SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Sign him and go get some more help for this year already

Créé par: TimmyG10
Équipe: 2023-24 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 29 févr. 2024
Publié: 29 févr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Might need to add a bit more yet?
Transactions
1.
VAN
  1. Tarasenko, Vladimir (2 500 000 $ retained)
OTT
  1. Räty, Aatu
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (VAN)
2.
VAN
  1. Guentzel, Jake (3 000 000 $ retained)
PIT
  1. Bains, Arshdeep
  2. Mikheyev, Ilya
  3. Truscott, Jacob [Liste de réserve]
  4. Woo, Jett
  5. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (VAN)
  6. Choix de 2e ronde en 2026 (VAN)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de SJS
Logo de VAN
2025
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2026
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $78 355 417 $850 000 $0 $5 144 583 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C, AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 650 000 $6 650 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 350 000 $7 350 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
0 $0 $
AD
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
825 000 $825 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 950 000 $4 950 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
AD, C, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
775 000 $775 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
883 750 $883 750 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
775 000 $775 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
775 000 $775 000 $
DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
29 févr. à 23 h 31
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2023
Messages: 2,813
Mentions "j'aime": 956
Pens don't want quantity, they want quality.
For Guentzel at 50%: Hoglander + 1st + Lekkerimaki + 2nd

Mikheyev has negative value and three B- prospects aren't interesting
29 févr. à 23 h 36
#2
TrevorA
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 6,887
Mentions "j'aime": 1,878
What happened to Phil Kessel!?
29 févr. à 23 h 40
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 3,818
Mentions "j'aime": 1,218
First trade yes, the second trade declined.
No way Canucks are trading Bains and Dubas isn't interested in Mikheyev.
29 févr. à 23 h 47
#4
pens1991
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 2,981
Mentions "j'aime": 1,099
I'm sorry but you are not serious people.
Borocop a aimé ceci.
1 mars à 0 h 35
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 10,741
Mentions "j'aime": 9,761
Quoting: Victor24
Pens don't want quantity, they want quality.
For Guentzel at 50%: Hoglander + 1st + Lekkerimaki + 2nd

Mikheyev has negative value and three B- prospects aren't interesting


Absolutely no chance you’re getting Lekkerimaki + Hoglander + a 1st + a 2nd for a rental. Mikheyev probably needs to go back for salary reasons unless there’s double retention

1st + 2nd + Raty/Podkolzin is probably the most the Canucks would offer
1 mars à 1 h 16
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 254
Mentions "j'aime": 100
Quoting: Victor24
Pens don't want quantity, they want quality.
For Guentzel at 50%: Hoglander + 1st + Lekkerimaki + 2nd

Mikheyev has negative value and three B- prospects aren't interesting


Hoglander, Lekkerimaki, 1st, 2nd is way too much for Guentzel. Nucks aren’t going to make another big splash anyways.
1 mars à 1 h 40
#7
Devo's 2nd Mock Draf
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 369
Mentions "j'aime": 99
Ottawa wouldn't accept a trade like that. Bare minimum would be a 2nd rounder and only if Ottawa doesn't retain any money. They are hoping for a 1st and solid prospect if a team wants him for 50%
1 mars à 8 h 29
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2023
Messages: 2,813
Mentions "j'aime": 956
Quoting: mv21227
Absolutely no chance you’re getting Lekkerimaki + Hoglander + a 1st + a 2nd for a rental. Mikheyev probably needs to go back for salary reasons unless there’s double retention

1st + 2nd + Raty/Podkolzin is probably the most the Canucks would offer


No? Guentzel might be the best player to be traded at the deadline in the last 20 years. That isn't cheap. Also Van might not be good next year, as this could be a lightning in a bottle season. I think an A+ prospect, a 1st, and a good NHL forward is worth an elite player.

Quoting: Poogy
Hoglander, Lekkerimaki, 1st, 2nd is way too much for Guentzel. Nucks aren’t going to make another big splash anyways.[/quote]

That I believe. Though Jimmy R is probably champing at the bit.
1 mars à 13 h 28
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 10,741
Mentions "j'aime": 9,761
Quoting: Victor24
No? Guentzel might be the best player to be traded at the deadline in the last 20 years. That isn't cheap. Also Van might not be good next year, as this could be a lightning in a bottle season. I think an A+ prospect, a 1st, and a good NHL forward is worth an elite player.


If he had term maybe, but as a pending UFA he’s not gonna get this much. That’s the Eichel return. Eichel was a 1C with term (albeit he did need major neck surgery and wanted out). Despite that he’s more valuable than a pending UFA 1st line winger would be
1 mars à 20 h 16
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2023
Messages: 2,813
Mentions "j'aime": 956
Quoting: mv21227
If he had term maybe, but as a pending UFA he’s not gonna get this much. That’s the Eichel return. Eichel was a 1C with term (albeit he did need major neck surgery and wanted out). Despite that he’s more valuable than a pending UFA 1st line winger would be


Guentzel
Xgoals per 60: 1.67
Goals per 60: 1.26
Points per 60: 2.99
Corsi: 62%
Xgoals against per 60: 2.99
Shooting Talent Above Average: 15.7%

Eichel in 2019
Xgoals per 60: 0.91
Goals per 60: 1.44
Points per 60: 3.15
Corsi: 58%
Xgoals against per 60: 2.95
Shooting Talent Above Average: 6.7%

So prime Eichel looks a lot like Guentzel and Jake hasn't had major neck surgery AND demanded a trade.

It's a lot for a rental but he IS a top 5 winger in the NHL...
1 mars à 20 h 27
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 10,741
Mentions "j'aime": 9,761
Quoting: Victor24
Guentzel
Xgoals per 60: 1.67
Goals per 60: 1.26
Points per 60: 2.99
Corsi: 62%
Xgoals against per 60: 2.99
Shooting Talent Above Average: 15.7%

Eichel in 2019
Xgoals per 60: 0.91
Goals per 60: 1.44
Points per 60: 3.15
Corsi: 58%
Xgoals against per 60: 2.95
Shooting Talent Above Average: 6.7%

So prime Eichel looks a lot like Guentzel and Jake hasn't had major neck surgery AND demanded a trade.

It's a lot for a rental but he IS a top 5 winger in the NHL...


Eichel also played on a much worse team and didn’t get to play on a line with a top 5-10 player of all time. When you add in the term and positional value, he’s definitely more valuable than Guentzel imo

And while Guentzel is great I wouldn’t say he’s a top 5 winger in the whole league. Top 5 LW maybe, but Kucherov, Pastrnak, Rantanen, M Tkachuk, Marner, Kaprizov, and Panarin I’m definitely taking over him. Arguably Robertson, Marchand, Reinhart, Nylander, Stone, Connor, and B Tkachuk as well
1 mars à 21 h 18
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2023
Messages: 2,813
Mentions "j'aime": 956
Modifié 1 mars à 21 h 23
Quoting: mv21227
Eichel also played on a much worse team and didn’t get to play on a line with a top 5-10 player of all time. When you add in the term and positional value, he’s definitely more valuable than Guentzel imo

And while Guentzel is great I wouldn’t say he’s a top 5 winger in the whole league. Top 5 LW maybe, but Kucherov, Pastrnak, Rantanen, M Tkachuk, Marner, Kaprizov, and Panarin I’m definitely taking over him. Arguably Robertson, Marchand, Reinhart, Nylander, Stone, Connor, and B Tkachuk as well


I would argue that experimental neck surgery is more of a risk WITH term.

As far as who's better, I think you could have an argument of those guys and which are better than the others. But I would argue that none are clearly better than the others.

But I think we're falling into opinion (which is partially my fault with my earlier statement)
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage