SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Fauteuil - DG

Next

Créé par: Jay27
Équipe: 2024-25 Canadiens de Montréal
Date de création initiale: 16 mars 2024
Publié: 16 mars 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Is this a playoff team?

I think it could be.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3950 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
84 375 000 $
43 250 000 $
21 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
MTL
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (CGY)
2.
MTL
  1. Kakko, Kaapo [Droits de RFA]
NYR
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (WPG)
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (CGY)
3.
4.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de MTL
Logo de COL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MIN
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de SJS
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de EDM
Logo de WSH
2025
Logo de MTL
Logo de CGY
Logo de MTL
Logo de PIT
Logo de MTL
Logo de NJD
Logo de VAN
Logo de MTL
Logo de DET
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
2026
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2387 700 000 $75 455 416 $1 022 500 $3 977 500 $12 244 584 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 7
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
C
UFA - 6
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 500 000 $$4M)
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 900 000 $2 900 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 362 500 $3 362 500 $
C, AD
RFA - 2
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AD
RFA
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
835 000 $835 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 450 000 $4 450 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
812 500 $812 500 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
RFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 875 000 $4 875 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance420 000 $$420K)
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 375 000 $4 375 000 $
DG/DD
RFA
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
875 000 $875 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
890 000 $890 000 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
950 000 $950 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
867 500 $867 500 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
DG
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
16 mars à 15 h 17
#1
taxation is theft
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2024
Messages: 220
Mentions "j'aime": 25
That xhekaj deal is unrealistic af
16 mars à 15 h 19
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 5,269
Mentions "j'aime": 2,299
Rangers don’t need picks, they need cheap good RWs
Fox_Czar_Cup a aimé ceci.
16 mars à 15 h 25
#3
Prime Primeau
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 5,463
Mentions "j'aime": 2,172
I’m not against trading Anderson for Vlasic but I’m totally against buying anyone out. Have people not learned from the Wild?

Also, massive overpay on Kakko’s and Xhekaj’s contacts
16 mars à 15 h 41
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 2,454
Mentions "j'aime": 1,593
Quoting: GuyGuyGuy
I’m not against trading Anderson for Vlasic but I’m totally against buying anyone out. Have people not learned from the Wild?

Strange comparison to try to make. Those are two very unique buyouts that are clogging up their ability to progress and a Vlasic buyout wouldn't cause anything close to that level of problem.
16 mars à 15 h 47
#5
Prime Primeau
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 5,463
Mentions "j'aime": 2,172
Quoting: SupremeBone
Strange comparison to try to make. Those are two very unique buyouts that are clogging up their ability to progress and a Vlasic buyout wouldn't cause anything close to that level of problem.

4m less the first year, then 5m. It’s a lot. Also, paying him for 2 years after that when we will have Slaf and Guhle on new deals hurt a lot
Steve_321 a aimé ceci.
16 mars à 15 h 51
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,502
Mentions "j'aime": 19,652
Flames will offer you a 3rd for Harris. Not a top 45 pick
16 mars à 16 h 11
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 2,454
Mentions "j'aime": 1,593
Quoting: GuyGuyGuy
4m less the first year, then 5m. It’s a lot. Also, paying him for 2 years after that when we will have Slaf and Guhle on new deals hurt a lot

In comparison to 7mil both of those years so you save 3.2mil and 2.2mil at the cost of 2.6mil over the following 2 years. If you're pushing to make the playoffs next year, that strikes me as the preferable alternative.
16 mars à 16 h 15
#8
Schulz33
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 314
Mentions "j'aime": 121
How the heck is Kakko worth a 1st let alone a 1st and a 2nd? 8 goals man. 8.
16 mars à 16 h 27
#9
Prime Primeau
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 5,463
Mentions "j'aime": 2,172
Quoting: SupremeBone
In comparison to 7mil both of those years so you save 3.2mil and 2.2mil at the cost of 2.6mil over the following 2 years. If you're pushing to make the playoffs next year, that strikes me as the preferable alternative.

We aren’t pushing for the playoffs next year. We will still be a bottom team with lot of cap space, so taking 7m isn’t a problem. We want cap space the years after, when we will be competing for a cup
Steve_321 a aimé ceci.
16 mars à 16 h 51
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2023
Messages: 3,478
Mentions "j'aime": 1,451
Rangers say no thanks.
Fox_Czar_Cup a aimé ceci.
16 mars à 18 h 3
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 7,467
Mentions "j'aime": 3,191
Calgary has no need for Harris. Conroy will be shopping for a top 4 not overpaying for a small depth defenseman.
16 mars à 19 h 45
#12
sharcuda22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 1,765
Mentions "j'aime": 552
No thanks from the sharks my goodness
16 mars à 20 h 5
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 691
Mentions "j'aime": 126
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Flames will offer you a 3rd for Harris. Not a top 45 pick


Harris is clean worth a 2nd.
16 mars à 20 h 6
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 691
Mentions "j'aime": 126
Quoting: GuyGuyGuy
We aren’t pushing for the playoffs next year. We will still be a bottom team with lot of cap space, so taking 7m isn’t a problem. We want cap space the years after, when we will be competing for a cup

I don’t mind trading for Vlasic pickle - buyout is not a good idea
16 mars à 20 h 9
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,502
Mentions "j'aime": 19,652
Quoting: Steve_321
Harris is clean worth a 2nd.


Maybe, not a high 2nd though. We just got Okhotiuk for a 5th and he's not that far off
16 mars à 21 h 58
#16
Prime Primeau
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 5,463
Mentions "j'aime": 2,172
Quoting: Steve_321
I don’t mind trading for Vlasic pickle - buyout is not a good idea


Buyout is never a good idea
17 mars à 18 h 5
#17
RecycleShark
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 951
Mentions "j'aime": 265
Quoting: sharcuda22
No thanks from the sharks my goodness


Actually, I think the Sharks should do the Vlasic for Anderson swap. Vlasic is blocking our D prospects from icetime, is no longer solid defensively, and is not going to score 6 goals again next season. The Sharks need bigger forwards like Anderson and we'll have room for him on our roster and in our budget when Labanc and Hoffman are gone. This is a bad contract swap that benefits both teams. Better than buyouts.

Overall it's $14 M for Vlasic and $16.5 M for Anderson so maybe the Habs should send a 3rd round pick or a B level prospect to the Sharks as well.
Jay27 a aimé ceci.
18 mars à 6 h 17
#18
sharcuda22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 1,765
Mentions "j'aime": 552
Quoting: RecycleShark
Actually, I think the Sharks should do the Vlasic for Anderson swap. Vlasic is blocking our D prospects from icetime, is no longer solid defensively, and is not going to score 6 goals again next season. The Sharks need bigger forwards like Anderson and we'll have room for him on our roster and in our budget when Labanc and Hoffman are gone. This is a bad contract swap that benefits both teams. Better than buyouts.

Overall it's $14 M for Vlasic and $16.5 M for Anderson so maybe the Habs should send a 3rd round pick or a B level prospect to the Sharks as well.


Vlasic hasn’t blocked any of our d prospects this season and we have shown we will just scratch him if need be. Thrun Okhotiuk and Addison have all played as much or more than they have shown to deserve and Muk they are taking their time with. Sharks have valued getting cap space open as much and as soon as possible so this move would be contrary to the rest of our rebuild plan.
18 mars à 15 h 35
#19
Démarrer sujet
Jay27
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 1,962
Mentions "j'aime": 1,104
Quoting: GuyGuyGuy
I’m not against trading Anderson for Vlasic but I’m totally against buying anyone out. Have people not learned from the Wild?

Also, massive overpay on Kakko’s and Xhekaj’s contacts


Vlasic buyout would be heavy for the first couple seasons but Habs have the cap then it’s completely manageable for the following couple of seasons.

Kakko contract is actually quite in line with the Dach and Newhook deals so I don’t see how that is unreasonable while yeah that’s a lot to give Xhekaj but I believe in his potential so I don’t think it’s a bad investment to get him locked up for his entire prime.
18 mars à 15 h 37
#20
Démarrer sujet
Jay27
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 1,962
Mentions "j'aime": 1,104
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Maybe, not a high 2nd though. We just got Okhotiuk for a 5th and he's not that far off


Where Calgary is in the standings and how they’re playing, that second is most likely a mid second.
18 mars à 15 h 40
#21
Démarrer sujet
Jay27
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 1,962
Mentions "j'aime": 1,104
Quoting: CowanDeBrabarian
How the heck is Kakko worth a 1st let alone a 1st and a 2nd? 8 goals man. 8.


Quite in line with what Hughes payed to get Newhook. And Kakko is better than 8 goals, just having a rough season, at least he’s solid defensively even when he’s not scoring.
18 mars à 16 h 29
#22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,502
Mentions "j'aime": 19,652
Quoting: Jay27
Where Calgary is in the standings and how they’re playing, that second is most likely a mid second.


How they're playing? Beating a team as bad as the Habs isn't hard. Sure they had a great comeback vs Vegas but they cot obliterated in the 3 games before that
18 mars à 18 h 49
#23
Prime Primeau
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 5,463
Mentions "j'aime": 2,172
Quoting: Jay27
Vlasic buyout would be heavy for the first couple seasons but Habs have the cap then it’s completely manageable for the following couple of seasons.

Kakko contract is actually quite in line with the Dach and Newhook deals so I don’t see how that is unreasonable while yeah that’s a lot to give Xhekaj but I believe in his potential so I don’t think it’s a bad investment to get him locked up for his entire prime.


We don’t need to make space now. Having 1,5m in 2 years will hurt more than 7m now and next season

Kakko has been bad. Seriously awful. He wouldn’t get the money we paid for Dach and Newhook

Also, even in his prime, Xhekaj will never be worth 4m. Maybe 3,5m, but not 4
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage