SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Gabe Comes Back

Créé par: DrFart_PhD_MD_Esq
Équipe: 2024-25 Avalanche du Colorado
Date de création initiale: 25 mars 2024
Publié: 25 mars 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
66 000 000 $
3900 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
62 750 000 $
1825 000 $
1825 000 $
Transactions
1.
COL
  1. Perbix, Jack [Liste de réserve]
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (BOS)
2.
COL
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (ANA)
Détails additionnels:
I have no idea if Anaheim or anyone accepts Ross in a draft day trade. I just think the Avs will need to dump his cap or Josh Mansons cap if Gabe comes back. Would love to resign walker but likely not realistic.
ANA
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (BOS)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de COL
Logo de ANA
Logo de COL
Logo de ANA
Logo de SEA
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de NSH
2025
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
2026
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de PHI
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2187 500 000 $86 911 667 $0 $80 000 $588 333 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
12 600 000 $12 600 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
9 250 000 $9 250 000 $
AD, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG, C
RFA
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG, C
UFA
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
825 000 $825 000 $
AG
UFA
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
898 750 $898 750 $ (Bonis de performance22 500 $$22K)
C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
896 250 $896 250 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
AD
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
900 000 $900 000 $
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
825 000 $825 000 $
DG
UFA
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
850 000 $850 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
791 667 $791 667 $
DG
RFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
25 mars à 11 h 42
#1
Representing the 505
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 4,524
Mentions "j'aime": 3,718
I like Trenin but I'm not buying him as a 3C. I also think, given his age, Mitts is either going long or just doing a 3-4 year bridge to get to UFA before he hits 30. Also would prefer they trade Manson to keep Walker but that may not be possible.
25 mars à 11 h 45
#2
Future Ducks legend
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 10,244
Mentions "j'aime": 7,032
Why is Anaheim giving up a 2nd for a guy who we could have signed if we wanted to?
GeneralLandro a aimé ceci.
25 mars à 11 h 46
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 15,935
Mentions "j'aime": 12,270
Can’t see Verbeek wanting to trade a 2nd for another center
Jded a aimé ceci.
25 mars à 11 h 58
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 2,830
Mentions "j'aime": 2,481
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
Why is Anaheim giving up a 2nd for a guy who we could have signed if we wanted to?


How was Anaheim able to sign an rfa "if they wanted to"?
Xqb15a, Anus_McLeod, JeffW and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
25 mars à 12 h 1
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 2,830
Mentions "j'aime": 2,481
Quoting: GeneralLandro
Can’t see Verbeek wanting to trade a 2nd for another center


Replace Rico while the young guns grow? Seem to be lacking proven nhl centers. Might not be the right guy for you but I see a need at center unless you're full sending next season towards a high pick.
25 mars à 12 h 13
#6
Future Ducks legend
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 10,244
Mentions "j'aime": 7,032
Quoting: MeetYourMakar
How was Anaheim able to sign an rfa "if they wanted to"?


Saw 27 and first year of contract, thought he was a UFA signing.

Either way, last thing Anaheim needs is another center.
25 mars à 12 h 14
#7
Future Ducks legend
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 10,244
Mentions "j'aime": 7,032
Modifié 25 mars à 17 h 16
Quoting: MeetYourMakar
Replace Rico while the young guns grow? Seem to be lacking proven nhl centers. Might not be the right guy for you but I see a need at center unless you're full sending next season towards a high pick.


McTavish, Lundestrom, and Strome are all proven NHL centers, and we can go hunting in UFA if we specifically want a short term guy while the kids come in.
GeneralLandro a aimé ceci.
25 mars à 12 h 44
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,884
Mentions "j'aime": 1,906
Quoting: MeetYourMakar
Replace Rico while the young guns grow? Seem to be lacking proven nhl centers. Might not be the right guy for you but I see a need at center unless you're full sending next season towards a high pick.


Ducks have Carlsson, McTavish, Zegras, Strome, Lundestrom, Grouxl, Gauthier who could all very reasonably play center for ANA next year. What do you mean?
GeneralLandro a aimé ceci.
25 mars à 14 h 7
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 2,830
Mentions "j'aime": 2,481
Quoting: Jded
Ducks have Carlsson, McTavish, Zegras, Strome, Lundestrom, Grouxl, Gauthier who could all very reasonably play center for ANA next year. What do you mean?


This is center depth that will win a draft loto, not a playoff birth. Strome has been good but also plays the wing, I am high on McTavish but, he isn't a full time center either. Zegras is a wing. Leo learning at 1 or 2c isnt a bad idea but that doubles back to what the Ducks plan to do. How many more seasons until you try for playoffs? I am not saying Colton is the right guy, but this isnt an nhl center depth that gives anyone concern. You've acquired some really really good prospect, would figure its about time to bring in established talent and make a run at the weak Pacific.
25 mars à 15 h 14
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,884
Mentions "j'aime": 1,906
Quoting: MeetYourMakar
This is center depth that will win a draft loto, not a playoff birth. Strome has been good but also plays the wing, I am high on McTavish but, he isn't a full time center either. Zegras is a wing. Leo learning at 1 or 2c isnt a bad idea but that doubles back to what the Ducks plan to do. How many more seasons until you try for playoffs? I am not saying Colton is the right guy, but this isnt an nhl center depth that gives anyone concern. You've acquired some really really good prospect, would figure its about time to bring in established talent and make a run at the weak Pacific.


I’m sorry but I don’t think you’ve been watching ANA games (which frankly, is a very good thing for you).

Leo has only been learning exclusively as a 1 or 2C and has looked totally solid for this being his D+1 year. He will remain in that role for ANA long-term

McTavish is undoubtedly a 2C for ANA right now. He’s almost producing .7pt/g and >52% faceoffs as a 21 year old. He’s locked in with Leo as 1/2Cs now and long/term.

That leaves 3C with Zegras (who has 2 60+ point campaigns exclusively as a center), Strome who is center capable but I agree better for the wing, Lundestrom and Grouxl who are probably more 4Cs, and Gauthier who will more likely play LW but could totally get looks at C.

I love the idea of being a contender, but I’m less convinced that the time to sell futures for a run at the division is right after back/to-back campaigns as a bottom 3 NHL team. We have a lot of issues to fix and development of our youth to be had. I actually agree that Colton would be a solid 3C, but I’m not sure it makes sense to lock up $4Mx3 at what is one of Anaheim’s least concerning positions long-term, and where our young guys need to be playing to develop. It’s not an absurd proposal though tbh, I’d actually like Colton. I just dont agree that the Ducks don’t have centers. We have like 4 <23year old Cs that I expect to be in our top 6 next year alone
GiggywithGibby a aimé ceci.
25 mars à 17 h 18
#11
Future Ducks legend
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 10,244
Mentions "j'aime": 7,032
Quoting: MeetYourMakar
This is center depth that will win a draft loto, not a playoff birth. Strome has been good but also plays the wing, I am high on McTavish but, he isn't a full time center either. Zegras is a wing. Leo learning at 1 or 2c isnt a bad idea but that doubles back to what the Ducks plan to do. How many more seasons until you try for playoffs? I am not saying Colton is the right guy, but this isnt an nhl center depth that gives anyone concern. You've acquired some really really good prospect, would figure its about time to bring in established talent and make a run at the weak Pacific.


Leo is our 1C, McTavish has been exclusively 2C all year. If we feel the need for a 3C, again, there is free agency, especially if we want someone short term.
25 mars à 17 h 32
#12
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 12,623
Mentions "j'aime": 3,361
Can NJD get in on that ross colton offer?
25 mars à 18 h 14
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,884
Mentions "j'aime": 1,906
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
Leo is our 1C, McTavish has been exclusively 2C all year. If we feel the need for a 3C, again, there is free agency, especially if we want someone short term.


I’ll be honest, the more I think about this the more I’m into it. Zegras doesn’t make sense as a 3C. Even if he works on his defensive game, he’ll always be offense first and not someone who should start their shifts in the dzone. Gauthier is likely a LW for us and also deserving of a better ceiling than 3C behind Leo and McT. That leaves Gaucher who disappointed this year and looks like he needs at least a year if not more, and may end up topping out on the 4th line. A Vatrano - Colton - Killorn 3rd line could start like 60% of their shifts in the dzone and play solid defense but also still contribute some pretty solid production
26 mars à 10 h 5
#14
Future Ducks legend
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 10,244
Mentions "j'aime": 7,032
Quoting: Jded
I’ll be honest, the more I think about this the more I’m into it. Zegras doesn’t make sense as a 3C. Even if he works on his defensive game, he’ll always be offense first and not someone who should start their shifts in the dzone. Gauthier is likely a LW for us and also deserving of a better ceiling than 3C behind Leo and McT. That leaves Gaucher who disappointed this year and looks like he needs at least a year if not more, and may end up topping out on the 4th line. A Vatrano - Colton - Killorn 3rd line could start like 60% of their shifts in the dzone and play solid defense but also still contribute some pretty solid production


If we going to bring in an upgrade at 3C, then we should send cheaper roster players the other way.

A big reason Colorado would look to do this is for cap relief, and they are still in compete mode. Lundestrom or Groulx and a long shot NHLer like Helleson makes more sense I think.
Jded a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage