SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Flames trades

Créé par: AdamL188
Équipe: 2023-24 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 11 févr. 2024
Publié: 11 févr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Feedback always appreciated
Transactions
1.
CGY
  1. Bloom, Josh
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (VAN)
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2025 (VAN)
VAN
  1. Tanev, Christopher (2 250 000 $ retained)
2.
CGY
  1. Faksa, Radek
  2. Lundkvist, Nils
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (DAL)
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (DAL)
Détails additionnels:
(3rd becomes a 2024 2nd if Stars make 2nd round)
DAL
  1. Hanifin, Noah (2 000 000 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
8x7.25 in place
3.
CGY
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (EDM)
4.
CGY
  1. Boqvist, Adam
  2. Choix de 7e ronde en 2025 (CBJ)
CBJ
  1. Vladar, Daniel
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (VAN)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de CGY
Logo de VAN
Logo de DAL
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de EDM
Logo de CGY
Logo de NJD
Logo de CHI
Logo de CGY
2025
Logo de FLA
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de DAL
Logo de VAN
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CBJ
2026
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de VAN
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2283 500 000 $80 314 999 $0 $1 927 500 $3 185 001 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Flames de Calgary
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 800 000 $5 800 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
863 333 $863 333 $
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Stars de Dallas
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
775 000 $775 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 8
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
813 333 $813 333 $ (Bonis de performance15 000 $$15K)
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
762 500 $762 500 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Stars de Dallas
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
775 000 $775 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Flames de Calgary
762 500 $762 500 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
AG, AD, C
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
11 févr. à 19 h 55
#1
Future Norris guy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 15,605
Mentions "j'aime": 8,625
Reports are that Hanifin is seeking closer to 8 x 8 Faska is a dump and Lundkvist is a bottom pairing RHD. Nill very rarely trades 1st plus this offer would easily be beaten elsewhere.
SomeonesOffended a aimé ceci.
11 févr. à 20 h 33
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 1,262
Mentions "j'aime": 491
Quoting: MoSeider53
Reports are that Hanifin is seeking closer to 8 x 8 Faska is a dump and Lundkvist is a bottom pairing RHD. Nill very rarely trades 1st plus this offer would easily be beaten elsewhere.


Yeah if we're taking back Faksa one of there good prospects would have to be included.
11 févr. à 20 h 52
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 3,792
Mentions "j'aime": 1,208
Canucks will take the Chris Tanev trade.
11 févr. à 21 h 0
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,938
Mentions "j'aime": 729
My only problem from a DAL perspective is they already have Miro, Harley, and Lindell as LHD. I know Miro can also play RD and has been doing that the last two years, but I'd be interested in trying to get him back to LD if at all possible. Doing this obviously doesn't help. I also just don't think they have that kind of money next year with other pieces needing contracts, like Duchene and Harley. Faksa going as a cap dump definitely helps, but I don't know.
11 févr. à 22 h 58
#5
TrevorA
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 6,871
Mentions "j'aime": 1,870
We’ll get better for Tanev (at least a 1st or 2nd + Top Prospect)

Hanifin should bring a similar package to what Lindholm fetched

Duehr holds no Trade Value. He cleared Waivers a couple weeks ago

Boqvist = Vladar in value, so they’d be one for one, but we don’t want/need Boqvist. We’d need a Big Physical Shut Down RD like Peeke more than an inconsistent offensive one who doesn’t play Defence in Boqvist. Only Boqvist I’d want on the Flames is Jesper
11 févr. à 23 h 57
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 2,844
Mentions "j'aime": 834
AZ (or anyone) is not giving a 3rd for a 26yo 4th line playing 8m game
12 févr. à 9 h 59
#7
Former NHL Executive
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2023
Messages: 710
Mentions "j'aime": 161
Quoting: KingofRnR
We’ll get better for Tanev (at least a 1st or 2nd + Top Prospect)

Hanifin should bring a similar package to what Lindholm fetched

Duehr holds no Trade Value. He cleared Waivers a couple weeks ago

Boqvist = Vladar in value, so they’d be one for one, but we don’t want/need Boqvist. We’d need a Big Physical Shut Down RD like Peeke more than an inconsistent offensive one who doesn’t play Defence in Boqvist. Only Boqvist I’d want on the Flames is Jesper


You are getting a 2nd for him. FFS man.
12 févr. à 10 h 3
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 2,198
Mentions "j'aime": 1,906
Quoting: KingofRnR
We’ll get better for Tanev (at least a 1st or 2nd + Top Prospect)

Hanifin should bring a similar package to what Lindholm fetched

Duehr holds no Trade Value. He cleared Waivers a couple weeks ago

Boqvist = Vladar in value, so they’d be one for one, but we don’t want/need Boqvist. We’d need a Big Physical Shut Down RD like Peeke more than an inconsistent offensive one who doesn’t play Defence in Boqvist. Only Boqvist I’d want on the Flames is Jesper


For Tanev: 1st + Top Prospect might be rich, but a 2nd + Top Prospect should absolutely be in play.

Agree on Hanifin and Duehr, although players that clear waivers do gain a little value since teams can then send them down if they trade for them without needing waivers (ex: Robinson to Buffalo for a conditional 7th). Not a 3rd, but a 7th would be possible.

Boqvist ~= Vladar, the difference certainly isn't a 2nd. Columbus isn't really in a position to trade for Vladar right now, since we'd be right back to 3 goalies. Probably an offseason move if anything. You could absolutely have Peeke; for Vladar, for a mid-rounder, for free, just take him.
12 févr. à 12 h 19
#9
TrevorA
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 6,871
Mentions "j'aime": 1,870
Quoting: CaseyFlyman
For Tanev: 1st + Top Prospect might be rich, but a 2nd + Top Prospect should absolutely be in play.

Agree on Hanifin and Duehr, although players that clear waivers do gain a little value since teams can then send them down if they trade for them without needing waivers (ex: Robinson to Buffalo for a conditional 7th). Not a 3rd, but a 7th would be possible.

Boqvist ~= Vladar, the difference certainly isn't a 2nd. Columbus isn't really in a position to trade for Vladar right now, since we'd be right back to 3 goalies. Probably an offseason move if anything. You could absolutely have Peeke; for Vladar, for a mid-rounder, for free, just take him.

Yes, that’s what I meant. Either or

Sure, perhaps a 7th for Duehr, but that’s doubtful

We agree 👍 Peeke is intriguing, maybe he just needs a change of scenery and wouldn’t be a terribly expensive 3-RD. Like what I see in Pachal so far and/or might pursue Kovacevik first, but I’m curious about Peeke
CaseyFlyman a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage