Quoting: jonh514
As a Habs fan I would do this and use our pick 6-10 on a replacement.
Mailloux and Barron are working out as well and with Guhle playing on the right, there is less pressure.
I wouldn't. Too risky imo. As controversial as the Reinbacher pick was, he's still the defacto "best Dman" of that draft, and clearly the RD prospect with the highest upside (by a wide margin) over guys like Barron and Mailloux for the Habs.
I'm not buying Guhle playing on the right side as a long-term solution. As for Barron and Mailloux...Barron from an offensive perspective is basically already an NHL top 4 dman, but because of his defensive inconsistencies, I can see MTL having doubts on overcommitting to him (and he probably gets a bridge deal this offseason). Mailloux is almost having a "perfect" AHL rookie season. He's cleaned up his defensive game, and showed his offensive talent is borderline elite levels, and is an AHL all-star AS A ROOKIE. Habs management are probably really excited about Mailloux's progress.
That being said, I don't think there's enough of a sample size on any of Guhle at RD or Barron and Mailloux for MTL to move Reinbacher.
Only way I see the Habs getting Zegras, is them offering their 2024 1st rd pick +. And a lot still needs to be determined. If the pick is too low (13th-16th overall range) I think ANA passes. If the pick is too high (top 5-7 pick) Habs will pass. The pick would need to be in that sweet spot (between 8th and 12th overall imo), and for MTL to value Zegras over whoever they would pick AND for ANA to have a target in mind that they would be willing to sacrifice Zegras to get. Then based off of both teams accepting the "core" of the trade, most likely Habs would be adding secondary asset(s) to get the deal done.