SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Deadline 2024

Créé par: duffmckagan
Équipe: 2023-24 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 6 févr. 2024
Publié: 8 févr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Broberg, Philip
  2. Campbell, Jack (2 000 000 $ retained)
  3. Ceci, Cody
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (EDM)
2.
SJS
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (COL)
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2025 (COL)
COL
  1. Granlund, Mikael (2 000 000 $ retained)
  2. MacDonald, Jacob
3.
SJS
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2026 (VAN)
4.
SJS
  1. Kapanen, Kasperi
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (NYR)
5.
SJS
  1. Myers, Tyler
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (VAN)
  3. Choix de 6e ronde en 2024 (SJS)
6.
SJS
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (NYR)
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2025 (MIN)
7.
SJS
  1. Drury, Jack
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (CAR)
8.
CBJ
  1. Bordeleau, Thomas
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (PIT)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (NJD)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de SJS
Logo de EDM
Logo de CAR
Logo de NYR
Logo de SJS
Logo de NYR
Logo de VAN
Logo de VGK
Logo de PIT
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de NJD
2025
Logo de SJS
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de WPG
Logo de COL
Logo de MIN
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de WSH
2026
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de VAN
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $73 980 000 $25 000 $2 145 000 $9 520 000 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
828 333 $828 333 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
775 000 $775 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
925 000 $925 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
762 500 $762 500 $
AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
775 000 $775 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
912 500 $912 500 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
775 000 $775 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 350 000 $2 350 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
918 333 $918 333 $ (Bonis de performance1 000 000 $$1M)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
940 000 $940 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance30 000 $$30K)
AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
950 000 $950 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C
RFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
950 000 $950 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG
RFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
8 févr. à 14 h 49
#1
Beanmachine
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 1,485
Mentions "j'aime": 498
The Duclair ship has sailed for Calgary with the Kuzmenko acquisition.
8 févr. à 14 h 50
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 904
Mentions "j'aime": 1,083
Henrique is probably ahead of Granlund in terms of who the avs would prefer but at this point i'd prefer some stiff corpses to RyJo, so i'd personally accept. We don't need MacDonald tho.
8 févr. à 14 h 53
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 8,634
Mentions "j'aime": 3,931
That’s way way too much for Edmonton to pay. Easy fast pass.
Stevo989898 et CD282 a aimé ceci.
8 févr. à 14 h 57
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 3,207
Mentions "j'aime": 2,897
Jackets decline. Not enough for jiricek and doesn’t fit a need. Bordeleau is a nice piece but the jackets don’t have a need for him and the late first isn’t enough to entice the jackets to move jiricek. Only pieces I think the jackets would be interested in if jiricek were moved would be will smith or the sharks 24 first
8 févr. à 15 h 10
#5
Stovetop
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 2,004
Mentions "j'aime": 877
Quoting: swissmontana
Henrique is probably ahead of Granlund in terms of who the avs would prefer but at this point i'd prefer some stiff corpses to RyJo, so i'd personally accept. We don't need MacDonald tho.


Granlund has another year which would be a major selling point to the Avs who are pretty cap strapped. Having a solid 2nd line C / very good 3rd line C locked in at 3 mil for another year I feel would be very enticing for COL. I'd be happy to take RyJo back and add a 3rd going to the Sharks with conditions to upgrade if COL makes the WCFs.

Also, I think MacDonald is one of, if not THE most underrated players on the Sharks. He can literally slot in on Defense or Wing and be a very reliable player on both sides of the puck. He's crazy versatile and I could see him being a great depth add for a contender
swissmontana a aimé ceci.
8 févr. à 15 h 19
#6
Stovetop
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 2,004
Mentions "j'aime": 877
Quoting: SK101
Jackets decline. Not enough for jiricek and doesn’t fit a need. Bordeleau is a nice piece but the jackets don’t have a need for him and the late first isn’t enough to entice the jackets to move jiricek. Only pieces I think the jackets would be interested in if jiricek were moved would be will smith or the sharks 24 first


Yeah and those pieces are non-starters. I think CBJ would be looking for an NHL ready C as well, not one that's still on the cusp.

I also think the Sharks could just trade up in the draft with that PIT 1st and their 2nd a few spots and take Parekh who's debatably as good of a prospect as Jiricek
8 févr. à 15 h 22
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 3,054
Mentions "j'aime": 1,466
Blues have no need for Hoffman. No need to give up assets to get him
8 févr. à 15 h 44
#8
STL Blues GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 573
Mentions "j'aime": 87
nope. STL spits in ur face and dunks on you
8 févr. à 15 h 52
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 904
Mentions "j'aime": 1,083
Quoting: AStovetop
Granlund has another year which would be a major selling point to the Avs who are pretty cap strapped. Having a solid 2nd line C / very good 3rd line C locked in at 3 mil for another year I feel would be very enticing for COL. I'd be happy to take RyJo back and add a 3rd going to the Sharks with conditions to upgrade if COL makes the WCFs.

Also, I think MacDonald is one of, if not THE most underrated players on the Sharks. He can literally slot in on Defense or Wing and be a very reliable player on both sides of the puck. He's crazy versatile and I could see him being a great depth add for a contender


yeah, I like the Granlund $ amount and his contract running out next year right when a rookie C could take over. i'm not opposed. I just think Henrique has higher upside this year.
MacDonald is awesome, I liked him a lot with the Avs and Eagles and I think he has tons of upside. we just have SO much defensemen depth rn
TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
8 févr. à 16 h 1
#10
Stovetop
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 2,004
Mentions "j'aime": 877
Quoting: swissmontana
yeah, I like the Granlund $ amount and his contract running out next year right when a rookie C could take over. i'm not opposed. I just think Henrique has higher upside this year.
MacDonald is awesome, I liked him a lot with the Avs and Eagles and I think he has tons of upside. we just have SO much defensemen depth rn


Hmm, I feel like Granlund has been the far better player than Henrique this year. The time to sell for ANA on Henrique was when Getz was still there and he was having that great year.

As for MacD, he's played primarily forward this year, but I feel like depth forwards also isn't the Avs issue. it's more the Middle/top 6 Center depth
swissmontana a aimé ceci.
8 févr. à 16 h 2
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 904
Mentions "j'aime": 1,083
Quoting: AStovetop
Hmm, I feel like Granlund has been the far better player than Henrique this year. The time to sell for ANA on Henrique was when Getz was still there and he was having that great year.

As for MacD, he's played primarily forward this year, but I feel like depth forwards also isn't the Avs issue. it's more the Middle/top 6 Center depth


i like both players. i wouldn't be mad with either at this point. I prefer Henrique by a small margin and i think the Avs FO does too.

I forget MacDonald does both. Still just not what the Avs need. Need a 2C, 4C, and BU goalie.
TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
8 févr. à 16 h 21
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 597
Mentions "j'aime": 156
Flames are sellers
8 févr. à 17 h 31
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 9,644
Mentions "j'aime": 4,598
Not the worst 'band aid' option for the Avs (if they can move RyJo) when you take into account the retention but I'd prefer it to be the '24 1st if it happened.
8 févr. à 18 h 2
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,106
Mentions "j'aime": 7,777
Why would Edmonton trade out a top-4 defender at the deadline? They're gearing UP for the playoffs, not down.

And they wouldn't have any interest in Kakonen either. He'd be the 3rd best goalie in Edmonton, and at $2.75M, not very good value.

Saving $2M on Campbell while taking on a $2 75M 3rd goalie just isn't worth Ceci, Broberg and a 1st. Ridiculous.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage