SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Question to Ducks fans

Créé par: Jay27
Équipe: 2024-25 Canadiens de Montréal
Date de création initiale: 3 févr. 2024
Publié: 3 févr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3950 000 $
3950 000 $
3950 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 400 000 $
21 100 000 $
21 400 000 $
Transactions
MTL
  1. Zegras, Trevor
Détails additionnels:
I know this horse has been beaten to death and then some but I digress…
The scene: Habs now without Monahan or much of any center depth past Suzy move down the standings a bit further and end up with the 5th overall pick yet again(I believe no one can argue that this would be much of a stretch). Come up to the draft, Verbeek has decided to listen to offers on Zegras and has been doing so for some months. They already have a top 3 pick. Reinbacher is off the table but instead Hugo offers the 5th overall pick. What else would need to be added to get this deal done? Now let’s be fair on this, the assumption at this point is Zegras is available but there would be multiple teams interested so MTL would have to overpay…but within reason a top 5 pick has proven in the past to be very valuable but it’d be ridiculous for MTL to be adding a guy like Guhle, Hutson or Slaf. I look forward to your input.
ANA
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (MTL)
Détails additionnels:
#5 pick
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de WPG
Logo de COL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MIN
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de SJS
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de EDM
Logo de WSH
2025
Logo de MTL
Logo de CGY
Logo de MTL
Logo de PIT
Logo de MTL
Logo de VAN
Logo de MTL
Logo de DET
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
2026
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2787 700 000 $79 363 750 $1 022 500 $3 977 500 $8 336 250 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 900 000 $2 900 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
C
UFA - 6
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 362 500 $3 362 500 $
C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 500 000 $$4M)
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 7
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
835 000 $835 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 450 000 $4 450 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
812 500 $812 500 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AD, AG
RFA
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 875 000 $4 875 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance420 000 $$420K)
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
867 500 $867 500 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
890 000 $890 000 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
DG/DD
RFA
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
875 000 $875 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 925 000 $1 925 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
766 667 $766 667 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
DD
RFA
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
3 févr. à 14 h 18
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 15,575
Mentions "j'aime": 11,956
Slafkovsky
3 févr. à 14 h 47
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 1,757
Mentions "j'aime": 694
Quoting: GeneralLandro
Slafkovsky


If Verbeek have the 5th overall pick for Zegras he would immediately pul’ the trigger. Forget Slaf there 0 chance of happening. You’re being completely delusional.
3 févr. à 14 h 49
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 15,575
Mentions "j'aime": 11,956
Quoting: Joblow
If Verbeek have the 5th overall pick for Zegras he would immediately pul’ the trigger. Forget Slaf there 0 chance of happening. You’re being completely delusional.


We aren’t trading a guy who has shown he can produce for just a pick

We need a major asset to think about moving Zegras
3 févr. à 14 h 59
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 1,757
Mentions "j'aime": 694
Quoting: GeneralLandro
We aren’t trading a guy who has shown he can produce for just a pick

We need a major asset to think about moving Zegras


You will be dissapointed a lot if Zegras is traded this summer. If you think you are getting a first overall pick for Zegras you are completely out of your mind. Each year that you keep Zegras and he get closer to Ufa he lost big value. Especially if those trade rumors continue, Zegras will definitely want out of Anaheim and go play for a big market where he is destined to play. He will get endorsements money, more visibility and will be playing in front of a full building each night. You will end up with what Winnipeg received for Dubois. So a 5th overall pick is pretty damn a good return especially in a draft like 2024
3 févr. à 15 h 38
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,759
Mentions "j'aime": 1,790
Quoting: GeneralLandro
Slafkovsky


I think we gotta be reasonable here, and that’s clearly too much

First, I don’t think the deal happens at all until the pick is actually up, because I would imagine there would only be a couple players that Verbeek would see as worth trading Z for in this draft. So he’d want to be sure they’re actually available at MTL’s pick. 5th overall vs 7th is irrelevant, it’s really just whether or not his guy is up for grabs

Then it comes down to value. I agree that Rein, Slaf, and Hutson would be too much value. But draft picks have a lot of risk (and take time), and a back-to-back 22 year old 60pt scorer is near the ceiling of what you’d be hoping for. My guess is that it’d still take a prospect one tier down from Slaf/Hutson in the Roy/Beck/Mesar range, but again, I think it’d only be if Verbeek really liked one of them.

So imo, the baseline of the deal is something along the lines of Zegras for Lindstrom + Beck. There might be like a mid pick somewhere in there to even it out one way or the other, but that’s my thought

I feel like if Verbeek could walk away from the draft with a combo of Levshunov, Lindstrom, and someone in the Beck tier coming in that could make it palatable to let Z go. That said. I’m also stoked to just keep Z and draft Lev smile
OldNYIfan et Jay27 a aimé ceci.
3 févr. à 16 h 3
#6
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,526
Mentions "j'aime": 25,402
I want to reinforce what the esteemed @jded says in his excellent analysis by noting that a not-insignificant factor here is what happens with Anaheim's own pick. Let's assume that Verbeek and the scouting staff think that the two best prospects in this draft are Celebrini and Levshunov (but you can substitute anyone here for the latter, just as they surprised us with Leo Carlsson over Adam Fantilli). If we get one of those two with our own pick, the eventual "loss" from trading Zegras for what turns out to be a lesser player will be greatly diminished both psychologically and actually. If, on the other hand, both of them are gone by the time our own pick comes up, then I think that Zegras is off the table. (Basically, I'm just rephrasing jded's first point.)
Jay27 a aimé ceci.
3 févr. à 17 h 26
#7
Démarrer sujet
Jay27
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 1,962
Mentions "j'aime": 1,104
Quoting: Jded
I think we gotta be reasonable here, and that’s clearly too much

First, I don’t think the deal happens at all until the pick is actually up, because I would imagine there would only be a couple players that Verbeek would see as worth trading Z for in this draft. So he’d want to be sure they’re actually available at MTL’s pick. 5th overall vs 7th is irrelevant, it’s really just whether or not his guy is up for grabs

Then it comes down to value. I agree that Rein, Slaf, and Hutson would be too much value. But draft picks have a lot of risk (and take time), and a back-to-back 22 year old 60pt scorer is near the ceiling of what you’d be hoping for. My guess is that it’d still take a prospect one tier down from Slaf/Hutson in the Roy/Beck/Mesar range, but again, I think it’d only be if Verbeek really liked one of them.

So imo, the baseline of the deal is something along the lines of Zegras for Lindstrom + Beck. There might be like a mid pick somewhere in there to even it out one way or the other, but that’s my thought

I feel like if Verbeek could walk away from the draft with a combo of Levshunov, Lindstrom, and someone in the Beck tier coming in that could make it palatable to let Z go. That said. I’m also stoked to just keep Z and draft Lev smile


Wow, this is exactly the kind of feedback I was looking for. Thank you.

It’s funny because my proposal I have locked and loaded in my not-yet-posted ACGM is MTL’s 2024 first and Beck for Zegras. I sometimes like to gauge other fan bases expectations before I post my proposals as to not hopefully be completely off the mark as I am a Habs fan and only really watch their games.

In my mind the Ducks have both of their top 6 centres of the future in Mactavish and Leo. You add Beck to that mix as your 3c shutdown guy and the future looks great. Not to mention the guy they get with that high end pick. The Habs get that young top 6 offensive talent they’ve desired. I think both teams give up major pieces but are better in the long run for what they add in this situation, but you are right it all comes down to if the guy Verbeek wants is still available at that Habs pick.

I think there is also a less ideal scenario where Hugo offers up Reinbacher for Zegras and uses the probable top 7 pick to draft a RHD replacement. But like I said, that’d be less ideal.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage