SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Conroy Sell Mode

Créé par: jimothy802
Équipe: 2023-24 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 20 févr. 2024
Publié: 20 févr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Accurate/Prorated
LTIR activée: Non
Journées à la saison: 192
Journées restantes: 58
Saison restante: 30%
Masse salariale projetée avant les jours restants Info-bulle : 83 246 879 $
Description
Deadline deals and this would make for a rough last 30 or so games but they would have a little cap room for next off season to sign a top 4 D for a couple years and plan to sell expiring deals in the 24-25 season as well.
Transactions
1.
CGY
  1. Holtz, Alexander
  2. Vanecek, Vitek
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (NJD)
2.
CGY
  1. Johansen, Ryan
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (COL)
COL
  1. Tanev, Christopher
Détails additionnels:
Johansen can serve as a bottom 6 C for Calgary and next year at the deadline could be a trade chip for a late pick on an expiring deal
3.
CGY
  1. DeBrusk, Jake
  2. Lohrei, Mason
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (BOS)
Détails additionnels:
*DeBrusk is included for a future trade only, otherwise it would probably have to be Forbort and a good prospect to make the cap work
4.
CGY
  1. Broberg, Philip
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (EDM)
EDM
  1. DeBrusk, Jake (2 000 000 $ retained)
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (NJD)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de CGY
Logo de VAN
Logo de NJD
Logo de CGY
Logo de EDM
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CHI
Logo de CGY
2025
Logo de FLA
Logo de COL
Logo de BOS
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2026
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de VAN
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $81 524 939 $0 $1 927 500 $1 975 061 $
Masse salariale proratée

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
10 500 000 $3 171 875 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $2 114 583 $
C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 800 000 $1 752 083 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 500 000 $1 661 458 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $1 616 146 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
894 167 $270 113 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
863 333 $260 799 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 100 000 $936 458 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 900 000 $1 480 208 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
775 000 $234 115 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
4 000 000 $1 208 333 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
825 000 $249 219 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
775 000 $234 115 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 300 000 $392 708 $
C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
863 333 $260 799 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $1 374 479 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 200 000 $664 583 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 500 000 $755 208 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 250 000 $1 888 021 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 8
Logo de Flames de Calgary
813 333 $245 694 $ (Bonis de performance15 000 $$15K)
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $279 427 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
775 000 $234 115 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
925 000 $279 427 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Flames de Calgary
762 500 $230 339 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 300 000 $694 792 $ (1 150 000 $$1M347 396 $$347K)
AG, AD, C
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
20 févr. à 12 h 11
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,097
Mentions "j'aime": 7,773
Edmonton isn't trading Broberg for a rental.
20 févr. à 12 h 20
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 71
Mentions "j'aime": 18
Quoting: CD282
Edmonton isn't trading Broberg for a rental.


DeBrusk is 27 and from Edmonton so it doesn't have to be a rental
20 févr. à 12 h 25
#3
Representing the 505
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 4,505
Mentions "j'aime": 3,690
Avs decline; they can't afford to re-sign Tanev so they aren't trading a 1st for a rental and a cap dump.
TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
20 févr. à 12 h 26
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 11,510
Mentions "j'aime": 4,566
Even if Hanfin is coming with an extension, I'm still not sure I'd do that if I was Boston
20 févr. à 12 h 34
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 664
Mentions "j'aime": 673
Was surprised to here COL mentioned by Friedman as one of the teams interested in Tanev. Now, most of Friedman's stuff is useless hearsay, but at least it is often in the realm of possibility that matches team need to suitable player. Forget about whether they could re-sign Tanev or what the potential trade cost might be. I simply have no idea why COL would even be mentioned as interested. It would make no sense.
TJTwolf et NMAvsFan a aimé ceci.
20 févr. à 12 h 34
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 40,583
Mentions "j'aime": 18,490
Take out the 1st
20 févr. à 12 h 35
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 4,192
Mentions "j'aime": 1,652
Quoting: NMAvsFan
Avs decline; they can't afford to re-sign Tanev so they aren't trading a 1st for a rental and a cap dump.


They move him to another team for a centre? Only reason I can see they do that
TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
20 févr. à 12 h 39
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 71
Mentions "j'aime": 18
Quoting: NHLfan10506
Take out the 1st


Tom Fitzgerald offered the 1st so I think it is very much in play. The issue was salary retention which is why Vanecek was added here.
20 févr. à 12 h 41
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 3,883
Mentions "j'aime": 1,198
2 weeks and 1 day until Calgary fans are either disappointed or coming to terms with what the real return should be for players.

2 weeks and 1 day until Boston fans turn their focus to the playoffs and then what they can get with their cap room next year.

2 weeks and 1 day until teams that secure rentals worry about their capability to resign them.
20 févr. à 12 h 42
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 40,583
Mentions "j'aime": 18,490
Quoting: jimothy802
Tom Fitzgerald offered the 1st so I think it is very much in play. The issue was salary retention which is why Vanecek was added here.


Where did you see that?
Everything I saw said Fitzy offered Holtz for Markstrom with some retention.
No 1st round pick
20 févr. à 12 h 47
#11
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 21,276
Mentions "j'aime": 7,029
take out debrusk and it's still a no from boston.
20 févr. à 13 h 0
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 3,883
Mentions "j'aime": 1,198
Quoting: ON3M4N
Even if Hanfin is coming with an extension, I'm still not sure I'd do that if I was Boston


Boston likely doesn’t make an offer and waits. If they are worried about Hanifin signing an extension, I could see them offering a Grz, a 2025 first, a 2026 second, and maybe a prospect like Georgii Merkulov or John Farinacci for Hanifin with retention to Grz’s salary. Basically the caliber of AHL player offsets the delay in pick.

This deal values DeBrusk as a cap dump (he isn’t) and Lohrei as a second rounder. After going around and around with Calgary on 4 defenseman, I’m pretty comfortable it’s a waste of time discussing Lohrei’s relative value with them at this point, will revisit if he’s included in a deal with Hanifin when it isn’t about winning an argument and it’s about discussing the merits of the player.
20 févr. à 13 h 25
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,097
Mentions "j'aime": 7,773
Quoting: jimothy802
DeBrusk is 27 and from Edmonton so it doesn't have to be a rental

They can sign him in the summer for free. If he hasn't already extended, he's a rental.
20 févr. à 15 h 14
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 9,636
Mentions "j'aime": 4,594
I mean the Avs might consider adding a RHD for depth but can't see them being interested in Tanev to play 3RD. Very much overkill to give up a 1st for and lose a C for even with RyJo not having been the best fit.
20 févr. à 16 h 20
#15
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 71
Mentions "j'aime": 18
Quoting: NHLfan10506
Where did you see that?
Everything I saw said Fitzy offered Holtz for Markstrom with some retention.
No 1st round pick


I thought that was said on the episode of 32 Thoughts right after Markstrom to NJ didn't happen. I shouldn't say Fitz offered it since I am not in the room with any of these guys, but that's what I thought the offer was. Not familiar with Devils prospects to know if they have other 1st prospect equivalents (obviously not Nemec, Hughes) but I would think Markstrom would demand more than a 1st (pick or Holtz) and closer to a 1st + 1st value. Devils may still not make the trade but this would be considering NJ thinks if they get a goalie they could make a playoff push and the Flames have a shot at the wildcard in the west even after they trade away all their top players but if they trade Markstrom they would have no shot. Given that I think they would value Markstrom more than Anaheim values Gibson for example which would lead NJ to "overpay" on Markstrom value.
20 févr. à 16 h 49
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 40,583
Mentions "j'aime": 18,490
Quoting: jimothy802
I thought that was said on the episode of 32 Thoughts right after Markstrom to NJ didn't happen. I shouldn't say Fitz offered it since I am not in the room with any of these guys, but that's what I thought the offer was. Not familiar with Devils prospects to know if they have other 1st prospect equivalents (obviously not Nemec, Hughes) but I would think Markstrom would demand more than a 1st (pick or Holtz) and closer to a 1st + 1st value. Devils may still not make the trade but this would be considering NJ thinks if they get a goalie they could make a playoff push and the Flames have a shot at the wildcard in the west even after they trade away all their top players but if they trade Markstrom they would have no shot. Given that I think they would value Markstrom more than Anaheim values Gibson for example which would lead NJ to "overpay" on Markstrom value.


I am just going by what was reported: Holtz for Markstrom...with retention and cost of retention unknown.
That part seemed to be picked up in a couple of places.

From NJD perspective, it was notable to see Holtz included (even hard to believe at first).
We have been asked often about him, and it always seems to be stories of GMs asking for Holtz and Fitzy saying, no way.

Our other young players/prospects are the top guys that are not trade options (Nemec, Luke, Mercer).
After Holtz, the best two are Seamus Casey (RHD in NCAA) and Arseni Gritsyuk (LW in KHL)
After that, its probably Topias Vilen (LHD in AHL), Graeme Clarke (RW in AHL), Leeni Hameenaho (RW in Liiga).

It appears most of the talk has moved to Saros now.
Brunnete was Asst coach here last year...so he knows our guys.
He liked Holtz a lot...and spent a lot of time working with him one-on-one.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage