SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Conroy got offered a first for Tanev but he declined salary was coming back

Créé par: batman
Équipe: 2023-24 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 1 mars 2024
Publié: 1 mars 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Not a great job by Conroy ngl.. he's getting scammed on every deal he makes
Transactions
CGY
  1. Ceci, Cody
  2. Savoie, Carter
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (EDM)
Détails additionnels:
I supose it was something like this. Man it's not like CGY is going to compete any time soon.. just take a salary back and get those 1st rounders. You also fill a jersey. Ceci over Gilbert everyday.. and Conroy has make Markstrom unavailable and Markstrom criticised the Flames openly
EDM
    Tanev
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2024
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de DAL
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de NJD
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CGY
    2025
    Logo de FLA
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    2026
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2183 500 000 $76 701 666 $0 $212 500 $6 798 334 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
    AG, AD
    NMC
    UFA - 8
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    5 800 000 $5 800 000 $
    AD, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
    AG, AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
    AD, AG
    NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    863 333 $863 333 $
    AG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
    AG, C
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
    C, AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    762 500 $762 500 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    825 000 $825 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 2
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
    DG/DD
    NTC
    UFA - 8
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    G
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
    DG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    925 000 $925 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    775 000 $775 000 $
    AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
    AG, AD, C
    RFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    1 mars à 17 h 20
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2023
    Messages: 793
    Mentions "j'aime": 266
    He did well on the Lindholm trade
    Gmonwy a aimé ceci.
    1 mars à 17 h 23
    #2
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2022
    Messages: 967
    Mentions "j'aime": 363
    The late 1st round of this draft is negligible. They got a prospect that they value that was drafted in the 2nd and a 2nd round pick. There’s zero need for Ceci, you’re countering your own point, he’s better than Gilbert but they’re not going to compete
    EvanW711 et Fox_Czar_Cup a aimé ceci.
    1 mars à 17 h 27
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2018
    Messages: 9,559
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,186
    You got a 2nd and a 2nd round pick prospect that they like. 2 x 2nd's is easily equal to a late 1st round pick.

    I am a Leafs fan. The value was just fine.
    Fox_Czar_Cup a aimé ceci.
    1 mars à 17 h 27
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2018
    Messages: 9,559
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,186
    Quoting: BrockChoy
    He did well on the Lindholm trade


    Well is a huge understatement on the Lindholm trade. He killed Vancouver on that one haha.
    BrockChoy a aimé ceci.
    1 mars à 17 h 33
    #5
    Démarrer sujet
    fromtherivertothesea
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2023
    Messages: 2,866
    Mentions "j'aime": 798
    Quoting: TMLBRIAN
    Well is a huge understatement on the Lindholm trade. He killed Vancouver on that one haha.


    No one wanted Kuzmenko for free. Knowing the 1st is between 26-32 and that Jurmo might never play in the league, i wouldn't say Killed van.

    Of course Hunter is a very nice prospect
    dgibb10 a aimé ceci.
    1 mars à 17 h 37
    #6
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2018
    Messages: 9,559
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,186
    Quoting: batman
    No one wanted Kuzmenko for free. Knowing the 1st is between 26-32 and that Jurmo might never play in the league, i wouldn't say Killed van.

    Of course Hunter is a very nice prospect


    With Pettersson and Miller - I personally didn't see the need for Lindholm. Especially at the expense of Kuzmenko. Vancouver was playing very well. That's a big change. I didn't see it being necessary.

    I didn't understand the need to fire Kuzmenko to the sun. They could have kept him and gotten Tanev and called it a day.

    Either way I really like the return for Calgary.
    1 mars à 17 h 41
    #7
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2023
    Messages: 3,625
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,222
    Quoting: TMLBRIAN
    With Pettersson and Miller - I personally didn't see the need for Lindholm. Especially at the expense of Kuzmenko. Vancouver was playing very well. That's a big change. I didn't see it being necessary.

    I didn't understand the need to fire Kuzmenko to the sun. They could have kept him and gotten Tanev and called it a day.

    Either way I really like the return for Calgary.


    Who knows what the owner has stipulated. Could be no trades with Leafs and should be no trades in division.
    1 mars à 17 h 44
    #8
    Démarrer sujet
    fromtherivertothesea
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2023
    Messages: 2,866
    Mentions "j'aime": 798
    Quoting: MitchJr
    Who knows what the owner has stipulated. Could be no trades with Leafs and should be no trades in division.


    that would be so dumb by them
    MitchJr a aimé ceci.
    1 mars à 17 h 46
    #9
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2020
    Messages: 87
    Mentions "j'aime": 31
    the rumored first was Colorado, and the Flames would have had to eat RyJo's contract.

    I'd rather have a 2nd and Grush than a 1st and have to pay RyJo
    Fox_Czar_Cup a aimé ceci.
    1 mars à 17 h 54
    #10
    Hakuna Matata
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2020
    Messages: 34,469
    Mentions "j'aime": 21,102
    Look at NOV, could have got a haul for Zadorov + Tanev to TOR which would have sent 1st +

    But nah wanted to get scammed for fair value lul
    batman a aimé ceci.
    1 mars à 18 h 7
    #11
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2022
    Messages: 967
    Mentions "j'aime": 363
    Quoting: aadoyle
    Look at NOV, could have got a haul for Zadorov + Tanev to TOR which would have sent 1st +

    But nah wanted to get scammed for fair value lul


    Leafs literally don’t have the pieces that they’d part with to make that work. That’s a cope and a half.
    1 mars à 18 h 9
    #12
    Hakuna Matata
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2020
    Messages: 34,469
    Mentions "j'aime": 21,102
    Quoting: WranglerWranglin
    Leafs literally don’t have the pieces that they’d part with to make that work. That’s a cope and a half.


    They did have the pieces lul CGY just didnt want to deal and took market value over dealing with their former GM lul

    Did u not see what CGY got for both guys?

    TOR could have topped that easily lul

    A minimum of a 1st + would have went back for those two per reports back in NOV

    In the end CGY got

    2nd + 3rd + 5th + B prospect for both (the other 3rd is conditional based on DAL reaching SCF)

    Thats pretty bad value for those two

    Like if TOR gave 2024 1st + 2025 and 2026 3rd (no conditions) + Niemela that beats out those deals easily but CGY didnt want to deal so its fine
    batman a aimé ceci.
    1 mars à 18 h 12
    #13
    Démarrer sujet
    fromtherivertothesea
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2023
    Messages: 2,866
    Mentions "j'aime": 798
    Quoting: CrownRoyal
    the rumored first was Colorado, and the Flames would have had to eat RyJo's contract.

    I'd rather have a 2nd and Grush than a 1st and have to pay RyJo


    Surprising. They were really about to spend a 1st on a dmen? They already have Toews Girard Makar Manson Byram. 2C should be the priority no?
    1 mars à 18 h 12
    #14
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2022
    Messages: 967
    Mentions "j'aime": 363
    Quoting: aadoyle
    They did have the pieces lul

    Did u not see what CGY got for both guys?

    TOR could have topped that easily lul

    A minimum of a 1st + would have went back for those two per reports back in NOV

    In the end CGY got

    2nd + 3rd + 5th + B prospect for both (the other third is conditional based on DAL reaching SCF)

    Thats pretty bad value for those two


    So the Leafs would sent the 1st for Tanev because they have no 2nds, Calgary is very very clearly valuing prospects over picks so what’s the pick and the prospect coming back to finish the deal?
    1 mars à 18 h 14
    #15
    Démarrer sujet
    fromtherivertothesea
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2023
    Messages: 2,866
    Mentions "j'aime": 798
    Quoting: WranglerWranglin
    So the Leafs would sent the 1st for Tanev because they have no 2nds, Calgary is very very clearly valuing prospects over picks so what’s the pick and the prospect coming back to finish the deal?


    Grushnishkov is very mid. He falls behind Poirier, Hunter and Morin. The pick is conditionall. Poor job by Conroy
    1 mars à 18 h 14
    #16
    Hakuna Matata
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2020
    Messages: 34,469
    Mentions "j'aime": 21,102
    Quoting: WranglerWranglin
    So the Leafs would sent the 1st for Tanev because they have no 2nds, Calgary is very very clearly valuing prospects over picks so what’s the pick and the prospect coming back to finish the deal?


    Seem to have missed it back in NOV

    TOR and CGY were working on a deal for Zadorov and Tanev

    A minimum of a 1st + would have went back for both of them with ret. Deal fell apart due to CGY not wanting to ret among some other factors

    Few days later CGY trades Zadorov to VAN for a 3rd and 5th (market value) then a few days ago bites and trades Tanev (50% ret) for 2nd + conditional 3rd (probs wont get) and a B level prospect

    If they had buckled down and continued working in NOV they could have got a haul for the two but they took market value instead

    Like I would say 1st + 2 3rds + Niemela, Timmins would have gone the other way for those two
    1 mars à 18 h 21
    #17
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2022
    Messages: 967
    Mentions "j'aime": 363
    Quoting: batman
    Grushnishkov is very mid. He falls behind Poirier, Hunter and Morin. The pick is conditionall. Poor job by Conroy


    Completely different type of player that balances the pipeline nicely from a team that’s recently had elite round 2’s of drafts. You trying to say you’ve got a good read on this player that you probably never heard of two days ago is insane.
    1 mars à 18 h 23
    #18
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2022
    Messages: 967
    Mentions "j'aime": 363
    Quoting: aadoyle
    Seem to have missed it back in NOV

    TOR and CGY were working on a deal for Zadorov and Tanev

    A minimum of a 1st + would have went back for both of them with ret. Deal fell apart due to CGY not wanting to ret among some other factors

    Few days later CGY trades Zadorov to VAN for a 3rd and 5th (market value) then a few days ago bites and trades Tanev (50% ret) for 2nd + conditional 3rd (probs wont get) and a B level prospect

    If they had buckled down and continued working in NOV they could have got a haul for the two but they took market value instead

    Like I would say 1st + 2 3rds + Niemela, Timmins would have gone the other way for those two


    Pretty similar across the board. Timmins is terrible and zero value, Niemela’s development has been middling at best so far and the difference in picks beyond 20 in this draft class is a lottery ticket. For packaging up two guys that Toronto return is minimal.
    1 mars à 18 h 36
    #19
    TrevorA
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2021
    Messages: 6,869
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,868
    Just hoping Conny has a plan in mind to maybe be a buyer, because we do currently need to replace Tanev this season, although could you imagine if Tanev returned via Free Agency!? Ceci’s not ideal, but would have been a replacement at least. RyJo’s not great either, but we are lacking a Centre atm as well

    Grushnikov must be something special though to pass up on that 1st though, so I hope Conroy knows what he’s doing and he does make sense to balance out the Defence coroner currently have. We need a strong stay at home defender for the Offensive Dmen we already have, especially Brzustewicz

    Kylington may be able to replace Hanifin, otherwise we may need a replacement for him still yet too (Ryan Graves or Bo Byram maybe!?)

    Weegar-Andersson
    Kylington-???

    ???-Andersson
    Kylington-Weegar
    1 mars à 18 h 50
    #20
    Hakuna Matata
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2020
    Messages: 34,469
    Mentions "j'aime": 21,102
    Quoting: WranglerWranglin
    Pretty similar across the board. Timmins is terrible and zero value, Niemela’s development has been middling at best so far and the difference in picks beyond 20 in this draft class is a lottery ticket. For packaging up two guys that Toronto return is minimal.


    Timmins would have just been a fill in replacement and to make cap work but still in the end would have been better than what CGY got for both Zadorov + Tanev lul dont know how your not figuring that out

    1st + 2 3rds + Niemela (High B prospect) + Timmins beats out 2nd + 3rd + conditional 3rd (probs wont get) + 5th + B prospect (Artem Grushnikov)

    Also how is Nirmala's development middling have u not seen him lul

    6 goals 22 assists in first full AHL season so far, is not afraid to hit and is a nice developing 2-way Dman who can QB a PP and play PK
    batman a aimé ceci.
    1 mars à 19 h 12
    #21
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2022
    Messages: 967
    Mentions "j'aime": 363
    Quoting: aadoyle
    Timmins would have just been a fill in replacement and to make cap work but still in the end would have been better than what CGY got for both Zadorov + Tanev lul dont know how your not figuring that out

    1st + 2 3rds + Niemela (High B prospect) + Timmins beats out 2nd + 3rd + conditional 3rd (probs wont get) + 5th + B prospect (Artem Grushnikov)

    Also how is Nirmala's development middling have u not seen him lul

    6 goals 22 assists in first full AHL season so far, is not afraid to hit and is a nice developing 2-way Dman who can QB a PP and play PK


    All speculation. Neimala is a good player is a really bad pipeline stuck behind really bad D men.
    1 mars à 19 h 59
    #22
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2020
    Messages: 87
    Mentions "j'aime": 31
    Quoting: batman
    Grushnishkov is very mid. He falls behind Poirier, Hunter and Morin. The pick is conditionall. Poor job by Conroy
    Poor job because he got the expected return? The only people upset at this trade are those daft enough to buy into the deadline hype.

    personally I like the addition of Grush to the prospect pool, he's an excellent defensive player that skates very well. He's only "meh" if you judge purely on points. He's the Flames #3 defensive prospect behind Poirier and Brzustewicz and IMO it's pretty close between him and Bruiser, Grush may not have as high of a ceiling, but he has a higher floor. Morin is a good prospect be e hasn't done enough to pass Grush.

    I think Grush is really going to surprise people with how good he turns out. He's not going to put up many points but he's could be a premier defensive player. Some have compared him to Tanev, but I think the better comp is Willie Mitchell, except with very good skating.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage