SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

The Best Avs ACGM

Créé par: Anus_McLeod
Équipe: 2024-25 Avalanche du Colorado
Date de création initiale: 1 avr. 2024
Publié: 2 avr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Or perhaps the worst. Either way, counting on the FO to get good deals for both Mitts and Walker. Term can be adjusted if needed.

The goal is to get similar on ice performance but from cheaper personnel.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3950 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
56 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1775 000 $
1775 000 $
54 250 000 $
Transactions
1.
2.
COL
  1. Laughton, Scott
Détails additionnels:
Does Colorado need to add? Straight up seems close to fair on the surface but not sure if Philly has the incentive to do this.
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de ANA
Logo de SEA
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de NSH
2025
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
2026
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de PHI
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2287 700 000 $87 692 917 $0 $57 500 $7 083 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
12 600 000 $12 600 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
9 250 000 $9 250 000 $
AD, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG, C
RFA
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
896 250 $896 250 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
847 500 $847 500 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
845 000 $845 000 $
C
RFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
766 667 $766 667 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
837 500 $837 500 $
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
950 000 $950 000 $
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
775 000 $775 000 $
DG
UFA
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
850 000 $850 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
775 000 $775 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD, AG
UFA

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
2 avr. à 12 h 38
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 1,680
Mentions "j'aime": 1,007
That Mittelstadt contract is optimistic even if the Avs can get a good deal.

Habs don't make that trade and Avs need to add to the Philly trade (or just replace Manson).
Anus_McLeod a aimé ceci.
2 avr. à 12 h 41
#2
Habs 2010
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2020
Messages: 1,542
Mentions "j'aime": 969
That's a fair trade offer for Kovacevic (value wise), but I don't think MTL would really want Colton.
Anus_McLeod a aimé ceci.
2 avr. à 12 h 50
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 9,604
Mentions "j'aime": 4,583
You've disappointed me in that Monahan wasn't re-signed by MTL and traded to the Avs for their first round pick in 2026.

Not sure whether MTL would have interest in Colton but Kovacevic is definitely a guy the Avs should be looking at imo but I'd probably pass on the Manson for Laughton deal from the Avs PoV and keep Manson if possible and maybe give Trenin a shot at the 3C job (I like Walker but I'd rather keep Manson's nastiness and physicality over 'more of the same' in Walker and not sure JK has the nastiness of JM). Trenin hasn't really actually played that much at C though even if listed as one (or at least he hasn't taken many face offs which to me means he hasn't played C much) but then the same was true for Colton prior to this year. Yakov has definitely been the most impressive of the 'deadline' additions for me so far, and has a rep for taking other young Russians under his wing and might just have Kovalenko actually on his wing too.
Anus_McLeod et MeetYourMakar a aimé ceci.
2 avr. à 12 h 56
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 3,584
Mentions "j'aime": 3,444
Quoting: Shanesaw9
That's a fair trade offer for Kovacevic (value wise), but I don't think MTL would really want Colton.


I feel like Colton would make their bottom six better but also recognize they have a lot of forwards when healthy. I could see it happening if they also moved, say Evans.

Ultimately the Avs could move Colton for a pick and make a different offer for Kovacevic, but I went this route for the sake of simplicity.
TJTwolf et Shanesaw9 a aimé ceci.
2 avr. à 12 h 58
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 3,584
Mentions "j'aime": 3,444
Modifié 2 avr. à 13 h 4
Quoting: TJTwolf
You've disappointed me in that Monahan wasn't re-signed by MTL and traded to the Avs for their first round pick in 2026.

Not sure whether MTL would have interest in Colton but Kovacevic is definitely a guy the Avs should be looking at imo but I'd probably pass on the Manson for Laughton deal from the Avs PoV and keep Manson if possible and maybe give Trenin a shot at the 3C job (I like Walker but I'd rather keep Manson's nastiness and physicality over 'more of the same' in Walker and not sure JK has the nastiness of JM). Trenin hasn't really actually played that much at C though even if listed as one (or at least he hasn't taken many face offs which to me means he hasn't played C much) but then the same was true for Colton prior to this year. Yakov has definitely been the most impressive of the 'deadline' additions for me so far, and has a rep for taking other young Russians under his wing and might just have Kovalenko actually on his wing too.


I think the team needs Walker more than you do. If Kovacevic can be Manson lite, then I think that's enough. Basically it comes down to if Manson + Malinski > Kovacevic + Walker. Close call but I like the latter, and especially if Walker comes on a good deal.

Edit: Fair point about 3C. There are other options, one of which could be Trenin. Maybe even Kovalenko, although it's tough to say considering he hasn't played a single game yet.
TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
2 avr. à 13 h 18
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2023
Messages: 182
Mentions "j'aime": 99
Quite sure Flyers would decline. They value Laughton 1st+ (may it be realistic or not), and Manson wouldn't get that kinda return. And also don't think they want add another injury prone D, they have had more than enough injuries with D already.
Anus_McLeod a aimé ceci.
2 avr. à 13 h 22
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 9,604
Mentions "j'aime": 4,583
Quoting: Anus_McLeod
I think the team needs Walker more than you do. If Kovacevic can be Manson lite, then I think that's enough. Basically it comes down to if Manson + Malinski > Kovacevic + Walker. Close call but I like the latter, and especially if Walker comes on a good deal.

Edit: Fair point about 3C. There are other options, one of which could be Trenin. Maybe even Kovalenko, although it's tough to say considering he hasn't played a single game yet.


For me it's very much in the mix as to who is best to keep and who isn't. I have my favourites to keep, let go or trade but even then I can see the arguments for and against others. It's something of a headache but arguably a nice one to have for CMac & Joe. There's arguments to be made for keeping, trading or letting go any of a number of guys. I think playoff performance will be a key (and possibly determining) factor for both the various individuals and the team as much as potential returns in trades and potential internal replacements. My thinking is Manson & Kovacevic btw, a mix of the two options you give (with Malinski rotating in from the scratches). Personally if it weren't for the age factor I'd probably move Girard to keep Walker even though Walker is a righty as he can play left D as well. Girard also probably gives the best return in a trade for re-stocking. A lot of factors to consider.
Anus_McLeod et MeetYourMakar a aimé ceci.
2 avr. à 14 h 33
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 3,584
Mentions "j'aime": 3,444
Quoting: Ujeje
Quite sure Flyers would decline. They value Laughton 1st+ (may it be realistic or not), and Manson wouldn't get that kinda return. And also don't think they want add another injury prone D, they have had more than enough injuries with D already.


I do think they could use Manson but also suspect you're right about them valuing Laughton very highly (likely too highly). Maybe I'll change the next one to futures for Manson.
TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
2 avr. à 14 h 40
#9
Leaf Fan Joke Here
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 344
Mentions "j'aime": 107
colorado gonna retain 50%?

Good 4-6 D on min deal for a 3rd line center on a massive cap hit with term
2 avr. à 16 h 3
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 3,584
Mentions "j'aime": 3,444
Quoting: HabsAreSus
colorado gonna retain 50%?

Good 4-6 D on min deal for a 3rd line center on a massive cap hit with term


Colton's cap hit is fine for what he brings. Maybe a little steep but not a lot. Heck, Dvorak makes more than him, and Habs fans wanted a lot to move him back when he was healthy.

I'd happily keep Colton if it weren't necessary to find cap somewhere. To me both teams get a piece they can use in the trade.
2 avr. à 16 h 39
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2023
Messages: 182
Mentions "j'aime": 99
Quoting: Anus_McLeod
I do think they could use Manson but also suspect you're right about them valuing Laughton very highly (likely too highly). Maybe I'll change the next one to futures for Manson.


I think timing ain't right for them to acquire Manson unless they move Ristolainen. Or at least in my opinion they shouldn't trade for him unless they get something to help them in future as well.
Anus_McLeod a aimé ceci.
2 avr. à 17 h 27
#12
Prime Primeau
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 5,461
Mentions "j'aime": 2,172
Hum, yes. Where do we sign up?
Anus_McLeod a aimé ceci.
3 avr. à 7 h 55
#13
Habs 2010
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2020
Messages: 1,542
Mentions "j'aime": 969
Quoting: Anus_McLeod
I feel like Colton would make their bottom six better but also recognize they have a lot of forwards when healthy. I could see it happening if they also moved, say Evans.

Ultimately the Avs could move Colton for a pick and make a different offer for Kovacevic, but I went this route for the sake of simplicity.


Colton for sure would be an improvement to their current bottom 6, however I'm hoping for bigger things from the habs this offseason. A reunion with Monahan on the 3rd line would be ideal IMO.

They have lots of cap space and defenseman / draft picks to make a big splash this offseason potentially.
Anus_McLeod a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage