SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Would MTL Agree

Créé par: GMRyan
Équipe: 2023-24 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 5 mars 2024
Publié: 5 mars 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Reasoning-

Well, 3 draft picks all this year is something. I think MTL is still rebuilding their program, its pipeline looks wonderful, this would make it even better. Hughes has shown a willingness to make moves. Nick Robertson clearly continues to be suppressed in Toronto. Toronto simply is already paying and playing top wingers ie-Bertuzzi, Knies, Marner, Nylander, Jarnkrok. The Leafs need a C with a right shot who can PK more than another small, defensive liability who hasn’t unlocked his potential. Plus it seems like Robertson is the perfect fit for Montreal, not only is he 5 foot eight and American. But he’s also very religious and I believe he’s Catholic. If you’ve been to Montreal, you know there’s a lot of churches. So he’ll love it. Basically, he fits the profile and age group of the Habs more than the Leafs. Also, I think MTL is doing a wonderful job taking on other teams “untapped potential” ie, Kirby Dach, Alex Newhook, Robertson fits that description as well. In addition to, we all know the minute that Nick Robertson becomes a Hab, he simultaneously becomes a life long Leaf killer. And as a fan, that’s simply fun to watch and good hockey imo. As for David Savard, he costed Tampa a 1st, 3rd and 4th to get him. I think with the retention and quality of player, plus RHD, I think he easily fetches that and perhaps even more especially when you factor Evans into the trade.

So what’s your verdict? Comment below.
Transactions
TOR
  1. Evans, Jake
  2. Savard, David (1 500 000 $ retained)
MTL
  1. Robertson, Nicholas
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (NYI)
  4. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de TOR
Logo de CGY
Logo de VAN
Logo de TOR
Logo de OTT
2025
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2026
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $83 597 283 $0 $0 $-97 283 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
762 500 $762 500 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 400 000 $2 400 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
687 500 $687 500 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 550 000 $3 550 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
875 000 $875 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
775 000 $775 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
766 667 $766 667 $
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 687 500 $4 687 500 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 150 000 $4 150 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
775 000 $775 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
775 000 $775 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG, AD
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
5 mars à 15 h 42
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 19,749
Mentions "j'aime": 7,382
of course they would, the trade favours them heavily.
5 mars à 15 h 42
#2
PittsburghModelMyAss
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 3,378
Mentions "j'aime": 1,408
that return most likely nets you that package without retention... if they take 1.5m for this year & next, you'd prob need to add smtg else or find a 3rd party
LajAhu et GMRyan a aimé ceci.
5 mars à 15 h 48
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 3
Mentions "j'aime": 4
Overall very possible. I think the retention is the only issue. Hughes won't burn his last retention spot on Savard. He probably holds it for the draft in his ideal scenario or to move Allen, Pearson or Armia if it's a deal breaker. Your trade just needs a 3rd party to do it or no retention.
GMRyan et BigBadBurke a aimé ceci.
5 mars à 16 h 12
#4
fromtherivertothesea
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 2,866
Mentions "j'aime": 798
remove jake evans. we’re not trading him. would be very disappointed if we do so.
GMRyan a aimé ceci.
5 mars à 16 h 41
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,527
Mentions "j'aime": 6,449
Don't think we would be interested in Robertson, we don't need another small winger or more draft picks for that matter. I think maybe a deal could be had if the Leafs were giving up Minton or Cowen + a 2nd or 3rd but this package offers little in the way of what we need.
ohmyjlord et GMRyan a aimé ceci.
5 mars à 16 h 55
#6
Fall River Habs
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 886
Mentions "j'aime": 336
Quoting: LajAhu
Overall very possible. I think the retention is the only issue. Hughes won't burn his last retention spot on Savard. He probably holds it for the draft in his ideal scenario or to move Allen, Pearson or Armia if it's a deal breaker. Your trade just needs a 3rd party to do it or no retention.


Doesn’t Montreal gain back one of the retention slots once the season is over?
GMRyan a aimé ceci.
5 mars à 17 h 1
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2017
Messages: 611
Mentions "j'aime": 498
I doubt the Habs would have significant interest in Robertson. Not that he's a bad player, he's just not what Hughes is targetting right now.
5 mars à 18 h 20
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 3
Mentions "j'aime": 4
Quoting: KentMcNally
Doesn’t Montreal gain back one of the retention slots once the season is over?


Not 100% sure, but I believe it ''resets'' on July 1st so after the draft.
GMRyan et Campabee a aimé ceci.
5 mars à 18 h 43
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,527
Mentions "j'aime": 6,449
Quoting: KentMcNally
Doesn’t Montreal gain back one of the retention slots once the season is over?


No, contracts do not expire until June 30th, that's why July 1st is FA frenzy.
5 mars à 19 h 51
#10
PittsburghModelMyAss
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 3,378
Mentions "j'aime": 1,408
Quoting: batman
remove jake evans. we’re not trading him. would be very disappointed if we do so.


disagree. they need to start making more room as it's becoming ever evident that Gallagher and Anderson will be bottom-6 players for the next 2-3 years
GMRyan a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage