SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Zeeg ass

Créé par: xercuses
Équipe: 2023-24 Canadiens de Montréal
Date de création initiale: 7 févr. 2024
Publié: 7 févr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de MTL
Logo de WPG
Logo de COL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MIN
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de SJS
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de EDM
Logo de WSH
2025
Logo de MTL
Logo de CGY
Logo de MTL
Logo de PIT
Logo de MTL
Logo de VAN
Logo de MTL
Logo de DET
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
2026
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $78 285 416 $1 170 000 $3 977 500 $5 214 584 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 8
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 500 000 $$4M)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 900 000 $2 900 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 4
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 362 500 $3 362 500 $
C, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 450 000 $4 450 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 4
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance420 000 $$420K)
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 925 000 $1 925 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 875 000 $4 875 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
828 333 $828 333 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
766 667 $766 667 $
DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
812 500 $812 500 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
762 500 $762 500 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
867 500 $867 500 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
DG
RFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
7 févr. à 13 h 16
#1
NHL Insider
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2016
Messages: 2,010
Mentions "j'aime": 713
Ducks take this imo
7 févr. à 13 h 17
#2
HuGo is a Boss GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 6,998
Mentions "j'aime": 3,055
As a Habs fan I would do this and use our pick 6-10 on a replacement.

Mailloux and Barron are working out as well and with Guhle playing on the right, there is less pressure.
xercuses a aimé ceci.
7 févr. à 13 h 22
#3
Molson beer is meh
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 3,861
Mentions "j'aime": 1,775
Quoting: NARC311
Ducks take this imo


Doubt MTL does however. It would be such a bad look on Kent Hughes, considering the "reported" deals he refused for the 5th overall pick (Cutter Gauthier being one of them), not to mention all the offensive talent they passed on to pick Reinbacher.

For better or for worse, I believe MTL are too committed to Reinbacher, at least for the next 2-3 years until they have a good idea of what he's capable of doing in the NHL.
jonh514 a aimé ceci.
7 févr. à 13 h 24
#4
Future Norris guy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 15,605
Mentions "j'aime": 8,625
This is probably the only way, That Trevor Zegras will ever play for the Habs.
7 févr. à 13 h 33
#5
HuGo is a Boss GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 6,998
Mentions "j'aime": 3,055
Quoting: Blazingbat11
Doubt MTL does however. It would be such a bad look on Kent Hughes, considering the "reported" deals he refused for the 5th overall pick (Cutter Gauthier being one of them), not to mention all the offensive talent they passed on to pick Reinbacher.

For better or for worse, I believe MTL are too committed to Reinbacher, at least for the next 2-3 years until they have a good idea of what he's capable of doing in the NHL.


Very good points. But let's say they get to their pick and Levshunov is sitting there and all of Celebrini, Demidov, Lindstrom are gone, do they do this?
MountRoyal a aimé ceci.
7 févr. à 13 h 35
#6
Le patriote
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2018
Messages: 6,356
Mentions "j'aime": 1,410
that would be stupid to do that
7 févr. à 13 h 47
#7
Flood Geologist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 449
Mentions "j'aime": 232
Quoting: jonh514
Very good points. But let's say they get to their pick and Levshunov is sitting there and all of Celebrini, Demidov, Lindstrom are gone, do they do this?


Maybe trade that pick for Zegras straight up then and keep reinbacher?
Blazingbat11 a aimé ceci.
7 févr. à 13 h 47
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2023
Messages: 2,460
Mentions "j'aime": 1,021
Quoting: Blazingbat11
Doubt MTL does however. It would be such a bad look on Kent Hughes, considering the "reported" deals he refused for the 5th overall pick (Cutter Gauthier being one of them), not to mention all the offensive talent they passed on to pick Reinbacher.

For better or for worse, I believe MTL are too committed to Reinbacher, at least for the next 2-3 years until they have a good idea of what he's capable of doing in the NHL.


Reported in parentheses is the key here
Blazingbat11 a aimé ceci.
7 févr. à 13 h 49
#9
Molson beer is meh
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 3,861
Mentions "j'aime": 1,775
Quoting: jonh514
As a Habs fan I would do this and use our pick 6-10 on a replacement.

Mailloux and Barron are working out as well and with Guhle playing on the right, there is less pressure.


I wouldn't. Too risky imo. As controversial as the Reinbacher pick was, he's still the defacto "best Dman" of that draft, and clearly the RD prospect with the highest upside (by a wide margin) over guys like Barron and Mailloux for the Habs.

I'm not buying Guhle playing on the right side as a long-term solution. As for Barron and Mailloux...Barron from an offensive perspective is basically already an NHL top 4 dman, but because of his defensive inconsistencies, I can see MTL having doubts on overcommitting to him (and he probably gets a bridge deal this offseason). Mailloux is almost having a "perfect" AHL rookie season. He's cleaned up his defensive game, and showed his offensive talent is borderline elite levels, and is an AHL all-star AS A ROOKIE. Habs management are probably really excited about Mailloux's progress.
That being said, I don't think there's enough of a sample size on any of Guhle at RD or Barron and Mailloux for MTL to move Reinbacher.


Only way I see the Habs getting Zegras, is them offering their 2024 1st rd pick +. And a lot still needs to be determined. If the pick is too low (13th-16th overall range) I think ANA passes. If the pick is too high (top 5-7 pick) Habs will pass. The pick would need to be in that sweet spot (between 8th and 12th overall imo), and for MTL to value Zegras over whoever they would pick AND for ANA to have a target in mind that they would be willing to sacrifice Zegras to get. Then based off of both teams accepting the "core" of the trade, most likely Habs would be adding secondary asset(s) to get the deal done.
ricochetii a aimé ceci.
7 févr. à 13 h 58
#10
HuGo is a Boss GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 6,998
Mentions "j'aime": 3,055
Quoting: Blazingbat11
I wouldn't. Too risky imo. As controversial as the Reinbacher pick was, he's still the defacto "best Dman" of that draft, and clearly the RD prospect with the highest upside (by a wide margin) over guys like Barron and Mailloux for the Habs.

I'm not buying Guhle playing on the right side as a long-term solution. As for Barron and Mailloux...Barron from an offensive perspective is basically already an NHL top 4 dman, but because of his defensive inconsistencies, I can see MTL having doubts on overcommitting to him (and he probably gets a bridge deal this offseason). Mailloux is almost having a "perfect" AHL rookie season. He's cleaned up his defensive game, and showed his offensive talent is borderline elite levels, and is an AHL all-star AS A ROOKIE. Habs management are probably really excited about Mailloux's progress.
That being said, I don't think there's enough of a sample size on any of Guhle at RD or Barron and Mailloux for MTL to move Reinbacher.


Only way I see the Habs getting Zegras, is them offering their 2024 1st rd pick +. And a lot still needs to be determined. If the pick is too low (13th-16th overall range) I think ANA passes. If the pick is too high (top 5-7 pick) Habs will pass. The pick would need to be in that sweet spot (between 8th and 12th overall imo), and for MTL to value Zegras over whoever they would pick AND for ANA to have a target in mind that they would be willing to sacrifice Zegras to get. Then based off of both teams accepting the "core" of the trade, most likely Habs would be adding secondary asset(s) to get the deal done.


I mostly agree with you on the RD analysis.

On the pick ... Really not sure. I think after Celebrini, Demidov, and Lindstrom are gone, I'd take Zegras over all the rest.
7 févr. à 14 h 14
#11
Molson beer is meh
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 3,861
Mentions "j'aime": 1,775
Quoting: jonh514
I mostly agree with you on the RD analysis.

On the pick ... Really not sure. I think after Celebrini, Demidov, and Lindstrom are gone, I'd take Zegras over all the rest.


I'd add Catton to that forward group, but it's a debatable topic for sure. It's also why I think Habs keep the pick until 7th overall, because as much as Habs fans would hate to hear this, If a Dman like Silayev or Levshunov slide for whatever reason, Kent Hughes WILL be taking another Dman imo regardless of positional need.
Heck I'd be trading any LD (maybe not Hutson) if Habs could get Silayev lol
7 févr. à 14 h 19
#12
HuGo is a Boss GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 6,998
Mentions "j'aime": 3,055
Quoting: Blazingbat11
I'd add Catton to that forward group, but it's a debatable topic for sure. It's also why I think Habs keep the pick until 7th overall, because as much as Habs fans would hate to hear this, If a Dman like Silayev or Levshunov slide for whatever reason, Kent Hughes WILL be taking another Dman imo regardless of positional need.
Heck I'd be trading any LD (maybe not Hutson) if Habs could get Silayev lol


Best player available or bust, eh?

I don't think the Habs can trade an overflow defenseman and get great value back.
7 févr. à 14 h 31
#13
Molson beer is meh
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 3,861
Mentions "j'aime": 1,775
Quoting: jonh514
Best player available or bust, eh?

I don't think the Habs can trade an overflow defenseman and get great value back.


I think there would be a competitive market for Matheson (nothing crazy), and hypothetically, if Habs draft Silayev, Guhle automatically becomes expendable, and there should be a significant market for him.

A future LD of:

Silayev
Hutson
Struble
Xhekaj

with other guys like Harris (if he's still around) and Engstrom. Habs would still be plenty deep at LD.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage