SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

to me this is really the only deal that makes any sense

Créé par: Borocop
Équipe: 2024-25 Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Date de création initiale: 12 avr. 2024
Publié: 12 avr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Before you yell at me, this would be a deal way more complicated than just buying a rental, an assortment of pieces that cumulatively add up to a certain point of value won't cut it. It has to make actual sense for both teams to consider doing this.

For the sens, the rationale is that they get a piece they can add to their younger core at a position they have almost nothing at who can play a significant role for them down the line.

For the devils, the rationale is that Tkachuk brings more than enough value to compensate for going from Hamilton-Nemec-Marino to Hamilton-Casey-Marino and opens their cup contending window up as a result.


I dont care about the perceived value of the players, there needs to be logical rationale behind the move for both sides so dont tell me Nemec is more valuable than Thacuk or vice-versa, let me know if my rationale makes sense or not as to why both sides would or would not do this based on that.
Transactions
OTT
  1. Nemec, Simon
Détails additionnels:
straight-up
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de OTT
Logo de BOS
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de DET
Logo de FLA
Logo de TBL
Logo de OTT
2025
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de FLA
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
2026
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
1687 500 000 $67 513 333 $850 000 $3 250 000 $19 986 667 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 350 000 $8 350 000 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AD, C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 950 000 $2 950 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
7 950 000 $7 950 000 $
C
UFA - 6
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 975 000 $4 975 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
835 000 $835 000 $
C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
775 000 $775 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 050 000 $8 050 000 $
DG
UFA - 8
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
918 333 $918 333 $ (Bonis de performance3 250 000 $$3M)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
805 000 $805 000 $
DD
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
12 avr. à 15 h 18
#1
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 43,181
Mentions "j'aime": 24,068
Same here. This fits the Sens needs and direction. Otherwise I just don’t see it.

It’s the devils that want Tkachuk so badly , not the Sens needing to move him.

This is a hilarious convo
Borocop et FoxYou727 a aimé ceci.
12 avr. à 15 h 19
#2
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 29,324
Mentions "j'aime": 11,371
I think the amount of sense it makes is easily higher than the likelyhood of it happening.
Borocop, csick et FoxYou727 a aimé ceci.
12 avr. à 15 h 19
#3
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 43,181
Mentions "j'aime": 24,068
If you’re the devils and you make an offer that it doesn’t hurt you to part with , then you did not offer enough for Brady.

You just didn’t
12 avr. à 15 h 19
#4
Démarrer sujet
Au-revoir Dorion
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 4,576
Mentions "j'aime": 3,018
Quoting: mokumboi
I think the amount of sense it makes is easily higher than the likelyhood of it happening.


100%
csick a aimé ceci.
12 avr. à 15 h 19
#5
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 43,181
Mentions "j'aime": 24,068
Quoting: mokumboi
I think the amount of sense it makes is easily higher than the likelyhood of it happening.


100% . The odds of Brady being moved are low
12 avr. à 15 h 22
#6
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 43,181
Mentions "j'aime": 24,068
Quoting: mokumboi
I think the amount of sense it makes is easily higher than the likelyhood of it happening.


I just don’t get this. Like it’s other teams that are trying to pry Brady from Ottawa.

Like for example if they have to move him and he refuses to report then maybe you’re like I’ll take Kyrou and a 2nd .

But as is , other teams trying to pry him needs to give ottawa an offer they can’t refuse.

Mercer, Casey/Marino and a 1st isn’t an offer they can’t refuse from a quality perspective.
12 avr. à 15 h 28
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 4,422
Mentions "j'aime": 2,266
What is with the Brady to NJD push anyway? Maybe it's not just a good fit? I'm not sure who started it on either side.

Brady isn't Matthew. Brady isn't someone I would blow up a ton of the youth for, sorry. He's a really, really nice player, but the Devils are better setup with a depth of talent than to move a top two-way defenseman in Nemec.
Borocop a aimé ceci.
12 avr. à 15 h 30
#8
Démarrer sujet
Au-revoir Dorion
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 4,576
Mentions "j'aime": 3,018
Quoting: NJDevils1317
What is with the Brady to NJD push anyway? Maybe it's not just a good fit? I'm not sure who started it on either side.

Brady isn't Matthew. Brady isn't someone I would blow up a ton of the youth for, sorry. He's a really, really nice player, but the Devils are better setup with a depth of talent than to move a top two-way defenseman in Nemec.


i think mike rupps comments on NHL network really got the ball rolling. Totally fair though, I am a big Nemec fan
csick a aimé ceci.
12 avr. à 15 h 32
#9
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 43,181
Mentions "j'aime": 24,068
Quoting: NJDevils1317
What is with the Brady to NJD push anyway? Maybe it's not just a good fit? I'm not sure who started it on either side.

Brady isn't Matthew. Brady isn't someone I would blow up a ton of the youth for, sorry. He's a really, really nice player, but the Devils are better setup with a depth of talent than to move a top two-way defenseman in Nemec.


Brady is a slightly less skilled (Matthew is a better playmaker) but way more gritty version of Matthew. Brady hits more , cannot be moved from the front of the net and tips goals in front and out muscles ppl for rebounds .

This is way more valuable in the playoffs than even what Matthew brings .
12 avr. à 15 h 39
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 40,377
Mentions "j'aime": 18,419
Quoting: NJDevils1317
What is with the Brady to NJD push anyway? Maybe it's not just a good fit? I'm not sure who started it on either side.

Brady isn't Matthew. Brady isn't someone I would blow up a ton of the youth for, sorry. He's a really, really nice player, but the Devils are better setup with a depth of talent than to move a top two-way defenseman in Nemec.


A talking head on NHL network said it ought to happen. There is no news here. Just nothing else to talk about.
Borocop a aimé ceci.
12 avr. à 15 h 39
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 968
Mentions "j'aime": 546
It makes a lot of sense definitely and is fair but I feel like both teams decline
Borocop a aimé ceci.
12 avr. à 15 h 40
#12
Démarrer sujet
Au-revoir Dorion
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 4,576
Mentions "j'aime": 3,018
Quoting: NHLfan10506
A talking head on NHL network said it ought to happen. There is no news here. Just nothing else to talk about.


we are at that point of the season
12 avr. à 15 h 40
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 40,377
Mentions "j'aime": 18,419
Nemec is not going anywhere.
Borocop et NJDevils1317 a aimé ceci.
12 avr. à 15 h 43
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 40,377
Mentions "j'aime": 18,419
Quoting: Borocop
we are at that point of the season


Indeed. I am trying to limit myself to one visit to Tankathon per day. But my browser keeps thinking I want more.
Borocop a aimé ceci.
12 avr. à 15 h 44
#15
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 11,966
Mentions "j'aime": 3,161
Quoting: csick
Brady is a slightly less skilled (Matthew is a better playmaker) but way more gritty version of Matthew. Brady hits more , cannot be moved from the front of the net and tips goals in front and out muscles ppl for rebounds .

This is way more valuable in the playoffs than even what Matthew brings .


If only Brady could make the playoffs to see that.

"slightly less skilled" is a weird way to describe an 80 point gap in the last 3 years.

Dawson Mercer (age 19-20-21) is as close to brady tkachuk in points over the last 3 years than Brady is to Matthew.
12 avr. à 15 h 47
#16
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 43,181
Mentions "j'aime": 24,068
Quoting: dgibb10
If only Brady could make the playoffs to see that.

"slightly less skilled" is a weird way to describe an 80 point gap in the last 3 years.

Dawson Mercer (age 19-20-21) is as close to brady tkachuk in points over the last 3 years than Brady is to Matthew.


Matthew is 2 years older . Ages 21 to 24 is way different than ages 23 to 26 lmao.

Calgary was also a way better team than ottawa ever was and so is Florida .
12 avr. à 15 h 50
#17
Démarrer sujet
Au-revoir Dorion
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 4,576
Mentions "j'aime": 3,018
Quoting: NHLfan10506
Indeed. I am trying to limit myself to one visit to Tankathon per day. But my browser keeps thinking I want more.


the sens have won my tankathon simulations way too many times for me to expect us to not win the lottery at this point lol
12 avr. à 15 h 51
#18
Démarrer sujet
Au-revoir Dorion
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 4,576
Mentions "j'aime": 3,018
Quoting: dgibb10
If only Brady could make the playoffs to see that.

"slightly less skilled" is a weird way to describe an 80 point gap in the last 3 years.

Dawson Mercer (age 19-20-21) is as close to brady tkachuk in points over the last 3 years than Brady is to Matthew.


Quoting: csick
Matthew is 2 years older . Ages 21 to 24 is way different than ages 23 to 26 lmao.

Calgary was also a way better team than ottawa ever was and so is Florida .


Matt tkachuk is better than Brady Tkachuk, Brady Tkachuk is better than Dawson Mercer. Hope this helps
12 avr. à 15 h 54
#19
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 11,966
Mentions "j'aime": 3,161
Quoting: csick
Matthew is 2 years older . Ages 21 to 24 is way different than ages 23 to 26 lmao.

Calgary was also a way better team than ottawa ever was and so is Florida .


There's the same age gap between Mercer and Brady as there is Brady and Matthew. Except mercer is earlier in the development curve so the age gap actually means more in this case

Now, before you get it twisted, I am not saying mercer is as good as brady or that he will be.

I am saying Brady is lightyears behind Matthew.
12 avr. à 15 h 54
#20
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 43,181
Mentions "j'aime": 24,068
Quoting: Borocop
Matt tkachuk is better than Brady Tkachuk, Brady Tkachuk is better than Dawson Mercer. Hope this helps


I just looked at all the analytics from this season.

Mercer = okay to very meh
Holtz = Goddamn awful everywhere my god the next Wahlstrom
Marino = very meh

Tkachuk has better analytics than Hischier at both ends this year . It’s not massive but Tkachuk beats him slightly at both ends
12 avr. à 15 h 57
#21
Démarrer sujet
Au-revoir Dorion
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 4,576
Mentions "j'aime": 3,018
Quoting: csick
I just looked at all the analytics from this season.

Mercer = okay to very meh
Holtz = Goddamn awful everywhere my god the next Wahlstrom
Marino = very meh

Tkachuk has better analytics than Hischier at both ends this year . It’s not massive but Tkachuk beats him slightly at both ends


who cares? Tkachuk is what he is and hes not what hes not. If people dont want to trade nemec for him then theyre entitled to say they wont just as were entitled to say we wont trade Tkahuck for anything but Nemec
csick a aimé ceci.
12 avr. à 15 h 58
#22
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 43,181
Mentions "j'aime": 24,068
Quoting: Borocop
who cares? Tkachuk is what he is and hes not what hes not. If people dont want to trade nemec for him then theyre entitled to say they wont just as were entitled to say we wont trade Tkahuck for anything but Nemec


Yeah exactly .
Borocop a aimé ceci.
12 avr. à 16 h 1
#23
Démarrer sujet
Au-revoir Dorion
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 4,576
Mentions "j'aime": 3,018
Quoting: csick
Yeah exactly .


then stop falling into the trap lol
12 avr. à 16 h 1
#24
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 11,966
Mentions "j'aime": 3,161
Quoting: csick
I just looked at all the analytics from this season.

Mercer = okay to very meh
Holtz = Goddamn awful everywhere my god the next Wahlstrom
Marino = very meh

Tkachuk has better analytics than Hischier at both ends this year . It’s not massive but Tkachuk beats him slightly at both ends


If your analysis of players is based on 1 year of play you'd be a very easy GM to fleece.
12 avr. à 16 h 3
#25
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 43,181
Mentions "j'aime": 24,068
Quoting: dgibb10
If your analysis of players is based on 1 year of play you'd be a very easy GM to fleece.


Not at all. But you cannot ignore this year . If you don’t consider it you’re dumb
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage