Logo de MIN
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de SJS
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de EDM
Logo de WSH
2025
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de PIT
Logo de MTL
Logo de NJD
Logo de VAN
Logo de MTL
Logo de DET
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
2026
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de ARI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2384 500 000 $64 857 083 $1 022 500 $4 747 500 $19 642 917 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 7
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
C
UFA - 6
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 500 000 $$4M)
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Iginla, Tij
775 000 $775 000 $
Lindstrom, Cayden
800 000 $800 000 $
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 362 500 $3 362 500 $
C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
835 000 $835 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 900 000 $2 900 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
885 000 $885 000 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
812 500 $812 500 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance750 000 $$750K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance420 000 $$420K)
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 875 000 $4 875 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
875 000 $875 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
890 000 $890 000 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
867 500 $867 500 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
DG/DD
RFA
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
18 avr. à 13 h 54
#1
Matt1567
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 558
Mentions "j'aime": 240
What's everyone's obsession with the habs trading for a top 10 pick to draft a forward in a defense heavy class that's overall weaker than the average draft when they already have a top 5 pick and likely get one of the few forwards actually worth being top 10
18 avr. à 13 h 57
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 5,875
Mentions "j'aime": 1,528
that would not get 6th OA.
18 avr. à 13 h 58
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 1,058
Mentions "j'aime": 366
Modifié 18 avr. à 14 h 6
That's not even close, especially since the chances are they'd get Florida's 2025 1st. Definitely have to lose Arizonas 2nd going back too. It would probably cost Hutson or Reinbacher, since that's what they'd be giving up, the chance to get a top pairing defenseman with their pick.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
18 avr. à 14 h 16
#4
Bandwagon fairweathe
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 7,643
Mentions "j'aime": 3,271
Doesn’t really do much for Arizona, they have an abundance of picks and quantity of prospects, they are shooting for gold, need of franchise changers via draft/free agency or any trades.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
18 avr. à 14 h 20
#5
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,473
Mentions "j'aime": 25,368
Quoting: Shaun80
That's not even close, especially since the chances are they'd get Florida's 2025 1st. Definitely have to lose Arizona's 2nd going back too. It would probably cost Hutson or Reinbacher, since that's what they'd be giving up, the chance to get a top pairing defenseman with their pick.

Absolutely right, and not only about the point that I've emphasized. Arizona isn't giving up the seventh overall pick without getting a 2024 first (or the equivalent, like Hutson) back. Consider just the top prospects at their positions, all of who are rated in the top 10: Celebrini, Catton and Lindstrom (Cs), Buium and Dickinson (LDs), and Levshunov and Parekh (RDs), plus wild cards Demidov, Connelly and Yakemchuk. Assuming that one of the forwards goes in the first three with Celebrini and Levshunov, any of the remaining seven choices are a better value than the two complementary defensemen and the Florida 2025 first. And I haven't included Eiserman, Helenius or Silayev in this calculus.
Shaun80 a aimé ceci.
18 avr. à 14 h 40
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 19,594
Mentions "j'aime": 6,734
Not even close to getting 06 OV. Like I refrain from saying it because I don't think GM's actually do this but if they did, this would be worthy of a "laughs and hangs up" type of response.
18 avr. à 22 h 28
#7
Habswest
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 66
Mentions "j'aime": 23
I’d do Matheson or Guhle for the pick straight up. I think Utah would definitely consider especially since it sounds like they want to compete and go for it right away. And they were probably likely to take a dman with the pick anyways.
19 avr. à 13 h 44
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 186
Mentions "j'aime": 17
Quoting: Matt1567
What's everyone's obsession with the habs trading for a top 10 pick to draft a forward in a defense heavy class that's overall weaker than the average draft when they already have a top 5 pick and likely get one of the few forwards actually worth being top 10


Mainly because the Habs need forwards and not Defencemen
19 avr. à 14 h 32
#9
Matt1567
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 558
Mentions "j'aime": 240
Quoting: Habsfansince73
Mainly because the Habs need forwards and not Defencemen


but with our own pick we can get one for sure, and I think you can get better already established guys for the same price as moving up to say 9th overall, this draft isn't strong enough for forwards to justify moving up. Last year would've been a great draft to do it, but this year not so much
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage