SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

What next

Créé par: Joblow
Équipe: 2024-25 Canadiens de Montréal
Date de création initiale: 17 janv. 2024
Publié: 18 janv. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3925 000 $
3925 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
1900 000 $
21 800 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
21 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
MTL
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (CAR)
2.
SEA
  1. Farrell, Sean
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (MTL)
3.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de MTL
Logo de COL
Logo de CAR
Logo de MIN
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de SJS
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de EDM
Logo de WSH
2025
Logo de MTL
Logo de CGY
Logo de MTL
Logo de PIT
Logo de MTL
Logo de VAN
Logo de MTL
Logo de DET
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
2026
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2387 700 000 $72 267 083 $1 022 500 $4 238 750 $15 432 917 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 900 000 $2 900 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
C
UFA - 6
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 500 000 $$4M)
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 7
Logo de Stars de Dallas
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance318 750 $$319K)
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 362 500 $3 362 500 $
C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
835 000 $835 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
5 166 666 $5 166 666 $
C, AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 875 000 $4 875 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance420 000 $$420K)
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
RFA
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 925 000 $1 925 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
DD
RFA
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
812 500 $812 500 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
18 janv. à 16 h 58
#1
Reinbacher Josi 2.0
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2022
Messages: 4,141
Mentions "j'aime": 2,294
1. Primeau doesn't get that
2. MTL shouldn't trade for Gourde
3. Fair deal, but both teams might decline imo (Maybe MTL accepts)
Lafleur10 a aimé ceci.
18 janv. à 17 h 3
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,619
Mentions "j'aime": 791
1. Primeau for a 2nd is a useless trade for MTL hes still young and has played decently well needs more starts.
2. Gourde doesnt fit the habs timeline
3. We will have to move a dman, but Hutson is most certainly not the one habs dont consider that to add a center that they already have in Dach.

Each one of these trades either dont help the habs or hurts them going forward.
18 janv. à 17 h 13
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 1,716
Mentions "j'aime": 678
Quoting: habs_need_Scoring
1. Primeau for a 2nd is a useless trade for MTL hes still young and has played decently well needs more starts.
2. Gourde doesnt fit the habs timeline
3. We will have to move a dman, but Hutson is most certainly not the one habs dont consider that to add a center that they already have in Dach.

Each one of these trades either dont help the habs or hurts them going forward.


I respect your opinion but i don’t see thing like you do.
I am a huge Johnston fan and think he will be a stud. Giving up Hutson would be tough but we would immediately address the top 6 need with Johnston.
I am also extremely high on Adam Engstrom so i think Mtl could make this deal and still have a deep defense down the stretch in 2-3 season. The only reason i trade Primeau is that i don’t think we will be able to trade Allen so Hugues will face tough decision at some point.
Habs built a hard working, forechecking brand of hockey and adding a cup winner speedster who is a relentless worker would be a better option then to keep Dvorak who can’t skate no more.
18 janv. à 17 h 41
#4
Habs fan somehow
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 312
Mentions "j'aime": 80
I like your idea on the DAL trade. People get emotional about Hutson, but the truth is the Habs have an embarrassent of riches problem, and will have to move at least 2 young LD within the next 18 months.
Joblow a aimé ceci.
18 janv. à 17 h 43
#5
Go Habs Go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 10,667
Mentions "j'aime": 4,091
The next step is continued patience.
The only pressure point right now is unladening our surplus of LHD, which preferably involves adding a potential scoring forward.

Newhook and Anderson will have their opportunity to assert themselves on the 2nd line next season with a healthy Dach.
This will likely be Anderson's last opportunity to prove he can be an effective producer in this team's system.
Newhook will have a longer leash, but will need to start showing whether he is a top 6 contributor or more likely to end up as a 3rd liner.
Those opportunities won't be there if we add an NHL ready top 6 option immediately.

If the right deal comes along for an NHL ready top 6 winger, you can add them to the competition for a 2nd line spot, but there's no rush for a Zegras or Johnston if it's going to cost us a higher end asset like a top 10 1st or Hutson.
As much as I like Struble and the possibility of Engstrom becoming a staple, our offense needs a threat from the back end and we have to determine if that is Hutson before we even consider moving him.
Same for Barron. We need to stick with him until we can confidently define where he fits, even if it means he doesn't make it and loses all value.

When we move Monahan, Matheson, Savard, Harris, etc., we will have expendable assets towards targeting a forward without dipping into our high end prospects/picks.
I'd take Johnston, but there are a few players that are a hard no to moving and Hutson is one of them.
Lafleur10 a aimé ceci.
18 janv. à 17 h 46
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 690
Mentions "j'aime": 126
Would you rather Anderson and Gallagher or a superstar and another replacement player? If there is a snowballs chance in hell to actually move Anderson as has been rumored - HuGo must do it.
18 janv. à 17 h 46
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,525
Mentions "j'aime": 6,448
Quoting: Joblow
I respect your opinion but i don’t see thing like you do.
I am a huge Johnston fan and think he will be a stud. Giving up Hutson would be tough but we would immediately address the top 6 need with Johnston.
I am also extremely high on Adam Engstrom so i think Mtl could make this deal and still have a deep defense down the stretch in 2-3 season. The only reason i trade Primeau is that i don’t think we will be able to trade Allen so Hugues will face tough decision at some point.
Habs built a hard working, forechecking brand of hockey and adding a cup winner speedster who is a relentless worker would be a better option then to keep Dvorak who can’t skate no more.


The difference between Hutson and Engstrom though is similar to Petry and Q. Hughes, would you make that trade? I wouldn't!
18 janv. à 17 h 59
#8
Juraj SlafDadsky
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 271
Mentions "j'aime": 254
Quoting: ricochetii
The next step is continued patience.
The only pressure point right now is unladening our surplus of LHD, which preferably involves adding a potential scoring forward.

Newhook and Anderson will have their opportunity to assert themselves on the 2nd line next season with a healthy Dach.
This will likely be Anderson's last opportunity to prove he can be an effective producer in this team's system.
Newhook will have a longer leash, but will need to start showing whether he is a top 6 contributor or more likely to end up as a 3rd liner.
Those opportunities won't be there if we add an NHL ready top 6 option immediately.

If the right deal comes along for an NHL ready top 6 winger, you can add them to the competition for a 2nd line spot, but there's no rush for a Zegras or Johnston if it's going to cost us a higher end asset like a top 10 1st or Hutson.
As much as I like Struble and the possibility of Engstrom becoming a staple, our offense needs a threat from the back end and we have to determine if that is Hutson before we even consider moving him.
Same for Barron. We need to stick with him until we can confidently define where he fits, even if it means he doesn't make it and loses all value.

When we move Monahan, Matheson, Savard, Harris, etc., we will have expendable assets towards targeting a forward without dipping into our high end prospects/picks.
I'd take Johnston, but there are a few players that are a hard no to moving and Hutson is one of them.


Your first line "Continued patience" perfectly sums up what Montreal needs > What the fans want
ricochetii a aimé ceci.
18 janv. à 18 h 25
#9
True Reverse Retro
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 4,626
Mentions "j'aime": 3,038
Like Hutson, but Dallas isn’t trading their long-term 1C/1RW for him. Stars decline.
19 janv. à 7 h 11
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 26
Mentions "j'aime": 5
Quoting: TheMooterus
Like Hutson, but Dallas isn’t trading their long-term 1C/1RW for him. Stars decline.


they arent trading any roster player for a prospect. especially not a left shot dman. too many in the system with miro and harley already there, and bichsel and grushnikov on the way.
19 janv. à 14 h 3
#11
True Reverse Retro
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 4,626
Mentions "j'aime": 3,038
Quoting: Stars_SZN
they arent trading any roster player for a prospect. especially not a left shot dman. too many in the system with miro and harley already there, and bichsel and grushnikov on the way.


People overuse the whole "left shot, right shot" point for defensemen. Miro has already shown that he can play at an elite level on the right side and the Stars should be comfortable leaving him there. The Hutson trade doesn't make sense, but not because of what hand he shoots with. It doesn't make sense, because it makes the team worse this year and doesn't make them any better in the long term, IMO
19 janv. à 19 h 59
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 1,716
Mentions "j'aime": 678
Quoting: gm_jeanguy
I like your idea on the DAL trade. People get emotional about Hutson, but the truth is the Habs have an embarrassent of riches problem, and will have to move at least 2 young LD within the next 18 months.


I don’t want to move him but like you said we have to much LD and if we want a great top 6 potential we need to gave up more than late first round pick and b prospect.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage