SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

I can only wish

Créé par: Capsfan1211
Équipe: 2023-24 Capitals de Washington
Date de création initiale: 18 févr. 2024
Publié: 19 févr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
WSH
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (LAK)
LAK
  1. Edmundson, Joel (50 $ retained)
2.
WSH
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (VGK)
3.
WSH
  1. Pitlick, Tyler
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2026 (NYR)
4.
WSH
  1. Stanley, Logan
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (WPG)
5.
WSH
  1. Armia, Joel
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (PIT)
6.
WSH
  1. Malinski, Sam
  2. Meyers, Ben
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2025 (COL)
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2026 (COL)
7.
TOR
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (COL)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de WSH
Logo de VGK
Logo de WSH
Logo de BOS
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
2025
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de BOS
Logo de PIT
Logo de WSH
Logo de LAK
Logo de WPG
Logo de WSH
Logo de COL
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
2026
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de COL
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de NYR
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2283 500 000 $66 073 384 $20 000 $82 500 $17 426 616 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Capitals de Washington
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
C
UFA - 5
Logo de Capitals de Washington
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
796 667 $796 667 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
863 333 $863 333 $
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
5 166 667 $5 166 667 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
775 000 $775 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
789 167 $789 167 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
AD, AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
762 500 $762 500 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
775 000 $775 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
787 500 $787 500 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 675 000 $2 675 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
4 050 000 $4 050 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
775 000 $775 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
850 000 $850 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 062 500 $2 062 500 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
825 000 $825 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Capitals de Washington
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
9 200 000 $9 200 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
19 févr. à 14 h 58
#1
Jeff Gorton
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 2,223
Mentions "j'aime": 527
Why are the Habs adding? They have no reason to dump Armia
jpsnow13 a aimé ceci.
19 févr. à 15 h 13
#2
Habs_fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 677
Mentions "j'aime": 159
Habs are not giving up a 2nd round pick basically for a more expensive version of Armia
jpsnow13 a aimé ceci.
19 févr. à 15 h 26
#3
Fantasy Hockey Pro
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 5,152
Mentions "j'aime": 2,281
Quoting: JeffGorton
Why are the Habs adding? They have no reason to dump Armia


Quoting: p1015983
Habs are not giving up a 2nd round pick basically for a more expensive version of Armia


For the record I don’t think the Habs are the destination for Mantha, but also Mantha has been great this season. Caps absolutely shouldn’t even consider this trade.
19 févr. à 15 h 30
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 2,348
Mentions "j'aime": 2,239
How has no one commented on the 50 dollars retained on Edmundson tears of joy
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
19 févr. à 15 h 34
#5
Caps fan idk why
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 11,298
Mentions "j'aime": 4,367
Quoting: JeffGorton
Why are the Habs adding? They have no reason to dump Armia


Quoting: p1015983
Habs are not giving up a 2nd round pick basically for a more expensive version of Armia


Armia has 12p. Mantha has 28p and 17goals. "basically for a more expensive version of Armia" is the dumbest comparison i can think of lol. Mantha is a much much much better player. Armia is a good 4th liner with a middle 6 cap him + term.

Habs can sign Mantha if they want him after this season and he's not going to the Habs but this trade is terrible for Washington. Just trade mantha for a 2nd @50 retained
OldNYIfan et All_Knowing a aimé ceci.
19 févr. à 16 h 55
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 2,660
Mentions "j'aime": 1,701
Quoting: Capitalfail67
Armia has 12p. Mantha has 28p and 17goals. "basically for a more expensive version of Armia" is the dumbest comparison i can think of lol. Mantha is a much much much better player. Armia is a good 4th liner with a middle 6 cap him + term.

Habs can sign Mantha if they want him after this season and he's not going to the Habs but this trade is terrible for Washington. Just trade mantha for a 2nd 50 retained


Habs arent spending a 2nd to acquire a pending ufa. Thats beyond stupid
jpsnow13 a aimé ceci.
19 févr. à 16 h 58
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 14,579
Mentions "j'aime": 6,154
I came here to say no on the Edmundson trade, but saw that you retained $50, so now I'm all in.
markykins1 a aimé ceci.
20 févr. à 9 h 55
#8
twentyeighteen
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 1,251
Mentions "j'aime": 497
Quoting: Black61
Habs arent spending a 2nd to acquire a pending ufa. Thats beyond stupid


I think you need to read CF67 last sentence again. His opinion states that 'Habs could sign Mantha if they wanted him after the season'. Then he says 'he's not going to the Habs' inferring that 'If they wanted to, they could try but it's not happening'. Then he says 'the trade is terrible for Washington'. It is because they would be getting only a decent 4th liner to replace a 20 -25 goal scorer. This is in fact, not a good move for Washington. Then he gives the opinion that most of us share that if he's going to be moved that 50% retained to get a 2nd rounder back is a good trade. I don't think he was saying that's what Montreal would/should give. It's the deal that should be made, but not to Habs.
20 févr. à 12 h 45
#9
Caps fan idk why
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 11,298
Mentions "j'aime": 4,367
Quoting: Black61
Habs arent spending a 2nd to acquire a pending ufa. Thats beyond stupid


"Habs can sign Mantha if they want him after this season and he's not going to the Habs but this trade is terrible for Washington" literally said this
20 févr. à 12 h 46
#10
Caps fan idk why
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 11,298
Mentions "j'aime": 4,367
Quoting: markykins1
I think you need to read CF67 last sentence again. His opinion states that 'Habs could sign Mantha if they wanted him after the season'. Then he says 'he's not going to the Habs' inferring that 'If they wanted to, they could try but it's not happening'. Then he says 'the trade is terrible for Washington'. It is because they would be getting only a decent 4th liner to replace a 20 -25 goal scorer. This is in fact, not a good move for Washington. Then he gives the opinion that most of us share that if he's going to be moved that 50% retained to get a 2nd rounder back is a good trade. I don't think he was saying that's what Montreal would/should give. It's the deal that should be made, but not to Habs.


thank you!!!
markykins1 a aimé ceci.
20 févr. à 13 h 23
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,685
Mentions "j'aime": 1,055
Quoting: JeffGorton
Why are the Habs adding? They have no reason to dump Armia


Quoting: p1015983
Habs are not giving up a 2nd round pick basically for a more expensive version of Armia


Tell me you don't watch any other team besides the habs without literally saying that lol

Mantha is having a stellar season and Armia is absolutely horrible. Caps don't even consider this trade
20 févr. à 14 h 19
#12
Jeff Gorton
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 2,223
Mentions "j'aime": 527
Quoting: All_Knowing
Tell me you don't watch any other team besides the habs without literally saying that lol

Mantha is having a stellar season and Armia is absolutely horrible. Caps don't even consider this trade


You must not watch other teams as well then if you think Armia is having and I quote "absolutely horrible" season. Hes one of the best defensive forwards in the league. You must only look at Goals and Assists. Probably even use +/- as a way to judge players
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage