SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Ny Rangers FakE

Créé par: aecliptic
Équipe: 2023-24 Rangers de New York
Date de création initiale: 8 févr. 2024
Publié: 9 févr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
CBJ
  1. Edström, Adam
  2. Sýkora, Adam
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (NYR)
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (NYR)
2.
NYR
  1. Tarasenko, Vladimir (2 500 000 $ retained)
OTT
  1. Lamb, Brody [Liste de réserve]
  2. Tärnström, Oliver [Liste de réserve]
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (NYR)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
2025
Logo de DAL
Logo de NYR
Logo de MIN
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
2026
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2183 500 000 $80 487 416 $610 892 $582 500 $3 012 584 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Rangers de New York
11 642 857 $11 642 857 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
0 $0 $
AD
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Rangers de New York
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Rangers de New York
2 325 000 $2 325 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
828 333 $828 333 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 641 667 $3 641 667 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Rangers de New York
762 500 $762 500 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 666 667 $5 666 667 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 872 000 $3 872 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
825 000 $825 000 $ (Bonis de performance100 000 $$100K)
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
825 000 $825 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Rangers de New York
787 500 $787 500 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
4 437 500 $4 437 500 $
C, AG
UFA - 4

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
9 févr. à 15 h 4
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 399
Mentions "j'aime": 126
If I'm spending a 1st I want a better player than Boone Jenner
9 févr. à 15 h 5
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 5,269
Mentions "j'aime": 2,296
Brodzinski or Pitlick will be waived before Wheeler
9 févr. à 15 h 17
#3
Démarrer sujet
aecliptic
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,947
Mentions "j'aime": 1,284
Quoting: OldSenileGuy
If I'm spending a 1st I want a better player than Boone Jenner


The only other guy I like is Sissons.

Other than that, the C market is pretty aweful. Both Jenner and Sissons come with term, and good cap hits, so theyre not rentals. However Preds are fighting for a wild card spot so its unlikely they trade Sissons.
9 févr. à 15 h 18
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 7,142
Mentions "j'aime": 3,493
Quoting: OldSenileGuy
If I'm spending a 1st I want a better player than Boone Jenner


If you want a better player than Jenner its going to cost a lot more than a 1st.
squashmaple a aimé ceci.
9 févr. à 15 h 20
#5
Démarrer sujet
aecliptic
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,947
Mentions "j'aime": 1,284
Quoting: sens65
If you want a better player than Jenner its going to cost a lot more than a 1st.


He doesnt get it, for what Jenner lacks on the scoring sheet (eventhough hes usually a lock for 20g) he makes up for everywhere else on the ice. I basically use the Lindholm model and take a little off the top.
9 févr. à 15 h 25
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 7,142
Mentions "j'aime": 3,493
Quoting: aecliptic
He doesnt get it, for what Jenner lacks on the scoring sheet (eventhough hes usually a lock for 20g) he makes up for everywhere else on the ice. I basically use the Lindholm model and take a little off the top.


Yep.
9 févr. à 15 h 31
#7
not a he )
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 3,218
Mentions "j'aime": 4,379
Quoting: sens65
If you want a better player than Jenner its going to cost a lot more than a 1st.


Quoting: aecliptic
He doesnt get it, for what Jenner lacks on the scoring sheet (eventhough hes usually a lock for 20g) he makes up for everywhere else on the ice. I basically use the Lindholm model and take a little off the top.


I'd want the Horvat deal at the minimum because whatever difference in player quality between them is made up by the fact Jenner is on an extremely cheap contract for three full postseasons.
sens65 et Friendly_Cannon a aimé ceci.
9 févr. à 15 h 40
#8
Démarrer sujet
aecliptic
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,947
Mentions "j'aime": 1,284
Quoting: squashmaple
I'd want the Horvat deal at the minimum because whatever difference in player quality between them is made up by the fact Jenner is on an extremely cheap contract for three full postseasons.


Horvat was 3 years younger. Horvat was coming off a 30g season, and already had scored 30g at the time of the trade to the Isles. Jenner has scored over 20 goals 3 times (recently in b2b years), the last time he scored 30 was 2016. Hes never scored over 50 points.

This trade is pretty much on par with the Horvat trade. You got your 1st, you got your B prospect, however rather than a roster player youre gonna get another prospect and a 4th.
9 févr. à 15 h 51
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 748
Mentions "j'aime": 813
Thats not enough to get Jenner anyway. You are going to need a better prospect at least. He isnt being shopped so any trade would have to be an overpay.
9 févr. à 15 h 57
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 2,485
Mentions "j'aime": 1,102
Considering Tarasenko at 3.75m lat year cost a 1st, 4th, Blais and Skinner... I would hope that he could net more than a 2nd and two B/C type prospects this year at 2.5m
9 févr. à 15 h 59
#11
Démarrer sujet
aecliptic
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,947
Mentions "j'aime": 1,284
Quoting: TheBoyDuddus
Considering Tarasenko at 3.75m lat year cost a 1st, 4th, Blais and Skinner... I would hope that he could net more than a 2nd and two B/C type prospects this year at 2.5m


I love the fact that EVERYONE conveniently forgets that Nico Mikkola was apart of that trade too.
LVNYR_FAN a aimé ceci.
9 févr. à 18 h 2
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 2,081
Mentions "j'aime": 1,748
Quoting: aecliptic
Horvat was 3 years younger. Horvat was coming off a 30g season, and already had scored 30g at the time of the trade to the Isles. Jenner has scored over 20 goals 3 times (recently in b2b years), the last time he scored 30 was 2016. Hes never scored over 50 points.

This trade is pretty much on par with the Horvat trade. You got your 1st, you got your B prospect, however rather than a roster player youre gonna get another prospect and a 4th.


Those are fair points, and I love the Horvat trade as a model, but the big differences (market and contract) between the Horvat trade and a Jenner trade really can't be understated. It's an insane center market, which has recently been set by the Lindholm and Monahan trades; it definitely favors sellers. Add on that CBJ have explicitly said Jenner isn't available (where everyone knew Vancouver was looking to move Horvat), it would take a ransom to pry him loose. Plus, you're not staring down the barrel of offering an $8.5M contract to the guy in the offseason.

I think it's getting there in terms of value, but market + team situation + player contract could still force the return to 1st, 2nd, A-prospect IMO. Been saying that for months, and nothing that's transpired recently has led me to believe that's impossible or even unlikely.

If Jenner gets moved, it's going to take a "oh holy f***" offer that puts the league on notice, and this one just isn't there yet. Just my two cents.
9 févr. à 18 h 10
#13
Démarrer sujet
aecliptic
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,947
Mentions "j'aime": 1,284
Quoting: CaseyFlyman
Those are fair points, and I love the Horvat trade as a model, but the big differences (market and contract) between the Horvat trade and a Jenner trade really can't be understated. It's an insane center market, which has recently been set by the Lindholm and Monahan trades; it definitely favors sellers. Add on that CBJ have explicitly said Jenner isn't available (where everyone knew Vancouver was looking to move Horvat), it would take a ransom to pry him loose. Plus, you're not staring down the barrel of offering an $8.5M contract to the guy in the offseason.

I think it's getting there in terms of value, but market + team situation + player contract could still force the return to 1st, 2nd, A-prospect IMO. Been saying that for months, and nothing that's transpired recently has led me to believe that's impossible or even unlikely.

If Jenner gets moved, it's going to take a "oh holy f***" offer that puts the league on notice, and this one just isn't there yet. Just my two cents.


I dont expect them to move him because they have absolutely no reason to, just saying if the Rangers were going to give up 1sts and B prospects and whatever else, it should be for this type of player or dont bother cause its simply not worth it in this market.
CaseyFlyman a aimé ceci.
9 févr. à 18 h 13
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 2,081
Mentions "j'aime": 1,748
Quoting: aecliptic
I dont expect them to move him because they have absolutely no reason to, just saying if the Rangers were going to give up 1sts and B prospects and whatever else, it should be for this type of player or dont bother cause its simply not worth it in this market.


I 100% agree with you there.
9 févr. à 21 h 22
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 2,485
Mentions "j'aime": 1,102
Quoting: aecliptic
I love the fact that EVERYONE conveniently forgets that Nico Mikkola was apart of that trade too.


Personally don't think the return on the 4/5D made up a good portion of that but I hear you
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage