SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Necas to Montreal

Créé par: Caniac2000
Équipe: 2024-25 Hurricanes de la Caroline
Date de création initiale: 24 mars 2024
Publié: 24 mars 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Accurate/Prorated
LTIR activée: Non
Journées à la saison: 192
Journées restantes: 192
Saison restante: 100%
Masse salariale projetée avant les jours restants Info-bulle : 56 800 000 $
Description
Seeing WAY too many 1st Barron, Harris, Struble for Necas deals. This is the kind of deal it will take to get Necas. Futures aren't going to interest Carolina. He's the better player between him and Caufield, hence the pick. If the Canadiens aren't willing to part with a player like this, there's not going to be a deal here
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
2950 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 000 000 $
87 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
68 500 000 $
1775 000 $
1775 000 $
1775 000 $
11 000 000 $
21 750 000 $
12 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
CAR
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2026 (SJS)
2.
CAR
  1. Liljegren, Timothy [Droits de RFA]
TOR
  1. Drury, Jack [Droits de RFA]
3.
CAR
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
TOR
  1. Fast, Jesper
Détails additionnels:
Any team
4.
CAR
  1. Caufield, Cole
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (PIT)
MTL
  1. Necas, Martin [Droits de RFA]
  2. Suzuki, Ryan [Droits de RFA]
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de TOR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de OTT
Logo de TOR
Logo de CAR
2025
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de PIT
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
2026
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de SJS
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de TOR
Logo de CAR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2287 700 000 $84 875 000 $0 $0 $2 825 000 $
Masse salariale proratée

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
7 750 000 $7 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
9 750 000 $9 750 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 7
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
RFA
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
4 820 000 $4 820 000 $
C
UFA - 6
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA
775 000 $775 000 $
AD, AG
UFA
775 000 $775 000 $
C
UFA
775 000 $775 000 $
AD, AG
UFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
7 750 000 $7 750 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
RFA
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
UFA - 3
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG
UFA
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
950 000 $950 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
775 000 $775 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
775 000 $775 000 $
G
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
25 mars à 10 h 52
#26
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,551
Mentions "j'aime": 5,039
Quoting: Burnout
I guess a cure to addressing biased homerific proposals is to make one as well.

Without getting into the incomplete view of Caufield, its kind of strange how you overrate Necas and underrate Fast, Drury and Staal, Like, its kind of distracting that Carolina's competitive advantage has been basically dismantled with every other trade in this Armchair-GM.


Necas is a 70+ point producer that's 6'2, the fastest skater in the NHL, and is prime to explode in a system that doesn't require him to play Selke level defense... Staal and Fast have both been awful this year and Drury I can go either way, I think he'd be a fine 4C, but Lily would fill the gap on the backend.
25 mars à 11 h 8
#27
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 1,686
Mentions "j'aime": 1,015
Quoting: Caniac2000
Necas is a 70+ point producer that's 6'2, the fastest skater in the NHL, and is prime to explode in a system that doesn't require him to play Selke level defense... Staal and Fast have both been awful this year and Drury I can go either way, I think he'd be a fine 4C, but Lily would fill the gap on the backend.


If Necas ever actually played Selke level defence (or even above average defence like Caufield has this season), then I'd buy that argument more. As is, Necas is probably benefiting far more getting cushy matchups with strong teammates and there's no reason to expect he'd even be this good on another team.

And if you want Carolina to get rid of their insanely tough minutes table setting line, then I guess that's up to you, but I imagine Carolina's front office is smarter than that.
25 mars à 11 h 11
#28
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,551
Mentions "j'aime": 5,039
Quoting: Burnout
If Necas ever actually played Selke level defence (or even above average defence like Caufield has this season), then I'd buy that argument more. As is, Necas is probably benefiting far more getting cushy matchups with strong teammates and there's no reason to expect he'd even be this good on another team.

And if you want Carolina to get rid of their insanely tough minutes table setting line, then I guess that's up to you, but I imagine Carolina's front office is smarter than that.


Necas is above average defensively, what? Cushy matchups he gets by playing with the second powerplay unit, the top line, all while tasked with zone entries? Necas is hands down the better player here and he'd be even better where he doesn't have a leash on him. That is not questionable. Rod's system kills offensive talent, that is known.

Not get rid of the line, make it better. Staal's sucked, give KK the spot. He's been better defensively, offensively and in transition this year than Staal. Fast has not done anything. He works hard, but you can get that way cheaper, look at Stefan Noesen. No need to have them next year
25 mars à 11 h 26
#29
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 2,661
Mentions "j'aime": 1,701
Quoting: Caniac2000
How is Necas significantly worse when he has better career totals and a comparable total this season? Caufield's never hit 60 points, this would be a huge risk by Carolina. Necas has now proven in 3 seasons he can hold a 60+ point pace, hitting 70 already once.


At the same age necas had a career high of 16 goals 41 points and a career ppg of .58

Caufield has 2 seasons with more points than that 3 20+ goal seasons and a ppg of .72 .

So ya signifigantly worse than caufield
25 mars à 11 h 29
#30
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,551
Mentions "j'aime": 5,039
Quoting: Black61
At the same age necas had a career high of 16 goals 41 points and a career ppg of .58

Caufield has 2 seasons with more points than that 3 20+ goal seasons and a ppg of .72 .

So ya signifigantly worse than caufield


Love how you account for Caufield's season that was destroyed by the pandemic but not Necas. Necas has 3 60+ point pace seasons and one 70+ point pace season, this is Caufield's first 60+ point pace season.
25 mars à 11 h 31
#31
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 1,686
Mentions "j'aime": 1,015
Quoting: Caniac2000
Necas is above average defensively, what? Cushy matchups he gets by playing with the second powerplay unit, the top line, all while tasked with zone entries? Necas is hands down the better player here and he'd be even better where he doesn't have a leash on him. That is not questionable. Rod's system kills offensive talent, that is known.

Not get rid of the line, make it better. Staal's sucked, give KK the spot. He's been better defensively, offensively and in transition this year than Staal. Fast has not done anything. He works hard, but you can get that way cheaper, look at Stefan Noesen. No need to have them next year


You make it sound like being tasked with zone entries is hard to find. And Necas gets an extreme Ozone usage push and rarely plays other teams top players at 5v5, especially relative to who he plays with. That's so far from having a leash on. He's as textbook a sheltered point producing forward as there is in the NHL.

Necas is a really good player, but it seems like you're selectively making opinions on him, other Canes and other players in the NHL on a very limited look of stats and not at all watching them play.
25 mars à 11 h 31
#32
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 2,661
Mentions "j'aime": 1,701
Quoting: Caniac2000
Love how you account for Caufield's season that was destroyed by the pandemic but not Necas. Necas has 3 60+ point pace seasons and one 70+ point pace season, this is Caufield's first 60+ point pace season.


Do you not understand how ppg works? He put up points less frequently by a solid margin than caufield did.
25 mars à 11 h 36
#33
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 2,661
Mentions "j'aime": 1,701
Quoting: Caniac2000
Love how you account for Caufield's season that was destroyed by the pandemic but not Necas. Necas has 3 60+ point pace seasons and one 70+ point pace season, this is Caufield's first 60+ point pace season.


And this is Caufield's 2nd 60+ pace season which is more than necas had at the same age
25 mars à 11 h 36
#34
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,551
Mentions "j'aime": 5,039
Quoting: Black61
Do you not understand how ppg works? He put up points less frequently by a solid margin than caufield did.


What...? This is Caufield's 3rd full season in the NHL. As a rookie, he had a 52 point pace with 43 points in 67 games. That's a .64 PPG pace. He followed that up with 36 points in 46 games. A .78 PPG rate. This year, he's got a .78 PPG rate...

Necas, over the same time span, has a 0.5 PPG rate, a 0.86 PPG rate, and a 0.76 PPG rate. He's got that while being better defensively, a better skater, better in transition, AND while not playing top line minutes or top powerplay. Necas is CLEARLY the superior player here, stop it.
25 mars à 11 h 38
#35
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,551
Mentions "j'aime": 5,039
Quoting: Burnout
You make it sound like being tasked with zone entries is hard to find. And Necas gets an extreme Ozone usage push and rarely plays other teams top players at 5v5, especially relative to who he plays with. That's so far from having a leash on. He's as textbook a sheltered point producing forward as there is in the NHL.

Necas is a really good player, but it seems like you're selectively making opinions on him, other Canes and other players in the NHL on a very limited look of stats and not at all watching them play.


Have you ever watched a Necas zone entry? His skating ability is ridiculous. He's in something like the 98th percentile for successful zone entries, and he's still a 70+ point producer. What's your point here? All you said there is you don't understand Necas' biggest asset
25 mars à 11 h 39
#36
Leafs going to Leafs
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 10,026
Mentions "j'aime": 3,035
Quoting: Caniac2000
Necas is a 70+ point producer that's 6'2, the fastest skater in the NHL, and is prime to explode in a system that doesn't require him to play Selke level defense... Staal and Fast have both been awful this year and Drury I can go either way, I think he'd be a fine 4C, but Lily would fill the gap on the backend.


Yeah, but the only issue with that is the Leafs have a bigger gap on the backend... And Lilly's cheap+under RFA control... With 0 NHL ready RHD signed to an NHL contract next year

I don't see the Leafs trading Lilly only to try and find a similar player in FA
25 mars à 11 h 41
#37
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 2,661
Mentions "j'aime": 1,701
Quoting: Caniac2000
What...? This is Caufield's 3rd full season in the NHL. As a rookie, he had a 52 point pace with 43 points in 67 games. That's a .64 PPG pace. He followed that up with 36 points in 46 games. A .78 PPG rate. This year, he's got a .78 PPG rate...

Necas, over the same time span, has a 0.5 PPG rate, a 0.86 PPG rate, and a 0.76 PPG rate. He's got that while being better defensively, a better skater, better in transition, AND while not playing top line minutes or top powerplay. Necas is CLEARLY the superior player here, stop it.


And he is OLDER. at the same age as caufield is now he was a WORSE player.
25 mars à 11 h 58
#38
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,551
Mentions "j'aime": 5,039
Quoting: Black61
And he is OLDER. at the same age as caufield is now he was a WORSE player.


Necas is the significantly BETTER player. How do you not get this? This is Caufield's career high in points and he's STILL not on pace to match what Necas did last year, hence he is WORSE. He's injury prone, he's tiny, he's one dimentional, and he is the WORSE player. This isn't a debate, it's a fact
25 mars à 12 h 0
#39
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 2,661
Mentions "j'aime": 1,701
Quoting: Caniac2000
Necas is the significantly BETTER player. How do you not get this? This is Caufield's career high in points and he's STILL not on pace to match what Necas did last year, hence he is WORSE. He's injury prone, he's tiny, he's one dimentional, and he is the WORSE player. This isn't a debate, it's a fact


Last year for necas is still a year older. Are you really not smart enough to understand young players improve. Caufield by every metric is ahead of the curve that necas set.
25 mars à 12 h 3
#40
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,551
Mentions "j'aime": 5,039
Quoting: Black61
Last year for necas is still a year older. Are you really not smart enough to understand young players improve. Caufield by every metric is ahead of the curve that necas set.


And are you really not smart enough to understand that players can have career years and never see the light of day again? Do I need to point out Alex Galchenyuk or are you capable of remembering that? By every metric, Necas beats Caufield. You want to go back to when they were the same age, go for it. Necas' underlyings dominate still. At that age, Necas was still on the third line, and he's playing OUT OF POSITION. He's a natural center. Are you really not smart enough to see why he's the better player here?
25 mars à 12 h 23
#41
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 2,661
Mentions "j'aime": 1,701
Quoting: Caniac2000
And are you really not smart enough to understand that players can have career years and never see the light of day again? Do I need to point out Alex Galchenyuk or are you capable of remembering that? By every metric, Necas beats Caufield. You want to go back to when they were the same age, go for it. Necas' underlyings dominate still. At that age, Necas was still on the third line, and he's playing OUT OF POSITION. He's a natural center. Are you really not smart enough to see why he's the better player here?


Caufield since the calender flipped to 2022 is a .8 ppg player. Thats 2.5 seasons. Necas is a .72 over that time. If anyone is a 1 year wonder its necas because hes below caufields ppg again this year
25 mars à 12 h 25
#42
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,551
Mentions "j'aime": 5,039
Quoting: Black61
Caufield since the calender flipped to 2022 is a .8 ppg player. Thats 2.5 seasons. Necas is a .72 over that time. If anyone is a 1 year wonder its necas because hes below caufields ppg again this year


Necas also doesn't play top line minutes and actually has a better points/60 minutes played this year than Caufield. Since the all-star break, Necas is a PPG player. He's shown last year wasn't a one-year wonder. Caufield hasn't. Necas better. Conversation over!
25 mars à 13 h 41
#43
v5 CBJ GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 15,933
Mentions "j'aime": 8,572
Quoting: JokiStan
Caufield is more one dimensional and Necas has a better track record for consistent production


One dimensional was last year. He's worked on his passing game and his defensive game this year
25 mars à 15 h 10
#44
2285 Stanley Cup Cha
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 1,497
Mentions "j'aime": 552
Quoting: zk97
One dimensional was last year. He's worked on his passing game and his defensive game this year


Necas is still overall better
25 mars à 18 h 56
#45
Prime Primeau
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 5,484
Mentions "j'aime": 2,180
Quoting: JokiStan
Necas is still overall better


The difference between Necas and Caufield defensively is almost as close as the difference between them offensively. Necas isn’t very good defensively.

Also, at the same age, Caufield had a better ppg than Necas in every single season he played. He is signed long term and has been a better goal scorer. He is also better this year while coming off an injury and struggling offensively.

I’m not a Caufield fan, but it’s clear he is the superior player between him and Necas.

Op also keep using wrong stats (for example, when he stated Necas’ ppg over his first 3 years) and imaginary facts (for example, Caufield has only one 60 pts pace season). He is extremely biased. He even said Jarvis had a better ppg than Caufield.
25 mars à 19 h 41
#46
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,551
Mentions "j'aime": 5,039
Quoting: GuyGuyGuy
The difference between Necas and Caufield defensively is almost as close as the difference between them offensively. Necas isn’t very good defensively.

Also, at the same age, Caufield had a better ppg than Necas in every single season he played. He is signed long term and has been a better goal scorer. He is also better this year while coming off an injury and struggling offensively.

I’m not a Caufield fan, but it’s clear he is the superior player between him and Necas.

Op also keep using wrong stats (for example, when he stated Necas’ ppg over his first 3 years) and imaginary facts (for example, Caufield has only one 60 pts pace season). He is extremely biased. He even said Jarvis had a better ppg than Caufield.


This is outdated. Just like Caufield has worked on his defense, so has Necas. While Caufield is still bad but not among the worst in the league for metrics anymore, Necas is now average defensively.

Jarvis has a better PPG rate than Caufield... may want to check that. AND Jarvis is a year younger.
25 mars à 20 h 50
#47
Prime Primeau
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 5,484
Mentions "j'aime": 2,180
Modifié 25 mars à 21 h 3
Quoting: Caniac2000
This is outdated. Just like Caufield has worked on his defense, so has Necas. While Caufield is still bad but not among the worst in the league for metrics anymore, Necas is now average defensively.

Jarvis has a better PPG rate than Caufield... may want to check that. AND Jarvis is a year younger.


Both metrics improved, but they are both pretty close average

Also, I don’t know what stats you are watching, but here is Jarvis’ stats in his 3 years in the league :

17 goals, 23 assists in 68 games. 0.58 ppg

14 goals, 25 assists in 82 games. 0.475 ppg

27 goals, 30 assists in 72 games. 0.79 ppg

Overall ppg : 0,61

Here is Caufield’s stats :

23 goals, 20 assists in 67 games. 0.64 ppg

26 goals, 10 assists in 46 games. 0.78 ppg

20 goals, 35 assists in 70 games. 0.785 ppg

Overall ppg : 0.72


If you want age comparable here it is :

Jarvis at 21 and 22 : 0.51 ppg

Caufield at 21 and 22 : 0.68 ppg

It’s not even close
26 mars à 6 h 12
#48
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,551
Mentions "j'aime": 5,039
Quoting: GuyGuyGuy
Both metrics improved, but they are both pretty close average

Also, I don’t know what stats you are watching, but here is Jarvis’ stats in his 3 years in the league :

17 goals, 23 assists in 68 games. 0.58 ppg

14 goals, 25 assists in 82 games. 0.475 ppg

27 goals, 30 assists in 72 games. 0.79 ppg

Overall ppg : 0,61

Here is Caufield’s stats :

23 goals, 20 assists in 67 games. 0.64 ppg

26 goals, 10 assists in 46 games. 0.78 ppg

20 goals, 35 assists in 70 games. 0.785 ppg

Overall ppg : 0.72


If you want age comparable here it is :

Jarvis at 21 and 22 : 0.51 ppg

Caufield at 21 and 22 : 0.68 ppg

It’s not even close


You literally just proved the age 21 season Jarvis had a .79 ppg rate while Caufield at the same age had a .78.... what are you talking about?
26 mars à 7 h 6
#49
Prime Primeau
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 5,484
Mentions "j'aime": 2,180
Quoting: Caniac2000
You literally just proved the age 21 season Jarvis had a .79 ppg rate while Caufield at the same age had a .78.... what are you talking about?


But one year before, Jarvis had a 0.475 while Caufield had a 0.64. Jarvis at 21 also played a season more and the difference between them at 21 is 0.01, wich in a season, translate into not even a point. So yeah, big difference. However, at 20, the difference between them translate into 13,5 pts. Jarvis doesn’t have better age ajusted production and it’s quite clear
26 mars à 7 h 22
#50
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,551
Mentions "j'aime": 5,039
Quoting: GuyGuyGuy
But one year before, Jarvis had a 0.475 while Caufield had a 0.64. Jarvis at 21 also played a season more and the difference between them at 21 is 0.01, wich in a season, translate into not even a point. So yeah, big difference. However, at 20, the difference between them translate into 13,5 pts. Jarvis doesn’t have better age ajusted production and it’s quite clear


And Jarvis is still outproducing Caufield this year... what's your point? So, you want point pace when it works in favor of Caufield like in the case of Necas, but want to ignore it when it goes against Caufield? Which is it, you can't have it both ways. Jarvis has a better PPG rate, but you want to go back a year. Okay, so why doesn't that work for Necas and his 70 point season last year? Stop talking now, Caufield is inferior to both players and it's clear you're going to try to spin anything you can to fit your narrative.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage